DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Mobile sensing of point-source gas emissions using Bayesian inference: An empirical examination of the likelihood function

Abstract

This paper evaluates likelihood function forms for Bayesian inference of point-source gas emissions using a mobile sensor. Whereas Bayesian inference has been successfully used to estimate emission rates from time-averaged concentration data measured by stationary sensors, data collected by mobile sensors do not represent ensemble or time-averaged conditions. To examine the potential impact of this contrast, controlled release experiments were conducted with a mobile sensor measuring concentrations repeatedly along transverse cross sections of the downwind plumes. Experiments were conducted with measurements made at different downwind distances, different sensor heights, and with different obstacle states. An examination is made between two commonly-used likelihood functions, the Gaussian and the log-normal. For experiments conducted in the absence of obstacles, the Bayesian estimates using the log-normal likelihood function yield a much smaller bias than those based on the Gaussian likelihood function. This finding is consistent with the non-Gaussian nature of concentration fluctuations near a point-source. For experiments conducted in the presence of obstacles, the Bayesian inference based on the Gaussian likelihood function exhibits a better performance. This can be explained by the enhanced turbulent mixing due to the obstacle-introduced wake eddies. Overall, we find that the selection of the likelihood function can be physicallymore » related to the underlying conditions, and the proper selection is critical to ensure the performance of the Bayesian inference for source characterization using mobile sensing data.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E)
OSTI Identifier:
1799067
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1569489
Grant/Contract Number:  
AR0000749
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Environment (1994)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Atmospheric Environment (1994); Journal Volume: 218; Journal ID: ISSN 1352-2310
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Bayesian inference; environmental sensing; mobile monitoring; methane

Citation Formats

Zhou, Xiaochi, Montazeri, Amir, and Albertson, John D. Mobile sensing of point-source gas emissions using Bayesian inference: An empirical examination of the likelihood function. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116981.
Zhou, Xiaochi, Montazeri, Amir, & Albertson, John D. Mobile sensing of point-source gas emissions using Bayesian inference: An empirical examination of the likelihood function. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116981
Zhou, Xiaochi, Montazeri, Amir, and Albertson, John D. Thu . "Mobile sensing of point-source gas emissions using Bayesian inference: An empirical examination of the likelihood function". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116981. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1799067.
@article{osti_1799067,
title = {Mobile sensing of point-source gas emissions using Bayesian inference: An empirical examination of the likelihood function},
author = {Zhou, Xiaochi and Montazeri, Amir and Albertson, John D.},
abstractNote = {This paper evaluates likelihood function forms for Bayesian inference of point-source gas emissions using a mobile sensor. Whereas Bayesian inference has been successfully used to estimate emission rates from time-averaged concentration data measured by stationary sensors, data collected by mobile sensors do not represent ensemble or time-averaged conditions. To examine the potential impact of this contrast, controlled release experiments were conducted with a mobile sensor measuring concentrations repeatedly along transverse cross sections of the downwind plumes. Experiments were conducted with measurements made at different downwind distances, different sensor heights, and with different obstacle states. An examination is made between two commonly-used likelihood functions, the Gaussian and the log-normal. For experiments conducted in the absence of obstacles, the Bayesian estimates using the log-normal likelihood function yield a much smaller bias than those based on the Gaussian likelihood function. This finding is consistent with the non-Gaussian nature of concentration fluctuations near a point-source. For experiments conducted in the presence of obstacles, the Bayesian inference based on the Gaussian likelihood function exhibits a better performance. This can be explained by the enhanced turbulent mixing due to the obstacle-introduced wake eddies. Overall, we find that the selection of the likelihood function can be physically related to the underlying conditions, and the proper selection is critical to ensure the performance of the Bayesian inference for source characterization using mobile sensing data.},
doi = {10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116981},
journal = {Atmospheric Environment (1994)},
number = ,
volume = 218,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Sep 19 00:00:00 EDT 2019},
month = {Thu Sep 19 00:00:00 EDT 2019}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 10 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Passive Scalars in Turbulent Flows
journal, January 2000


An Information Roadmap Method for Robotic Sensor Path Planning
journal, March 2009

  • Zhang, G.; Ferrari, S.; Qian, M.
  • Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, Vol. 56, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10846-009-9318-x

Uncertainty Analysis in Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling
journal, June 2005


Dissipation methods, Taylor's hypothesis, and stability correction functions in the atmospheric surface layer
journal, July 1997

  • Hsieh, Cheng-I; Katul, Gabriel G.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 102, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/97JD00200

Theory for Reconstruction of an Unknown Number of Contaminant Sources using Probabilistic Inference
journal, March 2008


Natural Gas Pipeline Leaks Across Washington, DC
journal, January 2014

  • Jackson, Robert B.; Down, Adrian; Phillips, Nathan G.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/es404474x

Aerostat-lofted instrument and sampling method for determination of emissions from open area sources
journal, October 2011


Measuring Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Well Pads Using the Mobile Flux Plane Technique
journal, March 2015

  • Rella, Chris W.; Tsai, Tracy R.; Botkin, Connor G.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00099

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit
journal, March 1951


Bayesian inference for source determination with applications to a complex urban environment
journal, January 2007


Probability Theory as Logic: Data Assimilation for Multiple Source Reconstruction
journal, August 2011


Mobile Laboratory Observations of Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Region
journal, March 2015

  • Yacovitch, Tara I.; Herndon, Scott C.; Pétron, Gabrielle
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es506352j

Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure
journal, April 2012

  • Alvarez, R. A.; Pacala, S. W.; Winebrake, J. J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202407109

Wind tunnel simulations of plume dispersion through groups of obstacles
journal, November 1996


Plume dispersion through large groups of obstacles—A field investigation
journal, November 1995


Concentration fluctuations and fluxes in plumes from point sources in a turbulent boundary layer
journal, April 1982


Statistical characteristics of concentration fluctuations in dispersing plumes in the atmospheric surface layer
journal, July 1993

  • Yee, Eugene; Kosteniuk, P. R.; Chandler, G. M.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 65, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00708819

A mobile sensor network to map carbon dioxide emissions in urban environments
journal, January 2017

  • Lee, Joseph K.; Christen, Andreas; Ketler, Rick
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-10-645-2017

High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street View Cars: Exploiting Big Data
journal, June 2017

  • Apte, Joshua S.; Messier, Kyle P.; Gani, Shahzad
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00891

A Velocity–Dissipation Lagrangian Stochastic Model for Turbulent Dispersion in Atmospheric Boundary-Layer and Canopy Flows
journal, March 2014

  • Duman, Tomer; Katul, Gabriel G.; Siqueira, Mario B.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 152, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10546-014-9914-6

Assessment of Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Pads using Mobile Measurements
journal, November 2014

  • Brantley, Halley L.; Thoma, Eben D.; Squier, William C.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1021/es503070q

Mapping urban pipeline leaks: Methane leaks across Boston
journal, February 2013


Review of Lagrangian stochastic models for trajectories in the turbulent atmosphere
journal, February 1996

  • Wilson, John D.; Sawford, Brian L.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 78, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00122492

Atmospheric Tomography: A Bayesian Inversion Technique for Determining the Rate and Location of Fugitive Emissions
journal, January 2012

  • Humphries, Ruhi; Jenkins, Charles; Leuning, Ray
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/es202807s

Footprint estimation for scalar flux measurements in the atmospheric surface layer
journal, May 1992

  • Horst, T. W.; Weil, J. C.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 59, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00119817

Rapid, Vehicle-Based Identification of Location and Magnitude of Urban Natural Gas Pipeline Leaks
journal, March 2017

  • von Fischer, Joseph C.; Cooley, Daniel; Chamberlain, Sam
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06095

A Mobile Sensing Approach for Regional Surveillance of Fugitive Methane Emissions in Oil and Gas Production
journal, February 2016

  • Albertson, John. D.; Harvey, Tierney; Foderaro, Greg
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05059

Characterizing Fugitive Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Area Using a Mobile Laboratory
journal, June 2015

  • Lan, Xin; Talbot, Robert; Laine, Patrick
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5063055

Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows
journal, July 1987


A small, lightweight multipollutant sensor system for ground-mobile and aerial emission sampling from open area sources
journal, April 2017


Estimation of point source fugitive emission rates from a single sensor time series: A conditionally-sampled Gaussian plume reconstruction
journal, August 2015


An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows
journal, June 2000


Prior Probabilities
journal, January 1968


Inference of emission rates from multiple sources using Bayesian probability theory
journal, January 2010

  • Yee, Eugene; Flesch, Thomas K.
  • J. Environ. Monit., Vol. 12, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1039/B916954G

Backward-Time Lagrangian Stochastic Dispersion Models and Their Application to Estimate Gaseous Emissions
journal, June 1995