Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of carbon capture for petroleum refining, ammonia production, and thermoelectric power generation in the United States
Abstract
Understanding opportunities for carbon capture and storage (CCS) across sectors is important for choosing among greenhouse gas mitigation strategies. This study explores the cradle-to-gate life cycle environmental impacts of amine solvent based carbon capture systems on U.S. ammonia production, petroleum refineries, supercritical and subcritical pulverized coal power plants, and natural gas combined cycle plants. We use publicly available data to create comprehensive life cycle inventories for petroleum refining and ammonia production for 2014. We use these processes and additional modeled carbon capture processes to compare carbon capture on ammonia production and petroleum refining to inventories for coal and natural gas fired electricity with carbon capture. This analysis found that particulate matter formation potential, eutrophication potential, and water consumption increase in all sectors as a result of installation and operation of CCS technologies per kg CO2e abated, while the effect on acidification potential and particulate mater formation potential is mixed. The differences in tradeoffs among systems are driven primarily by three factors: the combustion emissions from fuel used to operate the capture unit, the upstream supply chain to obtain that fuel, and the relative impact of the carbon capture unit on baseline flue gas emissions (i.e. possible co-benefits from capture).
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Wind Energy Technologies Office
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1571707
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1603665
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC02-06CH11357
- Resource Type:
- Published Article
- Journal Name:
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Name: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Journal Volume: 91 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 1750-5836
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- Netherlands
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 02 PETROLEUM; ammonia; carbon capture; life cycle assessment; petroleum refining; thermoelectric power
Citation Formats
Young, Ben, Krynock, Michelle, Carlson, Derrick, Hawkins, Troy R., Marriott, Joe, Morelli, Ben, Jamieson, Matthew, Cooney, Gregory, and Skone, Timothy J. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of carbon capture for petroleum refining, ammonia production, and thermoelectric power generation in the United States. Netherlands: N. p., 2019.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102821.
Young, Ben, Krynock, Michelle, Carlson, Derrick, Hawkins, Troy R., Marriott, Joe, Morelli, Ben, Jamieson, Matthew, Cooney, Gregory, & Skone, Timothy J. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of carbon capture for petroleum refining, ammonia production, and thermoelectric power generation in the United States. Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102821
Young, Ben, Krynock, Michelle, Carlson, Derrick, Hawkins, Troy R., Marriott, Joe, Morelli, Ben, Jamieson, Matthew, Cooney, Gregory, and Skone, Timothy J. Sun .
"Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of carbon capture for petroleum refining, ammonia production, and thermoelectric power generation in the United States". Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102821.
@article{osti_1571707,
title = {Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of carbon capture for petroleum refining, ammonia production, and thermoelectric power generation in the United States},
author = {Young, Ben and Krynock, Michelle and Carlson, Derrick and Hawkins, Troy R. and Marriott, Joe and Morelli, Ben and Jamieson, Matthew and Cooney, Gregory and Skone, Timothy J.},
abstractNote = {Understanding opportunities for carbon capture and storage (CCS) across sectors is important for choosing among greenhouse gas mitigation strategies. This study explores the cradle-to-gate life cycle environmental impacts of amine solvent based carbon capture systems on U.S. ammonia production, petroleum refineries, supercritical and subcritical pulverized coal power plants, and natural gas combined cycle plants. We use publicly available data to create comprehensive life cycle inventories for petroleum refining and ammonia production for 2014. We use these processes and additional modeled carbon capture processes to compare carbon capture on ammonia production and petroleum refining to inventories for coal and natural gas fired electricity with carbon capture. This analysis found that particulate matter formation potential, eutrophication potential, and water consumption increase in all sectors as a result of installation and operation of CCS technologies per kg CO2e abated, while the effect on acidification potential and particulate mater formation potential is mixed. The differences in tradeoffs among systems are driven primarily by three factors: the combustion emissions from fuel used to operate the capture unit, the upstream supply chain to obtain that fuel, and the relative impact of the carbon capture unit on baseline flue gas emissions (i.e. possible co-benefits from capture).},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102821},
journal = {International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control},
number = C,
volume = 91,
place = {Netherlands},
year = {Sun Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Sun Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102821
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Comparison of carbon balance measuring tools in an enhanced oil recovery project based on the carbon dioxide from the ammonia production process streams
journal, February 2017
- Morales Mora, Miguel Angel; Pretelín Vergara, Froebel Carlos; Martínez Delgadillo, Sergio Alejandro
- Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 144
Mining Available Data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency to Support Rapid Life Cycle Inventory Modeling of Chemical Manufacturing
journal, August 2016
- Cashman, Sarah A.; Meyer, David E.; Edelen, Ashley N.
- Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 17
The future potential for Carbon Capture and Storage in climate change mitigation – an overview from perspectives of technology, economy and risk
journal, September 2015
- Wennersten, Ronald; Sun, Qie; Li, Hailong
- Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 103
From MEA to demixing solvents and future steps, a roadmap for lowering the cost of post-combustion carbon capture
journal, July 2011
- Raynal, Ludovic; Bouillon, Pierre-Antoine; Gomez, Adrien
- Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 171, Issue 3
Carbon capture and storage policy in the United States: A new coalition endeavors to change existing policy
journal, May 2011
- Pollak, Melisa; Phillips, Sarah Johnson; Vajjhala, Shalini
- Global Environmental Change, Vol. 21, Issue 2
A technical and economical evaluation of CO2 capture from FCC units
journal, February 2009
- de Mello, Leonardo F.; Pimenta, Ricardo D. M.; Moure, Gustavo T.
- Energy Procedia, Vol. 1, Issue 1
Heat supply alternatives for CO2 capture in the process industry
journal, May 2012
- Johansson, Daniella; Sjöblom, Jonas; Berntsson, Thore
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 8
A Review of Post-combustion CO2 Capture Technologies from Coal-fired Power Plants
journal, July 2017
- Wang, Yuan; Zhao, Li; Otto, Alexander
- Energy Procedia, Vol. 114
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
journal, January 2008
- Figueroa, José D.; Fout, Timothy; Plasynski, Sean
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 2, Issue 1, p. 9-20
Techno–Economic Evaluation of Technologies to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions at North American Refineries
journal, January 2017
- Motazedi, Kavan; Abella, Jessica P.; Bergerson, Joule A.
- Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 3
Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1
journal, May 2013
- Ryberg, Morten; Vieira, Marisa D. M.; Zgola, Melissa
- Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Vol. 16, Issue 2
Comparative assessment of CO2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes
journal, February 2012
- Kuramochi, Takeshi; Ramírez, Andrea; Turkenburg, Wim
- Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 38, Issue 1
Investigation of trace elements in the inlet and outlet streams of a MEA-based post-combustion capture process results from the test programme at the Niederaussem pilot plant
journal, January 2011
- Moser, Peter; Schmidt, Sandra; Stahl, Knut
- Energy Procedia, Vol. 4
Oxy-combustion Technology Development for Fluid Catalytic Crackers (FCC) – Large Pilot Scale Demonstration
journal, January 2013
- de Mello, Leonardo F.; Gobbo, Rodrigo; Moure, Gustavo T.
- Energy Procedia, Vol. 37
The impact of CO2 capture in the power and heat sector on the emission of SO2, NOx, particulate matter, volatile organic compounds and NH3 in the European Union
journal, April 2010
- Koornneef, Joris; Ramirez, Andrea; van Harmelen, Toon
- Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 44, Issue 11
Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits
journal, October 2017
- Supekar, Sarang D.; Skerlos, Steven J.
- Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 21
Using national inventories for estimating environmental impacts of products from industrial sectors: a case study of ethanol and gasoline
journal, February 2015
- Sengupta, Debalina; Hawkins, Troy R.; Smith, Raymond L.
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 20, Issue 5