skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs for a network of small-scale hydropower facilities in California

Abstract

Deployment of small-scale hydropower, which generally ranges in capacity from 1-10 MW, may partly depend on its ability to mitigate environmental concerns while generating sufficient revenues. In this paper, we quantify net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs of a cascading series of 36 small-scale hydropower facilities under consideration for development in Northeast California. To do so, we develop a net-revenue-maximizing optimization model that determines hydropower operations while capturing key technical and river network constraints. We find that significantly constraining maximum discharges from each facility largely eliminates downstream flow impacts but negligibly changes the 36 facilities' combined operations and net revenues. Thus, we find a negligible trade-off between net revenues and downstream impacts in our study system, suggesting small-scale hydropower can contribute to decarbonization efforts while limiting local environmental impacts on downstream flows at little economic cost.

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Water Power Technologies Office (EE-4WP)
OSTI Identifier:
1493372
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1503816
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5D00-72228
Journal ID: ISSN 2515-7620
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Environmental Research Communications
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Environmental Research Communications Journal Volume: 1 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2515-7620
Publisher:
IOP Publishing
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
13 HYDRO ENERGY; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; small-scale hydropower; downstream flow impacts; price-taker optimization; net revenue maximization; hydropower

Citation Formats

Craig, Michael, Zhao, Jin, Schneider, Gia, Schneider, Abe, Watson, Sterling, and Stark, Greg. Net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs for a network of small-scale hydropower facilities in California. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/aafd62.
Craig, Michael, Zhao, Jin, Schneider, Gia, Schneider, Abe, Watson, Sterling, & Stark, Greg. Net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs for a network of small-scale hydropower facilities in California. United States. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/aafd62.
Craig, Michael, Zhao, Jin, Schneider, Gia, Schneider, Abe, Watson, Sterling, and Stark, Greg. Fri . "Net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs for a network of small-scale hydropower facilities in California". United States. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/aafd62.
@article{osti_1493372,
title = {Net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs for a network of small-scale hydropower facilities in California},
author = {Craig, Michael and Zhao, Jin and Schneider, Gia and Schneider, Abe and Watson, Sterling and Stark, Greg},
abstractNote = {Deployment of small-scale hydropower, which generally ranges in capacity from 1-10 MW, may partly depend on its ability to mitigate environmental concerns while generating sufficient revenues. In this paper, we quantify net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs of a cascading series of 36 small-scale hydropower facilities under consideration for development in Northeast California. To do so, we develop a net-revenue-maximizing optimization model that determines hydropower operations while capturing key technical and river network constraints. We find that significantly constraining maximum discharges from each facility largely eliminates downstream flow impacts but negligibly changes the 36 facilities' combined operations and net revenues. Thus, we find a negligible trade-off between net revenues and downstream impacts in our study system, suggesting small-scale hydropower can contribute to decarbonization efforts while limiting local environmental impacts on downstream flows at little economic cost.},
doi = {10.1088/2515-7620/aafd62},
journal = {Environmental Research Communications},
number = 1,
volume = 1,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {2}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/aafd62

Figures / Tables:

Table 1 Table 1: Mean (across facilities) and range of values of key facility parameters by hydroEngine type.

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Governing the transition to renewable energy: A review of impacts and policy issues in the small hydropower boom
journal, February 2017


Risk Constrained Portfolio Selection of Renewable Sources in Hydrothermal Electricity Markets
journal, August 2009


The potential for small scale hydropower development in the US
journal, October 2010


Sources of Bureaucratic Delay: A Case Study of FERC Dam Relicensing
journal, October 2005

  • Kosnik, Lea-Rachel D.
  • The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 22, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/jleo/ewj004

Environmental Constraints on Hydropower: An Ex Post Benefit-Cost Analysis of Dam Relicensing in Michigan
journal, August 2006

  • Kotchen, M. J.; Moore, M. R.; Lupi, F.
  • Land Economics, Vol. 82, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.3368/le.82.3.384

Ecological impacts of small hydropower in China: Insights from an emergy analysis of a case plant
journal, January 2015


An MILP Approach for Short-Term Hydro Scheduling and Unit Commitment With Head-Dependent Reservoir
journal, August 2008

  • Borghetti, A.; D'Ambrosio, C.; Lodi, A.
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 23, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.926704

How Run-of-River Operation Affects Hydropower Generation and Value
journal, September 2007


Small hydro and the environmental implications of its extensive utilization
journal, May 2011


Development of Small Versus Large Hydropower in Norway– Comparison of Environmental Impacts
journal, January 2012


Modelling trade-offs between hydropower generation and environmental flow scenarios: a case study of the Lower Zambezi River Basin, Mozambique
journal, December 2010


Hydropower projects: a review of most effective mitigation measures
journal, November 2002


The diversity of hydropower projects
journal, November 2002


Micro-hydropower: Status and prospects
journal, February 2002

  • Paish, O.
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, Vol. 216, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1243/095765002760024827

Influence of Deregulated Electricity Markets on Hydropower Generation and Downstream Flow Regime
journal, July 2012


Environmental Effects of Dams and Impoundments
journal, November 1977


Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity
journal, October 2002


Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin
journal, March 2012

  • Ziv, G.; Baran, E.; Nam, S.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201423109

Allocation of Firm-Energy Rights Among Hydro Plants: An Aumann–Shapley Approach
journal, May 2009


    Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.