DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Violation of Field Line Conservation and Associated Spatial Scales in Particle-in-Cell Simulations and MMS Data

Abstract

For the first time, space flight technology exists to detect, in situ, violation of magnetic field line conservation. The violation of magnetic line conservation on scales smaller than the system size is a necessary and sufficient condition for finite magnetic field reconnection. We demonstrate that violation of line conservation produces a detectable, structured signature both in particle-in-cell simulations of reconnection and in data from the Magnetospheric Multi-Scale mission. In particle-in-cell simulations of asymmetric reconnection, the quantity—which we call M—that identifies this violation achieves significant values in electron skin depth-scale layers that extend away from the separator, with higher values emerging on the low-density, high-magnetic-field side of the current sheet. At the separator, M owes largely to perpendicular gradients in the parallel electric field, while it attains its highest values away from the separator in dispersed, layered structures associated with gradients in the perpendicular nonideal electric field and electron transport. Sub-ion scale bipolar forms of the quantity also appear further from the separator. In two MMS burst data intervals detecting the electron diffusion region, we find that M exceeds measurement uncertainties both at the separator and near the separatrices. One interval has highly sheared reconnecting fields and the other a strongermore » guide field. For one event, we determine the location and scale of M and the inner electron diffusion region relative to electron outflows and the magnetic separatrices. The measure can therefore serve as a potent diagnostic for magnetic reconnection in space measurements.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD (United States)
  2. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD (United States); Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH (United States)
  3. Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1544323
Grant/Contract Number:  
NNG04EB99C; NNX16AG75G
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 123; Journal Issue: 3
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; magnetic reconnection; magnetopause; PIC simulations; Magnetospheric Multi‐Scale; violation of field line conservation

Citation Formats

Wendel, Deirdre E., Liu, Yi-Hsin, Giles, Barbara L., and Torbert, Roy B. Violation of Field Line Conservation and Associated Spatial Scales in Particle-in-Cell Simulations and MMS Data. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/2017JA024467.
Wendel, Deirdre E., Liu, Yi-Hsin, Giles, Barbara L., & Torbert, Roy B. Violation of Field Line Conservation and Associated Spatial Scales in Particle-in-Cell Simulations and MMS Data. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024467
Wendel, Deirdre E., Liu, Yi-Hsin, Giles, Barbara L., and Torbert, Roy B. Tue . "Violation of Field Line Conservation and Associated Spatial Scales in Particle-in-Cell Simulations and MMS Data". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024467. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1544323.
@article{osti_1544323,
title = {Violation of Field Line Conservation and Associated Spatial Scales in Particle-in-Cell Simulations and MMS Data},
author = {Wendel, Deirdre E. and Liu, Yi-Hsin and Giles, Barbara L. and Torbert, Roy B.},
abstractNote = {For the first time, space flight technology exists to detect, in situ, violation of magnetic field line conservation. The violation of magnetic line conservation on scales smaller than the system size is a necessary and sufficient condition for finite magnetic field reconnection. We demonstrate that violation of line conservation produces a detectable, structured signature both in particle-in-cell simulations of reconnection and in data from the Magnetospheric Multi-Scale mission. In particle-in-cell simulations of asymmetric reconnection, the quantity—which we call M—that identifies this violation achieves significant values in electron skin depth-scale layers that extend away from the separator, with higher values emerging on the low-density, high-magnetic-field side of the current sheet. At the separator, M owes largely to perpendicular gradients in the parallel electric field, while it attains its highest values away from the separator in dispersed, layered structures associated with gradients in the perpendicular nonideal electric field and electron transport. Sub-ion scale bipolar forms of the quantity also appear further from the separator. In two MMS burst data intervals detecting the electron diffusion region, we find that M exceeds measurement uncertainties both at the separator and near the separatrices. One interval has highly sheared reconnecting fields and the other a stronger guide field. For one event, we determine the location and scale of M and the inner electron diffusion region relative to electron outflows and the magnetic separatrices. The measure can therefore serve as a potent diagnostic for magnetic reconnection in space measurements.},
doi = {10.1002/2017JA024467},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics},
number = 3,
volume = 123,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Feb 20 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Tue Feb 20 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Magnetic Reconnection
book, October 2009


Nongyrotropic electrons in guide field reconnection
journal, February 2016

  • Wendel, D. E.; Hesse, M.; Bessho, N.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4942031

Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection without null points: 1. Basic theory of magnetic flipping
journal, January 1995

  • Priest, E. R.; Démoulin, P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 100, Issue A12
  • DOI: 10.1029/95JA02740

Fingerprints of collisionless reconnection at the separator, I, Ambipolar-Hall signatures
journal, January 2002


On determining the nature and orientation of magnetic directional discontinuities: Problems with the minimum variance method
journal, January 2004


Potentials of surfaces in space
journal, November 1981


Kinetic signatures of the region surrounding the X line in asymmetric (magnetopause) reconnection : Signatures of Asymmetric Reconnection
journal, May 2016

  • Shay, M. A.; Phan, T. D.; Haggerty, C. C.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL069034

Slip-Squashing Factors as a Measure of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Reconnection
journal, March 2009


Experimental evidence of fast reconnection via trapped electron motion
journal, May 2004

  • Egedal, J.; Fox, W.; Porkolab, M.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1687727

Electron nongyrotropy in the context of collisionless magnetic reconnection
journal, September 2013

  • Aunai, Nicolas; Hesse, Michael; Kuznetsova, Maria
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 20, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4820953

Cluster observations of electron holes in association with magnetotail reconnection and comparison to simulations
journal, January 2005


Large-scale electron acceleration by parallel electric fields during magnetic reconnection
journal, February 2012

  • Egedal, J.; Daughton, W.; Le, A.
  • Nature Physics, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/nphys2249

Three-dimensional collisionless magnetic reconnection in the presence of a guide field
journal, January 2004


General magnetic reconnection, parallel electric fields, and helicity
journal, January 1988

  • Schindler, K.; Hesse, M.; Birn, J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 93, Issue A6
  • DOI: 10.1029/JA093iA06p05547

The FIELDS Instrument Suite on MMS: Scientific Objectives, Measurements, and Data Products
journal, November 2014


Four-point Cluster application of magnetic field analysis tools: The discontinuity analyzer
journal, January 2002


Fast Plasma Investigation for Magnetospheric Multiscale
journal, March 2016


Motion of observed structures calculated from multi-point magnetic field measurements: Application to Cluster
journal, January 2006

  • Shi, Q. Q.; Shen, C.; Dunlop, M. W.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005GL025073

A drift kinetic approach to stationary collisionless magnetic reconnection in an open cusp plasma
journal, April 2002


Collisionless magnetic reconnection in an asymmetric current sheet: ASYMMETRIC MAGNETIC RECONNECTION
journal, June 2008

  • Pritchett, P. L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 113, Issue A6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012930

Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space
journal, May 2016


Wake formation behind positively charged spacecraft in flowing tenuous plasmas
journal, June 2006

  • Engwall, E.; Eriksson, A. I.; Forest, J.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 13, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.2199207

On the Relation between Reconnected Magnetic Flux and Parallel Electric Fields in the Solar Corona
journal, October 2005

  • Hesse, Michael; Forbes, Terry G.; Birn, Joachim
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 631, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/432677

Magnetopause reconnection impact parameters from multiple spacecraft magnetic field measurements
journal, January 2009

  • Wendel, Deirdre E.; Reiff, Patricia H.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 36, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009GL040228

Formation of Electron Holes and Particle Energization During Magnetic Reconnection
journal, February 2003


Advances in petascale kinetic plasma simulation with VPIC and Roadrunner
journal, July 2009


Space charge enhanced, plasma gradient induced error in satellite electric field measurements
journal, January 1994

  • Diebold, D. A.; Hershkowitz, N.; DeKock, J. R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 99, Issue A1
  • DOI: 10.1029/93JA00432

Formation of a localized acceleration potential during magnetic reconnection with a guide field
journal, May 2009

  • Egedal, J.; Daughton, W.; Drake, J. F.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 16, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.3130732

What Can We Learn about Magnetotail Reconnection from 2D PIC Harris-Sheet Simulations?
journal, May 2015


Geospace Environment Modeling magnetic reconnection challenge: Simulations with a full particle electromagnetic code
journal, March 2001

  • Pritchett, P. L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 106, Issue A3
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999JA001006

Analyses of techniques for measuring DC and AC electric fields in the magnetosphere
journal, February 1973


Frozen flux violation, electron demagnetization and magnetic reconnection
journal, October 2015

  • Scudder, J. D.; Karimabadi, H.; Daughton, W.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 22, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4932332

The Axial Double Probe and Fields Signal Processing for the MMS Mission
journal, December 2014


A theoretical foundation of general magnetic reconnection
journal, January 1988


The magnetic structure of B ≠ 0-reconnection
journal, January 1998


The Spin-Plane Double Probe Electric Field Instrument for MMS
journal, November 2014


Vlasov simulations of electron holes driven by particle distributions from PIC reconnection simulations with a guide field
journal, January 2008

  • Goldman, Martin V.; Newman, David L.; Pritchett, Philip
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008GL035608

Theoretical models of magnetic field line merging
journal, January 1975


Electrostatic structure around spacecraft in tenuous plasmas: CLUSTER ELECTROSTATIC STRUCTURE
journal, September 2007

  • Cully, C. M.; Ergun, R. E.; Eriksson, A. I.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 112, Issue A9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012269

Non-Maxwellian electron distribution functions due to self-generated turbulence in collisionless guide-field reconnection
journal, October 2016

  • Muñoz, P. A.; Büchner, J.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4963773

Euler Potentials
journal, April 1970

  • Stern, David P.
  • American Journal of Physics, Vol. 38, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1119/1.1976373

Structure of the Magnetic Reconnection Diffusion Region from Four-Spacecraft Observations
journal, August 2004


Magnetic reconnection
journal, January 1984