Title: Algebraic expressions for estimating the impact depths of a surface barrier over a homogeneous soil

Journal Article · · Vadose Zone Journal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20003 · OSTI ID:1606199

Engineered surface barriers are used to isolate subsurface contaminants for effective long-term containment of municipal solid waste, other nonhazardous solid and liquid waste, hazardous and toxic wastes, and radioactive waste. The impact depths of a surface barrier are affected by the pre-barrier recharge rate and the properties of the soil beneath the barrier. In this paper, the pore-size-specific (PSS) water velocity is defined and an algebraic expression of PSS velocity is derived based on the stream tube concept and the Brooks and Corey hydraulic retention model. Algebraic expressions are developed to estimate drainage velocities and barrier impact depths after the emplacement of a surface barrier. Four impact depth terms are used to convey the protective effect: drainage front, average drainage, the location with 50% impact, and drainage tail. The drainage front depth is the deepest point at which the barrier has a detectable impact at a specific time (also called the near zero-impact depth). The average-impact depth is the depth at which average drainage occurs. At the 50% impact depth, the water flux rate is reduced by half because of the surface barrier. Lastly, the drainage tail depth (also called the full-impact depth) is the deepest depth at which the water conditions above it are in equilibrium with the barrier. The algebraic expressions show that the average-impact depth is no more than 1/3 of near zero-impact depth, while the 50% impact depth is slightly larger than 1/2 of the near zero-impact depth. The full-impact depth, depending on the final recharge rate from the surface barrier, is usually much smaller than the other impact depths. These differences lead to a very large transition zone beneath a surface barrier. Numerical simulations were conducted to replicate the same conditions. The numerical results corroborated the analytical models by predicting very similar water content profiles and near zero-, average-, 50%, and full-impact depths. The algebraic expressions provided in this paper are useful for quickly identifying sites where the depth of the existing contaminants could be beyond the protection of a surface barrier.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1606199
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-141144
Journal Information:
Vadose Zone Journal, Journal Name: Vadose Zone Journal Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 19; ISSN 1539-1663
Publisher:
Soil Science Society of AmericaCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (17)

Fly ash as a permeable cap for tailings management: pedogenesis in bauxite residue tailings journal November 2014
Design and performance evaluation of a 1000-year evapotranspiration-capillary surface barrier journal February 2017
Postconstruction Changes in the Hydraulic Properties of Water Balance Cover Soils journal April 2007
Assessing the Performance of Evapotranspiration Covers for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills in Northwestern Ohio journal April 2011
Field Hydrology of Water Balance Covers for Waste Containment journal February 2015
Properties of Porous Media Affecting Fluid Flow journal June 1966
Field Evaluation of Alternative Earthen Final Covers journal January 2001
Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US journal October 2005
Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters of a Field Drainage Experiment Using Inverse Techniques journal May 2003
Relative Permeability Calculations From Pore Size Distribution Data journal March 1953
Biointrusion of Protective Barriers at Hazardous Waste Sites journal May 1998
Field Water Balance of Landfill Final Covers journal November 2004
Simple Method for Predicting Drainage from Field Plots journal November 1980
Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters of a Field Drainage Experiment Using Inverse Techniques journal January 2003
Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters of a Field Drainage Experiment Using Inverse Techniques journal May 2003
Comparison of IHM and MIKE SHE Model Performance for Modeling Hydrologic Dynamics in Shallow Water Table Settings journal July 2015
Field Soil Water Retention of the Prototype Hanford Barrier and Its Variability with Space and Time journal August 2015