DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate

Abstract

Geoengineering by injecting sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the lower stratosphere has been suggested to reduce anthropogenically induced warming. While impacts of such geoengineering on climate have been investigated in recent decades, few modeling studies have considered biogeochemical feedbacks resulting from such intervention. This study comprehensively characterizes responses and feedbacks of terrestrial ecosystems, from an ensemble of coupled high-resolution Earth system model climate change simulations, under the highest standard greenhouse gas scenario with an extreme geoengineering mitigation strategy. Under this strategy, temperature increases beyond 2020 levels due to elevated anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) were completely offset by the SO2 injection. Carbon cycle feedbacks can alter the trajectory of atmospheric CO2 levels by storing or releasing additional carbon on land and in the ocean, thus moderating or amplifying climate change. We assess terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks to climate in response to geoengineering, using model output from the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) project. Results indicate terrestrial ecosystems become a stronger carbon sink globally because of lower ecosystem respiration and diminished disturbance effects under geoengineering. An additional 79 Pg C would be stored on land by the end of the twenty-first century, yielding as much as a 4% reduction in atmospheric CO2 molemore » fraction without marine biogeochemical feedbacks, compared to the high greenhouse gas scenario without geoengineering.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI Identifier:
1668885
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1668886; OSTI ID: 1687359; OSTI ID: 1819624
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-152535
Journal ID: ISSN 1748-9326
Grant/Contract Number:  
RUBISCO SFA; TES SFA; AC05-00OR22725; AC05-76RL01830; CBET-1931641; AGS-1617844; 1852977
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Environmental Research Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Environmental Research Letters Journal Volume: 15 Journal Issue: 10; Journal ID: ISSN 1748-9326
Publisher:
IOP Publishing
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; geoengineering; carbon cycle; terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks

Citation Formats

Yang, Cheng-En, Hoffman, Forrest M., Ricciuto, Daniel M., Tilmes, Simone, Xia, Lili, MacMartin, Douglas G., Kravitz, Ben, Richter, Jadwiga H., Mills, Michael, and Fu, Joshua S. Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate. United Kingdom: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7.
Yang, Cheng-En, Hoffman, Forrest M., Ricciuto, Daniel M., Tilmes, Simone, Xia, Lili, MacMartin, Douglas G., Kravitz, Ben, Richter, Jadwiga H., Mills, Michael, & Fu, Joshua S. Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7
Yang, Cheng-En, Hoffman, Forrest M., Ricciuto, Daniel M., Tilmes, Simone, Xia, Lili, MacMartin, Douglas G., Kravitz, Ben, Richter, Jadwiga H., Mills, Michael, and Fu, Joshua S. Wed . "Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7.
@article{osti_1668885,
title = {Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate},
author = {Yang, Cheng-En and Hoffman, Forrest M. and Ricciuto, Daniel M. and Tilmes, Simone and Xia, Lili and MacMartin, Douglas G. and Kravitz, Ben and Richter, Jadwiga H. and Mills, Michael and Fu, Joshua S.},
abstractNote = {Geoengineering by injecting sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the lower stratosphere has been suggested to reduce anthropogenically induced warming. While impacts of such geoengineering on climate have been investigated in recent decades, few modeling studies have considered biogeochemical feedbacks resulting from such intervention. This study comprehensively characterizes responses and feedbacks of terrestrial ecosystems, from an ensemble of coupled high-resolution Earth system model climate change simulations, under the highest standard greenhouse gas scenario with an extreme geoengineering mitigation strategy. Under this strategy, temperature increases beyond 2020 levels due to elevated anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) were completely offset by the SO2 injection. Carbon cycle feedbacks can alter the trajectory of atmospheric CO2 levels by storing or releasing additional carbon on land and in the ocean, thus moderating or amplifying climate change. We assess terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks to climate in response to geoengineering, using model output from the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) project. Results indicate terrestrial ecosystems become a stronger carbon sink globally because of lower ecosystem respiration and diminished disturbance effects under geoengineering. An additional 79 Pg C would be stored on land by the end of the twenty-first century, yielding as much as a 4% reduction in atmospheric CO2 mole fraction without marine biogeochemical feedbacks, compared to the high greenhouse gas scenario without geoengineering.},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
number = 10,
volume = 15,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Wed Sep 30 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Wed Sep 30 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Dynamics of the coupled human–climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineering
journal, June 2013


The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300
journal, August 2011


Potential of Multivariate Quantitative Methods for Delineation and Visualization of Ecoregions
journal, April 2004


Climate impacts of geoengineering in a delayed mitigation scenario: GEOENGINEERING AND DELAYED MITIGATION
journal, August 2016

  • Tilmes, S.; Sanderson, B. M.; O'Neill, B. C.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL070122

A Model‐Based Investigation of Terrestrial Plant Carbon Uptake Response to Four Radiation Modification Approaches
journal, April 2020

  • Duan, Lei; Cao, Long; Bala, Govindasamy
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 125, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031883

The CCSM4 Ocean Component
journal, March 2012

  • Danabasoglu, Gokhan; Bates, Susan C.; Briegleb, Bruce P.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00091.1

Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes
journal, April 2008

  • Fabry, Victoria J.; Seibel, Brad A.; Feely, Richard A.
  • ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 65, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn048

Climate policy under uncertainty: a case for solar geoengineering
journal, May 2012


Modeling of solar radiation management: a comparison of simulations using reduced solar constant and stratospheric sulphate aerosols
journal, July 2014

  • Kalidindi, Sirisha; Bala, Govindasamy; Modak, Angshuman
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 44, Issue 9-10
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-014-2240-3

Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness
journal, September 1989


Climate trade-off between black carbon and carbon dioxide emissions
journal, January 2008


RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions
journal, August 2011


The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): THE HYDROLOGIC IMPACT OF GEOENGINEERING
journal, October 2013

  • Tilmes, Simone; Fasullo, John; Lamarque, Jean-Francois
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50868

Quantifying the effects of solar geoengineering on vegetation
journal, February 2019


Mapcurves: a quantitative method for comparing categorical maps
journal, May 2006

  • Hargrove, William W.; Hoffman, Forrest M.; Hessburg, Paul F.
  • Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10109-006-0025-x

Causes and implications of persistent atmospheric carbon dioxide biases in Earth System Models
journal, February 2014

  • Hoffman, F. M.; Randerson, J. T.; Arora, V. K.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 119, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JG002381

An Atlantic influence on Amazon rainfall
journal, March 2009


Estimating global agricultural effects of geoengineering using volcanic eruptions
journal, August 2018


Plant responses to increasing CO 2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity
journal, August 2016

  • Swann, Abigail L. S.; Hoffman, Forrest M.; Koven, Charles D.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 36
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1604581113

Arctic sea ice and atmospheric circulation under the GeoMIP G1 scenario
journal, January 2014

  • Moore, John C.; Rinke, Annette; Yu, Xiaoyong
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021060

Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO 2 injections
journal, January 2008

  • Robock, Alan; Oman, Luke; Stenchikov, Georgiy L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue D16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JD010050

Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink
journal, April 2009

  • Mercado, Lina M.; Bellouin, Nicolas; Sitch, Stephen
  • Nature, Vol. 458, Issue 7241
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature07949

Global Carbon Budget 2019
journal, January 2019

  • Friedlingstein, Pierre; Jones, Matthew W.; O'Sullivan, Michael
  • Earth System Science Data, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019

Radiative and Chemical Response to Interactive Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols in Fully Coupled CESM1(WACCM)
journal, December 2017

  • Mills, Michael J.; Richter, Jadwiga H.; Tilmes, Simone
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027006

First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives
journal, December 2017

  • Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Mills, Michael J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JD026874

Solar geoengineering reduces atmospheric carbon burden
journal, September 2017

  • Keith, David W.; Wagner, Gernot; Zabel, Claire L.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3376

Simulated Effect of Carbon Cycle Feedback on Climate Response to Solar Geoengineering
journal, December 2017


The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes
journal, May 2008


Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario
journal, February 2014

  • Keller, David P.; Feng, Ellias Y.; Oschlies, Andreas
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4304

Glossary: Carbon Dioxide and Climate
dataset, January 1990

  • O'Hara, F. N.
  • Environmental System Science Data Infrastructure for a Virtual Ecosystem
  • DOI: 10.15485/1463805

Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene
journal, August 2018

  • Steffen, Will; Rockström, Johan; Richardson, Katherine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 33
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810141115

Soil Moisture and Other Hydrological Changes in a Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble
journal, December 2019

  • Cheng, Wei; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Dagon, Katherine
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JD030237

Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
journal, January 2016


Persistent polar ocean warming in a strategically geoengineered climate
journal, October 2018


Quantifying the impacts of land surface schemes and dynamic vegetation on the model dependency of projected changes in surface energy and water budgets
journal, January 2016

  • Yu, Miao; Wang, Guiling; Chen, Haishan
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000492

Contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO 2 emissions scenarios
journal, July 2015


Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GEOMIP MODEL RESPONSE
journal, August 2013

  • Kravitz, Ben; Caldeira, Ken; Boucher, Olivier
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50646

Impact of idealized future stratospheric aerosol injection on the large-scale ocean and land carbon cycles: GEOENGINEERING IMPACT ON CARBON CYCLE
journal, January 2016

  • Tjiputra, J. F.; Grini, A.; Lee, H.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 121, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003045

Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle
journal, May 2008

  • Bala, G.; Duffy, P. B.; Taylor, K. E.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0711648105

Geoengineering as a design problem
journal, January 2016

  • Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Wang, Hailong
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-7-469-2016

Volcanic eruptions and climate
journal, May 2000


Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble
dataset, January 2018

  • (Macmartin@Cornell. Edu), Simone Tilmes (Tilmes@Ucar. Edu), Jadwiga H. Richter (Jrichter@Ucar. Edu), Michael Mills (Mmills@Ucar. Edu), Ben Kravitz (Ben. Kravitz@Pnnl. Gov), And Douglas G. MacMartin
  • UCAR/NCAR Earth System Grid
  • DOI: 10.5065/D6JH3JXX

Sulfuric acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols
journal, January 2009

  • Kravitz, Ben; Robock, Alan; Oman, Luke
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD011918

Ocean Acidification: The Other CO 2 Problem
journal, January 2009


Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms
journal, September 2005

  • Orr, James C.; Fabry, Victoria J.; Aumont, Olivier
  • Nature, Vol. 437, Issue 7059
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature04095

Why Does Amazon Precipitation Decrease When Tropical Forests Respond to Increasing CO 2 ?
journal, April 2019

  • Langenbrunner, B.; Pritchard, M. S.; Kooperman, G. J.
  • Earth's Future, Vol. 7, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018EF001026