skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Validation of two-layer model for underexpanded hydrogen jets

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the two-layer model more accurately predicts hydrogen dispersion than the conventional notional nozzle models without significantly increasing the computational expense. However, the model was only validated for predicting the concentration distribution and has not been adequately validated for predicting the velocity distributions. In the present study, particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) was used to measure the velocity field of an underexpanded hydrogen jet released at 10 bar from a 1.5 mm diameter orifice. The two-layer model was the used to calculate the inlet conditions for a two-dimensional axisymmetric CFD model to simulate the hydrogen jet downstream of the Mach disk. The predicted velocity spreading and centerline decay rates agreed well with the PIV measurements. The predicted concentration distribution was consistent with data from previous planar Rayleigh scattering measurements used to verify the concentration distribution predictions in an earlier study. The jet spreading was also simulated using several widely used notional nozzle models combined with the integral plume model for comparison. These results show that the velocity and concentration distributions are both better predicted by the two-layer model than the notional nozzle models to complement previous studies verifying only the predicted concentration profiles. Thus, this study showsmore » that the two-layer model can accurately predict the jet velocity distributions as well as the concentration distributions as verified earlier. Though more validation studies are needed to improve confidence in the model and increase the range of validity, the present work indicates that the two-layer model is a promising tool for fast, accurate predictions of the flow fields of underexpanded hydrogen jets.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [1];  [3];  [4]
  1. Shandong Univ., Jinan (China)
  2. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States); Innovation Campus Delaware, DE (United States)
  3. Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China)
  4. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Transportation Office. Fuel Cell Technologies Office; USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1671809
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1809565
Report Number(s):
SAND2020-9264J
Journal ID: ISSN 0360-3199; 690350
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC04-94AL85000; NA0003525
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 46; Journal Issue: 23; Journal ID: ISSN 0360-3199
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
08 HYDROGEN

Citation Formats

Li, Xuefang, Chowdhury, Bikram Roy, He, Qian, Christopher, David M., and Hecht, Ethan S.. Validation of two-layer model for underexpanded hydrogen jets. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.204.
Li, Xuefang, Chowdhury, Bikram Roy, He, Qian, Christopher, David M., & Hecht, Ethan S.. Validation of two-layer model for underexpanded hydrogen jets. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.204
Li, Xuefang, Chowdhury, Bikram Roy, He, Qian, Christopher, David M., and Hecht, Ethan S.. Fri . "Validation of two-layer model for underexpanded hydrogen jets". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.204. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1671809.
@article{osti_1671809,
title = {Validation of two-layer model for underexpanded hydrogen jets},
author = {Li, Xuefang and Chowdhury, Bikram Roy and He, Qian and Christopher, David M. and Hecht, Ethan S.},
abstractNote = {Previous studies have shown that the two-layer model more accurately predicts hydrogen dispersion than the conventional notional nozzle models without significantly increasing the computational expense. However, the model was only validated for predicting the concentration distribution and has not been adequately validated for predicting the velocity distributions. In the present study, particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) was used to measure the velocity field of an underexpanded hydrogen jet released at 10 bar from a 1.5 mm diameter orifice. The two-layer model was the used to calculate the inlet conditions for a two-dimensional axisymmetric CFD model to simulate the hydrogen jet downstream of the Mach disk. The predicted velocity spreading and centerline decay rates agreed well with the PIV measurements. The predicted concentration distribution was consistent with data from previous planar Rayleigh scattering measurements used to verify the concentration distribution predictions in an earlier study. The jet spreading was also simulated using several widely used notional nozzle models combined with the integral plume model for comparison. These results show that the velocity and concentration distributions are both better predicted by the two-layer model than the notional nozzle models to complement previous studies verifying only the predicted concentration profiles. Thus, this study shows that the two-layer model can accurately predict the jet velocity distributions as well as the concentration distributions as verified earlier. Though more validation studies are needed to improve confidence in the model and increase the range of validity, the present work indicates that the two-layer model is a promising tool for fast, accurate predictions of the flow fields of underexpanded hydrogen jets.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.204},
journal = {International Journal of Hydrogen Energy},
number = 23,
volume = 46,
place = {United States},
year = {2020},
month = {10}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Hydrogen storage for fuel cell vehicles
journal, August 2014


Review on the research of hydrogen storage system fast refueling in fuel cell vehicle
journal, April 2019


The Structure and Concentration Decay of High Pressure Jets of Natural Gas
journal, April 1984

  • Birch, A. D.; Brown, D. R.; Dodson, M. G.
  • Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 36, Issue 5-6
  • DOI: 10.1080/00102208408923739

Velocity Decay of High Pressure Jets
journal, March 1987

  • Birch, A. D.; Hughes, D. J.; Swaffield, F.
  • Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 52, Issue 1-3
  • DOI: 10.1080/00102208708952575

Scaling parameters for underexpanded supersonic jets
journal, December 2002

  • Yüceil, K. Bülent; Ötügen, M. Volkan
  • Physics of Fluids, Vol. 14, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1513796

Characterization of high-pressure, underexpanded hydrogen-jet flames
journal, August 2007


Hydrogen jet flames
journal, June 2013


Comparison of two-layer model for hydrogen and helium jets with notional nozzle model predictions and experimental data for pressures up to 35 MPa
journal, March 2017


Numerical investigation of a high pressure hydrogen jet of 82 MPa with adaptive mesh refinement: Concentration and velocity distributions
journal, May 2018


Simplified partitioning model to simulate high pressure under-expanded jet flows impinging vertical obstacles
journal, July 2018


Ignitability and mixing of underexpanded hydrogen jets
journal, November 2012


Simulation of small-scale releases from liquid hydrogen storage systems
journal, March 2011


Simulation of high-pressure liquid hydrogen releases
journal, June 2013


HyRAM: A methodology and toolkit for quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen systems
journal, March 2017


Validation of a reduced-order jet model for subsonic and underexpanded hydrogen jets
journal, January 2016


Investigation of small-scale unintended releases of hydrogen: momentum-dominated regime
journal, November 2008