DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs for a network of small-scale hydropower facilities in California

Journal Article · · Environmental Research Communications

Deployment of small-scale hydropower, which generally ranges in capacity from 1-10 MW, may partly depend on its ability to mitigate environmental concerns while generating sufficient revenues. In this paper, we quantify net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs of a cascading series of 36 small-scale hydropower facilities under consideration for development in Northeast California. To do so, we develop a net-revenue-maximizing optimization model that determines hydropower operations while capturing key technical and river network constraints. We find that significantly constraining maximum discharges from each facility largely eliminates downstream flow impacts but negligibly changes the 36 facilities' combined operations and net revenues. Thus, we find a negligible trade-off between net revenues and downstream impacts in our study system, suggesting small-scale hydropower can contribute to decarbonization efforts while limiting local environmental impacts on downstream flows at little economic cost.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Office of Renewable Energy. Water Power Technologies Office; USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1493372
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1503816
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5D00-72228
Journal Information:
Environmental Research Communications, Vol. 1, Issue 1; ISSN 2515-7620
Publisher:
IOP ScienceCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (22)

Governing the transition to renewable energy: A review of impacts and policy issues in the small hydropower boom journal February 2017
The potential for small scale hydropower development in the US journal October 2010
Sources of Bureaucratic Delay: A Case Study of FERC Dam Relicensing journal October 2005
Environmental Constraints on Hydropower: An Ex Post Benefit-Cost Analysis of Dam Relicensing in Michigan journal August 2006
Ecological impacts of small hydropower in China: Insights from an emergy analysis of a case plant journal January 2015
How Run-of-River Operation Affects Hydropower Generation and Value journal September 2007
Development of Small Versus Large Hydropower in Norway– Comparison of Environmental Impacts journal January 2012
Small hydro and the environmental implications of its extensive utilization journal May 2011
Modelling trade-offs between hydropower generation and environmental flow scenarios: a case study of the Lower Zambezi River Basin, Mozambique journal December 2010
Micro-hydropower: Status and prospects journal February 2002
Balancing Environmental Protection and Energy Production in the Federal Hydropower Licensing Process journal June 2010
Consolidation and ownership trends of nonfederal hydropower generating assets, 1980–2003 journal May 2008
Environmental Effects of Dams and Impoundments journal November 1977
Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity journal October 2002
Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin journal March 2012
An MILP Approach for Short-Term Hydro Scheduling and Unit Commitment With Head-Dependent Reservoir journal August 2008
The diversity of hydropower projects journal November 2002
Allocation of Firm-Energy Rights Among Hydro Plants: An Aumann–Shapley Approach journal May 2009
Influence of Deregulated Electricity Markets on Hydropower Generation and Downstream Flow Regime journal July 2012
Risk Constrained Portfolio Selection of Renewable Sources in Hydrothermal Electricity Markets journal August 2009
Hydropower projects: a review of most effective mitigation measures journal November 2002
Balancing Environmental Protection and Energy Production in the Federal Hydropower Licensing Process journal January 2008

Figures / Tables (7)