Coil current and vacuum magnetic flux calculation for axisymmetric equilibria
Abstract
In fixedboundary axisymmetric equilibrium calculations the plasma shape is assigned from input. In several circumstances, the plasma shape may not be known a priori, or one may desire to also compute the magnetic field in the volume surrounding the plasma through the calculation of a freeboundary equilibrium. This requires either the coil currents or the magnetic poloidal flux on a curve in the vacuum region to be assigned as input for the freeboundary equilibrium calculation. The FREEFIX code presented in this article is a general tool for calculating coil currents being given a fixedboundary calculation. Finally, a new formulation is presented, which considerably reduces the computational cost of the calculation. FREEFIX performs well for different geometries and experiments.
 Authors:

 Auburn Univ., AL (United States)
 Publication Date:
 Research Org.:
 Auburn Univ., AL (United States)
 Sponsoring Org.:
 USDOE
 OSTI Identifier:
 1594951
 Grant/Contract Number:
 SC0014196; FG0293ER54215; S013799F
 Resource Type:
 Accepted Manuscript
 Journal Name:
 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
 Additional Journal Information:
 Journal Volume: 59; Journal Issue: 12; Journal ID: ISSN 07413335
 Publisher:
 IOP Science
 Country of Publication:
 United States
 Language:
 English
 Subject:
 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
Citation Formats
Guazzotto, L. Coil current and vacuum magnetic flux calculation for axisymmetric equilibria. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. https://doi.org/10.1088/13616587/aa8be4.
Guazzotto, L. Coil current and vacuum magnetic flux calculation for axisymmetric equilibria. United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/13616587/aa8be4
Guazzotto, L. Thu .
"Coil current and vacuum magnetic flux calculation for axisymmetric equilibria". United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/13616587/aa8be4. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1594951.
@article{osti_1594951,
title = {Coil current and vacuum magnetic flux calculation for axisymmetric equilibria},
author = {Guazzotto, L.},
abstractNote = {In fixedboundary axisymmetric equilibrium calculations the plasma shape is assigned from input. In several circumstances, the plasma shape may not be known a priori, or one may desire to also compute the magnetic field in the volume surrounding the plasma through the calculation of a freeboundary equilibrium. This requires either the coil currents or the magnetic poloidal flux on a curve in the vacuum region to be assigned as input for the freeboundary equilibrium calculation. The FREEFIX code presented in this article is a general tool for calculating coil currents being given a fixedboundary calculation. Finally, a new formulation is presented, which considerably reduces the computational cost of the calculation. FREEFIX performs well for different geometries and experiments.},
doi = {10.1088/13616587/aa8be4},
journal = {Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion},
number = 12,
volume = 59,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {10}
}
Works referenced in this record:
A model for transonic plasma flow
journal, February 2014
 Guazzotto, Luca; Hameiri, Eliezer
 Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 21, Issue 2
Use of the virtualcasing principle in calculating the containing magnetic field in toroidal plasma systems
journal, September 1972
 Shafranov, V. D.; Zakharov, L. E.
 Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 12, Issue 5
Magnetohydrodynamics equilibria with toroidal and poloidal flow
journal, May 2005
 Guazzotto, L.; Betti, R.
 Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 12, Issue 5
Exploration of spherical torus physics in the NSTX device
journal, March 2000
 Ono, M.; Kaye, S. M.; Peng, Y. K. M.
 Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 40, Issue 3Y
Numerical study of tilt stability of prolate fieldreversed configurations
journal, December 2000
 Belova, E. V.; Jardin, S. C.; Ji, H.
 Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 7, Issue 12
Perturbed solutions of fixed boundary MHD equilibria
journal, January 2004
 Portone, A.
 Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 44, Issue 2
Kinetic effects on the stability properties of fieldreversed configurations. II. Nonlinear evolution
journal, May 2004
 Belova, Elena V.; Davidson, Ronald C.; Ji, Hantao
 Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 11, Issue 5
Numerical study of tokamak equilibria with arbitrary flow
journal, February 2004
 Guazzotto, L.; Betti, R.; Manickam, J.
 Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 11, Issue 2
Computation of ideal MHD equilibria
journal, September 1976
 Lackner, K.
 Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 12, Issue 1
Big Dee  A Flexible Facility Operating Near Breakeven Conditions
journal, July 1985
 Luxon, J. L.; Davis, L. G.
 Fusion Technology, Vol. 8, Issue 1P2A
Numerical methods for solving some problems of the theory of plasma equilibrium in toroidal configurations
journal, August 1973
 Zakharov, L. E.
 Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 13, Issue 4
The equilibrium and stability of rotating plasmas
journal, January 1983
 Hameiri, Eliezer
 Physics of Fluids, Vol. 26, Issue 1
Works referencing / citing this record:
Numerical simulations of global Alfvén eigenmodes excitation and stabilization in NSTXU
journal, September 2019
 Belova, E. V.; Fredrickson, E. D.; Lestz, J. B.
 Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 26, Issue 9