DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves

Journal Article · · Astrophys.J.
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8]; ORCiD logo [9];  [10];  [11];  [5]; ORCiD logo [12];  [13];  [14];  [15]; ORCiD logo [16];  [17];  [18] more »; ORCiD logo [19];  [19];  [13];  [20];  [21];  [22];  [23];  [20];  [24];  [25]; ORCiD logo [26];  [27];  [28];  [29];  [30];  [31];  [32];  [33]; ORCiD logo [16]; ORCiD logo [34];  [35];  [19];  [36];  [37];  [38];  [16];  [39];  [40];  [41];  [4];  [1];  [42];  [43];  [44]; ORCiD logo [45];  [15];  [46];  [47];  [48]; ORCiD logo [31];  [14];  [49]; ORCiD logo [50];  [51]; ORCiD logo [52]; ORCiD logo [2];  [13];  [17]; ORCiD logo [53];  [54];  [3];  [13];  [3];  [11]; ORCiD logo [10];  [51];  [55];  [11]; ORCiD logo [19];  [29];  [17];  [56];  [57];  [6]; ORCiD logo [11];  [58];  [5];  [16];  [59];  [60];  [22];  [16];  [61];  [62];  [63]; ORCiD logo [64];  [46];  [65];  [46];  [16];  [4];  [51];  [5];  [66];  [67];  [51];  [19];  [3];  [5];  [43]; ORCiD logo [50];  [34];  [18];  [6];  [5];  [68];  [51];  [6];  [43];  [69];  [28];  [28];  [70];  [71];  [72];  [73];  [74];  [16];  [6];  [13];  [75];  [76];  [8];  [54];  [4];  [13];  [30];  [43];  [77];  [78];  [6];  [34];  [69];  [32];  [51];  [43];  [42];  [79];  [3];  [80];  [5];  [25];  [18]; ORCiD logo [4];  [81]; ORCiD logo [82];  [83];  [84];  [85];  [43];  [71];  [19];  [46]; ORCiD logo [10];  [16];  [86];  [18];  [23];  [58];  [3];  [87];  [55];  [70];  [63];  [8];  [88];  [10];  [5];  [48];  [22];  [31];  [76];  [13]; ORCiD logo [19];  [60];  [89];  [71];  [13];  [18];  [14];  [90];  [61];  [30]; ORCiD logo [91];  [84];  [43]; ORCiD logo [10];  [92];  [51];  [52];  [51];  [14];  [60];  [17]; ORCiD logo [10]; ORCiD logo [13];  [93];  [11];  [6];  [70]; ORCiD logo [94];  [95];  [96];  [97];  [3];  [32];  [19];  [3];  [43];  [51]; ORCiD logo [98];  [16]; ORCiD logo [99];  [5];  [100];  [53];  [101]; ORCiD logo [48];  [6];  [87];  [16];  [6];  [4];  [6];  [11] « less
  1. UC, Irvine
  2. Johns Hopkins U.
  3. Illinois U., Urbana
  4. SLAC
  5. UC, Berkeley
  6. Stanford U., Phys. Dept.
  7. Oxford U.
  8. UC, Berkeley; LBL, Berkeley
  9. Rice U.
  10. Fermilab
  11. UC, San Diego
  12. SISSA, Trieste; Trieste U.; INFN, Trieste
  13. LBL, Berkeley
  14. Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.
  15. New Mexico U.
  16. Argonne (main)
  17. APC, Paris
  18. Caltech
  19. Cornell U.
  20. Argonne (main); Chicago U., KICP
  21. Fermilab; Chicago U.; Chicago U., KICP
  22. Melbourne U.
  23. Cincinnati U.
  24. Caltech; Caltech, JPL
  25. LMU Munich (main)
  26. Johns Hopkins U.; Texas U.
  27. Canadian Inst. Theor. Astrophys.
  28. LBL, Berkeley; UC, Berkeley
  29. Paris, Inst. Astrophys.
  30. Stony Brook U.
  31. Jodrell Bank
  32. Arizona State U.
  33. Chicago U., KICP; Harvard U.
  34. Florida State U.
  35. Cardiff U.
  36. Dartmouth Coll.
  37. Chicago U.; Argonne (main); Chicago U., KICP
  38. Geneva U., CAP; Sussex U., Astron. Ctr.
  39. Cambridge U., DAMTP; Cambridge U., KICC; Cambridge U., Inst. of Astron.
  40. Argonne (main); Chicago U., KICP; Chicago U.
  41. Tokyo U.
  42. Groningen U.
  43. Chicago U.; Chicago U., KICP
  44. Toronto U., Astron. Dept.; U. Toronto, Dunlap Inst. Astron. Astrophys.; Caltech
  45. SLAC; Stanford U., Phys. Dept.
  46. KEK, Tsukuba
  47. APC, Paris; IPhT, Saclay; Sao Paulo U.; Hefei, CUST
  48. Pennsylvania U.
  49. McGill U.
  50. NIST, Boulder
  51. Princeton U.
  52. Harvard U.
  53. NASA, Goddard
  54. Sussex U., Astron. Ctr.
  55. Simon Fraser U.
  56. INFN, Trieste
  57. Southern California U.; Princeton U.
  58. Haverford Coll.
  59. Stockholm Observ.
  60. Case Western Reserve U.
  61. British Columbia U.
  62. Colorado U.
  63. Minnesota U.
  64. Michigan U.
  65. CCA, New York
  66. Columbia U.
  67. Toronto U., Astron. Dept.; U. Toronto, Dunlap Inst. Astron. Astrophys.
  68. Virginia U.
  69. Tokyo U., IPMU
  70. UC, Davis
  71. Yale U.
  72. Pittsburgh U.
  73. Harvard U.; Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.
  74. Ben Gurion U. of Negev
  75. Aalto U.
  76. Caltech, JPL
  77. UC, Santa Barbara
  78. Perimeter Inst. Theor. Phys.
  79. IPhT, Saclay; Sao Paulo U.
  80. Southern Methodist U.
  81. ST-ECF, Garching
  82. Paris, Inst. Astrophys.; U. Amsterdam, GRAPPA
  83. Washington U., St. Louis; McDonnell Ctr. Space Sci.
  84. Cambridge U., DAMTP
  85. Milan Bicocca U.
  86. Caltech, JPL; Caltech
  87. Southern California U.
  88. Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.; Marseille, CPPM
  89. Stanford U., Phys. Dept.; KIPAC, Menlo Park
  90. Princeton, Inst. Advanced Study
  91. Penn State U.
  92. Brookhaven
  93. Kyoto U.
  94. Wisconsin U., Madison
  95. Milan U.
  96. IJCLab, Orsay
  97. Brown U.
  98. UC, San Diego; Princeton, Inst. Advanced Study
  99. Syracuse U.
  100. UCLA; Michigan State U.
  101. Chicago U., KICP

CMB-S4—the next-generation ground-based cosmic microwave background (CMB) experiment—is set to significantly advance the sensitivity of CMB measurements and enhance our understanding of the origin and evolution of the universe. Among the science cases pursued with CMB-S4, the quest for detecting primordial gravitational waves is a central driver of the experimental design. This work details the development of a forecasting framework that includes a power-spectrum-based semianalytic projection tool, targeted explicitly toward optimizing constraints on the tensor-to-scalar ratio, r, in the presence of Galactic foregrounds and gravitational lensing of the CMB. This framework is unique in its direct use of information from the achieved performance of current Stage 2–3 CMB experiments to robustly forecast the science reach of upcoming CMB-polarization endeavors. The methodology allows for rapid iteration over experimental configurations and offers a flexible way to optimize the design of future experiments, given a desired scientific goal. To form a closed-loop process, we couple this semianalytic tool with map-based validation studies, which allow for the injection of additional complexity and verification of our forecasts with several independent analysis methods. We document multiple rounds of forecasts for CMB-S4 using this process and the resulting establishment of the current reference design of the primordial gravitational-wave component of the Stage-4 experiment, optimized to achieve our science goals of detecting primordial gravitational waves for r > 0.003 at greater than 5σ, or in the absence of a detection, of reaching an upper limit of r < 0.001 at 95% CL.

Research Organization:
APC, Paris; Aalto U.; Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Arizona State U.; Ben Gurion U. of Negev; British Columbia U.; Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); Brown U.; CCA, New York; Caltech; Caltech, JPL; Cambridge U., DAMTP; Cambridge U., Inst. of Astron.; Cambridge U., KICC; Canadian Inst. Theor. Astrophys.; Cardiff U.; Case Western Reserve U.; Chicago U.; Chicago U., KICP; Cincinnati U.; Colorado U.; Columbia U.; Cornell U.; Dartmouth Coll.; Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Florida State U.; Geneva U., CAP; Groningen U.; Harvard U.; Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr. Astrophys.; Haverford Coll.; Hefei, CUST; IJCLab, Orsay; INFN, Trieste; IPhT, Saclay; Illinois U., Urbana; Jodrell Bank; Johns Hopkins U.; KEK, Tsukuba; Kyoto U.; LMU Munich (main); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Marseille, CPPM; McDonnell Ctr. Space Sci.; McGill U.; Melbourne U.; Michigan State U.; Michigan U.; Milan Bicocca U.; Milan U.; Minnesota U.; NASA, Goddard; NIST, Boulder; New Mexico U.; Oxford U.; Paris, Inst. Astrophys.; Penn State U.; Pennsylvania U.; Perimeter Inst. Theor. Phys.; Pittsburgh U.; Princeton U.; Princeton, Inst. Advanced Study; Rice U.; SISSA, Trieste; SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States); ST-ECF, Garching; Sao Paulo U.; Simon Fraser U.; Southern California U.; Southern Methodist U.; Stanford U., Phys. Dept.; Stockholm Observ.; Stony Brook U.; Stony Brook University, NY (United States); Sussex U., Astron. Ctr.; Syracuse U.; Syracuse Univ., NY (United States); Syracuse University, NY (United States); Texas U.; Tokyo U.; Tokyo U., IPMU; Toronto U., Astron. Dept.; Trieste U.; U. Amsterdam, GRAPPA; U. Toronto, Dunlap Inst. Astron. Astrophys.; UC, Berkeley; UC, Davis; UC, Irvine; UC, San Diego; UC, Santa Barbara; UCLA; Virginia U.; Washington U., St. Louis; Wisconsin U., Madison; Yale U.
Sponsoring Organization:
National Science Foundation (NSF); US Department of Energy; USDOE; USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES); USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Organization:
CMB-S4 Collaboration
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231; AC02-06CH11357; AC02-07CH11359; AC02-76SF00515; FG02-95ER40899; SC0018298; SC0020441
OSTI ID:
1682286
Report Number(s):
DOE-SYR--0899-1; FERMILAB-PUB-20-468-AE-SCD; oai:inspirehep.net:1813863; arXiv:2008.12619
Journal Information:
Astrophys.J., Journal Name: Astrophys.J. Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 926
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English