skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments

Abstract

The benefits nature provides to people, called ecosystem services, are increasingly recognized and accounted for in assessments of infrastructure development, agricultural management, conservation prioritization, and sustainable sourcing. These assessments are often limited by data, however, a gap with tremendous potential to be filled through Earth observations (EO), which produce a variety of data across spatial and temporal extents and resolutions. Despite widespread recognition of this potential, in practice few ecosystem service studies use EO. Here, we identify challenges and opportunities to using EO in ecosystem service modeling and assessment. Some challenges are technical, related to data awareness, processing, and access. These challenges require systematic investment in model platforms and data management. Other challenges are more conceptual but still systemic; they are byproducts of the structure of existing ecosystem service models and addressing them requires scientific investment in solutions and tools applicable to a wide range of models and approaches. We also highlight new ways in which EO can be leveraged for ecosystem service assessments, identifying promising new areas of research. More widespread use of EO for ecosystem service assessment will only be achieved if all of these types of challenges are addressed. Furthermore, this will require non-traditional funding and partneringmore » opportunities from private and public agencies to promote data exploration, sharing, and archiving. Investing in this integration will be reflected in better and more accurate ecosystem service assessments worldwide.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [2];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [3];  [11];  [12];  [13];  [14];  [15];  [16];  [17] more »; ORCiD logo [18];  [19]; ORCiD logo [20]; ORCiD logo [21];  [3];  [22];  [23] « less
  1. Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN (United States)
  2. Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
  3. Univ. of Vermont, Burlington, VT (United States)
  4. Columbia Univ., Palisades, NY (United States)
  5. Univ. of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA (United States). Scripps Inst. of Oceanography
  6. The George Washington Univ., Washington, DC (United States)
  7. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO (United States)
  8. The Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA (United States)
  9. UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig (Germany)
  10. Univ. of Minnesota, Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN (United States)
  11. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
  12. Stanford Univ. Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford, CA (United States)
  13. Univ. of South Florida, Saint Petersburg, FL (United States)
  14. Upstream Tech, Alameda, CA (United States)
  15. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States)
  16. Univ. of Florida, Davie, FL (United States)
  17. McGill Univ., Bellevue, QC (Canada)
  18. McGill Univ., Montreal, QC (Canada)
  19. Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN (United States); Rainforest Alliance, New York, NY (United States)
  20. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  21. Yale Univ., New Haven, CT (United States)
  22. Sewanee, Univ. of the South, Sewanee, TN (United States)
  23. Conservation Intl., Arlington, VA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1495934
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Science of the Total Environment
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 665; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0048-9697
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Ecosystem benefits; Remote sensing; Monitoring; Research priorities

Citation Formats

Ramirez-Reyes, Carlos, Brauman, Kate A., Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca, Galford, Gillian L., Adamo, Susana B., Anderson, Christopher B., Anderson, Clarissa, Allington, Ginger R. H., Bagstad, Kenneth J., Coe, Michael T., Cord, Anna F., Dee, Laura E., Gould, Rachelle K., Jain, Meha, Kowal, Virginia A., Muller-Karger, Frank E., Norriss, Jessica, Potapov, Peter, Qiu, Jiangxiao, Rieb, Jesse T., Robinson, Brian E., Samberg, Leah H., Singh, Nagendra, Szeto, Sabrina H., Voigt, Brian, Watson, Keri, and Wright, T. Maxwell. Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.150.
Ramirez-Reyes, Carlos, Brauman, Kate A., Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca, Galford, Gillian L., Adamo, Susana B., Anderson, Christopher B., Anderson, Clarissa, Allington, Ginger R. H., Bagstad, Kenneth J., Coe, Michael T., Cord, Anna F., Dee, Laura E., Gould, Rachelle K., Jain, Meha, Kowal, Virginia A., Muller-Karger, Frank E., Norriss, Jessica, Potapov, Peter, Qiu, Jiangxiao, Rieb, Jesse T., Robinson, Brian E., Samberg, Leah H., Singh, Nagendra, Szeto, Sabrina H., Voigt, Brian, Watson, Keri, & Wright, T. Maxwell. Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.150
Ramirez-Reyes, Carlos, Brauman, Kate A., Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca, Galford, Gillian L., Adamo, Susana B., Anderson, Christopher B., Anderson, Clarissa, Allington, Ginger R. H., Bagstad, Kenneth J., Coe, Michael T., Cord, Anna F., Dee, Laura E., Gould, Rachelle K., Jain, Meha, Kowal, Virginia A., Muller-Karger, Frank E., Norriss, Jessica, Potapov, Peter, Qiu, Jiangxiao, Rieb, Jesse T., Robinson, Brian E., Samberg, Leah H., Singh, Nagendra, Szeto, Sabrina H., Voigt, Brian, Watson, Keri, and Wright, T. Maxwell. Tue . "Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.150. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1495934.
@article{osti_1495934,
title = {Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments},
author = {Ramirez-Reyes, Carlos and Brauman, Kate A. and Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca and Galford, Gillian L. and Adamo, Susana B. and Anderson, Christopher B. and Anderson, Clarissa and Allington, Ginger R. H. and Bagstad, Kenneth J. and Coe, Michael T. and Cord, Anna F. and Dee, Laura E. and Gould, Rachelle K. and Jain, Meha and Kowal, Virginia A. and Muller-Karger, Frank E. and Norriss, Jessica and Potapov, Peter and Qiu, Jiangxiao and Rieb, Jesse T. and Robinson, Brian E. and Samberg, Leah H. and Singh, Nagendra and Szeto, Sabrina H. and Voigt, Brian and Watson, Keri and Wright, T. Maxwell},
abstractNote = {The benefits nature provides to people, called ecosystem services, are increasingly recognized and accounted for in assessments of infrastructure development, agricultural management, conservation prioritization, and sustainable sourcing. These assessments are often limited by data, however, a gap with tremendous potential to be filled through Earth observations (EO), which produce a variety of data across spatial and temporal extents and resolutions. Despite widespread recognition of this potential, in practice few ecosystem service studies use EO. Here, we identify challenges and opportunities to using EO in ecosystem service modeling and assessment. Some challenges are technical, related to data awareness, processing, and access. These challenges require systematic investment in model platforms and data management. Other challenges are more conceptual but still systemic; they are byproducts of the structure of existing ecosystem service models and addressing them requires scientific investment in solutions and tools applicable to a wide range of models and approaches. We also highlight new ways in which EO can be leveraged for ecosystem service assessments, identifying promising new areas of research. More widespread use of EO for ecosystem service assessment will only be achieved if all of these types of challenges are addressed. Furthermore, this will require non-traditional funding and partnering opportunities from private and public agencies to promote data exploration, sharing, and archiving. Investing in this integration will be reflected in better and more accurate ecosystem service assessments worldwide.},
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.150},
journal = {Science of the Total Environment},
number = C,
volume = 665,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {2}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 6 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Figure 1 Figure 1: Opportunities for Earth observations to improve ecosystem service assessments. Ecosystem service models have been applied across scales, from local to global, to quantify ecosystem service supply and demand. Technical and conceptual barriers remain to creating models that effectively integrate social and biophysical systems that are comparable and transferablemore » across geographies. Earth observation data may reduce these barriers by providing new ways to measure ecosystem service drivers that are consistent across time and space.« less

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Online Analysis Enhances Use of NASA Earth Science Data
journal, January 2007

  • Acker, James G.; Leptoukh, Gregory
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 88, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007EO020003

Modeling carbon storage across a heterogeneous mixed temperate forest: the influence of forest type specificity on regional-scale carbon storage estimates
journal, February 2018

  • Adams, Alison B.; Pontius, Jennifer; Galford, Gillian L.
  • Landscape Ecology, Vol. 33, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10980-018-0625-0

Potential contributions of remote sensing to ecosystem service assessments
journal, April 2014

  • Andrew, Margaret E.; Wulder, Michael A.; Nelson, Trisalyn A.
  • Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, Vol. 38, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1177/0309133314528942

Managing Multiple Ecosystem Services for Landscape Conservation: A Green Infrastructure in Lombardy Region
journal, January 2016


Quantifying and Mapping Ecosystem Services Supplies and Demands: A Review of Remote Sensing Applications
journal, July 2012

  • Ayanu, Yohannes Zergaw; Conrad, Christopher; Nauss, Thomas
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1021/es300157u

Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss
journal, September 2017


A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation
journal, September 2013


Monitoring Global Croplands with Coarse Resolution Earth Observations: The Global Agriculture Monitoring (GLAM) Project
journal, June 2010

  • Becker-Reshef, Inbal; Justice, Chris; Sullivan, Mark
  • Remote Sensing, Vol. 2, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.3390/rs2061589

The SWOT Mission and Its Capabilities for Land Hydrology
journal, October 2015

  • Biancamaria, Sylvain; Lettenmaier, Dennis P.; Pavelsky, Tamlin M.
  • Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 37, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10712-015-9346-y

Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape
journal, October 2013


On Measuring Economic Values for Nature
journal, April 2000

  • Bockstael, Nancy E.; Freeman, A. Myrick; Kopp, Raymond J.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 34, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/es990673l

The Concept of Essential Climate Variables in Support of Climate Research, Applications, and Policy
journal, September 2014

  • Bojinski, Stephan; Verstraete, Michel; Peterson, Thomas C.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 95, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00047.1

Impacts of Land-Use Change on Groundwater Supply: Ecosystem Services Assessment in Kona, Hawaii
journal, December 2015


Using ecological production functions to link ecological processes to ecosystem services: Ecological Production Functions and Ecosystem Services
journal, September 2016

  • Bruins, Randall JF; Canfield, Timothy J.; Duke, Clifford
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1842

Using InVEST to assess ecosystem services on conserved properties in Sonoma County, CA
journal, April 2017

  • Butsic, Van; Shapero, Matthew; Moanga, Diana
  • California Agriculture, Vol. 71, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3733/ca.2017a0008

Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview
journal, January 2006

  • Carpenter, Stephen R.; Bennett, Elena M.; Peterson, Garry D.
  • Ecology and Society, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5751/ES-01610-110129

Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters
journal, January 2013


Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services
journal, April 2017

  • Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca; Sim, Sarah; Hamel, Perrine
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15065

Priorities to Advance Monitoring of Ecosystem Services Using Earth Observation
journal, June 2017

  • Cord, Anna F.; Brauman, Kate A.; Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 32, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.003

Remote sensing of ecosystem services: A systematic review
journal, May 2015


Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments
journal, December 2007

  • Diaz, S.; Lavorel, S.; de Bello, F.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, Issue 52
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704716104

Assessing nature's contributions to people
journal, January 2018


The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services
journal, April 2010


VIIRS night-time lights
journal, March 2017

  • Elvidge, Christopher D.; Baugh, Kimberly; Zhizhin, Mikhail
  • International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 38, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1342050

Recommendations on the Use of Satellite Remote-Sensing Data for Urban Air Quality
journal, November 2004

  • Engel-Cox, Jill A.; Hoff, Raymond M.; Haymet, A. D. J.
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 54, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10471005

Using deep learning and Google Street View to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the United States
journal, November 2017

  • Gebru, Timnit; Krause, Jonathan; Wang, Yilun
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, Issue 50
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700035114

Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone
journal, December 2017


Review of decision support tools to operationalize the ecosystem services concept
journal, August 2017


Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice
journal, June 2015

  • Guerry, Anne D.; Polasky, Stephen; Lubchenco, Jane
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503751112

Humid tropical forest disturbance alerts using Landsat data
journal, March 2016

  • Hansen, Matthew C.; Krylov, Alexander; Tyukavina, Alexandra
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034008

An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators
journal, June 2013


Dual-season mapping of wetland inundation and vegetation for the central Amazon basin
journal, November 2003


Climate Engine: Cloud Computing and Visualization of Climate and Remote Sensing Data for Advanced Natural Resource Monitoring and Process Understanding
journal, November 2017

  • Huntington, Justin L.; Hegewisch, Katherine C.; Daudert, Britta
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 98, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00324.1

‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services
journal, January 2015


Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty
journal, August 2016


The MODIS fire products
journal, November 2002


Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services
journal, October 2012

  • Keeler, B. L.; Polasky, S.; Brauman, K. A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 45
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1215991109

What are shared and social values of ecosystems?
journal, March 2015


Key lessons for incorporating natural infrastructure into regional climate adaptation planning
journal, July 2014


Assessing ecosystem service provision under climate change to support conservation and development planning in Myanmar
journal, September 2017


Remote sensing of surface water quality in relation to catchment condition in Zimbabwe
journal, August 2017

  • Masocha, Mhosisi; Murwira, Amon; Magadza, Christopher H. D.
  • Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, Vol. 100
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2017.02.013

Measuring inequality with asset indicators
journal, June 2005


Understanding the Use of Ecosystem Service Knowledge in Decision Making: Lessons from International Experiences of Spatial Planning
journal, January 2014

  • McKenzie, Emily; Posner, Stephen; Tillmann, Patricia
  • Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 32, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1068/c12292j

Collaborative Supercomputing for Global Change Science
journal, March 2011

  • Nemani, R.; Votava, P.; Michaelis, A.
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 92, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011EO130001

Essential Biodiversity Variables
journal, January 2013


Satellite remote sensing, biodiversity research and conservation of the future
journal, May 2014

  • Pettorelli, Nathalie; Safi, Kamran; Turner, Woody
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 369, Issue 1643
  • DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0190

Socio-Geography of Human Mobility: A Study Using Longitudinal Mobile Phone Data
journal, June 2012


Managing water services in tropical regions: From land cover proxies to hydrologic fluxes
journal, November 2014

  • Ponette-González, Alexandra G.; Brauman, Kate A.; Marín-Spiotta, Erika
  • Ambio, Vol. 44, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0578-8

US government considers charging for popular Earth-observing data
journal, April 2018


The mobility network of European tourists: a longitudinal study and a comparison with geo-located Twitter data
journal, February 2018

  • Provenzano, Davide; Hawelka, Bartosz; Baggio, Rodolfo
  • Tourism Review, Vol. 73, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1108/TR-03-2017-0052

Spatial fit between water quality policies and hydrologic ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural landscape
journal, August 2016


Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape
journal, December 2017

  • Qiu, Jiangxiao; Carpenter, Stephen R.; Booth, Eric G.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 28, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/eap.1633

Understanding relationships among ecosystem services across spatial scales and over time
journal, May 2018

  • Qiu, Jiangxiao; Carpenter, Stephen R.; Booth, Eric G.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb87

Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000: GLOBAL AGRICULTURAL LANDS IN 2000
journal, January 2008

  • Ramankutty, Navin; Evan, Amato T.; Monfreda, Chad
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 22, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007GB002952

Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico reduce forest fragmentation
journal, October 2018

  • Ramirez‐Reyes, Carlos; Sims, Katharine R. E.; Potapov, Peter
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 28, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/eap.1753

Using image recognition to automate assessment of cultural ecosystem services from social media photographs
journal, June 2018


When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models
journal, August 2017

  • Rieb, Jesse T.; Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca; Daily, Gretchen C.
  • BioScience, Vol. 67, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1093/biosci/bix075

Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions
journal, July 2015


Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents
journal, May 2011

  • Saatchi, S. S.; Harris, N. L.; Brown, S.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1019576108

Barriers to adopting satellite remote sensing for water quality management
journal, August 2013

  • Schaeffer, Blake A.; Schaeffer, Kelly G.; Keith, Darryl
  • International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 34, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2013.823524

A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead: Priorities for ecosystem service studies
journal, January 2011


A hybrid analytical-heuristic method for calibrating land-use change models
journal, May 2013


GRACE satellite observations reveal the severity of recent water over-consumption in the United States
journal, August 2017


High-resolution gridded population datasets for Latin America and the Caribbean in 2010, 2015, and 2020
journal, September 2015

  • Sorichetta, Alessandro; Hornby, Graeme M.; Stevens, Forrest R.
  • Scientific Data, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2015.45

Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural-Resource Management
journal, April 2009


WorldPop, open data for spatial demography
journal, January 2017


A global 1-km consensus land-cover product for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling: Consensus land cover
journal, April 2014

  • Tuanmu, Mao-Ning; Jetz, Walter
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography, Vol. 23, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1111/geb.12182

Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation
journal, June 2003


A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment
journal, March 2014


Quantifying flood mitigation services: The economic value of Otter Creek wetlands and floodplains to Middlebury, VT
journal, October 2016


Effects of human demand on conservation planning for biodiversity and ecosystem services
journal, February 2019

  • Watson, Keri B.; Galford, Gillian L.; Sonter, Laura J.
  • Conservation Biology, Vol. 33, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13276

The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
journal, March 2016

  • Wilkinson, Mark D.; Dumontier, Michel; Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan
  • Scientific Data, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Machine learning for ecosystem services
journal, October 2018


Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives
journal, August 2015


Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals
journal, February 2018


Satellites: Make Earth observations open access
journal, September 2014

  • Wulder, Michael A.; Coops, Nicholas C.
  • Nature, Vol. 513, Issue 7516
  • DOI: 10.1038/513030a

Remote sensing of ecosystem services: An opportunity for spatially explicit assessment
journal, November 2010


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Three-dimensional digital mapping of ecosystems: a new era in spatial ecology
    journal, February 2020

    • D'Urban Jackson, Tim; Williams, Gareth J.; Walker-Springett, Guy
    • Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 287, Issue 1920
    • DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2383

    Urban Ecosystem Services Quantification through Remote Sensing Approach: A Systematic Review
    journal, May 2019


      Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.