skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Gaining insight into the $$T\,_2^*$$– T 2 relationship in surface NMR free-induction decay measurements

Abstract

One of the primary shortcomings of the surface nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) freeinduction decay (FID) measurement is the uncertainty surrounding which mechanism controls the signal’s time dependence. Ideally, the FID-estimated relaxation time T$$*\atop{2}$$ that describes the signal’s decay carries an intimate link to the geometry of the pore space. In this limit the parameter T$$*\atop{2}$$ is closely linked to a related parameter T 2, which is more closely linked to pore-geometry. If T$$*\atop{2}$$ T 2 the FID can provide valuable insight into relative pore-size and can be used to make quantitative permeability estimates. However, given only FID measurements it is difficult to determine whether T$$*\atop{2}$$ is linked to pore geometry or whether it has been strongly influenced by background magnetic field inhomogeneity. If the link between an observed T$$*\atop{2}$$ and the underlying T 2 could be further constrained the utility of the standard surface NMR FID measurement would be greatly improved. We hypothesize that an approach employing an updated surface NMR forward model that solves the full Bloch equations with appropriately weighted relaxation terms can be used to help constrain the T$$*\atop{2}$$ –T 2 relationship. Weighting the relaxation terms requires estimating the poorly constrained parameters T 2 and T 1; to deal with this uncertainty we propose to conduct a parameter search involving multiple inversions that employ a suite of forward models each describing a distinct but plausible T$$*\atop{2}$$ –T 2 relationship. We hypothesize that forward models given poor T 2 estimates will produce poor data fits when using the complex-inversion, while forward models given reliable T 2 estimates will produce satisfactory data fits. By examining the data fits produced by the suite of plausible forward models, the likely T$$*\atop{2}$$ –T 2 can be constrained by identifying the range of T 2 estimates that produce reliable data fits. Synthetic and field results are presented to investigate the feasibility of the proposed technique.

Authors:
 [1];  [1]
  1. Aarhus Univ. (Denmark)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Vista Clara, Inc., Mukilteo, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1540600
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0004623
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Geophysical Journal International
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 213; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0956-540X
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; Geochemistry & Geophysics

Citation Formats

Grombacher, Denys, and Auken, Esben. Gaining insight into the $T\,_2^*$– T 2 relationship in surface NMR free-induction decay measurements. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1093/gji/ggy067.
Grombacher, Denys, & Auken, Esben. Gaining insight into the $T\,_2^*$– T 2 relationship in surface NMR free-induction decay measurements. United States. doi:10.1093/gji/ggy067.
Grombacher, Denys, and Auken, Esben. Fri . "Gaining insight into the $T\,_2^*$– T 2 relationship in surface NMR free-induction decay measurements". United States. doi:10.1093/gji/ggy067. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1540600.
@article{osti_1540600,
title = {Gaining insight into the $T\,_2^*$– T 2 relationship in surface NMR free-induction decay measurements},
author = {Grombacher, Denys and Auken, Esben},
abstractNote = {One of the primary shortcomings of the surface nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) freeinduction decay (FID) measurement is the uncertainty surrounding which mechanism controls the signal’s time dependence. Ideally, the FID-estimated relaxation time T$*\atop{2}$ that describes the signal’s decay carries an intimate link to the geometry of the pore space. In this limit the parameter T$*\atop{2}$ is closely linked to a related parameter T2, which is more closely linked to pore-geometry. If T$*\atop{2}$ T2 the FID can provide valuable insight into relative pore-size and can be used to make quantitative permeability estimates. However, given only FID measurements it is difficult to determine whether T$*\atop{2}$ is linked to pore geometry or whether it has been strongly influenced by background magnetic field inhomogeneity. If the link between an observed T$*\atop{2}$ and the underlying T2 could be further constrained the utility of the standard surface NMR FID measurement would be greatly improved. We hypothesize that an approach employing an updated surface NMR forward model that solves the full Bloch equations with appropriately weighted relaxation terms can be used to help constrain the T$*\atop{2}$ –T2 relationship. Weighting the relaxation terms requires estimating the poorly constrained parameters T2 and T1; to deal with this uncertainty we propose to conduct a parameter search involving multiple inversions that employ a suite of forward models each describing a distinct but plausible T$*\atop{2}$ –T2 relationship. We hypothesize that forward models given poor T2 estimates will produce poor data fits when using the complex-inversion, while forward models given reliable T2 estimates will produce satisfactory data fits. By examining the data fits produced by the suite of plausible forward models, the likely T$*\atop{2}$ –T2 can be constrained by identifying the range of T2 estimates that produce reliable data fits. Synthetic and field results are presented to investigate the feasibility of the proposed technique.},
doi = {10.1093/gji/ggy067},
journal = {Geophysical Journal International},
number = 2,
volume = 213,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {2}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 4 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The effect of pore size and magnetic susceptibility on the surface NMR relaxation parameter T2*
journal, October 2010


Multiecho scheme advances surface NMR for aquifer characterization: MULTIECHO SCHEME ADVANCES SURFACE NMR
journal, December 2013

  • Grunewald, Elliot; Walsh, David
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013GL057607

Numerically optimized modulations for adiabatic pulses in surface nuclear magnetic resonance
journal, December 2017


Accounting for relaxation during pulse effects for long pulses and fast relaxation times in surface nuclear magnetic resonance
journal, September 2017

  • Grombacher, Denys; Behroozmand, Ahmad A.; Auken, Esben
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 82, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1190/geo2016-0567.1

Study on complex inversion of magnetic resonance sounding signals
journal, February 2005


Inversion of surface NMR data
journal, January 1998

  • Legchenko, Anatoly V.; Shushakov, Oleg A.
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 63, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1190/1.1444329

A new direct non-invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia
journal, June 1991

  • Schirov, M.; Legchenko, A.; Creer, G.
  • Exploration Geophysics, Vol. 22, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1071/EG991333

The internal magnetic field distribution, and single exponential magnetic resonance free induction decay, in rocks
journal, August 2005

  • Chen, Quan; Marble, Andrew E.; Colpitts, Bruce G.
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 175, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.05.001

QT inversion — Comprehensive use of the complete surface NMR data set
journal, July 2010

  • Mueller-Petke, Mike; Yaramanci, Ugur
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 75, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1190/1.3471523

Estimating the longitudinal relaxation time T 1 in surface NMR
journal, March 2011

  • Walbrecker, Jan O.; Hertrich, Marian; Lehmann-Horn, Jochen A.
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 76, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1190/1.3549642

A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements
journal, May 2002


MRSmatlab — A software tool for processing, modeling, and inversion of magnetic resonance sounding data
journal, July 2016

  • Müller-Petke, Mike; Braun, Martina; Hertrich, Marian
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 81, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0461.1

Determination of pore size distribution in sedimentary rocks by proton nuclear magnetic resonance
journal, April 1992


Frequency cycling for compensation of undesired off-resonance effects in surface nuclear magnetic resonance
journal, July 2016

  • Grombacher, Denys; Müller-Petke, Mike; Knight, Rosemary
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 81, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1190/geo2015-0181.1

Imparting a phase during excitation for improved resolution in surface nuclear magnetic resonance
journal, November 2014

  • Grombacher, Denys; Walbrecker, Jan O.; Knight, Rosemary
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 79, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1190/geo2013-0452.1

Advancement and validation of surface nuclear magnetic resonance spin-echo measurements of T 2
journal, March 2014


Application of the magnetic resonance sounding method to the investigation of aquifers in the presence of magnetic materials
journal, November 2010

  • Legchenko, Anatoly; Vouillamoz, Jean-Michel; Roy, Jean
  • GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 75, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1190/1.3494596

Importance of classical diffusion in NMR studies of water in biological cells
journal, June 1979


A Three-Part Study of NMR Longitudinal Relaxation Properties of Water-Saturated Sandstones
journal, September 1988

  • Kenyon, W. E.; Day, P. I.; Straley, C.
  • SPE Formation Evaluation, Vol. 3, Issue 03
  • DOI: 10.2118/15643-PA

Magnetic Resonance Sounding Applied to Aquifer Characterization
journal, May 2004


Theory of FID NMR Signal Dephasing Induced by Mesoscopic Magnetic Field Inhomogeneities in Biological Systems
journal, July 2001

  • Sukstanskii, Alexander L.; Yablonskiy, Dmitriy A.
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Vol. 151, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2363

Theory of surface nuclear magnetic resonance with applications to geophysical imaging problems
journal, July 2000

  • Weichman, Peter B.; Lavely, Eugene M.; Ritzwoller, Michael H.
  • Physical Review E, Vol. 62, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1290