DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Evaluating the simulated mean soil carbon transit times by Earth system models using observations

Abstract

One known bias in current Earth system models (ESMs) is the underestimation of global mean soil carbon (C) transit time (τsoil), which quantifies the age of the C atoms at the time they leave the soil. However, it remains unclear where such underestimations are located globally. Here, we constructed a global database of measured τsoil across 187 sites to evaluate results from 12 ESMs. The observations showed that the estimated τsoil was dramatically shorter from the soil incubation studies in the laboratory environment (median = 4 years; interquartile range = 1 to 25 years) than that derived from field in situ measurements (31; 5 to 84 years) with shifts in stable isotopic C(13C) or the stock-over-flux approach. In comparison with the field observations, the multi-model ensemble simulated a shorter median (19 years) anda smaller spatial variation (6 to 29 years) of τsoil across the same site locations. We then found a significant and negative linear correlation between the in situ measured τsoil and mean annual air temperature. The underestimations of modeled τsoil are mainly located in cold and dry biomes, especially tundra and desert.Furthermore, we showed that one ESM (i.e., CESM) has improved its τsoil estimate by incorporation of the soil vertical profile. These findingsmore » indicate that the spatial variation of τsoil is a useful benchmark for ESMs, and we recommend more observations and modeling efforts on soil C dynamics in regions limited by temperature and moisture.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [6];  [7];  [8]
  1. East China Normal University, Shanghai (China)
  2. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (France)
  3. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States)
  4. Nanjing Forestry University (China)
  5. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  6. CSIRO Ocean and Atmosphere, Victoria (Australia)
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan (China)
  8. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States); Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1502524
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biogeosciences (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Biogeosciences (Online); Journal Volume: 16; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 1726-4189
Publisher:
European Geosciences Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Wang, Jing, Xia, Jianyang, Zhou, Xuhui, Huang, Kun, Zhou, Jian, Huang, Yuanyuan, Jiang, Lifen, Xu, Xia, Liang, Junyi, Wang, Ying-Ping, Cheng, Xiaoli, and Luo, Yiqi. Evaluating the simulated mean soil carbon transit times by Earth system models using observations. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.5194/bg-16-917-2019.
Wang, Jing, Xia, Jianyang, Zhou, Xuhui, Huang, Kun, Zhou, Jian, Huang, Yuanyuan, Jiang, Lifen, Xu, Xia, Liang, Junyi, Wang, Ying-Ping, Cheng, Xiaoli, & Luo, Yiqi. Evaluating the simulated mean soil carbon transit times by Earth system models using observations. United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-917-2019
Wang, Jing, Xia, Jianyang, Zhou, Xuhui, Huang, Kun, Zhou, Jian, Huang, Yuanyuan, Jiang, Lifen, Xu, Xia, Liang, Junyi, Wang, Ying-Ping, Cheng, Xiaoli, and Luo, Yiqi. Wed . "Evaluating the simulated mean soil carbon transit times by Earth system models using observations". United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-917-2019. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1502524.
@article{osti_1502524,
title = {Evaluating the simulated mean soil carbon transit times by Earth system models using observations},
author = {Wang, Jing and Xia, Jianyang and Zhou, Xuhui and Huang, Kun and Zhou, Jian and Huang, Yuanyuan and Jiang, Lifen and Xu, Xia and Liang, Junyi and Wang, Ying-Ping and Cheng, Xiaoli and Luo, Yiqi},
abstractNote = {One known bias in current Earth system models (ESMs) is the underestimation of global mean soil carbon (C) transit time (τsoil), which quantifies the age of the C atoms at the time they leave the soil. However, it remains unclear where such underestimations are located globally. Here, we constructed a global database of measured τsoil across 187 sites to evaluate results from 12 ESMs. The observations showed that the estimated τsoil was dramatically shorter from the soil incubation studies in the laboratory environment (median = 4 years; interquartile range = 1 to 25 years) than that derived from field in situ measurements (31; 5 to 84 years) with shifts in stable isotopic C(13C) or the stock-over-flux approach. In comparison with the field observations, the multi-model ensemble simulated a shorter median (19 years) anda smaller spatial variation (6 to 29 years) of τsoil across the same site locations. We then found a significant and negative linear correlation between the in situ measured τsoil and mean annual air temperature. The underestimations of modeled τsoil are mainly located in cold and dry biomes, especially tundra and desert.Furthermore, we showed that one ESM (i.e., CESM) has improved its τsoil estimate by incorporation of the soil vertical profile. These findings indicate that the spatial variation of τsoil is a useful benchmark for ESMs, and we recommend more observations and modeling efforts on soil C dynamics in regions limited by temperature and moisture.},
doi = {10.5194/bg-16-917-2019},
journal = {Biogeosciences (Online)},
number = 4,
volume = 16,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Feb 27 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Wed Feb 27 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 5 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Figure 1 Figure 1: Spatial distributions of observational sites for estimates of SOC transit time (τsoil, year). (a) The site locations of measurements with different approaches. (b) Probability density functions of τsoil measured with different approaches. Note that the left axis is for the 13C and stock-over-flux approaches, and the right axismore » is for laboratory incubation studies.« less

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Sustainability of terrestrial carbon sequestration: A case study in Duke Forest with inversion approach: SUSTAINABILITY OF TERRESTRIAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION
journal, March 2003

  • Luo, Yiqi; White, Luther W.; Canadell, Josep G.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 17, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2002GB001923

The muddle of ages, turnover, transit, and residence times in the carbon cycle
journal, November 2016

  • Sierra, Carlos A.; Müller, Markus; Metzler, Holger
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 23, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13556

Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes
journal, July 2013

  • Wieder, William R.; Bonan, Gordon B.; Allison, Steven D.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1951

Comparison of dryland climate change in observations and CMIP5 simulations
journal, September 2015

  • Ji, Mingxia; Huang, Jianping; Xie, Yongkun
  • Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 32, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00376-015-4267-8

Rapid Exchange Between Soil Carbon and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Driven by Temperature Change
journal, April 1996


Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback
journal, April 2015

  • Schuur, E. A. G.; McGuire, A. D.; Schädel, C.
  • Nature, Vol. 520, Issue 7546
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature14338

A general mathematical framework for representing soil organic matter dynamics
journal, November 2015

  • Sierra, Carlos A.; Müller, Markus
  • Ecological Monographs, Vol. 85, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1890/15-0361.1

C4MIP – The Coupled Climate–Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project: experimental protocol for CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Jones, Chris D.; Arora, Vivek; Friedlingstein, Pierre
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2853-2016

Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models: SOIL CARBON MODELING
journal, January 2016

  • Luo, Yiqi; Ahlström, Anders; Allison, Steven D.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 30, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GB005239

Natural 13C abundance as a tracer for studies of soil organic matter dynamics
journal, January 1987


Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations
journal, January 2013

  • Todd-Brown, K. E. O.; Randerson, J. T.; Post, W. M.
  • Biogeosciences, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/bg-10-1717-2013

Mean residence time of O horizon carbon along a climatic gradient in Scandinavia estimated by 14C measurements of archived soils
journal, July 2010


Linear Autonomous Compartmental Models as Continuous-Time Markov Chains: Transit-Time and Age Distributions
journal, July 2017


MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets
journal, January 2010

  • Friedl, Mark A.; Sulla-Menashe, Damien; Tan, Bin
  • Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 114, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016

Nitrogen cycling and feedbacks in a global dynamic land model: MODELING THE LAND NITROGEN CYCLE
journal, January 2010

  • Gerber, Stefan; Hedin, Lars O.; Oppenheimer, Michael
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 24, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008GB003336

Matrix approach to land carbon cycle modeling: A case study with the Community Land Model
journal, November 2017

  • Huang, Yuanyuan; Lu, Xingjie; Shi, Zheng
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 24, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13948

Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C 4 MIP Model Intercomparison
journal, July 2006

  • Friedlingstein, P.; Cox, P.; Betts, R.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3800.1

Soil carbon saturation: Evaluation and corroboration by long-term incubations
journal, July 2008


Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization
journal, December 2015

  • Kolby Smith, W.; Reed, Sasha C.; Cleveland, Cory C.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2879

Application of eddy covariance measurements to the temperature dependence of soil organic matter mean residence time: SOIL ORGANIC CARBON TURNOVER
journal, June 2003

  • Sanderman, Jonathan; Amundson, Ronald G.; Baldocchi, Dennis D.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 17, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2001GB001833

How long do elements cycle in terrestrial ecosystems?
journal, May 2018


Terrestrial Carbon Cycle: Climate Relations in Eight CMIP5 Earth System Models
journal, November 2013


Transit-time and age distributions for nonlinear time-dependent compartmental systems
journal, January 2018

  • Metzler, Holger; Müller, Markus; Sierra, Carlos A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1705296115

The effect of vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry and alternate soil C and N models on C dynamics of CLM4
journal, January 2013


Spatial representation of organic carbon and active-layer thickness of high latitude soils in CMIP5 earth system models
journal, August 2017


Radiocarbon constraints imply reduced carbon uptake by soils during the 21st century
journal, September 2016


Higher climatological temperature sensitivity of soil carbon in cold than warm climates
journal, October 2017

  • Koven, Charles D.; Hugelius, Gustaf; Lawrence, David M.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3421

Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology
journal, April 2010

  • Allison, Steven D.; Wallenstein, Matthew D.; Bradford, Mark A.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 3, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo846

Kernel Quantile Estimators
journal, June 1990


Traceable components of terrestrial carbon storage capacity in biogeochemical models
journal, March 2013

  • Xia, Jianyang; Luo, Yiqi; Wang, Ying-Ping
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 19, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12172

The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink
journal, May 2015


Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems
journal, September 2014

  • Carvalhais, Nuno; Forkel, Matthias; Khomik, Myroslava
  • Nature, Vol. 514, Issue 7521
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13731

Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle
journal, May 2014

  • Poulter, Benjamin; Frank, David; Ciais, Philippe
  • Nature, Vol. 509, Issue 7502
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13376

Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
journal, October 2011

  • Schmidt, Michael W. I.; Torn, Margaret S.; Abiven, Samuel
  • Nature, Vol. 478, Issue 7367
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature10386

The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times
journal, January 2016

  • Bloom, A. Anthony; Exbrayat, Jean-François; van der Velde, Ivar R.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1515160113

Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change
journal, July 2016

  • Bradford, Mark A.; Wieder, William R.; Bonan, Gordon B.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3071

Representing and Understanding the Carbon Cycle Using the Theory of Compartmental Dynamical Systems
journal, August 2018

  • Sierra, Carlos A.; Ceballos-Núñez, Verónika; Metzler, Holger
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001360

A note on the concepts of age distribution and transit time in natural reservoirs
journal, February 1973


Ecosystem carbon transit versus turnover times in response to climate warming and rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration
journal, January 2018


Methodological uncertainty in estimating carbon turnover times of soil fractions
journal, September 2016


Methods for estimating temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter based on incubation data: A comparative evaluation
journal, January 2015


Soil carbon dynamics following land-use change varied with temperature and precipitation gradients: evidence from stable isotopes
journal, April 2015

  • Zhang, Kerong; Dang, Haishan; Zhang, Quanfa
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12886

Transit times and mean ages for nonautonomous and autonomous compartmental systems
journal, April 2016

  • Rasmussen, Martin; Hastings, Alan; Smith, Matthew J.
  • Journal of Mathematical Biology, Vol. 73, Issue 6-7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00285-016-0990-8

Linear Analysis of soil Decomposition: Insights from the Century Model
journal, May 1998


A note on the concepts of age distribution and transit time in natural reservoirs
journal, January 1973


Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
text, January 2011

  • Schmidt, M. W. I.; Torn, M. S.; Abiven, S.
  • Nature Publishing Group
  • DOI: 10.5167/uzh-51257

Transit times and mean ages for nonautonomous and autonomous compartmental systems
preprint, January 2016


Terrestrial ecosystem model performance in simulating productivity and its vulnerability to climate change in the northern permafrost region: Modeled Productivity in Permafrost Regions
journal, February 2017

  • Xia, Jianyang; McGuire, A. David; Lawrence, David
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 122, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016jg003384

Transit times and mean ages for nonautonomous and autonomous compartmental systems
journal, April 2016

  • Rasmussen, Martin; Hastings, Alan; Smith, Matthew J.
  • Journal of Mathematical Biology, Vol. 73, Issue 6-7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00285-016-0990-8

Mean residence time of O horizon carbon along a climatic gradient in Scandinavia estimated by 14C measurements of archived soils
journal, July 2010


Natural 13C abundance as a tracer for studies of soil organic matter dynamics
journal, January 1987


Spatial representation of organic carbon and active-layer thickness of high latitude soils in CMIP5 earth system models
journal, August 2017


Comparison of carbon dynamics in tropical and temperate soils using radiocarbon measurements
journal, June 1993

  • Trumbore, Susan E.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/93gb00468

Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle
journal, May 2014

  • Poulter, Benjamin; Frank, David; Ciais, Philippe
  • Nature, Vol. 509, Issue 7502
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13376

Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems
journal, September 2014

  • Carvalhais, Nuno; Forkel, Matthias; Khomik, Myroslava
  • Nature, Vol. 514, Issue 7521
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13731

Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback
journal, April 2015

  • Schuur, E. A. G.; McGuire, A. D.; Schädel, C.
  • Nature, Vol. 520, Issue 7546
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature14338

Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change
journal, July 2016

  • Bradford, Mark A.; Wieder, William R.; Bonan, Gordon B.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3071

The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times
journal, January 2016

  • Bloom, A. Anthony; Exbrayat, Jean-François; van der Velde, Ivar R.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1515160113

Rapid Exchange Between Soil Carbon and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Driven by Temperature Change
journal, April 1996


Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models
text, January 2016

  • Luo, Yiqi; Ahlstrom, Anders; Allison, Steven D.
  • AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
  • DOI: 10.35099/aurora-99

Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.