DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Hydromechanical Controls on the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Injection-Induced Seismicity in Different Fault Architecture: Implication for 2013–2014 Azle Earthquakes

Journal Article · · Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth

Recent observations of seismic events at the subsurface energy exploration sites show that spatial and temporal correlations sometimes do not match the spatial order of the known or detected fault location from the injection well. This study investigates the coupled flow and geomechanical control on the patterns of induced seismicity along multiple basement faults that show an unusual spatiotemporal relation with induced seismicity occurring in the far field first, followed by the near field. Two possible geological scenarios considered are (1) the presence of conductive hydraulic pathway within the basement connected to the distant fault (hydraulic connectivity) and (2) no hydraulic pathway, but the coexistence of faults with mixed polarity (favorability to slip) as observed at Azle, TX. Based on the Coulomb stability analysis and seismicity rate estimates, simulation results show that direct pore pressure diffusion through a hydraulic pathway to the distant fault can generate a larger number of seismicity than along the fault close to the injection well. Prior to pore pressure diffusion, elastic stress transfer can initiate seismic activity along the favorably oriented fault, even at the longer distance to the well, which may explain the deep 2013–2014 Azle earthquake sequences. This study emphasizes that hydrological and geomechanical features of faults will locally control poroelastic coupling mechanisms, potentially influencing the spatiotemporal pattern of injection-induced seismicity, which can be used to infer subsurface architecture of fault/fracture networks

Research Organization:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000; 200180
OSTI ID:
1664591
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1664593; OSTI ID: 1670767
Report Number(s):
SAND2020-10450J; 691031
Journal Information:
Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth, Vol. 125, Issue 9; ISSN 2169-9313
Publisher:
American Geophysical UnionCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 11 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (43)

Overview of microseismic response to CO2 injection into the Mt. Simon saline reservoir at the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project journal November 2016
General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation journal February 1941
Fault zone architecture and permeability structure journal January 1996
Injection-induced seismicity on basement faults including poroelastic stressing: INDUCED SEISMICITY ON BASEMENT FAULTS journal April 2016
3-D Modeling of Induced Seismicity Along Multiple Faults: Magnitude, Rate, and Location in a Poroelasticity System journal November 2018
Operational and geological controls of coupled poroelastic stressing and pore-pressure accumulation along faults: Induced earthquakes in Pohang, South Korea journal February 2020
Seismicity Rate Surge on Faults after Shut‐in: Poroelastic Response to Fluid Injection journal June 2018
Coupled Fluid Flow and Geomechanical Modeling of Seismicity in the Azle Area (North Texas) journal August 2020
Pore pressure and poroelasticity effects in Coulomb stress analysis of earthquake interactions journal January 2002
Seismicity Induced by Wastewater Injection in Washington County, Ohio: Influence of Preexisting Structure, Regional Stress Regime, and Well Operations journal May 2018
Earthquakes Induced by the Stimulation of an Enhanced Geothermal System below Basel (Switzerland) journal September 2009
The induced earthquake sequence related to the St. Gallen deep geothermal project (Switzerland): Fault reactivation and fluid interactions imaged by microseismicity: Induced Seismicity St. Gallen journal September 2017
A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering journal February 1994
Seismic response of the fractured and faulted granite of Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) to 5 km deep massive water injections journal May 2009
A Method for Efficient Calculation of Diffusion and Reactions of Lipophilic Compounds in Complex Cell Geometry journal August 2011
Injection-Induced Earthquakes journal July 2013
The spatial footprint of injection wells in a global compilation of induced earthquake sequences journal August 2018
Characterization of induced seismicity patterns derived from internal structure in event clusters: CHARACTERIZATION OF INDUCED SEISMICITY journal May 2017
Causal factors for seismicity near Azle, Texas journal April 2015
Ellenburger wastewater injection and seismicity in North Texas journal December 2016
Stress drops of induced and tectonic earthquakes in the central United States are indistinguishable journal August 2017
Surface Monitoring of Microseismicity at the Decatur, Illinois, CO 2 Sequestration Demonstration Site journal June 2015
Induced Seismicity journal May 2018
Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio: INDUCED SEISMICITY IN YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO journal July 2013
Assessing whether the 2017 M w 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event journal April 2018
How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates? journal November 2016
Induced seismicity within geological carbon sequestration projects: Maximum earthquake magnitude and leakage potential from undetected faults journal September 2012
Earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms in central Oklahoma reveal a complex system of reactivated subsurface strike-slip faulting: Earthquake Source Parameters in Oklahoma journal April 2015
Hydromechanical Earthquake Nucleation Model Forecasts Onset, Peak, and Falling Rates of Induced Seismicity in Oklahoma and Kansas journal April 2018
Numerical model of pore‐pressure diffusion associated with the initiation of the 2010–2011 Guy–Greenbrier, Arkansas earthquakes journal September 2016
The Role of Fault‐Zone Architectural Elements on Pore Pressure Propagation and Induced Seismicity journal September 2018
Tracking Induced Seismicity in the Fort Worth Basin: A Summary of the 2008–2018 North Texas Earthquake Study Catalog journal June 2019
Active tectonics in the Lesser Caucasus: Coexistence of compressive and extensional structures journal October 1993
Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid-saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents journal January 1976
Myths and Facts on Wastewater Injection, Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhanced Oil Recovery, and Induced Seismicity journal June 2015
Modeling of fault reactivation and induced seismicity during hydraulic fracturing of shale-gas reservoirs journal July 2013
Injection-induced seismicity: Poroelastic and earthquake nucleation effects: INJECTION INDUCED SEISMICITY journal July 2015
Surface uplift and time-dependent seismic hazard due to fluid injection in eastern Texas journal September 2016
Far-field pressurization likely caused one of the largest injection induced earthquakes by reactivating a large preexisting basement fault structure: FAIRVIEW EARTHQUAKE ON 13 FEBRUARY 2016 journal October 2016
Effect of Fault Architecture and Permeability Evolution on Response to Fluid Injection journal November 2018
Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma journal July 2019
Hydrogeologic Controls on Induced Seismicity in Crystalline Basement Rocks Due to Fluid Injection into Basal Reservoirs: Y. Zhang et al. Ground Water xx, no. xx: xx-xx journal June 2013
Implications of hydrostatic pore pressures and high crustal strength for the deformation of intraplate lithosphere journal July 2001

Figures / Tables (12)


Related Subjects