DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Misclassification of primary liver cancer in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors

Journal Article · · International Journal of Cancer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32887 · OSTI ID:1599913
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [2];  [4]
  1. Department of Statistics Radiation Effects Research Foundation Hiroshima Japan
  2. Department of Epidemiology Radiation Effects Research Foundation Hiroshima Japan
  3. Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics National Cancer Institute Rockville Maryland
  4. Hirosoft International Corporation Eureka California

Primary liver cancer is difficult to diagnose accurately at death, due to metastases from nearby organs and to concomitant diseases, such as chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Trends in diagnostic accuracy could affect radiation risk estimates for incident liver cancer by altering background rates or by impacting risk modification by sex and age. We quantified the potential impact of death‐certificate inaccuracies on radiation risk estimates for liver cancer in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors. True‐positive and false‐negative rates were obtained from a previous study that compared death‐certificate causes of death with those based on pathological review, from 1958 to 1987. We assumed various scenarios for misclassification rates after 1987. We obtained estimated true positives and estimated false negatives by stratified sampling from binomial distributions with probabilities given by the true‐positive and false‐negative rates, respectively. Poisson regression methods were applied to highly stratified person‐year tables of corrected case counts and accrued person years. During the study period (1958–2009), there were 1,885 cases of liver cancer, which included 383 death‐certificate‐only (DCO) cases; 1,283 cases with chronic liver disease as the underlying cause of death; and 150 DCO cases of pancreatic cancer among 105,444 study participants. Across the range of scenarios considered, radiation risk estimates based on corrected case counts were attenuated, on average, by 13–30%. Our results indicated that radiation risk estimates for liver cancer were potentially sensitive to death‐certificate inaccuracies. Additional data are needed to inform misclassification rates in recent years.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1599913
Journal Information:
International Journal of Cancer, Journal Name: International Journal of Cancer Vol. 147 Journal Issue: 5; ISSN 0020-7136
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 4 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (21)

Solid Cancer Incidence among the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–2009 journal May 2017
Radiation and Risk of Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreatic Cancers among Atomic Bomb Survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 1958–2009 journal July 2019
Temporal changes in liver cancer incidence rates in Japan: Accounting for death certificate inaccuracies and improving diagnostic techniques journal January 2001
Dose Estimation for Atomic Bomb Survivor Studies: Its Evolution and Present Status journal July 2006
Selection of reference groups in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors journal December 2017
Epidemiological studies of atomic bomb radiation at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation journal February 2019
Agreement Between Death Certificate and Autopsy Diagnoses Among Atomic bomb Survivors journal January 1994
Missing Doses in the Life Span Study of Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors journal February 2013
Accounting for Misclassified Outcomes in Binary Regression Models Using Multiple Imputation With Internal Validation Data journal April 2013
Uncertainty in estimating probability of causation in a cross-sectional study: joint effects of radiation and hepatitis-C virus on chronic liver disease journal June 2004
The Effect of Diagnostic Misclassification on Non-Cancer and Cancer Mortality Dose Response in A-Bomb Survivors journal June 1992
Allowing for Random Errors in Radiation Dose Estimates for the Atomic Bomb Survivor Data journal September 1990
Covariance Analysis of Censored Survival Data Using Log-Linear Analysis Techniques journal June 1981
Noncancer Disease Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors, 1958–1998 journal June 2004
Lack of association between acute exposure to ionizing radiationand liver cirrhosis journal January 2006
Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases journal March 2012
The Analysis of Rates and of Survivorship Using Log-Linear Models journal June 1980
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries journal September 2018
Validation Data-based Adjustments for Outcome Misclassification in Logistic Regression: An Illustration journal January 2011
DS02R1: Improvements to Atomic Bomb Survivors’ Input Data and Implementation of Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02) and Resulting Changes in Estimated Doses journal January 2017
Accuracy of Death Certificates and Assessment of Factors for Misclassification of Underlying Cause of Death journal January 2016