Evidence against Ryskin's model of cosmic acceleration
Abstract
Here, I examine how well Ryskin’s model of emergent cosmic acceleration fits several sets of cosmological observations. I find that while Ryskin’s model is somewhat compatible with the standard model of cosmological acceleration (ΛCDM) for low redshift (z ≲ 1) measurements, its predictions diverge considerably from those of the standard model for measurements made at high redshift (for which z ≳ 1), and it is therefore not a compelling substitute for the standard model.
- Authors:
-
- Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1581582
- Grant/Contract Number:
- SC0019038; CNS-1006860; EPS-1006860; EPS-0919443
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Astroparticle Physics
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 118; Journal ID: ISSN 0927-6505
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; Cosmology; General Relativity; Dark Energy
Citation Formats
Ryan, Joseph. Evidence against Ryskin's model of cosmic acceleration. United States: N. p., 2020.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2020.102428.
Ryan, Joseph. Evidence against Ryskin's model of cosmic acceleration. United States. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2020.102428.
Ryan, Joseph. Thu .
"Evidence against Ryskin's model of cosmic acceleration". United States. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2020.102428. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1581582.
@article{osti_1581582,
title = {Evidence against Ryskin's model of cosmic acceleration},
author = {Ryan, Joseph},
abstractNote = {Here, I examine how well Ryskin’s model of emergent cosmic acceleration fits several sets of cosmological observations. I find that while Ryskin’s model is somewhat compatible with the standard model of cosmological acceleration (ΛCDM) for low redshift (z ≲ 1) measurements, its predictions diverge considerably from those of the standard model for measurements made at high redshift (for which z ≳ 1), and it is therefore not a compelling substitute for the standard model.},
doi = {10.1016/j.astropartphys.2020.102428},
journal = {Astroparticle Physics},
number = ,
volume = 118,
place = {United States},
year = {2020},
month = {1}
}
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
Other availability
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.