DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Understanding the charge transport mechanisms through ultrathin SiOx layers in passivated contacts for high-efficiency silicon solar cells

Journal Article · · Applied Physics Letters
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5081832 · OSTI ID:1502791
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [3];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [4];  [2]
  1. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (United States); National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
  2. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
  3. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)
  4. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (United States)

We report on the microscopic structure of the SiOx layer and the transport mechanism in polycrystalline Si (poly-Si) passivated contacts, which enable high-efficiency crystalline Si (c-Si) solar cells. Using electron beam induced current (EBIC) measurements, we accurately map nanoscale conduction-enabling pinholes in 2.2 nm thick SiOx layers in a poly-Si/SiOx/c-Si stack. These conduction enabling pinholes appear as bright spots in EBIC maps due to carrier transport and collection limitations introduced by the insulating 2.2 nm SiOx layer. Performing high-resolution transmission electron microscopy at a bright spot identified with EBIC reveals that conduction pinholes in SiOx can be regions of thin tunneling SiOx rather than a geometric pinhole. Additionally, selectively etching the underlying poly-Si layer in contacts with 1.5 and 2.2 nm thick SiOx layers using tetramethylammonium hydroxide results in pinhole-like etch features in both contacts. However, EBIC measurements for a contact with a thinner, 1.5 nm SiOx layer do not reveal pinholes, which is consistent with uniform tunneling transport through the 1.5 nm SiOx layer. Finally, we theoretically show that reducing the metal to the c-Si contact size from microns, like in the p-type passivated emitter rear contact, to tens of nanometers, like in poly-Si contacts, allows lowering of the unpassivated contact area by several orders of magnitude, thus resulting in excellent passivation, as has been demonstrated for these contacts.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Solar Energy Technologies Office (EE-4S)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1502791
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA--5900-72682
Journal Information:
Applied Physics Letters, Journal Name: Applied Physics Letters Journal Issue: 8 Vol. 114; ISSN 0003-6951
Publisher:
American Institute of Physics (AIP)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (25)

Surface passivation of crystalline silicon solar cells: a review journal January 2000
Solar cell efficiency tables (version 51)
  • Green, Martin A.; Hishikawa, Yoshihiro; Dunlop, Ewan D.
  • Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 26, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2978
journal December 2017
Dielectric surface passivation for silicon solar cells: A review journal June 2017
Electron beam induced current studies of MS and MIS devices on CdS journal January 1980
Tunnel oxide passivated contacts as an alternative to partial rear contacts journal December 2014
IBC c-Si solar cells based on ion-implanted poly-silicon passivating contacts journal December 2016
n-Type Si solar cells with passivating electron contact: Identifying sources for efficiency limitations by wafer thickness and resistivity variation journal December 2017
Charge carrier transport mechanisms of passivating contacts studied by temperature-dependent J-V measurements journal May 2018
Effect of silicon oxide thickness on polysilicon based passivated contacts for high-efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells journal October 2018
Temperature-dependent contact resistance of carrier selective Poly-Si on oxide junctions journal October 2018
Silicon-Rich Silicon Carbide Hole-Selective Rear Contacts for Crystalline-Silicon-Based Solar Cells journal December 2016
Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26% journal March 2017
Ultrathin (<4 nm) SiO2 and Si–O–N gate dielectric layers for silicon microelectronics: Understanding the processing, structure, and physical and electrical limits journal September 2001
Structure and morphology of polycrystalline silicon‐single crystal silicon interfaces journal April 1985
Stress‐related problems in silicon technology journal September 1991
Direct observation of a scaling effect on effective minority carrier lifetimes journal October 1994
Pinhole density and contact resistivity of carrier selective junctions with polycrystalline silicon on oxide journal June 2017
Hydrogen passivation of poly-Si/SiO x contacts for Si solar cells using Al 2 O 3 studied with deuterium journal May 2018
A 720 mV open circuit voltage SiO x : c ‐Si:SiO x double heterostructure solar cell journal December 1985
An accurate calculation of spreading resistance journal April 2006
Bias temperature instability in scaled p/sup +/ polysilicon gate p-MOSFET's journal May 1999
A Roadmap Toward 24% Efficient PERC Solar Cells in Industrial Mass Production journal November 2017
High-gain bipolar transistors with polysilicon tunnel junction emitter contacts journal July 1985
Polycrystalline silicon passivated tunneling contacts for high efficiency silicon solar cells journal March 2016
Interdigitated back contact solar cells with polycrystalline silicon on oxide passivating contacts for both polarities journal July 2017

Cited By (4)

Separating the two polarities of the POLO contacts of an 26.1%-efficient IBC solar cell other January 2020
Work Function Tunability of Graphene with Thermally Evaporated Rhenium Heptoxide for Transparent Electrode Applications journal December 2019
Separating the two polarities of the POLO contacts of an 26.1%-efficient IBC solar cell journal January 2020
Separating the two polarities of the POLO contacts of an 26.1%-efficient IBC solar cell other January 2020