DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systems

Abstract

In this work, we present Lift & Learn, a physics-informed method for learning low-dimensional models for large-scale dynamical systems. The method exploits knowledge of a system’s governing equations to identify a coordinate transformation in which the system dynamics have quadratic structure. This transformation is called a lifting map because it often adds auxiliary variables to the system state. The lifting map is applied to data obtained by evaluating a model for the original nonlinear system. This lifted data is projected onto its leading principal components, and low-dimensional linear and quadratic matrix operators are fit to the lifted reduced data using a least-squares operator inference procedure. Analysis of our method shows that the Lift & Learn models are able to capture the system physics in the lifted coordinates at least as accurately as traditional intrusive model reduction approaches. This preservation of system physics makes the Lift & Learn models robust to changes in inputs. Numerical experiments on the FitzHugh–Nagumo neuron activation model and the compressible Euler equations demonstrate the generalizability of our model.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)
  2. Univ. of California, San Diego, CA (United States)
  3. New York Univ. (NYU), NY (United States). Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
  4. Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States). Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States); New York Univ. (NYU), NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); US Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
OSTI Identifier:
1803677
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1603700
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0019303; SC0019334; FA9550-17-1-0195; FA9550-15-1-0038; FA9550-18-1-0023
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physica. D, Nonlinear Phenomena
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 406; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0167-2789
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; Data-driven model reduction; Scientific machine learning; Dynamical systems; Partial differential equations; Lifting map

Citation Formats

Qian, Elizabeth, Kramer, Boris, Peherstorfer, Benjamin, and Willcox, Karen. Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systems. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2020.132401.
Qian, Elizabeth, Kramer, Boris, Peherstorfer, Benjamin, & Willcox, Karen. Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systems. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2020.132401
Qian, Elizabeth, Kramer, Boris, Peherstorfer, Benjamin, and Willcox, Karen. Wed . "Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systems". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2020.132401. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1803677.
@article{osti_1803677,
title = {Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systems},
author = {Qian, Elizabeth and Kramer, Boris and Peherstorfer, Benjamin and Willcox, Karen},
abstractNote = {In this work, we present Lift & Learn, a physics-informed method for learning low-dimensional models for large-scale dynamical systems. The method exploits knowledge of a system’s governing equations to identify a coordinate transformation in which the system dynamics have quadratic structure. This transformation is called a lifting map because it often adds auxiliary variables to the system state. The lifting map is applied to data obtained by evaluating a model for the original nonlinear system. This lifted data is projected onto its leading principal components, and low-dimensional linear and quadratic matrix operators are fit to the lifted reduced data using a least-squares operator inference procedure. Analysis of our method shows that the Lift & Learn models are able to capture the system physics in the lifted coordinates at least as accurately as traditional intrusive model reduction approaches. This preservation of system physics makes the Lift & Learn models robust to changes in inputs. Numerical experiments on the FitzHugh–Nagumo neuron activation model and the compressible Euler equations demonstrate the generalizability of our model.},
doi = {10.1016/j.physd.2020.132401},
journal = {Physica. D, Nonlinear Phenomena},
number = C,
volume = 406,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Feb 19 00:00:00 EST 2020},
month = {Wed Feb 19 00:00:00 EST 2020}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 95 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data
journal, July 2010


A Data–Driven Approximation of the Koopman Operator: Extending Dynamic Mode Decomposition
journal, June 2015

  • Williams, Matthew O.; Kevrekidis, Ioannis G.; Rowley, Clarence W.
  • Journal of Nonlinear Science, Vol. 25, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00332-015-9258-5

Aerodynamic Data Reconstruction and Inverse Design Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
journal, August 2004

  • Bui-Thanh, T.; Damodaran, M.; Willcox, K.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 42, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.2159

Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I — Convex underestimating problems
journal, December 1976


A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: I. Symmetric forms of the compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations and the second law of thermodynamics
journal, February 1986

  • Hughes, T. J. R.; Franca, L. P.; Mallet, M.
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 54, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(86)90127-1

Data-driven operator inference for nonintrusive projection-based model reduction
journal, July 2016

  • Peherstorfer, Benjamin; Willcox, Karen
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 306
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.03.025

Impulses and Physiological States in Theoretical Models of Nerve Membrane
journal, July 1961


Extracting Sparse High-Dimensional Dynamics from Limited Data
journal, January 2018

  • Schaeffer, Hayden; Tran, Giang; Ward, Rachel
  • SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 78, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1137/18M116798X

Nonintrusive reduced-order modeling of parametrized time-dependent partial differential equations
journal, February 2013

  • Audouze, Christophe; De Vuyst, Florian; Nair, Prasanth B.
  • Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 29, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/num.21768

Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
journal, March 2016

  • Brunton, Steven L.; Proctor, Joshua L.; Kutz, J. Nathan
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517384113

Two-Sided Projection Methods for Nonlinear Model Order Reduction
journal, January 2015

  • Benner, Peter; Breiten, Tobias
  • SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 37, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1137/14097255X

Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations
journal, April 2017

  • Rudy, Samuel H.; Brunton, Steven L.; Proctor, Joshua L.
  • Science Advances, Vol. 3, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1602614

An Active Pulse Transmission Line Simulating Nerve Axon
journal, October 1962


Data-driven model order reduction of quadratic-bilinear systems: The Loewner framework for QB systems
journal, July 2018

  • Gosea, Ion Victor; Antoulas, Athanasios C.
  • Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, Vol. 25, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/nla.2200

Projection-based model reduction: Formulations for physics-based machine learning
journal, January 2019


Dynamical Systems of Continuous Spectra
journal, March 1932

  • Koopman, B. O.; Neumann, J. v.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 18, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.18.3.255

The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows
journal, January 1993


Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows
journal, November 2009


QLMOR: A Projection-Based Nonlinear Model Order Reduction Approach Using Quadratic-Linear Representation of Nonlinear Systems
journal, September 2011

  • Gu, Chenjie
  • IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 30, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1109/TCAD.2011.2142184

Extended dynamic mode decomposition with dictionary learning: A data-driven adaptive spectral decomposition of the Koopman operator
journal, October 2017

  • Li, Qianxiao; Dietrich, Felix; Bollt, Erik M.
  • Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Vol. 27, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4993854

Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of unsteady flows using artificial neural networks with application to a combustion problem
journal, May 2019


Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures
journal, January 1987

  • Sirovich, Lawrence
  • Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 45, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1090/qam/910462

Fusing wind-tunnel measurements and CFD data using constrained gappy proper orthogonal decomposition
journal, March 2019

  • Mifsud, Michael; Vendl, Alexander; Hansen, Lars-Uwe
  • Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 86
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.036

Data to decisions: Real-time structural assessment from sparse measurements affected by uncertainty
journal, April 2017


Kernel Methods for the Approximation of Nonlinear Systems
journal, January 2017

  • Bouvrie, Jake; Hamzi, Boumediene
  • SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 55, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1137/14096815X

Nonlinear Model Order Reduction via Lifting Transformations and Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
journal, June 2019

  • Kramer, Boris; Willcox, Karen E.
  • AIAA Journal, Vol. 57, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2514/1.J057791

Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation
journal, January 2010

  • Chaturantabut, Saifon; Sorensen, Danny C.
  • SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 32, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1137/090766498

Data-driven model order reduction of quadratic-bilinear systems: The Loewner framework for QB systems
journal, July 2018

  • Gosea, Ion Victor; Antoulas, Athanasios C.
  • Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, Vol. 25, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/nla.2200

Stochastic resonance in neuron models
journal, January 1993

  • Longtin, Andr�
  • Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 70, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/bf01053970

Fusing wind-tunnel measurements and CFD data using constrained gappy proper orthogonal decomposition
journal, March 2019

  • Mifsud, Michael; Vendl, Alexander; Hansen, Lars-Uwe
  • Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 86
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.036

Projection-based model reduction: Formulations for physics-based machine learning
journal, January 2019


Data to decisions: Real-time structural assessment from sparse measurements affected by uncertainty
journal, April 2017


Dynamical Systems of Continuous Spectra
journal, March 1932

  • Koopman, B. O.; Neumann, J. v.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 18, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.18.3.255

Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. III. Dynamics and scaling
journal, January 1987

  • Sirovich, Lawrence
  • Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 45, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1090/qam/910464

Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation
journal, January 2010

  • Chaturantabut, Saifon; Sorensen, Danny C.
  • SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 32, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1137/090766498