skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Energy and environmental consequences of a cool pavement campaign

Abstract

Raising the albedo (solar reflectance) of streets can lower outside air temperature, reduce building energy use, and improve air quality in cities. However, the production and installation of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation treatments with enhanced albedo (“cool” pavements) may entail more or less energy consumption and carbon emission than that of less-reflective treatments. We developed several case studies in which a cool surface treatment is substituted for a more typical treatment (that is, a cool technology is selected instead of a more typical technology). We then assessed over a 50-year analysis period the changes in primary energy demand (PED, excluding feedstock energy) and global warming potential (GWP, meaning carbon dioxide equivalent) in Los Angeles and Fresno, California. The analysis considers two stages of the pavement life cycle: materials and construction (MAC), comprising material production, transport, and construction; and use, scoped as the influence of pavement albedo on cooling, heating, and lighting energy consumption in buildings. In Los Angeles, substituting a styrene acrylate reflective coating or a chip seal for a slurry seal in routine maintenance, or a bonded concrete overlay on asphalt (BCOA) without supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) for mill-and-fill asphalt concrete in conventional or long-life rehabilitation, induced MAC-stage PEDmore » and GWP penalties that substantially exceeded use-stage savings, primarily due to material production. Modified rehabilitation cases in which SCM comprised 21% to 50% of the BCOA's total cementitious content by mass (portland cement + SCM) yielded smaller total (MAC + use) PED and GWP penalties, or even total PED and GWP savings. Trends in Fresno were similar, with some differences in GWP outcomes that result from Fresno's longer heating season. The modified rehabilitation cases using BCOA with high SCM content yielded total GWP savings in each city; all other cases yielded total GWP penalties. Here, the magnitude of the one-time GWP offset offered by global cooling from the increased albedo itself always, and sometimes greatly, exceeded the 50-year total GWP penalty or savings. In Los Angeles, the annual building conditioning (cooling + heating) PED and energy cost savings intensities yielded by cool pavements were each about an order of magnitude smaller than the corresponding savings from cool roofs.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [4];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [1]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Heat Island Group
  2. Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (United States). Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering
  3. Univ. of California Pavement Research Center, Yolo County, CA (United States)
  4. NYC Mayor’s Office of Sustainability, New York, NY (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1571936
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1495797
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Energy and Buildings
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 157; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0378-7788
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Cool pavement; Building energy use; Heating; Cooling; Materials and construction; Supplementary cementitious materials (SCM); Urban climate; Global warming potential (GWP); Global cooling

Citation Formats

Gilbert, Haley E., Rosado, Pablo J., Ban-Weiss, George, Harvey, John T., Li, Hui, Mandel, Benjamin H., Millstein, Dev, Mohegh, Arash, Saboori, Arash, and Levinson, Ronnen M. Energy and environmental consequences of a cool pavement campaign. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.051.
Gilbert, Haley E., Rosado, Pablo J., Ban-Weiss, George, Harvey, John T., Li, Hui, Mandel, Benjamin H., Millstein, Dev, Mohegh, Arash, Saboori, Arash, & Levinson, Ronnen M. Energy and environmental consequences of a cool pavement campaign. United States. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.051.
Gilbert, Haley E., Rosado, Pablo J., Ban-Weiss, George, Harvey, John T., Li, Hui, Mandel, Benjamin H., Millstein, Dev, Mohegh, Arash, Saboori, Arash, and Levinson, Ronnen M. Wed . "Energy and environmental consequences of a cool pavement campaign". United States. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.051. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1571936.
@article{osti_1571936,
title = {Energy and environmental consequences of a cool pavement campaign},
author = {Gilbert, Haley E. and Rosado, Pablo J. and Ban-Weiss, George and Harvey, John T. and Li, Hui and Mandel, Benjamin H. and Millstein, Dev and Mohegh, Arash and Saboori, Arash and Levinson, Ronnen M.},
abstractNote = {Raising the albedo (solar reflectance) of streets can lower outside air temperature, reduce building energy use, and improve air quality in cities. However, the production and installation of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation treatments with enhanced albedo (“cool” pavements) may entail more or less energy consumption and carbon emission than that of less-reflective treatments. We developed several case studies in which a cool surface treatment is substituted for a more typical treatment (that is, a cool technology is selected instead of a more typical technology). We then assessed over a 50-year analysis period the changes in primary energy demand (PED, excluding feedstock energy) and global warming potential (GWP, meaning carbon dioxide equivalent) in Los Angeles and Fresno, California. The analysis considers two stages of the pavement life cycle: materials and construction (MAC), comprising material production, transport, and construction; and use, scoped as the influence of pavement albedo on cooling, heating, and lighting energy consumption in buildings. In Los Angeles, substituting a styrene acrylate reflective coating or a chip seal for a slurry seal in routine maintenance, or a bonded concrete overlay on asphalt (BCOA) without supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) for mill-and-fill asphalt concrete in conventional or long-life rehabilitation, induced MAC-stage PED and GWP penalties that substantially exceeded use-stage savings, primarily due to material production. Modified rehabilitation cases in which SCM comprised 21% to 50% of the BCOA's total cementitious content by mass (portland cement + SCM) yielded smaller total (MAC + use) PED and GWP penalties, or even total PED and GWP savings. Trends in Fresno were similar, with some differences in GWP outcomes that result from Fresno's longer heating season. The modified rehabilitation cases using BCOA with high SCM content yielded total GWP savings in each city; all other cases yielded total GWP penalties. Here, the magnitude of the one-time GWP offset offered by global cooling from the increased albedo itself always, and sometimes greatly, exceeded the 50-year total GWP penalty or savings. In Los Angeles, the annual building conditioning (cooling + heating) PED and energy cost savings intensities yielded by cool pavements were each about an order of magnitude smaller than the corresponding savings from cool roofs.},
doi = {10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.051},
journal = {Energy and Buildings},
number = C,
volume = 157,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {3}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 4 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share: