On choosing the resolution of normative models
Long time horizon normative models are frequently used for policy analysis, strategic planning, and system analysis. Choosing the granularity of the temporal or spatial resolution of such models is an important modeling decision, often having a first order impact on model results. This type of decision is frequently made by modeler judgment, specifically when the predictive power of alternative choices cannot be tested. In this paper, we show how the implicit tradeoffs modelers make in these formulation decisions, in particular in the tradeoff between the accuracy of representation enabled by the available data and model parsimony, may be addressed with established information theoretic ideas. The paper provides guidance for modelers making these tradeoffs or, in certain cases, enables explicit tests for assessing appropriate levels of resolution. Here, we focus on optimization based normative models in the discussion, and draw our examples from the energy and climate domain.
- Research Organization:
- Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC); USDOE
- Grant/Contract Number:
- SC0005171; SC0016162
- OSTI ID:
- 1530702
- Alternate ID(s):
- OSTI ID: 2325398
- Journal Information:
- European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 279, Issue 2; ISSN 0377-2217
- Publisher:
- ElsevierCopyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Web of Science
Similar Records
Energy Storage in Long-Term System Models: A Review of Considerations, Best Practices, and Research Needs
From consultation to deliberation? Tracing deliberative norms in EIA frameworks in Swedish roads planning