skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A suite of benchmark and challenge problems for enhanced geothermal systems

Abstract

A diverse suite of numerical simulators is currently being applied to predict or understand the performance of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). To build confidence and identify critical development needs for these analytical tools, the United States Department of Energy, Geothermal Technologies Office sponsored a Code Comparison Study (GTO-CCS), with participants from universities, industry, and national laboratories. A principal objective for the study was to create a community forum for improvement and verification of numerical simulators for EGS modeling. Teams participating in the study were those representing U.S. national laboratories, universities, and industries, and each team brought unique numerical simulation capabilities to bear on the problems. Two classes of problems were developed during the study, benchmark problems and challenge problems. The benchmark problems were structured to test the ability of the collection of numerical simulators to solve various combinations of coupled thermal, hydrologic, geomechanical, and geochemical processes. This class of problems was strictly defined in terms of properties, driving forces, initial conditions, and boundary conditions. The challenge problems were based on the enhanced geothermal systems research conducted at Fenton Hill, near Los Alamos, New Mexico, between 1974 and 1995. The problems involved two phases of research, stimulation, development, and circulation inmore » two separate reservoirs. The challenge problems had specific questions to be answered via numerical simulation in three topical areas: (1) reservoir creation/stimulation, (2) reactive and passive transport, and (3) thermal recovery. Whereas the benchmark class of problems were designed to test capabilities for modeling coupled processes under strictly specified conditions, the stated objective for the challenge class of problems was to demonstrate what new understanding of the Fenton Hill experiments could be realized via the application of modern numerical simulation tools by recognized expert practitioners. Lastly, we present the suite of benchmark and challenge problems developed for the GTO-CCS, providing problem descriptions and sample solutions.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States). Computational Geosciences
  3. McClure Geomechanics, Palo Alto, CA (United States)
  4. Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV (United States). Mining and Metallurgical Engineering
  5. Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States). Dept. of Energy and Mineral Engineering
  6. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Earth and Environmental Sciences
  7. HydroGeoLogic Inc., Las Vegas, NV (United States)
  8. Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States). Energy Systems and Technologies Division
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Geothermal Technologies Office (EE-4G)
OSTI Identifier:
1523571
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-770461
Journal ID: ISSN 2363-8419; 962051
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 4; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2363-8419
Publisher:
Springer
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY

Citation Formats

White, Mark, Fu, Pengcheng, McClure, Mark, Danko, George, Elsworth, Derek, Sonnenthal, Eric, Kelkar, Sharad, and Podgorney, Robert. A suite of benchmark and challenge problems for enhanced geothermal systems. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1007/s40948-017-0076-0.
White, Mark, Fu, Pengcheng, McClure, Mark, Danko, George, Elsworth, Derek, Sonnenthal, Eric, Kelkar, Sharad, & Podgorney, Robert. A suite of benchmark and challenge problems for enhanced geothermal systems. United States. doi:10.1007/s40948-017-0076-0.
White, Mark, Fu, Pengcheng, McClure, Mark, Danko, George, Elsworth, Derek, Sonnenthal, Eric, Kelkar, Sharad, and Podgorney, Robert. Mon . "A suite of benchmark and challenge problems for enhanced geothermal systems". United States. doi:10.1007/s40948-017-0076-0. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1523571.
@article{osti_1523571,
title = {A suite of benchmark and challenge problems for enhanced geothermal systems},
author = {White, Mark and Fu, Pengcheng and McClure, Mark and Danko, George and Elsworth, Derek and Sonnenthal, Eric and Kelkar, Sharad and Podgorney, Robert},
abstractNote = {A diverse suite of numerical simulators is currently being applied to predict or understand the performance of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). To build confidence and identify critical development needs for these analytical tools, the United States Department of Energy, Geothermal Technologies Office sponsored a Code Comparison Study (GTO-CCS), with participants from universities, industry, and national laboratories. A principal objective for the study was to create a community forum for improvement and verification of numerical simulators for EGS modeling. Teams participating in the study were those representing U.S. national laboratories, universities, and industries, and each team brought unique numerical simulation capabilities to bear on the problems. Two classes of problems were developed during the study, benchmark problems and challenge problems. The benchmark problems were structured to test the ability of the collection of numerical simulators to solve various combinations of coupled thermal, hydrologic, geomechanical, and geochemical processes. This class of problems was strictly defined in terms of properties, driving forces, initial conditions, and boundary conditions. The challenge problems were based on the enhanced geothermal systems research conducted at Fenton Hill, near Los Alamos, New Mexico, between 1974 and 1995. The problems involved two phases of research, stimulation, development, and circulation in two separate reservoirs. The challenge problems had specific questions to be answered via numerical simulation in three topical areas: (1) reservoir creation/stimulation, (2) reactive and passive transport, and (3) thermal recovery. Whereas the benchmark class of problems were designed to test capabilities for modeling coupled processes under strictly specified conditions, the stated objective for the challenge class of problems was to demonstrate what new understanding of the Fenton Hill experiments could be realized via the application of modern numerical simulation tools by recognized expert practitioners. Lastly, we present the suite of benchmark and challenge problems developed for the GTO-CCS, providing problem descriptions and sample solutions.},
doi = {10.1007/s40948-017-0076-0},
journal = {Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources},
number = 1,
volume = 4,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {11}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Energy extraction from fractured geothermal reservoirs in low-permeability crystalline rock
journal, January 1981

  • Murphy, Hugh D.; Tester, Jefferson W.; Grigsby, Charles O.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 86, Issue B8
  • DOI: 10.1029/JB086iB08p07145

Earthquakes Induced by the Stimulation of an Enhanced Geothermal System below Basel (Switzerland)
journal, September 2009


Simulation of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. State of the Art: Part 1 – Physical Mechanisms and Simulator Formulation
journal, March 2010

  • Lemonnier, P.; Bourbiaux, B.
  • Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole, Vol. 65, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2009066

The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California: Pre-stimulation Modeling and Interpretation of the Stimulation
journal, October 2013

  • Rutqvist, Jonny; Dobson, Patrick F.; Garcia, Julio
  • Mathematical Geosciences, Vol. 47, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11004-013-9493-y

Numerical Simulation of Water-Oil Flow in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs
journal, December 1976

  • Kazemi, H.; Merrill, L. S.; Porterfield, K. L.
  • Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 16, Issue 06
  • DOI: 10.2118/5719-PA

The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs
journal, September 1963

  • Warren, J. E.; Root, P. J.
  • Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 3, Issue 03
  • DOI: 10.2118/426-PA

Induced seismicity associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems
journal, June 2007


Coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical phenomena in saturated fractured porous rocks: Numerical approach
journal, November 1984

  • Noorishad, J.; Tsang, C. F.; Witherspoon, P. A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 89, Issue B12
  • DOI: 10.1029/JB089iB12p10365

The potential for large errors in the inferred minimum earth stress when using incomplete hydraulic fracturing results
journal, December 1989

  • Brown, D. W.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 26, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(89)91437-X

Numerical simulation of thermal-hydrologic-mechanical-chemical processes in deformable, fractured porous media
journal, July 2009

  • Taron, Joshua; Elsworth, Derek; Min, Ki-Bok
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 46, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.01.008

Detailed joint structure in a geothermal reservoir from studies of induced microearthquake clusters
journal, June 1997

  • Phillips, W. Scott; House, Leigh S.; Fehler, Michael C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 102, Issue B6
  • DOI: 10.1029/97jb00762

On the mechanical interaction between a fluid-filled fracture and the earth's surface
journal, March 1979


Joint structures determined by clustering microearthquakes using waveform amplitude ratios
journal, September 1996

  • Roff, A.; Phillips, W. S.; Brown, D. W.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 33, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(95)00077-1

A continuum model for coupled stress and fluid flow in discrete fracture networks
journal, January 2016

  • Gan, Quan; Elsworth, Derek
  • Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40948-015-0020-0

An investigation of stimulation mechanisms in Enhanced Geothermal Systems
journal, December 2014


Fundamentals of rock joint deformation
journal, December 1983

  • Bandis, S. C.; Lumsden, A. C.; Barton, N. R.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 20, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(83)90595-8

Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints
journal, June 1985

  • Barton, N.; Bandis, S.; Bakhtar, K.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 22, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(85)93227-9

Simulation of proppant transport with gravitational settling and fracture closure in a three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulator
journal, February 2016


An experimental study of particle migration in pipe flow of viscoelastic fluids
journal, November 1996


Numerical simulation of CO2 disposal by mineral trapping in deep aquifers
journal, June 2004


Thermohydrological conditions and silica redistribution near high-level nuclear wastes emplaced in saturated geological formations
journal, January 1988


On the patterns of wing cracks along an outcrop scale flaw: A numerical modeling approach using complementarity
journal, January 2008

  • Mutlu, O.; Pollard, D. D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue B6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JB005284

An embedded fracture modeling framework for simulation of hydraulic fracturing and shear stimulation
journal, November 2015

  • Norbeck, Jack H.; McClure, Mark W.; Lo, Jonathan W.
  • Computational Geosciences, Vol. 20, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10596-015-9543-2

Towards a methodology for rock mechanics modelling
journal, June 1988

  • Starfield, A. M.; Cundall, P. A.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 25, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(88)92292-9

A modeling approach for analysis of coupled multiphase fluid flow, heat transfer, and deformation in fractured porous rock
journal, June 2002

  • Rutqvist, J.; Wu, Y. -S.; Tsang, C. -F.
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 39, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00022-9

An overview of TOUGH-based geomechanics models
journal, November 2017


Enhanced Geothermal Systems: An Opportunity for Hydrogeology
journal, November 2009