DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Chandra Follow-up of the SDSS DR8 Redmapper Catalog Using the MATCha Pipeline

Journal Article · · The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series (Online)
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [3];  [1];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5];  [6];  [7];  [1];  [7];  [8];  [1];  [1];  [7];  [7];  [1]
  1. Santa Cruz Inst. for Particle Physics, Santa Cruz, CA (United States); Univ. of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States); Yale Univ., New Haven, CT (United States)
  3. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
  4. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (United States); SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
  5. SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
  6. Observatories of the Carnegie Inst. of Washington, Pasadena, CA (United States)
  7. Univ. of Sussex, Brighton (United Kingdom)
  8. LMU Munchen, Munchen (Germany)

In order to place constraints on cosmology through optical surveys of galaxy clusters, one must first understand the properties of those clusters. To this end, we introduce the Mass Analysis Tool for Chandra (MATCha), a pipeline that uses a parallellized algorithm to analyze archival Chandra data. MATCha simultaneously calculates X-ray temperatures and luminosities and performs centering measurements for hundreds of potential galaxy clusters using archival X-ray exposures. We run MATCha on the redMaPPer SDSS DR8 cluster catalog and use MATCha's output X-ray temperatures and luminosities to analyze the galaxy cluster temperature–richness, luminosity–richness, luminosity–temperature, and temperature–luminosity scaling relations. We detect 447 clusters and determine 246 r 2500 temperatures across all redshifts. Within 0.1 < z < 0.35, we find that r 2500 T X scales with optical richness (λ) as $$\mathrm{ln}\left(\tfrac{{k}_{B}{T}_{{\rm{X}}}}{1.0\,\mathrm{keV}}\right)=(0.52\pm 0.05)\mathrm{ln}\left(\tfrac{\lambda }{70}\right)+(1.85\pm 0.03)$$ with an intrinsic scatter of $$0.27\pm 0.02$$ ($$1\sigma $$). We investigate the distribution of offsets between the X-ray center and redMaPPer center within 0.1 < z < 0.35, finding that 68%.3 ± 6.5% of clusters are well-centered. However, we find a broad tail of large offsets in this distribution, and we explore some of the causes of redMaPPer miscentering.

Research Organization:
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-76SF00515
OSTI ID:
1577319
Journal Information:
The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series (Online), Journal Name: The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series (Online) Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 244; ISSN 1538-4365
Publisher:
American Astronomical Society/IOPCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (58)

Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar journal January 1989
Observational probes of cosmic acceleration journal September 2013
Cross-calibrating X-ray detectors with clusters of galaxies: an IACHEC study journal November 2010
A low-scatter survey-based mass proxy for clusters of galaxies journal November 2012
XMM-Newton and Chandra cross-calibration using HIFLUGCS galaxy clusters : Systematic temperature differences and cosmological impact⋆ journal February 2015
The structural and scaling properties of nearby galaxy clusters: I. The universal mass profile journal April 2005
The structural and scaling properties of nearby galaxy clusters: II. The journal September 2005
The Dark Energy Survey
  • Sánchez, E.
  • THE DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE: 2nd International Conference on The Dark Side of the Universe DSU 2006, AIP Conference Proceedings https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2409089
conference January 2006
The spatial correlation function of rich clusters of galaxies journal July 1983
Linear Regression for Astronomical Data with Measurement Errors and Intrinsic Scatter journal October 1996
Some Aspects of Measurement Error in Linear Regression of Astronomical Data journal August 2007
CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT III: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS journal February 2009
χ 2 AND POISSONIAN DATA: BIASES EVEN IN THE HIGH-COUNT REGIME AND HOW TO AVOID THEM journal March 2009
A weak Lensing Study of X-Ray Groups in the Cosmos Survey: form and Evolution of the Mass-Luminosity Relation journal December 2009
Annealing a Follow-Up Program: Improvement of the dark Energy Figure of Merit for Optical Galaxy Cluster Surveys journal March 2010
IMPACT OF CHANDRA CALIBRATION UNCERTAINTIES ON GALAXY CLUSTER TEMPERATURES: APPLICATION TO THE HUBBLE CONSTANT journal August 2010
Robust Optical Richness Estimation with Reduced Scatter journal February 2012
redMaPPer II: X-RAY AND SZ PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS FOR THE SDSS CATALOG journal February 2014
redMaPPer. I. ALGORITHM AND SDSS DR8 CATALOG journal April 2014
INTRACLUSTER MEDIUM ENTROPY PROFILES FOR A CHANDRA ARCHIVAL SAMPLE OF GALAXY CLUSTERS journal April 2009
The Eighth data Release of the Sloan Digital sky Survey: First data from Sdss-Iii journal March 2011
The Dark Energy Survey journal November 2010
Weighing the Giants – I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images journal February 2014
The X-ray properties of optically selected clusters of galaxies journal March 2013
redMaPPer – IV. Photometric membership identification of red cluster galaxies with 1 per cent precision journal August 2015
Chandra measurements of a complete sample of X-ray luminous galaxy clusters: the luminosity–mass relation journal October 2016
The evolution of active galactic nuclei in clusters of galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey journal November 2016
Weak lensing measurement of the mass–richness relation of SDSS redMaPPer clusters journal December 2016
Next generation cosmology: constraints from the Euclid galaxy cluster survey journal March 2016
Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal May 2017
Modelling projection effects in optically selected cluster catalogues journal October 2018
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters journal October 2018
Dark Energy Surveyed Year 1 results: calibration of cluster mis-centring in the redMaPPer catalogues journal May 2019
Constraining dark energy with clusters: Complementarity with other probes journal September 2009
Combining cluster observables and stacked weak lensing to probe dark energy: Self-calibration of systematic uncertainties journal January 2011
Tracing cosmic evolution with clusters of galaxies journal April 2005
The observed growth of massive galaxy clusters - I. Statistical methods and cosmological constraints: Cluster growth: methods and cosmology journal July 2010
The observed growth of massive galaxy clusters - II. X-ray scaling relations: Cluster growth: X-ray scaling relations journal July 2010
The XMM Cluster Survey: X-ray analysis methodology: XCS: x-ray analysis methodology journal October 2011
Self-similar scaling and evolution in the galaxy cluster X-ray luminosity-temperature relation journal February 2012
CIAO: Chandra's data analysis system conference June 2006
Hyper Suprime-Cam conference October 2012
Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2011
H I in the Galaxy journal September 1990
Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe journal September 2008
The Dark Energy Survey conference May 2012
The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data journal May 2016
Chandra Cluster Cosmology Project III: Cosmological Parameter Constraints text January 2008
Intracluster Medium Entropy Profiles for a Chandra Archival Sample of Galaxy Clusters text January 2009
Constraining Dark Energy with Clusters: Complementarity with Other Probes text January 2009
A Weak Lensing Study of X-ray Groups in the COSMOS survey: Form and Evolution of the Mass-Luminosity Relation text January 2009
A low-scatter survey-based mass proxy for clusters of galaxies text January 2012
redMaPPer I: Algorithm and SDSS DR8 Catalog text January 2013
Next Generation Cosmology: Constraints from the Euclid Galaxy Cluster Survey text January 2015
Chandra Measurements of a Complete Sample of X-ray Luminous Galaxy Clusters: The Luminosity-Mass Relation text January 2015
Weak Lensing Measurement of the Mass--Richness Relation of SDSS redMaPPer Clusters text January 2016
Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data text January 2016
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters text January 2018