DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Effect of natural fractures on determining closure pressure

Abstract

Abstract In Utah FORGE reservoir, eight pressure transient tests (microhydraulic fracturing and DFIT™) show natural fracture/pressure-dependent leakoff. This behavior may lead to misinterpretation of the closure pressure (proxy for minimum principal stress). The closure pressures obtained from DFIT™ (or microhydraulic fracturing) testing may reflect shear failure along natural fractures or discontinuities rather than tensile failure and lead to inaccurate estimates of the minimum principal stress. In pressure tests conducted at the Utah FORGE site showed that reactivation or opening of natural fractures intersecting the wellbore and were suggested by multiple closure events in DFIT™ tests. In addition, comparisons between the pre- and post-well-tests FMI logs show that there are populations of induced fracture and reactivated natural fractures which are mostly vertical and sub-vertical. In this study, DFIT™ (or microhydraulic fracturing) test analysis and numerical simulations were used to suggest that hydraulic shearing of critically stressed natural fractures can contribute to multiple closure signatures and possibly lead to incorrect determination of the minimum principal stress. As other authors have previously advocated, the DFIT™ test analyses and numerical simulations suggest that better estimations of minimum principal stress may be derived by injecting at relatively high rate and pressure and insuring that tensilemore » breakdown is reached. In addition, extended shut-in period is required to determine accurate reservoir characteristics and fluid flow regime.« less

Authors:
; ; ;
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1619408
Grant/Contract Number:  
EE0007080
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology Journal Volume: 10 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 2190-0558
Publisher:
Springer Science + Business Media
Country of Publication:
Switzerland
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Nadimi, S., Forbes, B., Moore, J., and McLennan, J. D. Effect of natural fractures on determining closure pressure. Switzerland: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1007/s13202-019-00769-4.
Nadimi, S., Forbes, B., Moore, J., & McLennan, J. D. Effect of natural fractures on determining closure pressure. Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-00769-4
Nadimi, S., Forbes, B., Moore, J., and McLennan, J. D. Wed . "Effect of natural fractures on determining closure pressure". Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-00769-4.
@article{osti_1619408,
title = {Effect of natural fractures on determining closure pressure},
author = {Nadimi, S. and Forbes, B. and Moore, J. and McLennan, J. D.},
abstractNote = {Abstract In Utah FORGE reservoir, eight pressure transient tests (microhydraulic fracturing and DFIT™) show natural fracture/pressure-dependent leakoff. This behavior may lead to misinterpretation of the closure pressure (proxy for minimum principal stress). The closure pressures obtained from DFIT™ (or microhydraulic fracturing) testing may reflect shear failure along natural fractures or discontinuities rather than tensile failure and lead to inaccurate estimates of the minimum principal stress. In pressure tests conducted at the Utah FORGE site showed that reactivation or opening of natural fractures intersecting the wellbore and were suggested by multiple closure events in DFIT™ tests. In addition, comparisons between the pre- and post-well-tests FMI logs show that there are populations of induced fracture and reactivated natural fractures which are mostly vertical and sub-vertical. In this study, DFIT™ (or microhydraulic fracturing) test analysis and numerical simulations were used to suggest that hydraulic shearing of critically stressed natural fractures can contribute to multiple closure signatures and possibly lead to incorrect determination of the minimum principal stress. As other authors have previously advocated, the DFIT™ test analyses and numerical simulations suggest that better estimations of minimum principal stress may be derived by injecting at relatively high rate and pressure and insuring that tensile breakdown is reached. In addition, extended shut-in period is required to determine accurate reservoir characteristics and fluid flow regime.},
doi = {10.1007/s13202-019-00769-4},
journal = {Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology},
number = 2,
volume = 10,
place = {Switzerland},
year = {2019},
month = {8}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Downward migration of shearing in jointed rock during hydraulic injections
journal, October 1984

  • Pine, R. J.; Batchelor, A. S.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 21, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(84)92681-0

Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test in Coals to Determine Pore Pressure and Permeability
conference, April 2013

  • Ramurthy, Muthukumarappan; Marjerisson, Douglas M.; Daves, Scott B.
  • SPE Gas Technology Symposium
  • DOI: 10.2118/75701-MS

A 3D peridynamic simulation of hydraulic fracture process in a heterogeneous medium
journal, September 2016


Interpretation Methodology for Fracture Calibration Test Before-Closure Analysis of Normal and Abnormal Leakoff Mechanisms
conference, February 2016

  • Liu, Guoqing; Ehlig-Economides, Christine
  • SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference
  • DOI: 10.2118/179176-MS

Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells
journal, October 2003

  • Zoback, M. D.; Barton, C. A.; Brudy, M.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 40, Issue 7-8
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.07.001

Use of Pressure Derivative in Well Test Interpretation
journal, June 1989

  • Bourdet, Dominique; Ayoub, J. A.; Pirard, Y. M.
  • SPE Formation Evaluation, Vol. 4, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.2118/12777-PA

Global Model for Fracture Falloff Analysis
conference, April 2013

  • Marongiu-Porcu, Matteo; Ehlig-Economides, Christine A.; Economides, Michael John
  • North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition
  • DOI: 10.2118/144028-MS

Role of Stress-controlled Flow Pathways in HDR Geothermal Reservoirs
journal, May 2003

  • Ito, T.; Hayashi, K.
  • Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 160, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/PL00012563

Stress determination in active thrust belts: An alternative leak-off pressure interpretation
journal, August 2010


In situ stress measurements to 3.5 km depth in the Cajon Pass Scientific Research Borehole: Implications for the mechanics of crustal faulting
journal, January 1992

  • Zoback, Mark D.; Healy, John H.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 97, Issue B4
  • DOI: 10.1029/91JB02175

After-Closure Analysis of Fracture Calibration Tests
conference, April 2013

  • Nolte, K. G.; Maniere, J. L.; Owens, K. A.
  • SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
  • DOI: 10.2118/38676-MS

Trends in relationships between measured in-situ stresses and depth
journal, August 1978

  • Brown, E. T.; Hoek, E.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 15, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(78)91227-5

Observations of hydraulic stimulations in seven enhanced geothermal system projects
journal, July 2015


Slip-tendency analysis and fault reactivation
journal, January 1996


Interpretation of Fracturing Pressures
journal, September 1981

  • Nolte, Kenneth G.; Smith, Michael B.
  • Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 33, Issue 09
  • DOI: 10.2118/8297-PA