DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Extensions to models of the galaxy–halo connection

Abstract

We explore two widely used empirical models for the galaxy–halo connection, subhalo abundance matching (SHAM) and the halo occupation distribution (HOD), and compare them with the hydrodynamical simulation IllustrisTNG (TNG) for multiple statistics quantifying the galaxy distribution at ngal ≈ 1.3×10–3(Mpch–1)–3. We observe that in their most straightforward implementations, both models fail to reproduce the two-point clustering measured in TNG. We find that SHAM models that use the relaxation velocity, Vrelax, and the peak velocity, Vpeak, perform best, and match the clustering reasonably well, although neither captures adequately the one-halo clustering. Splitting the total sample into sub-populations, we discover that SHAM overpredicts the clustering of high-mass, blue, star-forming, and late-forming galaxies and underpredicts that of low-mass, red, quiescent, and early-forming galaxies. We also study various baryonic effects, finding that subhaloes in the dark-matter-only simulation have consistently higher values of their SHAM-proxy properties than their full-physics counterparts. We then consider a 2D implementation of the HOD model augmented with a secondary parameter (environment, velocity anisotropy, σ2Rhalf-mass, and total potential) tuned so as to match the two-point clustering of the IllustrisTNG galaxies on large scales. We analyse these galaxy populations adopting alternative statistical tools such as galaxy–galaxy lensing, void–galaxy cross-correlations, and cumulantsmore » of the density field, finding that the hydrodynamical galaxy distribution disfavours σ2Rhalf-mass and the total potential as secondary parameters, while the environment and velocity anisotropy samples are consistent with full physics across all statistical probes examined. Our results demonstrate the power of examining multiple statistics for determining the secondary parameters that are vital for understanding the galaxy–halo connection.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1755255
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1851838
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0013718
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Volume: 501 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; Astronomy & Astrophysics; methods: numerical; galaxies: haloes; cosmology: theory; cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe

Citation Formats

Hadzhiyska, Boryana, Bose, Sownak, Eisenstein, Daniel, and Hernquist, Lars. Extensions to models of the galaxy–halo connection. United Kingdom: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3776.
Hadzhiyska, Boryana, Bose, Sownak, Eisenstein, Daniel, & Hernquist, Lars. Extensions to models of the galaxy–halo connection. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3776
Hadzhiyska, Boryana, Bose, Sownak, Eisenstein, Daniel, and Hernquist, Lars. Tue . "Extensions to models of the galaxy–halo connection". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3776.
@article{osti_1755255,
title = {Extensions to models of the galaxy–halo connection},
author = {Hadzhiyska, Boryana and Bose, Sownak and Eisenstein, Daniel and Hernquist, Lars},
abstractNote = {We explore two widely used empirical models for the galaxy–halo connection, subhalo abundance matching (SHAM) and the halo occupation distribution (HOD), and compare them with the hydrodynamical simulation IllustrisTNG (TNG) for multiple statistics quantifying the galaxy distribution at ngal ≈ 1.3×10–3(Mpch–1)–3. We observe that in their most straightforward implementations, both models fail to reproduce the two-point clustering measured in TNG. We find that SHAM models that use the relaxation velocity, Vrelax, and the peak velocity, Vpeak, perform best, and match the clustering reasonably well, although neither captures adequately the one-halo clustering. Splitting the total sample into sub-populations, we discover that SHAM overpredicts the clustering of high-mass, blue, star-forming, and late-forming galaxies and underpredicts that of low-mass, red, quiescent, and early-forming galaxies. We also study various baryonic effects, finding that subhaloes in the dark-matter-only simulation have consistently higher values of their SHAM-proxy properties than their full-physics counterparts. We then consider a 2D implementation of the HOD model augmented with a secondary parameter (environment, velocity anisotropy, σ2Rhalf-mass, and total potential) tuned so as to match the two-point clustering of the IllustrisTNG galaxies on large scales. We analyse these galaxy populations adopting alternative statistical tools such as galaxy–galaxy lensing, void–galaxy cross-correlations, and cumulants of the density field, finding that the hydrodynamical galaxy distribution disfavours σ2Rhalf-mass and the total potential as secondary parameters, while the environment and velocity anisotropy samples are consistent with full physics across all statistical probes examined. Our results demonstrate the power of examining multiple statistics for determining the secondary parameters that are vital for understanding the galaxy–halo connection.},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3776},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
number = 2,
volume = 501,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Tue Dec 08 00:00:00 EST 2020},
month = {Tue Dec 08 00:00:00 EST 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3776

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Aemulus Project. III. Emulation of the Galaxy Correlation Function
journal, March 2019

  • Zhai, Zhongxu; Tinker, Jeremy L.; Becker, Matthew R.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 874, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0d7b

E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh
journal, January 2010


The Coma/A1367 supercluster and its environs
journal, June 1978

  • Gregory, S. A.; Thompson, L. A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 222
  • DOI: 10.1086/156198

The dynamical state and mass–concentration relation of galaxy clusters: The concentrations of massive galaxy clusters
journal, November 2012


Numerical simulations of the dark universe: State of the art and the next decade
journal, November 2012

  • Kuhlen, Michael; Vogelsberger, Mark; Angulo, Raul
  • Physics of the Dark Universe, Vol. 1, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2012.10.002

The effects of assembly bias on the inference of matter clustering from galaxy–galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering
journal, April 2018

  • McEwen, Joseph E.; Weinberg, David H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 477, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty882

Analytic model for galaxy and dark matter clustering
journal, October 2000


Satellite Dwarf Galaxies in a Hierarchical Universe: Infall Histories, Group Preprocessing, and Reionization
journal, June 2015

  • Wetzel, Andrew R.; Deason, Alis J.; Garrison-Kimmel, Shea
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 807, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/49

The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release
journal, May 2019

  • Nelson, Dylan; Springel, Volker; Pillepich, Annalisa
  • Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x

First results from the TNG50 simulation: the evolution of stellar and gaseous discs across cosmic time
journal, September 2019

  • Pillepich, Annalisa; Nelson, Dylan; Springel, Volker
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 490, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2338

Testing subhalo abundance matching in cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: Testing SHAM in SPH simulations
journal, May 2012


The clustering of galaxies at z ≈ 0.5 in the SDSS-III Data Release 9 BOSS-CMASS sample: a test for the ΛCDM cosmology
journal, April 2013

  • Nuza, Sebastián E.; Sánchez, Ariel G.; Prada, Francisco
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 432, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt513

How Are Galaxies Assigned to Halos? Searching for Assembly Bias in the SDSS Galaxy Clustering
journal, February 2019


The assembly bias of dark matter haloes to higher orders
journal, June 2008


Environmental dependence of dark matter halo growth - I. Halo merger rates
journal, April 2009


An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes
journal, September 1996

  • Mo, H. J.; White, S. D. M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 282, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/282.2.347

Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
journal, April 2018

  • Amendola, Luca; Appleby, Stephen; Avgoustidis, Anastasios
  • Living Reviews in Relativity, Vol. 21, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3

Galaxy assembly bias of central galaxies in the Illustris simulation
journal, January 2020

  • Xu, Xiaoju; Zheng, Zheng
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 492, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa009

The Overdensity and Masses of the Friends-Of-Friends Halos and Universality of halo mass Function
journal, June 2011

  • More, Surhud; Kravtsov, Andrey V.; Dalal, Neal
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 195, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/195/1/4

Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering
journal, July 1978

  • White, S. D. M.; Rees, M. J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 183, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/183.3.341

Bayesian analysis of the dynamic cosmic web in the SDSS galaxy survey
journal, June 2015

  • Leclercq, Florent; Jasche, Jens; Wandelt, Benjamin
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 06
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/06/015

Exploring the squeezed three-point galaxy correlation function with generalized halo occupation distribution models
journal, April 2018

  • Yuan, Sihan; Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Garrison, Lehman H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 478, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1089

The Connection Between Galaxies and Their Dark Matter Halos
journal, September 2018


Large-scale galaxy bias
journal, February 2018


Assembly bias and the Dynamical Structure of dark Matter Halos
journal, December 2009


First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality
journal, November 2017

  • Nelson, Dylan; Pillepich, Annalisa; Springel, Volker
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 475, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3040

How to optimally constrain galaxy assembly bias: supplement projected correlation functions with count-in-cells statistics
journal, June 2019

  • Wang, Kuan; Mao, Yao-Yuan; Zentner, Andrew R.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 488, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1733

Revealing the galaxy–halo connection in IllustrisTNG
journal, September 2019

  • Bose, Sownak; Eisenstein, Daniel J.; Hernquist, Lars
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 490, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2546

The impact of baryonic physics on the subhalo mass function and implications for gravitational lensing
journal, April 2017

  • Despali, Giulia; Vegetti, Simona
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 469, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx966

Planck 2015 results : XIII. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2016


Formation of galaxies and large-scale structure with cold dark matter
journal, October 1984

  • Blumenthal, George R.; Faber, S. M.; Primack, Joel R.
  • Nature, Vol. 311, Issue 5986
  • DOI: 10.1038/311517a0

Dependence of halo bias on mass and environment
journal, September 2017

  • Shi, Jingjing; Sheth, Ravi K.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 473, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2277

The age dependence of halo clustering
journal, October 2005


First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements – chemical evolution of magnesium and europium
journal, March 2018

  • Naiman, Jill P.; Pillepich, Annalisa; Springel, Volker
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 477, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty618

Cosmic web anisotropy is the primary indicator of halo assembly bias
journal, August 2019

  • Ramakrishnan, Sujatha; Paranjape, Aseem; Hahn, Oliver
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2344

Cosmological simulations of galaxy formation
journal, January 2020

  • Vogelsberger, Mark; Marinacci, Federico; Torrey, Paul
  • Nature Reviews Physics, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2

Subhalo abundance matching and assembly bias in the EAGLE simulation
journal, May 2016

  • Chaves-Montero, Jonás; Angulo, Raul E.; Schaye, Joop
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 460, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1225

What determines large scale galaxy clustering: halo mass or local density?
journal, February 2017


Dark matter halo growth - II. Diffuse accretion and its environmental dependence
journal, February 2010


Beyond BAO: Improving cosmological constraints from BOSS data with measurement of the void-galaxy cross-correlation
journal, July 2019


Combining cluster observables and stacked weak lensing to probe dark energy: Self-calibration of systematic uncertainties
journal, January 2011


A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTIES AFFECTING THE STELLAR MASS-HALO MASS RELATION FOR 0 < z < 4
journal, June 2010


Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and the Mass-To-Number Ratio of Galaxy Clusters: Marginalizing over the Physics of Galaxy Formation
journal, February 2014

  • Reddick, Rachel M.; Tinker, Jeremy L.; Wechsler, Risa H.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 783, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/118

The distribution of dark matter in the coma cluster
journal, February 1987

  • Merritt, David
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 313
  • DOI: 10.1086/164953

Constraints on assembly bias from galaxy clustering
journal, February 2019

  • Zentner, Andrew R.; Hearin, Andrew; van den Bosch, Frank C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 485, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz470

The Structure of Halos: Implications for Group and Cluster Cosmology
journal, February 2009


The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
journal, September 2000

  • York, Donald G.; Adelman, J.; Anderson, Jr., John E.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 120, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1086/301513

Cosmological parameter constraints from galaxy–galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering with the SDSS DR7
journal, April 2013

  • Mandelbaum, Rachel; Slosar, Anže; Baldauf, Tobias
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 432, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt572

Correlating galaxy colour and halo concentration: a tunable halo model of galactic conformity
journal, October 2015

  • Paranjape, Aseem; Kovač, Katarina; Hartley, William G.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 454, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2137

Introducing decorated HODs: modelling assembly bias in the galaxy–halo connection
journal, May 2016

  • Hearin, Andrew P.; Zentner, Andrew R.; van den Bosch, Frank C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 460, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw840

The Concentration Dependence of the Galaxy–Halo Connection: Modeling Assembly bias with Abundance Matching
journal, December 2016

  • Lehmann, Benjamin V.; Mao, Yao-Yuan; Becker, Matthew R.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 834, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/37

Modelling galaxy clustering: halo occupation distribution versus subhalo matching
journal, April 2016

  • Guo, Hong; Zheng, Zheng; Behroozi, Peter S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 459, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw845

First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies
journal, December 2017

  • Pillepich, Annalisa; Nelson, Dylan; Hernquist, Lars
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 475, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112

A non-parametric model for linking galaxy luminosity with halo/subhalo mass: are brightest cluster galaxies special?
journal, January 2008


Testing the accuracy of halo occupation distribution modelling using hydrodynamic simulations
journal, December 2019

  • Beltz-Mohrmann, Gillian D.; Berlind, Andreas A.; Szewciw, Adam O.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 491, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3442

Strong clustering of underdense regions and the environmental dependence of clustering from Gaussian initial conditions
journal, June 2007


Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at \fontshape{it}{z}=0
journal, December 2001

  • Springel, Volker; White, Simon D. M.; Tormen, Giuseppe
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 328, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04912.x

An evolution free test for non-zero cosmological constant
journal, October 1979

  • Alcock, Charles; Paczyński, Bohdan
  • Nature, Vol. 281, Issue 5730
  • DOI: 10.1038/281358a0

The impact of assembly bias on the halo occupation in hydrodynamical simulations
journal, August 2018

  • Artale, M. Celeste; Zehavi, Idit; Contreras, Sergio
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 480, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2110

High-order galaxy correlation functions in the APM Galaxy Survey
journal, June 1994


First results from the TNG50 simulation: galactic outflows driven by supernovae and black hole feedback
journal, August 2019

  • Nelson, Dylan; Pillepich, Annalisa; Springel, Volker
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 490, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

Understanding the halo-mass and galaxy-mass cross-correlation functions
journal, July 2008


Cosmological constraints from applying SHAM to rescaled cosmological simulations
journal, September 2013

  • Simha, Vimal; Cole, Shaun
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 436, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1643

The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
journal, November 2014

  • Schaye, Joop; Crain, Robert A.; Bower, Richard G.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 446, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2058

Halo occupation numbers and galaxy bias
journal, November 2000


Limitations to the ‘basic’ HOD model and beyond
journal, March 2020

  • Hadzhiyska, Boryana; Bose, Sownak; Eisenstein, Daniel
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 493, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa623

Algorithm for the direct reconstruction of the dark matter correlation function from weak lensing and galaxy clustering
journal, March 2010


The dependence of galaxy clustering on tidal environment in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
journal, March 2018

  • Paranjape, Aseem; Hahn, Oliver; Sheth, Ravi K.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty633

Haloes gone MAD★: The Halo-Finder Comparison Project: The Halo-Finder Comparison Project
journal, June 2011

  • Knebe, Alexander; Knollmann, Steffen R.; Muldrew, Stuart I.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 415, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18858.x

First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering
journal, December 2017

  • Springel, Volker; Pakmor, Rüdiger; Pillepich, Annalisa
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 475, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mock galaxy catalogues for the BOSS Final Data Release
journal, January 2016

  • Kitaura, Francisco-Shu; Rodríguez-Torres, Sergio; Chuang, Chia-Hsun
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 456, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2826

How Many Galaxies Fit in a Halo? Constraints on Galaxy Formation Efficiency from Spatial Clustering
journal, January 2001

  • Scoccimarro, Roman; Sheth, Ravi K.; Hui, Lam
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 546, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/318261

SDSS galaxy bias from halo mass-bias relation and its cosmological implications
journal, February 2005


Halo assembly bias and its effects on galaxy clustering
journal, February 2007


The Impact of Assembly Bias on the Galaxy Content of Dark Matter Halos
journal, January 2018

  • Zehavi, Idit; Contreras, Sergio; Padilla, Nelson
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 853, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa54a

The Halo Occupation Distribution: Toward an Empirical Determination of the Relation between Galaxies and Mass
journal, August 2002

  • Berlind, Andreas A.; Weinberg, David H.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 575, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/341469

Density profile of dark matter haloes and galaxies in the horizon–agn simulation: the impact of AGN feedback
journal, August 2017

  • Peirani, Sébastien; Dubois, Yohan; Volonteri, Marta
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2099

Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies
journal, November 2005

  • Zheng, Zheng; Berlind, Andreas A.; Weinberg, David H.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 633, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/466510

Massive neutrinos leave fingerprints on cosmic voids
journal, July 2019

  • Kreisch, Christina D.; Pisani, Alice; Carbone, Carmelita
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 488, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1944

Modeling Luminosity‐dependent Galaxy Clustering through Cosmic Time
journal, August 2006

  • Conroy, Charlie; Wechsler, Risa H.; Kravtsov, Andrey V.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 647, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/503602

Introducing the Illustris Project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe
journal, August 2014

  • Vogelsberger, Mark; Genel, Shy; Springel, Volker
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 444, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1536

First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields
journal, August 2018

  • Marinacci, Federico; Vogelsberger, Mark; Pakmor, Rüdiger
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2206

The three causes of low-mass assembly bias
journal, February 2020

  • Mansfield, Philip; Kravtsov, Andrey V.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 493, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa430

The impact of projection effects on cluster observables: stacked lensing and projected clustering
journal, June 2020

  • Sunayama, Tomomi; Park, Youngsoo; Takada, Masahiro
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 496, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1646