skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

This content will become publicly available on August 29, 2020

Title: Ratio method for estimating uncertainty in calculated gamma cascades

Abstract

The assessment of uncertainty on deduced quantities obtained through both measurement and modeling must include contributions from both components. There are several methods to estimate the uncertainty due to modeling, such as the parametric uncertainty and that stemming from model bias. However, in the case where experimental data exists for partial cross sections, such as discrete gammas emitted in the de-excitation of the product nucleus following the reaction, the discrepancy between the measured and modeled gamma cascades provides more information and allows for uncertainty estimation that can account for all types of model and data uncertainty. This work presents a method for estimating that uncertainty, using ratios of gammas to get a measure of the accuracy of different parts of the modeled gamma cascade. The gamma with the lowest intensity uncertainty is shown to be the best for determining the channel cross section with realistic uncertainties, indicating that it should be used rather than the most intense gamma or a sum of gammas. In conclusion, this method provides both a simple procedure for calculating realistic uncertainties and identifies the best gamma for use in converting a set of measured partial gamma cross sections to the deduced total channel cross section.

Authors:
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)
  2. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  3. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1569619
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-19-24079
Journal ID: ISSN 1434-6001
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
European Physical Journal. A
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 55; Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 1434-6001
Publisher:
Springer
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; Nuclear Data; Model Defect Uncertainties; Gamma Cascade Modeling for Experiments

Citation Formats

Lewis, Amanda Marie, Bernstein, Lee A., Kawano, Toshihiko, and Neudecker, Denise. Ratio method for estimating uncertainty in calculated gamma cascades. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12826-y.
Lewis, Amanda Marie, Bernstein, Lee A., Kawano, Toshihiko, & Neudecker, Denise. Ratio method for estimating uncertainty in calculated gamma cascades. United States. doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12826-y.
Lewis, Amanda Marie, Bernstein, Lee A., Kawano, Toshihiko, and Neudecker, Denise. Thu . "Ratio method for estimating uncertainty in calculated gamma cascades". United States. doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12826-y.
@article{osti_1569619,
title = {Ratio method for estimating uncertainty in calculated gamma cascades},
author = {Lewis, Amanda Marie and Bernstein, Lee A. and Kawano, Toshihiko and Neudecker, Denise},
abstractNote = {The assessment of uncertainty on deduced quantities obtained through both measurement and modeling must include contributions from both components. There are several methods to estimate the uncertainty due to modeling, such as the parametric uncertainty and that stemming from model bias. However, in the case where experimental data exists for partial cross sections, such as discrete gammas emitted in the de-excitation of the product nucleus following the reaction, the discrepancy between the measured and modeled gamma cascades provides more information and allows for uncertainty estimation that can account for all types of model and data uncertainty. This work presents a method for estimating that uncertainty, using ratios of gammas to get a measure of the accuracy of different parts of the modeled gamma cascade. The gamma with the lowest intensity uncertainty is shown to be the best for determining the channel cross section with realistic uncertainties, indicating that it should be used rather than the most intense gamma or a sum of gammas. In conclusion, this method provides both a simple procedure for calculating realistic uncertainties and identifies the best gamma for use in converting a set of measured partial gamma cross sections to the deduced total channel cross section.},
doi = {10.1140/epja/i2019-12826-y},
journal = {European Physical Journal. A},
number = 8,
volume = 55,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {8}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
This content will become publicly available on August 29, 2020
Publisher's Version of Record

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Template for estimating uncertainties of measured neutron-induced fission cross-sections
journal, January 2018

  • Neudecker, Denise; Hejnal, Brooke; Tovesson, Fredrik
  • EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 4
  • DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2018026

EMPIRE: Nuclear Reaction Model Code System for Data Evaluation
journal, December 2007


Modern Nuclear Data Evaluation with the TALYS Code System
journal, December 2012


Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Uncertainties: Basic Concepts and Documentation
journal, December 2012


Monte Carlo Simulation for Particle and γ-Ray Emissions in Statistical Hauser-Feshbach Model
journal, May 2010

  • Kawano, Toshihiko; Talou, Patrick; Chadwick, Mark B.
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1080/18811248.2010.9711637

RIPL – Reference Input Parameter Library for Calculation of Nuclear Reactions and Nuclear Data Evaluations
journal, December 2009


ORNL Resolved Resonance Covariance Generation for ENDF/B-VII.1
journal, December 2012


Uncertainty-driven nuclear data evaluation including thermal (n, α ) applied to 59 Ni
journal, November 2017


Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra of Actinides
journal, January 2016


Measurements and calculations of U 238 ( n , x n γ ) partial γ -ray cross sections
journal, February 2004


Towards sustainable nuclear energy: Putting nuclear physics to work
journal, November 2008


ISO uncertainty and collaborative trial data
journal, March 1998


Impact of model defect and experimental uncertainties on evaluated output
journal, September 2013

  • Neudecker, D.; Capote, R.; Leeb, H.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 723
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2013.05.005

Bayesian Monte Carlo method for nuclear data evaluation
journal, December 2015


Accurate U 238 ( n ,   2 n ) U 237 reaction cross-section measurements from 6.5 to 14.8 MeV
journal, October 2017