DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The microscopic mechanism behind the fission-barrier asymmetry (II): The rare-earth region 50 < Z < 82 and 82 < N < 126

Abstract

It is understood that most actinides fission into fragments of unequal size. This contradicts liquid-drop-model theory from which symmetric fission is expected. The first attempt to understand this difference suggested that division leading to one of the fragments being near doubly magic 132Sn is favored by gain in binding energy. After the Strutinsky shell-correction method was developed an alternative idea that gained popularity was that the fission saddle might be lower for mass-asymmetric shapes and that this asymmetry was preserved until scission. Recently it was determined [Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 252502] that 180Hg preferentially fissions asymmetrically in contradiction to the fragment-magic-shell expectation which suggested symmetric division peaked around 90Zr, with its magic neutron number , so it was presented as a “new type of asymmetric fission”. However, in a paper [Phys. Lett. B 34 (1971) 349] a “simple” microscopic mechanism behind the asymmetry of the actinide fission saddle points was proposed to be related to the coupling between levels of type [40ΛΩ] and [51ΛΩ]. The paper then generalizes this idea and made the remarkable prediction that analogous features could exist in other regions. In particular it was proposed that in the rare-earth region couplings between levels of type [30ΛΩ]more » and [41ΛΩ] would favor mass-asymmetric outer saddle shapes. In this picture the asymmetry of 180Hg is not a “new type of asymmetric fission” but of analogous origin as the asymmetry of actinide fission. This prediction has never been cited in the discussion of the recently observed fission asymmetries in the “new region of asymmetry”, in nuclear physics also referred to as the rare-earth region. We reflect by detailed analysis that the mechanism of the saddle asymmetry in the sub-Pb region is indeed the one predicted half a century ago.« less

Authors:
;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1488372
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1558050
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-18-28314
Journal ID: ISSN 0370-2693; S0370269318309614; PII: S0370269318309614
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25396; 89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Physics Letters B
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Physics Letters B Journal Volume: 789 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0370-2693
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
Netherlands
Language:
English
Subject:
74 ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS; Fission; Fission-fragment mass asymmetry; Single-particle levels

Citation Formats

Ichikawa, T., and Möller, P. The microscopic mechanism behind the fission-barrier asymmetry (II): The rare-earth region 50 < Z < 82 and 82 < N < 126. Netherlands: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.034.
Ichikawa, T., & Möller, P. The microscopic mechanism behind the fission-barrier asymmetry (II): The rare-earth region 50 < Z < 82 and 82 < N < 126. Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.034
Ichikawa, T., and Möller, P. Fri . "The microscopic mechanism behind the fission-barrier asymmetry (II): The rare-earth region 50 < Z < 82 and 82 < N < 126". Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.034.
@article{osti_1488372,
title = {The microscopic mechanism behind the fission-barrier asymmetry (II): The rare-earth region 50 < Z < 82 and 82 < N < 126},
author = {Ichikawa, T. and Möller, P.},
abstractNote = {It is understood that most actinides fission into fragments of unequal size. This contradicts liquid-drop-model theory from which symmetric fission is expected. The first attempt to understand this difference suggested that division leading to one of the fragments being near doubly magic 132Sn is favored by gain in binding energy. After the Strutinsky shell-correction method was developed an alternative idea that gained popularity was that the fission saddle might be lower for mass-asymmetric shapes and that this asymmetry was preserved until scission. Recently it was determined [Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 252502] that 180Hg preferentially fissions asymmetrically in contradiction to the fragment-magic-shell expectation which suggested symmetric division peaked around 90Zr, with its magic neutron number , so it was presented as a “new type of asymmetric fission”. However, in a paper [Phys. Lett. B 34 (1971) 349] a “simple” microscopic mechanism behind the asymmetry of the actinide fission saddle points was proposed to be related to the coupling between levels of type [40ΛΩ] and [51ΛΩ]. The paper then generalizes this idea and made the remarkable prediction that analogous features could exist in other regions. In particular it was proposed that in the rare-earth region couplings between levels of type [30ΛΩ] and [41ΛΩ] would favor mass-asymmetric outer saddle shapes. In this picture the asymmetry of 180Hg is not a “new type of asymmetric fission” but of analogous origin as the asymmetry of actinide fission. This prediction has never been cited in the discussion of the recently observed fission asymmetries in the “new region of asymmetry”, in nuclear physics also referred to as the rare-earth region. We reflect by detailed analysis that the mechanism of the saddle asymmetry in the sub-Pb region is indeed the one predicted half a century ago.},
doi = {10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.034},
journal = {Physics Letters B},
number = C,
volume = 789,
place = {Netherlands},
year = {Fri Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Fri Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.034

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 16 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Fig. 1 Fig. 1: Calculated symmetric-yield to peak-yield ratios for 987 fissioning systems. Black squares (open in colored regions, filled outside) indicate β-stable nuclei. From Ref. [22] where the results in the figure are further discussed.

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Shell effects in nuclear masses and deformation energies
journal, April 1967


Calculated fission properties of the heaviest elements
journal, July 1987


The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission
journal, September 1939


New developments in the calculation of heavy-element fission barriers
journal, February 1989


Nuclear Physics A. Stationary States of Nuclei
journal, April 1936


Disintegration of Uranium by Neutrons: a New Type of Nuclear Reaction
journal, February 1939

  • Meitner, Lise; Frisch, O. R.
  • Nature, Vol. 143, Issue 3615
  • DOI: 10.1038/143239a0

Calculation of fission barriers with the droplet model and folded Yukawa single-particle potential
journal, September 1974


Nuclear Ground-State Masses and Deformations
journal, March 1995

  • Moller, P.; Nix, J. R.; Myers, W. D.
  • Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, Vol. 59, Issue 2, p. 185-381
  • DOI: 10.1006/adnd.1995.1002

Energy dependence of fission-fragment mass distributions from strongly damped shape evolution
journal, December 2013


Heavy-element fission barriers
journal, June 2009


Physical Evidence for the Division of Heavy Nuclei under Neutron Bombardment
journal, February 1939


Some Properties of Superdeformed Nuclei
journal, July 1981


Brownian Shape Motion on Five-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces:Nuclear Fission-Fragment Mass Distributions
journal, March 2011


Realistic fission saddle-point shapes
journal, March 2000


A method for solving the independent-particle Schrödinger equation with a deformed average field
journal, October 1969


The microscopic mechanism behind the fission barrier asymmetry
journal, March 1971


Fission-fragment mass distributions from strongly damped shape evolution
journal, September 2011


Relativistic radioactive beams: A new access to nuclear-fission studies
journal, February 2000


Macroscopic potential-energy surfaces for symmetric fission and heavy-ion reactions
journal, November 1976


The fission barrier and odd-multipole shape distortions
journal, March 1970


Fragment-Shell Influences in Nuclear Fission
journal, December 1971


Calculated fission yields of neutron-deficient mercury isotopes
journal, February 2012


Nuclear octupole deformation and the mechanism of fission
journal, February 1961


“Shells” in deformed nuclei
journal, December 1968


A general two-body matrix element for a Gaussian interaction using cylindrical harmonic oscillator functions
journal, August 1966


Nuclear fission modes and fragment mass asymmetries in a five-dimensional deformation space
journal, February 2001

  • Möller, P.; Madland, D. G.; Sierk, A. J.
  • Nature, Vol. 409, Issue 6822
  • DOI: 10.1038/35057204

Asymmetry in nuclear fission
journal, March 1971


New Type of Asymmetric Fission in Proton-Rich Nuclei
journal, December 2010


Nuclear shell structures in terms of classical periodic orbits
journal, May 2016


Works referencing / citing this record:

Effect of shell structure on the fission of sub-lead nuclei
journal, October 2019


Asymmetric fission around lead: The case of Po 198
journal, December 2019


Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.