DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals

Abstract

A rapid transition away from unabated coal use is essential to fulfilling the Paris climate goals. However, many countries are actively building and operating coal power plants. Here we use plant-level data to specify alternative trajectories for coal technologies in an integrated assessment model. We then quantify cost-effective retirement pathways for global and country-level coal fleets to limit long-term temperature change. We present our results using a decision-relevant metric: the operational lifetime limit. Even if no new plants are built, the lifetimes of existing units are reduced to approximately 35 years in a well-below 2 °C scenario or 20 years in a 1.5 °C scenario. The risk of continued coal expansion, including the near-term growth permitted in some Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), is large. The lifetime limits for both 2 °C and 1.5 °C are reduced by 5 years if plants under construction come online and 10 years if all proposed projects are built.

Authors:
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [2];  [2]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [3];  [3]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [4]
  1. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States); Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States)
  3. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  4. Global Energy Monitor, San Francisco, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1608560
Report Number(s):
PNNL-ACT-SA-10417
Journal ID: ISSN 2041-1723
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nature Communications
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 10; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2041-1723
Publisher:
Nature Publishing Group
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT; climate-change mitigation; climate-change policy; energy infrastructure; energy modelling; energy policy

Citation Formats

Cui, Ryna Yiyun, Hultman, Nathan, Edwards, Morgan R., He, Linlang, Sen, Arijit, Surana, Kavita, McJeon, Haewon, Iyer, Gokul, Patel, Pralit, Yu, Sha, Nace, Ted, and Shearer, Christine. Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12618-3.
Cui, Ryna Yiyun, Hultman, Nathan, Edwards, Morgan R., He, Linlang, Sen, Arijit, Surana, Kavita, McJeon, Haewon, Iyer, Gokul, Patel, Pralit, Yu, Sha, Nace, Ted, & Shearer, Christine. Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals. United States. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12618-3
Cui, Ryna Yiyun, Hultman, Nathan, Edwards, Morgan R., He, Linlang, Sen, Arijit, Surana, Kavita, McJeon, Haewon, Iyer, Gokul, Patel, Pralit, Yu, Sha, Nace, Ted, and Shearer, Christine. Fri . "Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals". United States. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12618-3. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1608560.
@article{osti_1608560,
title = {Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals},
author = {Cui, Ryna Yiyun and Hultman, Nathan and Edwards, Morgan R. and He, Linlang and Sen, Arijit and Surana, Kavita and McJeon, Haewon and Iyer, Gokul and Patel, Pralit and Yu, Sha and Nace, Ted and Shearer, Christine},
abstractNote = {A rapid transition away from unabated coal use is essential to fulfilling the Paris climate goals. However, many countries are actively building and operating coal power plants. Here we use plant-level data to specify alternative trajectories for coal technologies in an integrated assessment model. We then quantify cost-effective retirement pathways for global and country-level coal fleets to limit long-term temperature change. We present our results using a decision-relevant metric: the operational lifetime limit. Even if no new plants are built, the lifetimes of existing units are reduced to approximately 35 years in a well-below 2 °C scenario or 20 years in a 1.5 °C scenario. The risk of continued coal expansion, including the near-term growth permitted in some Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), is large. The lifetime limits for both 2 °C and 1.5 °C are reduced by 5 years if plants under construction come online and 10 years if all proposed projects are built.},
doi = {10.1038/s41467-019-12618-3},
journal = {Nature Communications},
number = 1,
volume = 10,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Oct 18 00:00:00 EDT 2019},
month = {Fri Oct 18 00:00:00 EDT 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 84 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Rapid fuel switching from coal to natural gas through effective carbon pricing
journal, March 2018


Global emission hotspots of coal power generation
text, January 2019


Measuring a fair and ambitious climate agreement using cumulative emissions
journal, October 2015


Ripe for Retirement: An Economic Analysis of the U.S. Coal Fleet
journal, December 2013

  • Fleischman, Lesley; Cleetus, Rachel; Deyette, Jeff
  • The Electricity Journal, Vol. 26, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tej.2013.11.005

Measuring progress from nationally determined contributions to mid-century strategies
journal, November 2017


The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C
journal, January 2015


The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality
journal, January 2017


Reports of coal’s terminal decline may be exaggerated
journal, February 2018

  • Edenhofer, Ottmar; Steckel, Jan Christoph; Jakob, Michael
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa3a2

Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C
text, January 2017


Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C
journal, December 2017


Global emission hotspots of coal power generation
journal, February 2019


The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality
journal, January 2017


Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies
journal, January 2015


Targeted emission reductions from global super-polluting power plant units
journal, January 2018


RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100
journal, July 2011

  • Thomson, Allison M.; Calvin, Katherine V.; Smith, Steven J.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4

Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?
journal, November 2015


Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement
journal, January 2017

  • Peters, Glen P.; Andrew, Robbie M.; Canadell, Josep G.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3202

Commitment accounting of CO 2 emissions
journal, August 2014


Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset stranding required to meet the Paris Agreement
journal, May 2018

  • Pfeiffer, Alexander; Hepburn, Cameron; Vogt-Schilb, Adrien
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabc5f

Model of environmental life cycle assessment for coal mining operations
journal, August 2016


Power Plant Retirements: Trends and Possible Drivers
report, November 2017


Model of environmental life cycle assessment for coal mining operations
journal, August 2016


The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview
journal, January 2017


Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C
journal, June 2016

  • Rogelj, Joeri; den Elzen, Michel; Höhne, Niklas
  • Nature, Vol. 534, Issue 7609
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature18307

Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C
text, January 2017


Future CO 2 emissions and electricity generation from proposed coal-fired power plants in India: PROPOSED COAL PLANTS IN INDIA
journal, April 2017

  • Shearer, Christine; Fofrich, Robert; Davis, Steven J.
  • Earth's Future, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017EF000542

Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming
journal, January 2019


Global emission hotspots of coal power generation
journal, February 2019


Measuring a fair and ambitious climate agreement using cumulative emissions
journal, October 2015


Anti-fossil fuel norms
journal, February 2018


Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C
journal, March 2018


Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 degrees C warming
text, January 2019


Anti-fossil fuel norms
journal, February 2018


Current Emissions and Future Mitigation Pathways of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China from 2010 to 2030
journal, September 2018

  • Tong, Dan; Zhang, Qiang; Liu, Fei
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 52, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02919

The price of solar energy: Comparing competitive auctions for utility-scale solar PV in developing countries
journal, July 2018


The cost of CO2 capture and storage
journal, September 2015

  • Rubin, Edward S.; Davison, John E.; Herzog, Howard J.
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 40
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C
journal, March 2018


Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset stranding required to meet the Paris Agreement
audiovisual, January 2018

  • Pfeiffer, Alexander; Hepburn, Cameron; Vogt-Schilb, Adrien
  • Institute of Physics (IOP)
  • DOI: 10.5446/39379

Commitment accounting of CO 2 emissions
journal, August 2014


Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset stranding required to meet the Paris Agreement
journal, May 2018

  • Pfeiffer, Alexander; Hepburn, Cameron; Vogt-Schilb, Adrien
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabc5f

A simple object-oriented and open-source model for scientific and policy analyses of the global climate system – Hector v1.0
journal, January 2015

  • Hartin, C. A.; Patel, P.; Schwarber, A.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-939-2015

Future CO 2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure
journal, September 2010


Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement
journal, January 2017

  • Peters, Glen P.; Andrew, Robbie M.; Canadell, Josep G.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3202

Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?
journal, November 2015


Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
journal, December 2015

  • Smith, Pete; Davis, Steven J.; Creutzig, Felix
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2870

Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming
journal, January 2019


Future CO 2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure
journal, September 2010


Reports of coal’s terminal decline may be exaggerated
journal, February 2018

  • Edenhofer, Ottmar; Steckel, Jan Christoph; Jakob, Michael
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa3a2

Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C
text, January 2017


The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview
journal, January 2017


The price of solar energy: Comparing competitive auctions for utility-scale solar PV in developing countries
journal, July 2018


RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100
journal, July 2011

  • Thomson, Allison M.; Calvin, Katherine V.; Smith, Steven J.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4

Current Emissions and Future Mitigation Pathways of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China from 2010 to 2030
journal, September 2018

  • Tong, Dan; Zhang, Qiang; Liu, Fei
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 52, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02919

Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies
journal, January 2015


Targeted emission reductions from global super-polluting power plant units
journal, January 2018


Rapid fuel switching from coal to natural gas through effective carbon pricing
journal, March 2018


Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China at a city level
journal, October 2015

  • Zhang, Yan-Lin; Cao, Fang
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/srep14884

Works referencing / citing this record:

Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies
journal, December 2019


Shipping and the Paris climate agreement: a focus on committed emissions
journal, June 2020


Early transformation of the Chinese power sector to avoid additional coal lock-in
journal, January 2020

  • Wang, Huan; Chen, Wenying; Bertram, Christoph
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab5d99