DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modular repeat protein sculpting using rigid helical junctions

Abstract

The ability to precisely design large proteins with diverse shapes would enable applications ranging from the design of protein binders that wrap around their target to the positioning of multiple functional sites in specified orientations. We describe a protein backbone design method for generating a wide range of rigid fusions between helix-containing proteins and use it to design 75,000 structurally unique junctions between monomeric and homo-oligomeric de novo designed and ankyrin repeat proteins (RPs). Of the junction designs that were experimentally characterized, 82% have circular dichroism and solution small-angle X-ray scattering profiles consistent with the design models and are stable at 95 °C. Crystal structures of four designed junctions were in close agreement with the design models with rmsds ranging from 0.9 to 1.6 Å. Electron microscopic images of extended tetrameric structures and ~10-nm-diameter “L” and “V” shapes generated using the junctions are close to the design models, demonstrating the control the rigid junctions provide for protein shape sculpting over multiple nanometer length scales.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
NIGMS; USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1630336
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 117; Journal Issue: 16; Journal ID: ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher:
National Academy of Sciences
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
ENGLISH
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Brunette, TJ, Bick, Matthew J., Hansen, Jesse M., Chow, Cameron M., Kollman, Justin M., and Baker, David. Modular repeat protein sculpting using rigid helical junctions. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1073/pnas.1908768117.
Brunette, TJ, Bick, Matthew J., Hansen, Jesse M., Chow, Cameron M., Kollman, Justin M., & Baker, David. Modular repeat protein sculpting using rigid helical junctions. United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908768117
Brunette, TJ, Bick, Matthew J., Hansen, Jesse M., Chow, Cameron M., Kollman, Justin M., and Baker, David. Fri . "Modular repeat protein sculpting using rigid helical junctions". United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908768117. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1630336.
@article{osti_1630336,
title = {Modular repeat protein sculpting using rigid helical junctions},
author = {Brunette, TJ and Bick, Matthew J. and Hansen, Jesse M. and Chow, Cameron M. and Kollman, Justin M. and Baker, David},
abstractNote = {The ability to precisely design large proteins with diverse shapes would enable applications ranging from the design of protein binders that wrap around their target to the positioning of multiple functional sites in specified orientations. We describe a protein backbone design method for generating a wide range of rigid fusions between helix-containing proteins and use it to design 75,000 structurally unique junctions between monomeric and homo-oligomeric de novo designed and ankyrin repeat proteins (RPs). Of the junction designs that were experimentally characterized, 82% have circular dichroism and solution small-angle X-ray scattering profiles consistent with the design models and are stable at 95 °C. Crystal structures of four designed junctions were in close agreement with the design models with rmsds ranging from 0.9 to 1.6 Å. Electron microscopic images of extended tetrameric structures and ~10-nm-diameter “L” and “V” shapes generated using the junctions are close to the design models, demonstrating the control the rigid junctions provide for protein shape sculpting over multiple nanometer length scales.},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1908768117},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
number = 16,
volume = 117,
place = {United States},
year = {2020},
month = {4}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 21 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Fig. 1 Fig. 1: A general method to create arbitrary protein shapes using a library of designed junctions. (A) Building blocks: (Left, with different numbers of repeat units indicated in parentheses) DHRs, (Middle) homo-oligomers made from DHRs (9), and (Right) an ankyrin. (B) Junctions can be made by superimposing helices by overlappingmore » six residues (red) in terminal repeats (gray). The nearby residues are then redesigned (red sticks). (C) Junctions can also be made by building additional protein backbone (gold) as a contiguous chain with Rosetta fragment assembly. Following removal of a helix (gray) and/or one to four terminal helix residues (black), the sequence near the interface is redesigned (red sticks). (D) Designs from both fusion methods are filtered to ensure they are lower in energy than other conformations in the energy landscape, contain two or more helices in contact throughout the junction, and there are no buried unsatisfied residues. To check that the design is the lowest energy we used either Rosetta@home to model the energy landscape or a machine-learning approximation to the Rosetta@home simulation (SI Appendix, Discussion S2). (E) The junction library is then used to sculpt proteins into various shapes. In this case, a repeat protein shown in dark blue is connected first to a repeat protein in cyan followed by a repeat protein in light blue. Junctions are shown in gold. REU, Rosetta energy units.« less

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Rapid Sampling of Hydrogen Bond Networks for Computational Protein Design
journal, March 2018

  • Maguire, Jack B.; Boyken, Scott E.; Baker, David
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Vol. 14, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00033

Elfin: An algorithm for the computational design of custom three-dimensional structures from modular repeat protein building blocks
journal, February 2018


A General Computational Approach for Repeat Protein Design
journal, January 2015

  • Parmeggiani, Fabio; Huang, Po-Ssu; Vorobiev, Sergey
  • Journal of Molecular Biology, Vol. 427, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.11.005

Super-Resolution in Solution X-Ray Scattering and Its Applications to Structural Systems Biology
journal, May 2013


Exploring the repeat protein universe through computational protein design
journal, December 2015

  • Brunette, Tj; Parmeggiani, Fabio; Huang, Po-Ssu
  • Nature, Vol. 528, Issue 7583
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature16162

Design of structurally distinct proteins using strategies inspired by evolution
journal, May 2016


Controlling protein assembly on inorganic crystals through designed protein interfaces
journal, July 2019


DNA Origami: Scaffolds for Creating Higher Order Structures
journal, June 2017


Designing repeat proteins: a modular approach to protein design
journal, August 2017


Glycosidase and glycan polymorphism control hydrolytic release of immunogenic flagellin peptides
journal, April 2019

  • Buscaill, Pierre; Chandrasekar, Balakumaran; Sanguankiattichai, Nattapong
  • Science, Vol. 364, Issue 6436
  • DOI: 10.1126/science.aav0748

Limb proportions show developmental plasticity in response to embryo movement
journal, February 2017

  • Pollard, A. S.; Charlton, B. G.; Hutchinson, J. R.
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/srep41926

Arabidopsis PROTEASOME REGULATOR1 is required for auxin-mediated suppression of proteasome activity and regulates auxin signalling
journal, April 2016

  • Yang, Bao-Jun; Han, Xin-Xin; Yin, Lin-Lin
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11388

Computational design of self-assembling cyclic protein homo-oligomers
journal, December 2016

  • Fallas, Jorge A.; Ueda, George; Sheffler, William
  • Nature Chemistry, Vol. 9, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2673

HU multimerization shift controls nucleoid compaction
journal, July 2016

  • Hammel, Michal; Amlanjyoti, Dhar; Reyes, Francis E.
  • Science Advances, Vol. 2, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600650

Extreme stability in de novo-designed repeat arrays is determined by unusually stable short-range interactions
journal, June 2018

  • Geiger-Schuller, Kathryn; Sforza, Kevin; Yuhas, Max
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 29
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800283115

De novo design of self-assembling helical protein filaments
journal, November 2018


Comprehensive macromolecular conformations mapped by quantitative SAXS analyses
journal, April 2013

  • Hura, Greg L.; Budworth, Helen; Dyer, Kevin N.
  • Nature Methods, Vol. 10, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2453

Robust, high-throughput solution structural analyses by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)
journal, July 2009

  • Hura, Greg L.; Menon, Angeli L.; Hammel, Michal
  • Nature Methods, Vol. 6, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1353

Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipeline
journal, June 2019

  • Labrijn, Aran F.; Janmaat, Maarten L.; Reichert, Janice M.
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, Vol. 18, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41573-019-0028-1

Multi-input chemical control of protein dimerization for programming graded cellular responses
journal, September 2019


Geometrical assembly of ultrastable protein templates for nanomaterials
journal, June 2016

  • Glover, Dominic J.; Giger, Lars; Kim, Steve S.
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11771

Topological control of cytokine receptor signaling induces differential effects in hematopoiesis
journal, May 2019


Works referencing / citing this record:

Protein sequence design by conformational landscape optimization
journal, March 2021

  • Norn, Christoffer; Wicky, Basile I. M.; Juergens, David
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 118, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017228118

Recent advances in de novo protein design: Principles, methods, and applications
journal, January 2021


Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.