Basement Fault Reactivation by Fluid Injection Into Sedimentary Reservoirs: Poroelastic Effects
[1];
[2];
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA, Now at Desert Research Institute Reno NV USA
- Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA
- Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque NM USA, Now at Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA
Abstract To investigate mechanisms of seismic fault reactivation in crystalline basement in response to fluid injection in overlying sedimentary reservoirs, we conducted three‐dimensional finite element simulations to assess the effects of direct pore pressure communication and indirect poroelastic stress transfer on the change in Coulomb failure stress of favorably oriented faults of varying permeability structure in normal, strike‐slip, and reverse faulting stress regimes. We demonstrate that the direct pore pressure effect transmitted along a hydraulically conductive fault exceeds the indirect poroelastic effect, but alone is insufficient for fault reactivation in the basement. The poroelastic effect on the Coulomb failure stress results from induced normal tractions and, to a lesser extent, from induced shear tractions that relate to the flexing of the fault as the reservoir expands poroelastically with fluid injection. Assuming a higher Biot coefficient for reservoir over basement rock as previously reported, the combined direct pore pressure and indirect poroelastic effects result in reactivation of hydraulically conductive faults in the basement in normal and strike‐slip faulting stress regimes and in the reservoir in reverse faulting regimes. Sealing normal faults that are not preferentially conductive also preferentially reactivate in the reservoir. These findings apply to injection in either hanging or footwall of normal and reverse faults. Reducing the contrast in Biot coefficient between reservoir and basement favors fault reactivation in the reservoir for injection in the footwall in normal faulting stress regimes. These simulations demonstrate that geomechanical models without coupled poroelasticity underestimate the potential of fault reactivation in crystalline basement.
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE
- OSTI ID:
- 1543374
- Journal Information:
- Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth, Journal Name: Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth Vol. 124 Journal Issue: 7; ISSN 2169-9313
- Publisher:
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)Copyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Web of Science
Similar Records
Seismicity Rate Surge on Faults after Shut–in: Poroelastic Response to Fluid Injection
Hydromechanical Controls on the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Injection-Induced Seismicity in Different Fault Architecture: Implication for 2013–2014 Azle Earthquakes