skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool

Abstract

Abstract Eleven years (by publication) years after the development and application of the control banding (CB) Nanotool for the qualitative assessment and control of engineered nanoparticles (ENP), there remains no quantitative gold standard to serve as an alternative to the qualitative assessment. Many CB models have been developed during the years subsequent to the initial development of the CB Nanotool and the literature continues to blossom with comparisons and applications of these various tools; however, these developments have hitherto been made in the absence of validating and verifying their effectiveness using existing, albeit limited, quantitative methods. This paper reviews the existing literature on the CB Nanotool to evaluate its effectiveness in a variety of settings and presents a summary of qualitative and quantitative information from its application in a broad range of ENP handling activities performed in two different research institutions. A total of 28 ENP activities were assessed using the CB Nanotool (Version 2.0). Due to the lack of guidance on a single exposure assessment methodology, a combination of real-time monitoring, filter analysis, and microscopic analysis was used to assess various quantitative metrics, including mass concentration, particle number concentration, and particle speciation. All the results indicated that the controlmore » outcomes from the CB Nanotool qualitative assessment were sufficient to prevent workers from being exposed to ENP at levels beyond established exposure limits or background levels. These data represent an independent quantitative validation of CB Nanotool risk level outcomes and give further credence to the use of the CB Nanotool to effectively control worker exposures in the absence of quantitative air monitoring results.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1564453
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-07NA27344; 763780
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Annals of Work Exposures and Health
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Annals of Work Exposures and Health; Journal ID: ISSN 2398-7308
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
Country unknown/Code not available
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Zalk, David M., Paik, Samuel Y., and Chase, Wesley D. A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool. Country unknown/Code not available: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxz057.
Zalk, David M., Paik, Samuel Y., & Chase, Wesley D. A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool. Country unknown/Code not available. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxz057.
Zalk, David M., Paik, Samuel Y., and Chase, Wesley D. Wed . "A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool". Country unknown/Code not available. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxz057.
@article{osti_1564453,
title = {A Quantitative Validation of the Control Banding Nanotool},
author = {Zalk, David M. and Paik, Samuel Y. and Chase, Wesley D.},
abstractNote = {Abstract Eleven years (by publication) years after the development and application of the control banding (CB) Nanotool for the qualitative assessment and control of engineered nanoparticles (ENP), there remains no quantitative gold standard to serve as an alternative to the qualitative assessment. Many CB models have been developed during the years subsequent to the initial development of the CB Nanotool and the literature continues to blossom with comparisons and applications of these various tools; however, these developments have hitherto been made in the absence of validating and verifying their effectiveness using existing, albeit limited, quantitative methods. This paper reviews the existing literature on the CB Nanotool to evaluate its effectiveness in a variety of settings and presents a summary of qualitative and quantitative information from its application in a broad range of ENP handling activities performed in two different research institutions. A total of 28 ENP activities were assessed using the CB Nanotool (Version 2.0). Due to the lack of guidance on a single exposure assessment methodology, a combination of real-time monitoring, filter analysis, and microscopic analysis was used to assess various quantitative metrics, including mass concentration, particle number concentration, and particle speciation. All the results indicated that the control outcomes from the CB Nanotool qualitative assessment were sufficient to prevent workers from being exposed to ENP at levels beyond established exposure limits or background levels. These data represent an independent quantitative validation of CB Nanotool risk level outcomes and give further credence to the use of the CB Nanotool to effectively control worker exposures in the absence of quantitative air monitoring results.},
doi = {10.1093/annweh/wxz057},
journal = {Annals of Work Exposures and Health},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
year = {2019},
month = {8}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxz057

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 1 work
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Workshop report: Strategies for setting occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials
journal, April 2014

  • Gordon, Steven C.; Butala, John H.; Carter, Janet M.
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 68, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.005

Airborne Nanostructured Particles and Occupational Health
journal, December 2005


Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures
journal, June 2009

  • Zalk, David M.; Paik, Samuel Y.; Swuste, Paul
  • Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 11, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11051-009-9678-y

Risk Level Based Management System: A Control Banding Model for Occupational Health and Safety Risk Management in a Highly Regulated Environment
journal, January 2010


Control Banding Tools for Engineered Nanoparticles: What the Practitioner Needs to Know
journal, February 2018

  • Dunn, Kevin H.; Eastlake, Adrienne C.; Story, Michael
  • Annals of Work Exposures and Health, Vol. 62, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxy002

Occupational handling of nickel nanoparticles: A case report: Nickel Nanoparticle Toxicology
journal, May 2014

  • Journeay, W. Shane; Goldman, Rose H.
  • American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 57, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22344

Grassroots ergonomics: initiating an ergonomics program utilizing participatory techniques
journal, June 2001


Occupational exposure limits for nanomaterials: state of the art
journal, July 2010

  • Schulte, P. A.; Murashov, V.; Zumwalde, R.
  • Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 12, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11051-010-0008-1

Research Strategies for Safety Evaluation of Nanomaterials, Part VIII: International Efforts to Develop Risk-Based Safety Evaluations for Nanomaterials
journal, May 2006

  • Thomas, Karluss; Aguar, Pilar; Kawasaki, Hajime
  • Toxicological Sciences, Vol. 92, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj211

Inhaled nanoparticles—A current review
journal, May 2008


Environmental Risk Communication through Qualitative Risk Assessment
journal, June 2014


Pulmonary applications and toxicity of engineered nanoparticles
journal, September 2008

  • Card, Jeffrey W.; Zeldin, Darryl C.; Bonner, James C.
  • American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Vol. 295, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00041.2008

Review of Qualitative Approaches for the Construction Industry: Designing a Risk Management Toolbox
journal, June 2011


Silicon dioxide nanoparticles increase macrophage atherogenicity: Stimulation of cellular cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and triglycerides accumulation: SiO
journal, November 2014

  • Petrick, Lauren; Rosenblat, Mira; Paland, Nicole
  • Environmental Toxicology, Vol. 31, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/tox.22084

A Systematic Review of Reported Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials
journal, July 2016

  • Debia, Maximilien; Bakhiyi, Bouchra; Ostiguy, Claude
  • Annals of Occupational Hygiene, Vol. 60, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mew041

History and Evolution of Control Banding: A Review
journal, April 2008

  • Zalk, David M.; Nelson, Deborah Imel
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 5, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1080/15459620801997916

Acute Lung Injury: A Yellow Card for Engineered Nanoparticles?
journal, August 2009

  • Liu, M.; Zhang, H.; Slutsky, A. S.
  • Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjp006

Development of a Control Banding Tool for Nanomaterials
journal, January 2012

  • Riediker, M.; Ostiguy, C.; Triolet, J.
  • Journal of Nanomaterials, Vol. 2012
  • DOI: 10.1155/2012/879671

Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles
journal, April 2008

  • Schulte, Paul; Geraci, Charles; Zumwalde, Ralph
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1080/15459620801907840

Assessing the airborne titanium dioxide nanoparticle-related exposure hazard at workplace
journal, February 2009


Nanotechnologies, engineered nanomaterials and occupational health and safety – A review
journal, October 2010


Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma
journal, August 2009


Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: Environmental, health and safety considerations for assessing hazards and risks
journal, October 2008


Control banding tools for occupational exposure assessment of nanomaterials — Ready for use in a regulatory context?
journal, April 2016


Testing Strategies to Establish the Safety of Nanomaterials: Conclusions of an ECETOC Workshop
journal, January 2007

  • Warheit, David B.; Borm, Paul J. A.; Hennes, Christa
  • Inhalation Toxicology, Vol. 19, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1080/08958370701353080