Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers
Abstract
We report that in the nearfuture noisy intermediatescale quantum (NISQ) era of quantum computing technology, applications of quantum computing will be limited to calculations of very modest scales in terms of the number of qubits used. The need to represent numeric quantities using limited resources leads to digitization errors which must be taken into account. As a first step towards quantum simulations of realistic highenergy physics problems, we explore classically the effects of digitizing elements of the $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ gauge group to a finite set. We consider several methods for digitizing the group, finding the best performance from an actionpreserving projection onto a mesh. Working in (3+1) dimensions, we find that using $$\sim 7$$ (qu)bits to represent each $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ gauge link induces a digitization error on the order of $$10\%$$ in shortdistance observables and $$2\%$$ in longdistance observables. Promisingly, our results indicate that each $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ gauge link can be represented by $$\mathcal{O}(10)$$ (qu)bits, from which we estimate that a $16^3$ $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ lattice could be simulated with no more than $$\mathcal{O}(10^5)$$ (qu)bits. Lastly, our results on digitization are also of interest as a form of lossy compression that could be used in highperformance classical computing to alleviate communications bottlenecks.
 Authors:

 Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States)
 Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
 Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
 Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States); Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
 Publication Date:
 Research Org.:
 Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
 Sponsoring Org.:
 USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
 OSTI Identifier:
 1488593
 Alternate Identifier(s):
 OSTI ID: 1546279
 Report Number(s):
 arXiv:1811.03629; FERMILABPUB18615T
Journal ID: ISSN 24699926; PLRAAN; 1702968
 Grant/Contract Number:
 AC0207CH11359; SC0010005; SC0012704
 Resource Type:
 Accepted Manuscript
 Journal Name:
 Physical Review A
 Additional Journal Information:
 Journal Volume: 99; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 24699926
 Publisher:
 American Physical Society (APS)
 Country of Publication:
 United States
 Language:
 English
 Subject:
 72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS
Citation Formats
Hackett, Daniel C., Howe, Kiel, Hughes, Ciaran, Jay, William, Neil, Ethan T., and Simone, James N. Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers. United States: N. p., 2019.
Web. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341.
Hackett, Daniel C., Howe, Kiel, Hughes, Ciaran, Jay, William, Neil, Ethan T., & Simone, James N. Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers. United States. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341.
Hackett, Daniel C., Howe, Kiel, Hughes, Ciaran, Jay, William, Neil, Ethan T., and Simone, James N. Fri .
"Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers". United States. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1488593.
@article{osti_1488593,
title = {Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers},
author = {Hackett, Daniel C. and Howe, Kiel and Hughes, Ciaran and Jay, William and Neil, Ethan T. and Simone, James N.},
abstractNote = {We report that in the nearfuture noisy intermediatescale quantum (NISQ) era of quantum computing technology, applications of quantum computing will be limited to calculations of very modest scales in terms of the number of qubits used. The need to represent numeric quantities using limited resources leads to digitization errors which must be taken into account. As a first step towards quantum simulations of realistic highenergy physics problems, we explore classically the effects of digitizing elements of the $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ gauge group to a finite set. We consider several methods for digitizing the group, finding the best performance from an actionpreserving projection onto a mesh. Working in (3+1) dimensions, we find that using $\sim 7$ (qu)bits to represent each $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ gauge link induces a digitization error on the order of $10\%$ in shortdistance observables and $2\%$ in longdistance observables. Promisingly, our results indicate that each $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ gauge link can be represented by $\mathcal{O}(10)$ (qu)bits, from which we estimate that a $16^3$ $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ lattice could be simulated with no more than $\mathcal{O}(10^5)$ (qu)bits. Lastly, our results on digitization are also of interest as a form of lossy compression that could be used in highperformance classical computing to alleviate communications bottlenecks.},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341},
journal = {Physical Review A},
number = 6,
volume = 99,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {6}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Reversibility violation in the Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm
journal, March 2018
 Urbach, Carsten
 Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 224
Monte Carlo simulations of lattice models with finite subgroups of SU(3) as gauge groups
journal, December 1981
 Bhanot, G.; Rebbi, C.
 Physical Review D, Vol. 24, Issue 12
Nuclear physics from lattice QCD
journal, January 2011
 Beane, S. R.; Detmold, W.; Orginos, K.
 Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 66, Issue 1
Solving lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs
journal, September 2010
 Clark, M. A.; Babich, R.; Barros, K.
 Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 181, Issue 9
Monte Carlo computations in lattice gauge theories
journal, April 1983
 Creutz, Michael; Jacobs, Laurence; Rebbi, Claudio
 Physics Reports, Vol. 95, Issue 4
Critical behavior at finitetemperature confinement transitions
journal, December 1982
 Svetitsky, Benjamin; Yaffe, Laurence G.
 Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 210, Issue 4
An R package for modeling and simulating generalized spherical and related distributions
journal, October 2016
 Nolan, John P.
 Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Vol. 3, Issue 1
Formulation of lattice gauge theories for quantum simulations
journal, March 2015
 Zohar, Erez; Burrello, Michele
 Physical Review D, Vol. 91, Issue 5
Machine learning action parameters in lattice quantum chromodynamics
journal, May 2018
 Shanahan, Phiala E.; Trewartha, Daniel; Detmold, William
 Physical Review D, Vol. 97, Issue 9
Atomic Quantum Simulation of $\mathbf{U}(N)$ and $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ NonAbelian Lattice Gauge Theories
journal, March 2013
 Banerjee, D.; Bögli, M.; Dalmonte, M.
 Physical Review Letters, Vol. 110, Issue 12
Projected Entangled Pair States with nonAbelian gauge symmetries: An SU(2) study
journal, November 2016
 Zohar, Erez; Wahl, Thorsten B.; Burrello, Michele
 Annals of Physics, Vol. 374
Lattices in group manifolds: Applications to lattice gauge theory
journal, August 1982
 Lisboa, P.; Michael, C.
 Nuclear Physics B, Vol. 210, Issue 1
Quantumclassical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers
journal, September 2018
 Klco, N.; Dumitrescu, E. F.; McCaskey, A. J.
 Physical Review A, Vol. 98, Issue 3
Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: Local gauge invariance from angularmomentum conservation
journal, August 2013
 Zohar, Erez; Cirac, J. Ignacio; Reznik, Benni
 Physical Review A, Vol. 88, Issue 2
Monte Ćarlo calculations and a model of the phase structure for gauge theories on discrete subgroups of SU(2)
journal, November 1980
 Petcher, D.; Weingarten, D. H.
 Physical Review D, Vol. 22, Issue 10
TwentyFirst Century Lattice Gauge Theory: Results from the Quantum Chromodynamics Lagrangian
journal, November 2012
 Kronfeld, Andreas S.
 Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, Vol. 62, Issue 1
Efficient Basis Formulation for ( $1+1$ )Dimensional SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory: Spectral Calculations with Matrix Product States
journal, November 2017
 Bañuls, Mari Carmen; Cichy, Krzysztof; Cirac, J. Ignacio
 Physical Review X, Vol. 7, Issue 4
Finitedensity phase diagram of a $(1+1)d$ nonabelian lattice gauge theory with tensor networks
journal, April 2017
 Silvi, Pietro; Rico, Enrique; Dalmonte, Marcello
 Quantum, Vol. 1
Phase structure of nonAbelian lattice gauge theories
journal, June 1980
 Rebbi, Claudio
 Physical Review D, Vol. 21, Issue 12
QCD as a quantum link model
journal, September 1999
 Brower, R.; Chandrasekharan, S.; Wiese, U. J.
 Physical Review D, Vol. 60, Issue 9
Discrete subsets of SU(3) for lattice gauge theory
journal, June 1982
 Lisboa, P.; Michael, C.
 Physics Letters B, Vol. 113, Issue 4
Works referencing / citing this record:
General methods for digital quantum simulation of gauge theories
journal, August 2019
 Lamm, Henry; Lawrence, Scott; Yamauchi, Yukari
 Physical Review D, Vol. 100, Issue 3
Gluon field digitization for quantum computers
journal, December 2019
 Alexandru, Andrei; Bedaque, Paulo F.; Harmalkar, Siddhartha
 Physical Review D, Vol. 100, Issue 11
$\sigma $ Models on Quantum Computers
journal, August 2019
 Alexandru, Andrei; Bedaque, Paulo F.; Lamm, Henry
 Physical Review Letters, Vol. 123, Issue 9