skip to main content

DOE PAGESDOE PAGES

Title: QP Statistics Spotlight: Randomization – At Random: The rationale behind randomization, and options when up against constraints

While randomization may seem like a small part of the overall plan for implementing a designed experiment, it is important to protect against systematic bias and to justify the interpretation of the analysis results.
Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-17-31288
Journal ID: ISSN 0033-524X
Grant/Contract Number:
89233218CNA000001
Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Quality Progress
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 51; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 0033-524X
Publisher:
American Society for Quality Control
Research Org:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security; USDOE
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING
OSTI Identifier:
1505973

Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela. QP Statistics Spotlight: Randomization – At Random: The rationale behind randomization, and options when up against constraints. United States: N. p., Web.
Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela. QP Statistics Spotlight: Randomization – At Random: The rationale behind randomization, and options when up against constraints. United States.
Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela. 2018. "QP Statistics Spotlight: Randomization – At Random: The rationale behind randomization, and options when up against constraints". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1505973.
@article{osti_1505973,
title = {QP Statistics Spotlight: Randomization – At Random: The rationale behind randomization, and options when up against constraints},
author = {Anderson-Cook, Christine Michaela},
abstractNote = {While randomization may seem like a small part of the overall plan for implementing a designed experiment, it is important to protect against systematic bias and to justify the interpretation of the analysis results.},
doi = {},
journal = {Quality Progress},
number = 3,
volume = 51,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {3}
}