skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

This content will become publicly available on June 28, 2020

Title: Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers

Abstract

We report that in the near-future noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era of quantum computing technology, applications of quantum computing will be limited to calculations of very modest scales in terms of the number of qubits used. The need to represent numeric quantities using limited resources leads to digitization errors which must be taken into account. As a first step towards quantum simulations of realistic high-energy physics problems, we explore classically the effects of digitizing elements of the $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ gauge group to a finite set. We consider several methods for digitizing the group, finding the best performance from an action-preserving projection onto a mesh. Working in (3+1) dimensions, we find that using $$\sim 7$$ (qu)bits to represent each $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ gauge link induces a digitization error on the order of $$10\%$$ in short-distance observables and $$2\%$$ in long-distance observables. Promisingly, our results indicate that each $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ gauge link can be represented by $$\mathcal{O}(10)$$ (qu)bits, from which we estimate that a $16^3$ $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ lattice could be simulated with no more than $$\mathcal{O}(10^5)$$ (qu)bits. Lastly, our results on digitization are also of interest as a form of lossy compression that could be used in high-performance classical computing to alleviate communications bottlenecks.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [2]
  1. Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States)
  2. Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
  3. Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
  4. Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States); Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP) (SC-25)
OSTI Identifier:
1488593
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1546279
Report Number(s):
arXiv:1811.03629; FERMILAB-PUB-18-615-T
Journal ID: ISSN 2469-9926; PLRAAN; 1702968
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-07CH11359; SC0010005; SC0012704
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physical Review A
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 99; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 2469-9926
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS

Citation Formats

Hackett, Daniel C., Howe, Kiel, Hughes, Ciaran, Jay, William, Neil, Ethan T., and Simone, James N. Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341.
Hackett, Daniel C., Howe, Kiel, Hughes, Ciaran, Jay, William, Neil, Ethan T., & Simone, James N. Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers. United States. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341.
Hackett, Daniel C., Howe, Kiel, Hughes, Ciaran, Jay, William, Neil, Ethan T., and Simone, James N. Fri . "Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers". United States. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341.
@article{osti_1488593,
title = {Digitizing gauge fields: Lattice Monte Carlo results for future quantum computers},
author = {Hackett, Daniel C. and Howe, Kiel and Hughes, Ciaran and Jay, William and Neil, Ethan T. and Simone, James N.},
abstractNote = {We report that in the near-future noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era of quantum computing technology, applications of quantum computing will be limited to calculations of very modest scales in terms of the number of qubits used. The need to represent numeric quantities using limited resources leads to digitization errors which must be taken into account. As a first step towards quantum simulations of realistic high-energy physics problems, we explore classically the effects of digitizing elements of the $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ gauge group to a finite set. We consider several methods for digitizing the group, finding the best performance from an action-preserving projection onto a mesh. Working in (3+1) dimensions, we find that using $\sim 7$ (qu)bits to represent each $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ gauge link induces a digitization error on the order of $10\%$ in short-distance observables and $2\%$ in long-distance observables. Promisingly, our results indicate that each $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ gauge link can be represented by $\mathcal{O}(10)$ (qu)bits, from which we estimate that a $16^3$ $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ lattice could be simulated with no more than $\mathcal{O}(10^5)$ (qu)bits. Lastly, our results on digitization are also of interest as a form of lossy compression that could be used in high-performance classical computing to alleviate communications bottlenecks.},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062341},
journal = {Physical Review A},
number = 6,
volume = 99,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {6}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
This content will become publicly available on June 28, 2020
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Reversibility violation in the Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm
journal, March 2018


Monte Carlo simulations of lattice models with finite subgroups of SU(3) as gauge groups
journal, December 1981


Nuclear physics from lattice QCD
journal, January 2011

  • Beane, S. R.; Detmold, W.; Orginos, K.
  • Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 66, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2010.08.002

Solving lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs
journal, September 2010


Monte Carlo computations in lattice gauge theories
journal, April 1983


Critical behavior at finite-temperature confinement transitions
journal, December 1982


An R package for modeling and simulating generalized spherical and related distributions
journal, October 2016


Confinement of quarks
journal, October 1974


Formulation of lattice gauge theories for quantum simulations
journal, March 2015


Machine learning action parameters in lattice quantum chromodynamics
journal, May 2018


Atomic Quantum Simulation of U ( N ) and SU ( N ) Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories
journal, March 2013


Projected Entangled Pair States with non-Abelian gauge symmetries: An SU(2) study
journal, November 2016


Lattices in group manifolds: Applications to lattice gauge theory
journal, August 1982


Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers
journal, September 2018


Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: Local gauge invariance from angular-momentum conservation
journal, August 2013


Monte Ćarlo calculations and a model of the phase structure for gauge theories on discrete subgroups of SU(2)
journal, November 1980


Twenty-First Century Lattice Gauge Theory: Results from the Quantum Chromodynamics Lagrangian
journal, November 2012


Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
journal, August 2018


Efficient Basis Formulation for ( 1 + 1 )-Dimensional SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory: Spectral Calculations with Matrix Product States
journal, November 2017

  • Bañuls, Mari Carmen; Cichy, Krzysztof; Cirac, J. Ignacio
  • Physical Review X, Vol. 7, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041046

Finite-density phase diagram of a ( 1 + 1 ) d non-abelian lattice gauge theory with tensor networks
journal, April 2017


Phase structure of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories
journal, June 1980


QCD as a quantum link model
journal, September 1999


Discrete subsets of SU(3) for lattice gauge theory
journal, June 1982