skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The observational constraints on the flat $$\phi $$CDM models

Abstract

Most dark energy models have the ΛCDM as their limit, and if future observations constrain our universe to be close to ΛCDM Bayesian arguments about the evidence and the fine-tuning will have to be employed to discriminate between the models. Assuming a baseline ΛCDM model we investigate a number of quintessence and phantom dark energy models, and we study how they would perform when compared to observational data, such as the expansion rate, the angular distance, and the growth rate measurements, from the upcoming Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey. We sample posterior likelihood surfaces of these dark energy models with Monte Carlo Markov Chains while using central values consistent with the Planck ΛCDM universe and covariance matrices estimated with Fisher information matrix techniques. We find that for this setup the Bayes factor provides a substantial evidence in favor of the ΛCDM model over most of the alternatives. We also investigated how well the CPL parametrization approximates various scalar field dark energy models, and identified the location for each dark energy model in the CPL parameter space.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. Ilia State University, Tbilisi, GA (United States)
  2. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA (United States)
  3. Ilia State University, Tbilisi, GA (United States); Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS (United States)
  4. Ilia State University, Tbilisi, GA (United States); Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); Laurentian University, Sudbury (Canada)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1506649
Grant/Contract Number:  
FG03-99ER41093
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
European Physical Journal. C, Particles and Fields
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 78; Journal Issue: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 1434-6044
Publisher:
Springer
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS; 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS

Citation Formats

Avsajanishvili, Olga, Huang, Yiwen, Samushia, Lado, and Kahniashvili, Tina. The observational constraints on the flat $\phi $CDM models. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6233-y.
Avsajanishvili, Olga, Huang, Yiwen, Samushia, Lado, & Kahniashvili, Tina. The observational constraints on the flat $\phi $CDM models. United States. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6233-y.
Avsajanishvili, Olga, Huang, Yiwen, Samushia, Lado, and Kahniashvili, Tina. Wed . "The observational constraints on the flat $\phi $CDM models". United States. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6233-y. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1506649.
@article{osti_1506649,
title = {The observational constraints on the flat $\phi $CDM models},
author = {Avsajanishvili, Olga and Huang, Yiwen and Samushia, Lado and Kahniashvili, Tina},
abstractNote = {Most dark energy models have the ΛCDM as their limit, and if future observations constrain our universe to be close to ΛCDM Bayesian arguments about the evidence and the fine-tuning will have to be employed to discriminate between the models. Assuming a baseline ΛCDM model we investigate a number of quintessence and phantom dark energy models, and we study how they would perform when compared to observational data, such as the expansion rate, the angular distance, and the growth rate measurements, from the upcoming Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey. We sample posterior likelihood surfaces of these dark energy models with Monte Carlo Markov Chains while using central values consistent with the Planck ΛCDM universe and covariance matrices estimated with Fisher information matrix techniques. We find that for this setup the Bayes factor provides a substantial evidence in favor of the ΛCDM model over most of the alternatives. We also investigated how well the CPL parametrization approximates various scalar field dark energy models, and identified the location for each dark energy model in the CPL parameter space.},
doi = {10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6233-y},
journal = {European Physical Journal. C, Particles and Fields},
number = 9,
volume = 78,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {9}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Estimating the Dimension of a Model
journal, March 1978


Accelerating cosmologies tested by distance measures
journal, May 2007


Quintessence arising from exponential potentials
journal, May 2000


The Cosmological Constant
journal, February 2001


Dynamics of dark Energy
journal, November 2006

  • Copeland, Edmund J.; Sami, M.; Tsujikawa, Shinji
  • International Journal of Modern Physics D, Vol. 15, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1142/S021827180600942X

Bayesian evidences for dark energy models in light of current observational data
journal, February 2018


New cosmological tracker solution for quintessence
journal, September 2000


Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
journal, September 2013

  • Amendola, Luca; Appleby, Stephen; Bacon, David
  • Living Reviews in Relativity, Vol. 16, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.12942/lrr-2013-6

Parameterized beyond-Einstein growth
journal, December 2007


The viability of phantom dark energy: A review
journal, September 2017


Cosmic growth history and expansion history
journal, August 2005


Cosmology with Ultralight Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons
journal, September 1995

  • Frieman, Joshua A.; Hill, Christopher T.; Stebbins, Albert
  • Physical Review Letters, Vol. 75, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2077

Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
journal, October 2014


DESI and other Dark Energy experiments in the era of neutrino mass measurements
journal, May 2014

  • Font-Ribera, Andreu; McDonald, Patrick; Mostek, Nick
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 05
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/023

Observational probes of cosmic acceleration
journal, September 2013


Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant
journal, February 1999


Planck 2015 results : XIII. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2016


Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
journal, September 1998

  • Riess, Adam G.; Filippenko, Alexei V.; Challis, Peter
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 116, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1086/300499

Cluster Abundance Constraints for Cosmological Models with a Time‐varying, Spatially Inhomogeneous Energy Component with Negative Pressure
journal, December 1998

  • Wang, Limin; Steinhardt, Paul J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 508, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/306436

The cosmological constant and dark energy
journal, April 2003


Quintessence and supergravity
journal, November 1999


No Evidence for Extensions to the Standard Cosmological Model
journal, September 2017


The dynamics of quintessence, the quintessence of dynamics
journal, December 2007


Phantom dark energy models with a nearly flat potential
journal, September 2008


Limits of Quintessence
journal, September 2005


Quintessence versus phantom dark energy: the arbitrating power of current and future observations
journal, June 2013

  • Novosyadlyj, B.; Sergijenko, O.; Durrer, R.
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2013, Issue 06
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/06/042

Dark energy from a phantom field near a local potential minimum
journal, June 2009


Growth rate in the dynamical dark energy models
journal, November 2014


Cosmological tracking solutions
journal, May 1999


Power-law inflation
journal, September 1985


Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
journal, September 2008


New cosmological model of quintessence and dark matter
journal, October 2000


SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
journal, January 2011

  • Komatsu, E.; Smith, K. M.; Dunkley, J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 192, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18

Theoretical Models of dark Energy
journal, November 2012


Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask)
journal, July 2012


Narrowing down the possible explanations of cosmic acceleration with geometric probes
journal, July 2017

  • Dhawan, Suhail; Goobar, Ariel; Mörtsell, Edvard
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 07
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/07/040

Accelerating Universes with Scaling dark Matter
journal, April 2001

  • Chevallier, Michel; Polarski, David
  • International Journal of Modern Physics D, Vol. 10, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.1142/S0218271801000822

Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuum
journal, July 2003


Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations
journal, August 2010


New tracker models of dark energy
journal, August 2018

  • Bag, Satadru; Mishra, Swagat S.; Sahni, Varun
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 08
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/009

A new look at the statistical model identification
journal, December 1974


Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
journal, June 1988


A parametrization for the growth index of linear matter perturbations
journal, June 2009


Cosmology with a time-variable cosmological 'constant'
journal, February 1988

  • Peebles, P. J. E.; Ratra, Bharat
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 325
  • DOI: 10.1086/185100

Reconstructing the dark energy potential
journal, January 2018

  • Sangwan, Archana; Mukherjee, Ankan; Jassal, H. K.
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 01
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/018

Model-independent cosmological constraints from growth and expansion
journal, February 2018

  • L'Huillier, Benjamin; Shafieloo, Arman; Kim, Hyungjin
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty398

The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration
journal, November 2009


Cosmology with a primordial scaling field
journal, June 1998


Phenomenology of a Realistic Accelerating Universe Using Only Planck-Scale Physics
journal, March 2000


Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
journal, June 1999

  • Perlmutter, S.; Aldering, G.; Goldhaber, G.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 517, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/307221

Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
journal, March 2003


Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples
journal, August 2014


The cosmological constant problem and quintessence
journal, June 2002


When is the growth index constant?
journal, December 2016

  • Polarski, David; Starobinsky, Alexei A.; Giacomini, Hector
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2016, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/037