DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Leveraging operational information from wastewater injection wells to evaluate CO 2 injection performance for carbon storage applications in the Appalachian Basin

Abstract

Abstract Geologic parameters, geophysical logging, injection testing, and operational metrics from wastewater injection wells were integrated to develop a preliminary design of a carbon storage facility in the Appalachian Basin. A scattered group of 10–20 commercial wastewater injection wells dispose off produced water from oil and gas wells in the region, utilizing a sequence of stacked deep saline formations for injection zones. These wastewater injection wells provide practical benchmarks for understanding the feasibility of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) storage. Geologic models were developed based on characterization data from the wastewater injection wells. Reservoir simulations were calibrated according to injection testing and operational data from the wastewater injection wells. Long‐term operational data on injection flow rates and pressures measured in the wastewater injection wells were especially useful to evaluate the performance of carbon storage applications. The simulations were used to estimate injection pressures, radius of CO 2 saturation, and pressure response for industrial scale CO 2 storage applications. Results were also used to provide a design basis in terms of number of injection wells, well spacing, area of review, injection system components, monitoring plan, and CO 2 pipeline distribution system. The analysis demonstrates that there is sufficient injectivity in themore » deep saline formations in the west‐central Appalachian Basin to store commercial volumes of anthropogenic CO 2 . The geologic system appears suitable for supporting CO 2 injection rates of 0.5–1.0 million metric tons per year at injection pressures below formation fracture pressure in a single well. The long‐term operational data of wastewater injection wells within the study area suggested a lower permeability‐thickness values than indicated by initial reservoir tests. A workflow for developing realistic permeability values for input into reservoir simulations is presented. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Battelle Columbus OH USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1603704
Grant/Contract Number:  
DE‐FE0029466
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology Journal Volume: 10 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 2152-3878
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Valluri, Manoj, Sminchak, Joel, Cumming, Lydia, Main, Joel, and Larsen, Glenn. Leveraging operational information from wastewater injection wells to evaluate CO 2 injection performance for carbon storage applications in the Appalachian Basin. United Kingdom: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1002/ghg.1964.
Valluri, Manoj, Sminchak, Joel, Cumming, Lydia, Main, Joel, & Larsen, Glenn. Leveraging operational information from wastewater injection wells to evaluate CO 2 injection performance for carbon storage applications in the Appalachian Basin. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1964
Valluri, Manoj, Sminchak, Joel, Cumming, Lydia, Main, Joel, and Larsen, Glenn. Sun . "Leveraging operational information from wastewater injection wells to evaluate CO 2 injection performance for carbon storage applications in the Appalachian Basin". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1964.
@article{osti_1603704,
title = {Leveraging operational information from wastewater injection wells to evaluate CO 2 injection performance for carbon storage applications in the Appalachian Basin},
author = {Valluri, Manoj and Sminchak, Joel and Cumming, Lydia and Main, Joel and Larsen, Glenn},
abstractNote = {Abstract Geologic parameters, geophysical logging, injection testing, and operational metrics from wastewater injection wells were integrated to develop a preliminary design of a carbon storage facility in the Appalachian Basin. A scattered group of 10–20 commercial wastewater injection wells dispose off produced water from oil and gas wells in the region, utilizing a sequence of stacked deep saline formations for injection zones. These wastewater injection wells provide practical benchmarks for understanding the feasibility of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) storage. Geologic models were developed based on characterization data from the wastewater injection wells. Reservoir simulations were calibrated according to injection testing and operational data from the wastewater injection wells. Long‐term operational data on injection flow rates and pressures measured in the wastewater injection wells were especially useful to evaluate the performance of carbon storage applications. The simulations were used to estimate injection pressures, radius of CO 2 saturation, and pressure response for industrial scale CO 2 storage applications. Results were also used to provide a design basis in terms of number of injection wells, well spacing, area of review, injection system components, monitoring plan, and CO 2 pipeline distribution system. The analysis demonstrates that there is sufficient injectivity in the deep saline formations in the west‐central Appalachian Basin to store commercial volumes of anthropogenic CO 2 . The geologic system appears suitable for supporting CO 2 injection rates of 0.5–1.0 million metric tons per year at injection pressures below formation fracture pressure in a single well. The long‐term operational data of wastewater injection wells within the study area suggested a lower permeability‐thickness values than indicated by initial reservoir tests. A workflow for developing realistic permeability values for input into reservoir simulations is presented. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.},
doi = {10.1002/ghg.1964},
journal = {Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology},
number = 2,
volume = 10,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Sun Mar 08 00:00:00 EST 2020},
month = {Sun Mar 08 00:00:00 EST 2020}
}

Works referenced in this record:

A revised assessment of the CO2 storage capacity and enhanced oil recovery potential in the major oil fields of Ohio
journal, March 2017

  • Hawkins, Jared; Mishra, Srikanta; Stowe, Ryan
  • Environmental Geosciences, Vol. 24, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1306/eg.05161615019

Drainage and Imbibition CO2/Brine Relative Permeability Curves at Reservoir Conditions for High-Permeability Carbonate Rocks
conference, April 2013

  • Bennion, Douglas Brant; Bachu, Stefan
  • SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
  • DOI: 10.2118/134028-MS

Sub-regional CO2 Storage Resource and Containment Assessment of Cambrian and Ordovician Formations in Eastern Ohio
journal, January 2019


Geologic and hydrologic aspects of brine disposal intervals in the Appalachian Basin
journal, December 2015


Pressure-volume-temperature-concentration relation of aqueous sodium chloride solutions
journal, January 1970

  • Rowe, Allen M.; Chou, James C. S.
  • Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Vol. 15, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/je60044a016

Effects of CO2 Compressibility on CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers
journal, April 2010


Tables of the dynamic and kinematic viscosity of aqueous NaCl solutions in the temperature range 20–150 °C and the pressure range 0.1–35 MPa
journal, January 1981

  • Kestin, Joseph; Khalifa, H. Ezzat; Correia, Robert J.
  • Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.555641

A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils1
journal, January 1980


Lessons learned from the Youngstown, Ohio induced earthquake sequence from January 2011 to January 2012
journal, October 2017

  • Morris, A. P.; Ferrill, D. A.; Walter, G. R.
  • Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.016