skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Progress in disruption prevention for ITER

Abstract

Key plasma physics and real-time control elements needed for robustly stable operation of high fusion power discharges in ITER have been shown in recent research worldwide. Recent analysis has identified the current density profile as the main drive for disruptive instabilities in discharges simulating ITER's baseline scenario with high and low external torque. Ongoing development of model-based profile control and active control of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities is improving the stability of multiple scenarios. Significant advances have been made toward real-time physics-based prediction of instabilities, including path-oriented analysis, active sensing, and machine learning techniques for prediction that are beginning to go beyond simple disruption mitigation trigger applications. Active intervention adds to prevention of disruptions, including forced rotation of magnetic islands to prevent wall locking, and localized heating/current drive to shrink the islands. Stable discharge rampdowns have been achieved with the fastest ITER-like scaled current ramp rates, while maintaining an X-point configuration. Moreover, these elements are being integrated into stable operating scenarios and new event-handling systems for off-normal events in order to develop the physics basis and techniques for robust control in ITER.

Authors:
 [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [1];  [4]; ORCiD logo [1];  [5];  [3];  [6];  [1];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [1];  [4];  [10]; ORCiD logo [11]; ORCiD logo [12];  [11] more »;  [11]; ORCiD logo [13];  [12]; ORCiD logo [11]; ORCiD logo [5];  [3];  [9];  [14]; ORCiD logo [9];  [15];  [3];  [1]; ORCiD logo [11];  [14]; ORCiD logo [16] « less
  1. General Atomics, San Diego, CA (United States)
  2. Euratom-ENEA Association, Padova (Italy)
  3. Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)
  4. ITER Organization, St. Paul Lez Durance (France)
  5. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States). Plasma Science and Fusion Center
  6. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  7. National Fusion Research Inst., Daejeon (Republic of Korea)
  8. Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)
  9. Ecole Polytechnique Federale Lausanne (Switzlerland)
  10. Culham Centre for Fusion Energy (CCFE), Abingdon (United Kingdom)
  11. Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)
  12. Max Planck Inst. fur Plasmaphysik, Garching (Germany)
  13. Universita' degli Studi di Cagliari. Cagliari (Italy)
  14. Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA (United States)
  15. Inst. of Plasma Physics (IFP), Milan (Italy)
  16. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui (China). Hefei Inst. of Physical Sciences
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States); Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); General Atomics, San Diego, CA (United States); Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States); Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Fusion Energy Sciences (FES)
OSTI Identifier:
1508614
Grant/Contract Number:  
633053; AC02-09CH11466; AC52-07NA27344; FC02-04ER54698; FC02-99ER54512; FG02-04ER54761; FG02-99ER54524; FOA-0001498; SC0008520; SC0010492; SC0010720; SC0014264; SC0015878; SC0016372
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nuclear Fusion
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 59; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5515
Publisher:
IOP Science
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY

Citation Formats

Strait, E. J., Barr, Jayson L., Baruzzo, Matteo, Berkery, John, Buttery, Richard J., de Vries, Peter C., Eidietis, Nicholas W., Granetz, Robert, Hanson, Jeremy M., Holcomb, Chris T., Humphreys, Dave A., Kim, Jayhyun, Kolemen, Egemen, Kong, Mengdi, Lanctot, Matthew J., Lehnen, Michael, Lerche, Ernesto, Logan, Nikolas, Maraschek, Marc, Okabayashi, Michio, Park, Jong-Kyu, Pau, Alessandro, Pautasso, Gabriella, Poli, Francesca M., Rea, Cristina, Sabbagh, Steve A., Sauter, Olivier, Schuster, Eugenio, Sheikh, Umar Ahmed, Sozzi, Carlo, Turco, Francesca, Turnbull, Alan D., Wang, Zhirui, Wehner, Will P., and Zeng, Long. Progress in disruption prevention for ITER. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab15de.
Strait, E. J., Barr, Jayson L., Baruzzo, Matteo, Berkery, John, Buttery, Richard J., de Vries, Peter C., Eidietis, Nicholas W., Granetz, Robert, Hanson, Jeremy M., Holcomb, Chris T., Humphreys, Dave A., Kim, Jayhyun, Kolemen, Egemen, Kong, Mengdi, Lanctot, Matthew J., Lehnen, Michael, Lerche, Ernesto, Logan, Nikolas, Maraschek, Marc, Okabayashi, Michio, Park, Jong-Kyu, Pau, Alessandro, Pautasso, Gabriella, Poli, Francesca M., Rea, Cristina, Sabbagh, Steve A., Sauter, Olivier, Schuster, Eugenio, Sheikh, Umar Ahmed, Sozzi, Carlo, Turco, Francesca, Turnbull, Alan D., Wang, Zhirui, Wehner, Will P., & Zeng, Long. Progress in disruption prevention for ITER. United States. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab15de.
Strait, E. J., Barr, Jayson L., Baruzzo, Matteo, Berkery, John, Buttery, Richard J., de Vries, Peter C., Eidietis, Nicholas W., Granetz, Robert, Hanson, Jeremy M., Holcomb, Chris T., Humphreys, Dave A., Kim, Jayhyun, Kolemen, Egemen, Kong, Mengdi, Lanctot, Matthew J., Lehnen, Michael, Lerche, Ernesto, Logan, Nikolas, Maraschek, Marc, Okabayashi, Michio, Park, Jong-Kyu, Pau, Alessandro, Pautasso, Gabriella, Poli, Francesca M., Rea, Cristina, Sabbagh, Steve A., Sauter, Olivier, Schuster, Eugenio, Sheikh, Umar Ahmed, Sozzi, Carlo, Turco, Francesca, Turnbull, Alan D., Wang, Zhirui, Wehner, Will P., and Zeng, Long. Wed . "Progress in disruption prevention for ITER". United States. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab15de. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1508614.
@article{osti_1508614,
title = {Progress in disruption prevention for ITER},
author = {Strait, E. J. and Barr, Jayson L. and Baruzzo, Matteo and Berkery, John and Buttery, Richard J. and de Vries, Peter C. and Eidietis, Nicholas W. and Granetz, Robert and Hanson, Jeremy M. and Holcomb, Chris T. and Humphreys, Dave A. and Kim, Jayhyun and Kolemen, Egemen and Kong, Mengdi and Lanctot, Matthew J. and Lehnen, Michael and Lerche, Ernesto and Logan, Nikolas and Maraschek, Marc and Okabayashi, Michio and Park, Jong-Kyu and Pau, Alessandro and Pautasso, Gabriella and Poli, Francesca M. and Rea, Cristina and Sabbagh, Steve A. and Sauter, Olivier and Schuster, Eugenio and Sheikh, Umar Ahmed and Sozzi, Carlo and Turco, Francesca and Turnbull, Alan D. and Wang, Zhirui and Wehner, Will P. and Zeng, Long},
abstractNote = {Key plasma physics and real-time control elements needed for robustly stable operation of high fusion power discharges in ITER have been shown in recent research worldwide. Recent analysis has identified the current density profile as the main drive for disruptive instabilities in discharges simulating ITER's baseline scenario with high and low external torque. Ongoing development of model-based profile control and active control of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities is improving the stability of multiple scenarios. Significant advances have been made toward real-time physics-based prediction of instabilities, including path-oriented analysis, active sensing, and machine learning techniques for prediction that are beginning to go beyond simple disruption mitigation trigger applications. Active intervention adds to prevention of disruptions, including forced rotation of magnetic islands to prevent wall locking, and localized heating/current drive to shrink the islands. Stable discharge rampdowns have been achieved with the fastest ITER-like scaled current ramp rates, while maintaining an X-point configuration. Moreover, these elements are being integrated into stable operating scenarios and new event-handling systems for off-normal events in order to develop the physics basis and techniques for robust control in ITER.},
doi = {10.1088/1741-4326/ab15de},
journal = {Nuclear Fusion},
number = 11,
volume = 59,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {6}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 5 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Avoiding Tokamak Disruptions by Applying Static Magnetic Fields That Align Locked Modes with Stabilizing Wave-Driven Currents
journal, October 2015


Adaptive predictors based on probabilistic SVM for real time disruption mitigation on JET
journal, March 2018


Automatic disruption classification in JET with the ITER-like wall
journal, October 2015


A Riccati solution for the ideal MHD plasma response with applications to real-time stability control
journal, March 2018

  • Glasser, Alexander S.; Kolemen, Egemen; Glasser, A. H.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 25, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5007042

Statistical analysis of m / n   =  2/1 locked and quasi-stationary modes with rotating precursors at DIII-D
journal, November 2016


Scaling of the MHD perturbation amplitude required to trigger a disruption and predictions for ITER
journal, December 2015


Disruption avoidance by means of electron cyclotron waves
journal, November 2011


Experimental validation of a Lyapunov-based controller for the plasma safety factor and plasma pressure in the TCV tokamak
journal, March 2018


Plasma internal profile control using IDA-PBC: Application to TCV
journal, November 2017


The influence of an ITER-like wall on disruptions at JET
journal, May 2014

  • de Vries, P. C.; Baruzzo, M.; Hogeweij, G. M. D.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 21, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4872017

Simulation of profile evolution from ramp-up to ramp-down and optimization of tokamak plasma termination with the RAPTOR code
journal, October 2017

  • Teplukhina, A. A.; Sauter, O.; Felici, F.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 59, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/aa857e

Adaptive high learning rate probabilistic disruption predictors from scratch for the next generation of tokamaks
journal, October 2014


Sawtooth control in JET with ITER relevant low field side resonance ion cyclotron resonance heating and ITER-like wall
journal, November 2014


The causes of the disruptive tearing instabilities of the ITER Baseline Scenario in DIII-D
journal, September 2018


Experiments on actuator management and integrated control at ASDEX Upgrade
journal, November 2017


Preliminary exception handling analysis for the ITER plasma control system
journal, November 2017


Disruptions in ITER and strategies for their control and mitigation
journal, August 2015


Effect of thick blanket modules on neoclassical tearing mode locking in ITER
journal, November 2016


Path-oriented early reaction to approaching disruptions in ASDEX Upgrade and TCV in view of the future needs for ITER and DEMO
journal, November 2017

  • Maraschek, M.; Gude, A.; Igochine, V.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 60, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/aa8d05

Sawtooth pacing with on-axis ICRH modulation in JET-ILW
journal, February 2017


Overview of physics results from the conclusive operation of the National Spherical Torus Experiment
journal, September 2013


Development of an efficient real-time disruption predictor from scratch on JET and implications for ITER
journal, September 2013


Analysis of plasma termination in the JET hybrid scenario
journal, June 2018


Novel aspects of plasma control in ITER
journal, February 2015

  • Humphreys, D.; Ambrosino, G.; de Vries, P.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 22, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4907901

Power requirements for electron cyclotron current drive and ion cyclotron resonance heating for sawtooth control in ITER
journal, May 2013


A First Analysis of JET Plasma Profile-Based Indicators for Disruption Prediction and Avoidance
journal, July 2018


Pivotal issues on relativistic electrons in ITER
journal, January 2018


The development of safe high current operation in JET-ILW
journal, October 2015


Physics conditions for robust control of tearing modes in a rotating tokamak plasma
journal, November 2017

  • Lazzaro, E.; Borgogno, D.; Brunetti, D.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 60, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/aa8be7

Optimal current profile control for enhanced repeatability of L-mode and H-mode discharges in DIII-D
journal, November 2017


Survey of disruption causes at JET
journal, April 2011


Real time control developments at JET in preparation for deuterium-tritium operation
journal, November 2017


$\mathscr{H}_2$ optimal control techniques for resistive wall mode feedback in tokamaks
journal, February 2018


Implementing a finite-state off-normal and fault response system for disruption avoidance in tokamaks
journal, March 2018


A reduced resistive wall mode kinetic stability model for disruption forecasting
journal, May 2017

  • Berkery, J. W.; Sabbagh, S. A.; Bell, R. E.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 24, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4977464

An advanced disruption predictor for JET tested in a simulated real-time environment
journal, January 2010


Interpretation of machine-learning-based disruption models for plasma control
journal, June 2017


The role of MHD in causing impurity peaking in JET hybrid plasmas
journal, April 2016


Impact of toroidal and poloidal mode spectra on the control of non-axisymmetric fields in tokamaks
journal, May 2017

  • Lanctot, M. J.; Park, J. -K.; Piovesan, P.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 24, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4982688

NTM stabilization by alternating O-point EC current drive using a high-power diplexer
journal, August 2016


The ITER disruption mitigation trigger: developing its preliminary design
journal, January 2018


Overview on plasma operation with a full tungsten wall in ASDEX Upgrade
journal, July 2013


Disruption avoidance through the prevention of NTM destabilization in TCV
journal, August 2018


The influence of rotation on the βN threshold for the 2∕1 neoclassical tearing mode in DIII-D
journal, May 2008

  • Buttery, R. J.; La Haye, R. J.; Gohil, P.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 15, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.2894215

Stability of DIII-D high-performance, negative central shear discharges
journal, March 2017


Tungsten transport in JET H-mode plasmas in hybrid scenario, experimental observations and modelling
journal, July 2014


A robust solution for the resistive MHD toroidal Δ′ matrix in near real-time
journal, August 2018

  • Glasser, Alexander S.; Kolemen, Egemen
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 25, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5029477

Measurement of the Resistive-Wall-Mode Stability in a Rotating Plasma Using Active MHD Spectroscopy
journal, September 2004


Current relaxation time scales in toroidal plasmas
journal, February 1989

  • Mikkelsen, D. R.
  • Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, Vol. 1, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.859146

Predicting disruptive instabilities in controlled fusion plasmas through deep learning
journal, April 2019


Requirements for Triggering the ITER Disruption Mitigation System
journal, April 2016

  • de Vries, P. C.; Pautasso, G.; Humphreys, D.
  • Fusion Science and Technology, Vol. 69, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.13182/FST15-176

Profile control simulations and experiments on TCV: a controller test environment and results using a model-based predictive controller
journal, October 2017


Viability Assessment of a Cross-Tokamak AUG-JET Disruption Predictor
journal, February 2018


Multi-machine analysis of termination scenarios with comparison to simulations of controlled shutdown of ITER discharges
journal, December 2017


Early evolution of electron cyclotron driven current during suppression of tearing modes in a circular tokamak
journal, October 2016

  • Pratt, J.; Huijsmans, G. T. A.; Westerhof, E.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 23, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4964785

A cross-tokamak neural network disruption predictor for the JET and ASDEX Upgrade tokamaks
journal, April 2005


Implementation of the forced landing scheme under off-normal events in KSTAR
journal, March 2018


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference: summary of sessions EX/C, EX/S and PPC
    journal, January 2020