DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Global‐Mean Precipitation Response to CO 2 ‐Induced Warming in CMIP6 Models

Abstract

Abstract We examine the response of globally averaged precipitation to global warming—the hydrologic sensitivity (HS)—in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) multi‐model ensemble. Multi‐model mean HS is 2.5% K −1 (ranging from 2.1–3.1% K −1 across models), a modest decrease compared to CMIP5 (where it was 2.6% K −1 ). This new set of simulations is used as an out‐of‐sample test for observational constraints on HS proposed based on CMIP5. The constraint based on clear‐sky shortwave absorption sensitivity to water vapor has weakened, and it is argued that a proposed constraint based on surface low cloud longwave radiative effects does not apply to HS. Finally, while a previously proposed mechanism connecting HS and climate sensitivity via low clouds is present in the CMIP6 ensemble, it is not an important factor for variations in HS. This explains why HS is uncorrelated with climate sensitivity across the CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]
  1. National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1664610
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1664611
Grant/Contract Number:  
1844590
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Geophysical Research Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geophysical Research Letters Journal Volume: 47 Journal Issue: 17; Journal ID: ISSN 0094-8276
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Pendergrass, A. G. The Global‐Mean Precipitation Response to CO 2 ‐Induced Warming in CMIP6 Models. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1029/2020GL089964.
Pendergrass, A. G. The Global‐Mean Precipitation Response to CO 2 ‐Induced Warming in CMIP6 Models. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089964
Pendergrass, A. G. Mon . "The Global‐Mean Precipitation Response to CO 2 ‐Induced Warming in CMIP6 Models". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089964.
@article{osti_1664610,
title = {The Global‐Mean Precipitation Response to CO 2 ‐Induced Warming in CMIP6 Models},
author = {Pendergrass, A. G.},
abstractNote = {Abstract We examine the response of globally averaged precipitation to global warming—the hydrologic sensitivity (HS)—in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) multi‐model ensemble. Multi‐model mean HS is 2.5% K −1 (ranging from 2.1–3.1% K −1 across models), a modest decrease compared to CMIP5 (where it was 2.6% K −1 ). This new set of simulations is used as an out‐of‐sample test for observational constraints on HS proposed based on CMIP5. The constraint based on clear‐sky shortwave absorption sensitivity to water vapor has weakened, and it is argued that a proposed constraint based on surface low cloud longwave radiative effects does not apply to HS. Finally, while a previously proposed mechanism connecting HS and climate sensitivity via low clouds is present in the CMIP6 ensemble, it is not an important factor for variations in HS. This explains why HS is uncorrelated with climate sensitivity across the CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles.},
doi = {10.1029/2020GL089964},
journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
number = 17,
volume = 47,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Sep 07 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Mon Sep 07 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089964

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 19 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

An Update on the Oceanic Precipitation Rate and Its Zonal Distribution in Light of Advanced Observations from Space
journal, May 2014


Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance?
journal, January 2003

  • Payton, Mark E.; Greenstone, Matthew H.; Schenker, Nathaniel
  • Journal of Insect Science, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/jis/3.1.34

Tropical anvil clouds and climate sensitivity
journal, August 2016

  • Hartmann, Dennis L.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 32
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1610455113

Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
journal, January 2016

  • Eyring, Veronika; Bony, Sandrine; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016

Fast and slow precipitation responses to individual climate forcers: A PDRMIP multimodel study
journal, March 2016

  • Samset, B. H.; Myhre, G.; Forster, P. M.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL068064

A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity
journal, January 2004


GISS‐E2.1: Configurations and Climatology
journal, August 2020

  • Kelley, Maxwell; Schmidt, Gavin A.; Nazarenko, Larissa S.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS002025

An observational radiative constraint on hydrologic cycle intensification
journal, December 2015

  • DeAngelis, Anthony M.; Qu, Xin; Zelinka, Mark D.
  • Nature, Vol. 528, Issue 7581
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature15770

Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation
journal, December 2019

  • Forster, Piers M.; Maycock, Amanda C.; McKenna, Christine M.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0

Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing
journal, January 2014

  • Sherwood, Steven C.; Bony, Sandrine; Dufresne, Jean-Louis
  • Nature, Vol. 505, Issue 7481
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12829

Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models: CLIMATE SENSITIVITY IN CMIP5 MODELS
journal, May 2012

  • Andrews, Timothy; Gregory, Jonathan M.; Webb, Mark J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051607

Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change
journal, March 2019


An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations
journal, September 2012

  • Stephens, Graeme L.; Li, Juilin; Wild, Martin
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1580

Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models
journal, November 2015

  • Knutti, Reto; Rugenstein, Maria A. A.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 373, Issue 2054
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0146

Understanding the Intermodel Spread in Global-Mean Hydrological Sensitivity
journal, January 2016

  • Fläschner, Dagmar; Mauritsen, Thorsten; Stevens, Bjorn
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 29, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0351.1

Surface Irradiances of Edition 4.0 Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Data Product
journal, June 2018


Thermodynamic control of anvil cloud amount
journal, July 2016

  • Bony, Sandrine; Stevens, Bjorn; Coppin, David
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 32
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1601472113

Interactions between Hydrological Sensitivity, Radiative Cooling, Stability, and Low-Level Cloud Amount Feedback
journal, March 2018


The Performance of Hydrological Monthly Products Using SSM/I–SSMI/S Sensors
journal, February 2013

  • Vila, Daniel; Hernandez, Cecilia; Ferraro, Ralph
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 14, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-12-056.1

Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product
journal, January 2018


Low clouds link equilibrium climate sensitivity to hydrological sensitivity
journal, September 2018


Missing iris effect as a possible cause of muted hydrological change and high climate sensitivity in models
journal, April 2015

  • Mauritsen, Thorsten; Stevens, Bjorn
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2414

The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections
journal, June 2007

  • Tebaldi, Claudia; Knutti, Reto
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 365, Issue 1857
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2007.2076

Statistical significance of climate sensitivity predictors obtained by data mining
journal, March 2014

  • Caldwell, Peter M.; Bretherton, Christopher S.; Zelinka, Mark D.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014GL059205