skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The costs of sugar production from different feedstocks and processing technologies: Review of Industrial Sugar Production Costs

Abstract

Sugar production is essential for the production of foods, biochemicals, and biofuels via biochemical or catalytic routes. Sugar-containing crops, and starch-based and cellulosic feedstocks are resources for sugar production via juice extraction, starch saccharification, and pretreatment and hydrolysis, respectively. Technologies have been developed to attain a high sugar yield; however, production costs are a major consideration in commercializing newly developed approaches to the production of sugars. In this review, the fixed capital and production costs of sugar produced from first- and second-generation crops are summarized. As expected, first-generation crops provide the lowest fixed capital costs, ranging from 0.01 to 0.13 $ kg-1 feedstock, and have production costs ranging from 0.22 to 0.55 $ kg-1 sugar. For cellulosic crops, because of their recalcitrant structure and complex processing, the fixed capital and production costs are higher, ranging from 0.02 to 1.10 $ kg-1 feedstock and 0.10 to 3.37 $ kg-1 sugar, respectively.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [1]
  1. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States). Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
  2. Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, VA (United States). Dept. of Food Science and Technology
  3. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States). DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation; US Dept. of Agriculture (USDA)., Peoria, IL (United States). Bioenergy Research, Agricultural Research Service
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (CABBI), Urbana, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1495027
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1510346
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0018420; DE‐SC0018420
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 13; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; sugar production; sugar-containing crops; starch-based feedstocks; cellulosic feedstocks; fixed capital cost; production cost

Citation Formats

Cheng, Ming-Hsun, Huang, Haibo, Dien, Bruce S., and Singh, Vijay. The costs of sugar production from different feedstocks and processing technologies: Review of Industrial Sugar Production Costs. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1002/bbb.1976.
Cheng, Ming-Hsun, Huang, Haibo, Dien, Bruce S., & Singh, Vijay. The costs of sugar production from different feedstocks and processing technologies: Review of Industrial Sugar Production Costs. United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1976
Cheng, Ming-Hsun, Huang, Haibo, Dien, Bruce S., and Singh, Vijay. Sat . "The costs of sugar production from different feedstocks and processing technologies: Review of Industrial Sugar Production Costs". United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1976. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1495027.
@article{osti_1495027,
title = {The costs of sugar production from different feedstocks and processing technologies: Review of Industrial Sugar Production Costs},
author = {Cheng, Ming-Hsun and Huang, Haibo and Dien, Bruce S. and Singh, Vijay},
abstractNote = {Sugar production is essential for the production of foods, biochemicals, and biofuels via biochemical or catalytic routes. Sugar-containing crops, and starch-based and cellulosic feedstocks are resources for sugar production via juice extraction, starch saccharification, and pretreatment and hydrolysis, respectively. Technologies have been developed to attain a high sugar yield; however, production costs are a major consideration in commercializing newly developed approaches to the production of sugars. In this review, the fixed capital and production costs of sugar produced from first- and second-generation crops are summarized. As expected, first-generation crops provide the lowest fixed capital costs, ranging from 0.01 to 0.13 $ kg-1 feedstock, and have production costs ranging from 0.22 to 0.55 $ kg-1 sugar. For cellulosic crops, because of their recalcitrant structure and complex processing, the fixed capital and production costs are higher, ranging from 0.02 to 1.10 $ kg-1 feedstock and 0.10 to 3.37 $ kg-1 sugar, respectively.},
doi = {10.1002/bbb.1976},
journal = {Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining},
number = 3,
volume = 13,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {2}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels
journal, May 2008


Techno-economic impacts of varied compositional profiles of sugarcane experimental hybrids on a biorefinery producing sugar, ethanol and electricity
journal, September 2017


High-conversion hydrolysates and corn sweetener production in dry-grind corn process
journal, January 2018

  • Wang, Zhaoqin; Sharma, Vivek; Dien, Bruce S.
  • Cereal Chemistry, Vol. 95, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/cche.10030

Techno-economic analysis of a lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery with ionic liquid pre-treatment
journal, June 2011

  • Klein-Marcuschamer, Daniel; Simmons, Blake A.; Blanch, Harvey W.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 5, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.303

Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities
journal, October 2007

  • Jørgensen, Henning; Kristensen, Jan Bach; Felby, Claus
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 1, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.4

The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals
journal, July 2010


Process model and economic analysis of ethanol production from sugar beet raw juice as part of the cleaner production concept
journal, January 2012


Modeling the process and costs of fuel ethanol production by the corn dry-grind process
journal, May 2006


Techno-economic analysis of co-located corn grain and corn stover ethanol plants
journal, February 2014

  • Ou, Longwen; Brown, Tristan R.; Thilakaratne, Rajeeva
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 8, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1475

Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: Biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification
journal, July 2010


Engineering process and cost model for a conventional corn wet milling facility
journal, January 2008


Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production – A review
journal, January 2016


Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems
journal, September 2009

  • Cherubini, Francesco; Jungmeier, Gerfried; Wellisch, Maria
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 3, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.172

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Based on Pilot Biorefinery Data: a Case Study of Sweet Sorghum Bagasse Processed via L+SScF
journal, April 2018


Plant size: Capital cost relationships in the dry mill ethanol industry
journal, June 2005


Second generation biofuels: Economics and policies
journal, July 2011


Techno-economic analysis of utilization of stillage from a cellulosic biorefinery
journal, November 2017


Fungal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
journal, November 2012


The Techno-Economic Basis for Coproduct Manufacturing To Enable Hydrocarbon Fuel Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass
journal, May 2016


Refining sweet sorghum to ethanol and sugar: economic trade-offs in the context of North China
journal, June 2005


Rapid and effective oxidative pretreatment of woody biomass at mild reaction conditions and low oxidant loadings
journal, January 2013

  • Li, Zhenglun; Chen, Charles H.; Hegg, Eric L.
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-119

Ethanol from corn: a technical and economical assessment based on different scenarios
journal, May 2008

  • Franceschin, Giada; Zamboni, Andrea; Bezzo, Fabrizio
  • Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 86, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2008.01.001

Techno-economic analysis for the biochemical conversion of Miscanthus x giganteus into bioethanol
journal, March 2017


Effects of fertilizer application and dry/wet processing of Miscanthus x giganteus on bioethanol production
journal, March 2016


Techno-economic analysis for incorporating a liquid-liquid extraction system to remove acetic acid into a proposed commercial scale biorefinery
journal, July 2016

  • Aghazadeh, Mahdieh; Engelberth, Abigail S.
  • Biotechnology Progress, Vol. 32, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2325

Techno-economic evaluations of a generic wood-to-ethanol process: effect of increased cellulose yields and enzyme recycle
journal, January 1998


Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review
journal, May 2002


Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills
journal, August 2010

  • Kim, Misook; Day, Donal F.
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Vol. 38, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0812-8

Techno-economic and ex-ante environmental assessment of C6 sugars production from spruce and corn. Comparison of organosolv and wet milling technologies
journal, January 2018


Determination of reducing sugar with improved precision
journal, December 1965


Enzymatic corn wet milling: engineering process and cost model
journal, January 2009

  • Ramírez, Edna C.; Johnston, David B.; McAloon, Andrew J.
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-2-2

Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
journal, April 2005


Structural characterization of alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreated grasses exhibiting diverse lignin phenotypes
journal, January 2012

  • Li, Muyang; Foster, Cliff; Kelkar, Shantanu
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-38

Butanol production from lignocellulosics
journal, April 2012


Biofuels 2020: Biorefineries based on lignocellulosic materials
journal, July 2016

  • Valdivia, Miguel; Galan, Jose Luis; Laffarga, Joaquina
  • Microbial Biotechnology, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12387

Industrial sugar beets to biofuel: Field to fuel production system and cost estimates
journal, September 2015


Grain and cellulosic ethanol: History, economics, and energy policy
journal, June 2007


Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand
journal, May 2008

  • Nguyen, Thu Lan T.; Gheewala, Shabbir H.
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 13, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-008-0011-2

Cellulosic ethanol production in the United States: Conversion technologies, current production status, economics, and emerging developments
journal, September 2009

  • Dwivedi, Puneet; Alavalapati, Janaki R. R.; Lal, Pankaj
  • Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 13, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2009.06.003

Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: A review
journal, July 2010


Techno-economic analysis (TEA) of low-moisture anhydrous ammonia (LMAA) pretreatment method for corn stover
journal, December 2015


Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol
journal, January 2008

  • Yang, Bin; Wyman, Charles E.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.49

Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review
journal, February 2010

  • Naik, S. N.; Goud, Vaibhav V.; Rout, Prasant K.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003

Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: An experience curve approach
journal, January 2009


Techno-economic analysis of biodiesel and ethanol co-production from lipid-producing sugarcane: Biodiesel and Ethanol Co-Production from Lipid-Producing Sugarcane
journal, March 2016

  • Huang, Haibo; Long, Stephen; Singh, Vijay
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1640

Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: Current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects
journal, August 2012


Pretreatment of corn stover by aqueous ammonia
journal, October 2003


Mitigation of cellulose recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis by ionic liquid pretreatment
journal, April 2007

  • Dadi, Anantharam P.; Schall, Constance A.; Varanasi, Sasidhar
  • Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vol. 137-140, Issue 1-12, p. 407-421
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12010-007-9068-9

Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Materials for Ethanol Production: A Review
journal, January 2003