Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey

Abbott, T. M.  C.; Alarcon, A.; Allam, S.; Andersen, P.; Andrade-Oliveira, F.; Annis, J.; Asorey, J.; Avila, S.; Bacon, D.; Banik, N.; Bassett, B. A.; Baxter, E.; Bechtol, K.; Becker, M. R.; Bernstein, G. M.; Bertin, E.; Blazek, J.; Bridle, S. L.; Brooks, D.; Brout, D.; Burke, D. L.; Calcino, J.; Camacho, H.; Campos, A.; Carnero Rosell, A.; Carollo, D.; Carrasco Kind, M.; Carretero, J.; Castander, F. J.; Cawthon, R.; Challis, P.; Chan, K. C.; Chang, C.; Childress, M.; Crocce, M.; Cunha, C. E.; D’Andrea, C. B.; da Costa, L. N.; Davis, C.; Davis, T. M.; De Vicente, J.; DePoy, D. L.; DeRose, J.; Desai, S.; Diehl, H. T.; Dietrich, J. P.; Dodelson, S.; Doel, P.; Drlica-Wagner, A.; Eifler, T. F.; Elvin-Poole, J.; Estrada, J.; Evrard, A. E.; Fernandez, E.; Flaugher, B.; Foley, R. J.; Fosalba, P.; Frieman, J.; Galbany, L.; García-Bellido, J.; Gatti, M.; Gaztanaga, E.; Gerdes, D. W.; Giannantonio, T.; Glazebrook, K.; Goldstein, D. A.; Gruen, D.; Gruendl, R. A.; Gschwend, J.; Gutierrez, G.; Hartley, W. G.; Hinton, S. R.; Hollowood, D. L.; Honscheid, K.; Hoormann, J. K.; Hoyle, B.; Huterer, D.; Jain, B.; James, D. J.; Jarvis, M.; Jeltema, T.; Kasai, E.; Kent, S.; Kessler, R.; Kim, A. G.; Kokron, N.; Krause, E.; Kron, R.; Kuehn, K.; Kuropatkin, N.; Lahav, O.; Lasker, J.; Lemos, P.; Lewis, G. F.; Li, T. S.; Lidman, C.; Lima, M.; Lin, H.; Macaulay, E.; MacCrann, N.; Maia, M. A.  G.; March, M.; Marriner, J.; Marshall, J. L.; Martini, P.; McMahon, R. G.; Melchior, P.; Menanteau, F.; Miquel, R.; Mohr, J. J.; Morganson, E.; Muir, J.; Möller, A.; Neilsen, E.; Nichol, R. C.; Nord, B.; Ogando, R. L.  C.; Palmese, A.; Pan, Y. -C.; Peiris, H. V.; Percival, W. J.; Plazas, A. A.; Porredon, A.; Prat, J.; Romer, A. K.; Roodman, A.; Rosenfeld, R.; Ross, A. J.; Rykoff, E. S.; Samuroff, S.; Sánchez, C.; Sanchez, E.; Scarpine, V.; Schindler, R.; Schubnell, M.; Scolnic, D.; Secco, L. F.; Serrano, S.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Sharp, R.; Sheldon, E.; Smith, M.; Soares-Santos, M.; Sobreira, F.; Sommer, N. E.; Swann, E.; Swanson, M. E.  C.; Tarle, G.; Thomas, D.; Thomas, R. C.; Troxel, M. A.; Tucker, B. E.; Uddin, S. A.; Vielzeuf, P.; Walker, A. R.; Wang, M.; Weaverdyck, N.; Wechsler, R. H.; Weller, J.; Yanny, B.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zuntz, J.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.171301

Title: Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey

Abstract

The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed Type Ia supernova light curves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, w, of dark energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark energy, finding w=-0.80+0.09-0.11. The geometry is shown to be consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the baryon density of Ωb=0.069+0.009-0.012 that is independent of early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the next decade.

Authors:: Abbott, T. M. C.; Alarcon, A.; Allam, S.; Andersen, P.; Andrade-Oliveira, F.; Annis, J.; Asorey, J.; Avila, S.; Bacon, D.; Banik, N.; Bassett, B. A.; Baxter, E.; Bechtol, K.; Becker, M. R.; Bernstein, G. M.; Bertin, E.; Blazek, J.; Bridle, S. L.; Brooks, D.; Brout, D. more »« less

Publication Date:: 2019-05-01

Research Org.:: Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States); Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)

Contributing Org.:: DES Collaboration

OSTI Identifier:: 1487399

Alternate Identifier(s):: OSTI ID: 1510140; OSTI ID: 1550891; OSTI ID: 1602527; OSTI ID: 1643943; OSTI ID: 1755508; OSTI ID: 1781333

Report Number(s):: arXiv:1811.02375; FERMILAB-PUB-18-585-AE
Journal ID: ISSN 0031-9007; PRLTAO; 1702363

Grant/Contract Number:: AC02-07CH11359; SC0010118; AC02-05CH11231; SC0011726; SC0007859; SC0019193

Resource Type:: Accepted Manuscript

Journal Name:: Physical Review Letters

Additional Journal Information:: Journal Volume: 122; Journal Issue: 17; Journal ID: ISSN 0031-9007

Publisher:: American Physical Society (APS)

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Subject:: 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; 72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS; Cosmological parameters; Dark energy; Dark matter

Citation Formats


                    Abbott, T. M.  C., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Andersen, P., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Banik, N., Bassett, B. A., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Blazek, J., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Brout, D., Burke, D. L., Calcino, J., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Carnero Rosell, A., Carollo, D., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Challis, P., Chan, K. C., Chang, C., Childress, M., Crocce, M., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., Davis, T. M., De Vicente, J., DePoy, D. L., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Estrada, J., Evrard, A. E., Fernandez, E., Flaugher, B., Foley, R. J., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Galbany, L., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Glazebrook, K., Goldstein, D. A., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoormann, J. K., Hoyle, B., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeltema, T., Kasai, E., Kent, S., Kessler, R., Kim, A. G., Kokron, N., Krause, E., Kron, R., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lasker, J., Lemos, P., Lewis, G. F., Li, T. S., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Lin, H., Macaulay, E., MacCrann, N., Maia, M. A.  G., March, M., Marriner, J., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McMahon, R. G., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morganson, E., Muir, J., Möller, A., Neilsen, E., Nichol, R. C., Nord, B., Ogando, R. L.  C., Palmese, A., Pan, Y. -C., Peiris, H. V., Percival, W. J., Plazas, A. A., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schindler, R., Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Secco, L. F., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sharp, R., Sheldon, E., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Sommer, N. E., Swann, E., Swanson, M. E.  C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Thomas, R. C., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, B. E., Uddin, S. A., Vielzeuf, P., Walker, A. R., Wang, M., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Yanny, B., Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J. Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey.  United States: N. p., 2019. 
Web.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.171301.

Copy to clipboard


                    Abbott, T. M.  C., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Andersen, P., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Banik, N., Bassett, B. A., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Blazek, J., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Brout, D., Burke, D. L., Calcino, J., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Carnero Rosell, A., Carollo, D., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Challis, P., Chan, K. C., Chang, C., Childress, M., Crocce, M., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., Davis, T. M., De Vicente, J., DePoy, D. L., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Estrada, J., Evrard, A. E., Fernandez, E., Flaugher, B., Foley, R. J., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Galbany, L., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Glazebrook, K., Goldstein, D. A., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoormann, J. K., Hoyle, B., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeltema, T., Kasai, E., Kent, S., Kessler, R., Kim, A. G., Kokron, N., Krause, E., Kron, R., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lasker, J., Lemos, P., Lewis, G. F., Li, T. S., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Lin, H., Macaulay, E., MacCrann, N., Maia, M. A.  G., March, M., Marriner, J., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McMahon, R. G., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morganson, E., Muir, J., Möller, A., Neilsen, E., Nichol, R. C., Nord, B., Ogando, R. L.  C., Palmese, A., Pan, Y. -C., Peiris, H. V., Percival, W. J., Plazas, A. A., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schindler, R., Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Secco, L. F., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sharp, R., Sheldon, E., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Sommer, N. E., Swann, E., Swanson, M. E.  C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Thomas, R. C., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, B. E., Uddin, S. A., Vielzeuf, P., Walker, A. R., Wang, M., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Yanny, B., Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., & Zuntz, J. Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey.  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.171301

Copy to clipboard


                    Abbott, T. M.  C., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Andersen, P., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Banik, N., Bassett, B. A., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Blazek, J., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Brout, D., Burke, D. L., Calcino, J., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Carnero Rosell, A., Carollo, D., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Challis, P., Chan, K. C., Chang, C., Childress, M., Crocce, M., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., Davis, T. M., De Vicente, J., DePoy, D. L., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Estrada, J., Evrard, A. E., Fernandez, E., Flaugher, B., Foley, R. J., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Galbany, L., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Glazebrook, K., Goldstein, D. A., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoormann, J. K., Hoyle, B., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeltema, T., Kasai, E., Kent, S., Kessler, R., Kim, A. G., Kokron, N., Krause, E., Kron, R., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lasker, J., Lemos, P., Lewis, G. F., Li, T. S., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Lin, H., Macaulay, E., MacCrann, N., Maia, M. A.  G., March, M., Marriner, J., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McMahon, R. G., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morganson, E., Muir, J., Möller, A., Neilsen, E., Nichol, R. C., Nord, B., Ogando, R. L.  C., Palmese, A., Pan, Y. -C., Peiris, H. V., Percival, W. J., Plazas, A. A., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schindler, R., Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Secco, L. F., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sharp, R., Sheldon, E., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Sommer, N. E., Swann, E., Swanson, M. E.  C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Thomas, R. C., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, B. E., Uddin, S. A., Vielzeuf, P., Walker, A. R., Wang, M., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Yanny, B., Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J. Wed .  
"Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey".  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.171301.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1487399.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1487399,

  title        = {Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey},

  author       = {Abbott, T. M.  C. and Alarcon, A. and Allam, S. and Andersen, P. and Andrade-Oliveira, F. and Annis, J. and Asorey, J. and Avila, S. and Bacon, D. and Banik, N. and Bassett, B. A. and Baxter, E. and Bechtol, K. and Becker, M. R. and Bernstein, G. M. and Bertin, E. and Blazek, J. and Bridle, S. L. and Brooks, D. and Brout, D. and Burke, D. L. and Calcino, J. and Camacho, H. and Campos, A. and Carnero Rosell, A. and Carollo, D. and Carrasco Kind, M. and Carretero, J. and Castander, F. J. and Cawthon, R. and Challis, P. and Chan, K. C. and Chang, C. and Childress, M. and Crocce, M. and Cunha, C. E. and D’Andrea, C. B. and da Costa, L. N. and Davis, C. and Davis, T. M. and De Vicente, J. and DePoy, D. L. and DeRose, J. and Desai, S. and Diehl, H. T. and Dietrich, J. P. and Dodelson, S. and Doel, P. and Drlica-Wagner, A. and Eifler, T. F. and Elvin-Poole, J. and Estrada, J. and Evrard, A. E. and Fernandez, E. and Flaugher, B. and Foley, R. J. and Fosalba, P. and Frieman, J. and Galbany, L. and García-Bellido, J. and Gatti, M. and Gaztanaga, E. and Gerdes, D. W. and Giannantonio, T. and Glazebrook, K. and Goldstein, D. A. and Gruen, D. and Gruendl, R. A. and Gschwend, J. and Gutierrez, G. and Hartley, W. G. and Hinton, S. R. and Hollowood, D. L. and Honscheid, K. and Hoormann, J. K. and Hoyle, B. and Huterer, D. and Jain, B. and James, D. J. and Jarvis, M. and Jeltema, T. and Kasai, E. and Kent, S. and Kessler, R. and Kim, A. G. and Kokron, N. and Krause, E. and Kron, R. and Kuehn, K. and Kuropatkin, N. and Lahav, O. and Lasker, J. and Lemos, P. and Lewis, G. F. and Li, T. S. and Lidman, C. and Lima, M. and Lin, H. and Macaulay, E. and MacCrann, N. and Maia, M. A.  G. and March, M. and Marriner, J. and Marshall, J. L. and Martini, P. and McMahon, R. G. and Melchior, P. and Menanteau, F. and Miquel, R. and Mohr, J. J. and Morganson, E. and Muir, J. and Möller, A. and Neilsen, E. and Nichol, R. C. and Nord, B. and Ogando, R. L.  C. and Palmese, A. and Pan, Y. -C. and Peiris, H. V. and Percival, W. J. and Plazas, A. A. and Porredon, A. and Prat, J. and Romer, A. K. and Roodman, A. and Rosenfeld, R. and Ross, A. J. and Rykoff, E. S. and Samuroff, S. and Sánchez, C. and Sanchez, E. and Scarpine, V. and Schindler, R. and Schubnell, M. and Scolnic, D. and Secco, L. F. and Serrano, S. and Sevilla-Noarbe, I. and Sharp, R. and Sheldon, E. and Smith, M. and Soares-Santos, M. and Sobreira, F. and Sommer, N. E. and Swann, E. and Swanson, M. E.  C. and Tarle, G. and Thomas, D. and Thomas, R. C. and Troxel, M. A. and Tucker, B. E. and Uddin, S. A. and Vielzeuf, P. and Walker, A. R. and Wang, M. and Weaverdyck, N. and Wechsler, R. H. and Weller, J. and Yanny, B. and Zhang, B. and Zhang, Y. and Zuntz, J.},

  abstractNote = {The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed Type Ia supernova light curves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, w, of dark energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark energy, finding w=-0.80+0.09-0.11. The geometry is shown to be consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the baryon density of Ωb=0.069+0.009-0.012 that is independent of early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the next decade.},

  doi          = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.171301},

  journal      = {Physical Review Letters},

  number       = 17,

  volume       = 122,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {2019},

  month        = {5}

}

Copy to clipboard

Journal Article:

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Publisher's Version of Record

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.171301

Other availability

Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 51 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Works referenced in this record:

THE CARNEGIE SUPERNOVA PROJECT: FIRST PHOTOMETRY DATA RELEASE OF LOW-REDSHIFT TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
journal, January 2010

Contreras, Carlos; Hamuy, Mario; Phillips, M. M.
The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 139, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/2/519

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11 Galaxy samples
journal, April 2014

Anderson, Lauren; Aubourg, Éric; Bailey, Stephen
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 441, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu523

Dark energy two decades after: observables, probes, consistency tests
journal, December 2017

Huterer, Dragan; Shafer, Daniel L.
Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 81, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa997e

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
journal, August 2018

Troxel, M. A.; MacCrann, N.; Zuntz, J.
Physical Review D, Vol. 98, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043528

Optimized clustering estimators for BAO measurements accounting for significant redshift uncertainty
journal, August 2017

Ross, Ashley J.; Banik, Nilanjan; Avila, Santiago
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2120

The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
journal, July 2011

Beutler, Florian; Blake, Chris; Colless, Matthew
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 416, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19250.x

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, August 2018

Abbott, T. M. C.; Abdalla, F. B.; Alarcon, A.
Physical Review D, Vol. 98, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043526

Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
journal, May 2017

Sheldon, Erin S.; Huff, Eric M.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 841, Issue 1
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa704b

First cosmology results using Type Ia supernova from the Dark Energy Survey: simulations to correct supernova distance biases
journal, February 2019

Kessler, R.; Brout, D.; D’Andrea, C. B.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 485, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz463

H0LiCOW – I. H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring: program overview
journal, February 2017

Suyu, S. H.; Bonvin, V.; Courbin, F.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 468, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx483

The dark Energy Camera
journal, October 2015

Flaugher, B.; Diehl, H. T.; Honscheid, K.
The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 150, Issue 5
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/150

Measuring type ia Supernova Populations of Stretch and Color and Predicting Distance Biases
journal, May 2016

Scolnic, D.; Kessler, R.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 822, Issue 2
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/L35

Automated Transient Identification in the dark Energy Survey
journal, August 2015

Goldstein, D. A.; D’Andrea, C. B.; Fischer, J. A.
The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 150, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/82

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
journal, March 2017

Alam, Shadab; Ata, Metin; Bailey, Stephen
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 470, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx721

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
journal, April 2018

Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, E. S.
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 235, Issue 2
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f5

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues
journal, August 2018

Zuntz, J.; Sheldon, E.; Samuroff, S.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2219

Planck 2015 results : XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
journal, September 2016

Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.; Ashdown, M.
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 594
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526926

cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys
journal, May 2017

Krause, Elisabeth; Eifler, Tim
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 470, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1261

Observational probes of cosmic acceleration
journal, September 2013

Weinberg, David H.; Mortonson, Michael J.; Eisenstein, Daniel J.
Physics Reports, Vol. 530, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.001

Planck 2015 results : XIII. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2016

Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 594
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
journal, September 1998

Riess, Adam G.; Filippenko, Alexei V.; Challis, Peter
The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 116, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1086/300499

The SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations at Redshift of 0.72 with the DR14 Luminous Red Galaxy Sample
journal, August 2018

Bautista, Julian E.; Vargas-Magaña, Mariana; Dawson, Kyle S.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 863, Issue 1
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacea5

The Dark Energy Survey data management system
conference, July 2008

Mohr, Joseph J.; Adams, Darren; Barkhouse, Wayne
SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
DOI: 10.1117/12.789550

The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline
journal, May 2018

Morganson, E.; Gruendl, R. A.; Menanteau, F.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 130, Issue 989
DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/aab4ef

DES Y1 Results: validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys
journal, July 2018

MacCrann, N.; DeRose, J.; Wechsler, R. H.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 480, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1899

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations
journal, September 2018

Cawthon, R.; Davis, C.; Gatti, M.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2424

The Blanco Cosmology Survey: data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics, and data Release
journal, September 2012

Desai, S.; Armstrong, R.; Mohr, J. J.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 757, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/83

The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15
journal, March 2015

Ross, Ashley J.; Samushia, Lado; Howlett, Cullan
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 449, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv154

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: cross-correlation redshifts – methods and systematics characterization
journal, February 2018

Gatti, M.; Vielzeuf, P.; Davis, C.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 477, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty466

IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW CfA SUPERNOVA TYPE Ia LIGHT CURVES
journal, July 2009

Hicken, Malcolm; Wood-Vasey, W. Michael; Blondin, Stephane
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 700, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1097

Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
journal, September 2008

Frieman, Joshua A.; Turner, Michael S.; Huterer, Dragan
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 46, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145243

Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation
journal, June 2000

Benitez, Narciso
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 536, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1086/308947

The Difference Imaging Pipeline for the Transient Search in the dark Energy Survey
journal, November 2015

Kessler, R.; Marriner, J.; Childress, M.
The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 150, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/6/172

Planck 2015 results : XV. Gravitational lensing
journal, September 2016

Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 594
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525941

Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
journal, September 2018

Mandelbaum, Rachel
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 56, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928

CfA4: LIGHT CURVES FOR 94 TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
journal, May 2012

Hicken, Malcolm; Challis, Peter; Kirshner, Robert P.
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 200, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/12

Dark Energy Survey Year-1 results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO
journal, May 2018

Avila, S.; Crocce, M.; Ross, A. J.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 479, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1389

Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
journal, December 2017

Burke, D. L.; Rykoff, E. S.; Allam, S.
The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 155, Issue 1
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9f22

BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics
journal, July 2018

Chan, K. C.; Crocce, M.; Ross, A. J.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 480, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2036

Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
journal, September 2011

Allen, Steven W.; Evrard, August E.; Mantz, Adam B.
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 49, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102514

CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation
journal, September 2015

Zuntz, J.; Paterno, M.; Jennings, E.
Astronomy and Computing, Vol. 12
DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2015.05.005

Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
journal, September 2002

Hu, Wayne; Dodelson, Scott
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 40, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926

SUPERCAL: CROSS-CALIBRATION OF MULTIPLE PHOTOMETRIC SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE COSMOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS WITH TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
journal, December 2015

Scolnic, D.; Casertano, S.; Riess, A.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 815, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/117

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies
journal, April 2018

Hoyle, B.; Gruen, D.; Bernstein, G. M.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 478, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty957

Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment
journal, January 2007

Hunter, John D.
Computing in Science & Engineering, Vol. 9, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS
journal, September 2013

Hinshaw, G.; Larson, D.; Komatsu, E.
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 208, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample
journal, May 2018

Scolnic, D. M.; Jones, D. O.; Rest, A.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 859, Issue 2
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
journal, August 2018

Elvin-Poole, J.; Crocce, M.; Ross, A. J.
Physical Review D, Vol. 98, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.042006

First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
journal, February 2019

Abbott, T. M. C.; Allam, S.; Andersen, P.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 872, Issue 2
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab04fa

Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
journal, June 1999

Perlmutter, S.; Aldering, G.; Goldhaber, G.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 517, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1086/307221

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing
journal, August 2018

Prat, J.; Sánchez, C.; Fang, Y.
Physical Review D, Vol. 98, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.042005

redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

Rozo, E.; Rykoff, E. S.; Abate, A.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 461, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1281

Correcting Type Ia Supernova Distances for Selection Biases and Contamination in Photometrically Identified Samples
journal, February 2017

Kessler, R.; Scolnic, D.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 836, Issue 1
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/56

Planck 2015 results : XXIII. The thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect-cosmic infrared background correlation
journal, September 2016

Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 594
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527418

Optimized clustering estimators for BAO measurements accounting for significant redshift uncertainty
text, January 2017

Ross, Ashley J.; Banik, Nilanjan; Avila, Santiago
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
DOI: 10.17863/cam.10077

Planck 2015 results : VI. LFI mapmaking
journal, September 2016

Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Ashdown, M.
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 594
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525813

Planck 2015 results : X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps
journal, September 2016

Adam, R.; Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 594
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525967

Planck 2015 results : XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
journal, September 2016

Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 594
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526681

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2018

Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, Es
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
DOI: 10.17863/cam.21145

Planck 2015 results : XXVI. The Second
journal, September 2016

Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Argüeso, F.
Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 594
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526914

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations
text, January 2018

Cawthon, R.; Davis, C.; Gatti, M.
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
DOI: 10.17863/cam.20892

The Dark Energy Survey Data Management System
text, January 2008

Mohr, Joseph J.; Barkhouse, Wayne; Beldica, Cristina
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0807.2515

The Carnegie Supernova Project: First Photometry Data Release of Low-Redshift Type Ia Supernovae
text, January 2009

Contreras, Carlos; Hamuy, Mario; Phillips, M. M.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0910.3330

The Blanco Cosmology Survey: Data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics and Data Release
text, January 2012

Desai, S.; Armstrong, R.; Mohr, J. J.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1204.1210

CfA4: Light Curves for 94 Type Ia Supernovae
text, January 2012

Hicken, Malcolm; Challis, Peter; Kirshner, Robert P.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1205.4493

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 10 and 11 galaxy samples
text, January 2013

Anderson, Lauren; Aubourg, Eric; Bailey, Stephen
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1312.4877

CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation
text, January 2014

Zuntz, Joe; Paterno, Marc; Jennings, Elise
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1409.3409

Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
text, January 2015

Collaboration, Planck; Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589

Planck 2015 results. XV. Gravitational lensing
text, January 2015

Collaboration, Planck; Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1502.01591

Automated Transient Identification in the Dark Energy Survey
text, January 2015

Goldstein, D. A.; D'Andrea, C. B.; Fischer, J. A.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1504.02936

Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
text, January 2015

Collaboration, Planck; Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1507.02704

redMaGiC: Selecting Luminous Red Galaxies from the DES Science Verification Data
text, January 2015

Rozo, E.; Rykoff, E. S.; Abate, A.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1507.05460

H0LiCOW I. $H_0$ Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring: Program Overview
text, January 2016

Suyu, S. H.; Bonvin, V.; Courbin, F.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1607.00017

Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
text, January 2017

Sheldon, Erin S.; Huff, Eric M.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1702.02601

Optimized Clustering Estimators for BAO Measurements Accounting for Significant Redshift Uncertainty
text, January 2017

Ross, Ashley J.; Banik, Nilanjan; Avila, Santiago
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1705.05442

Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
text, January 2017

Burke, D.; Rykoff, E. S.; Allam, S.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1706.01542

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
text, January 2017

Collaboration, Des; Abbott, T. M. C.; Abdalla, F. B.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.01530

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2017

Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, E. S.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.01531

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak lensing source galaxies
text, January 2017

Hoyle, B.; Gruen, D.; Bernstein, G. M.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.01532

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing
text, January 2017

Prat, J.; Sánchez, C.; Fang, Y.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.01537

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear
text, January 2017

Troxel, M. A.; MacCrann, N.; Zuntz, J.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1708.01538

Dark energy two decades after: Observables, probes, consistency tests
text, January 2017

Huterer, Dragan; Shafer, Daniel L.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1709.01091

The SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations at redshift of 0.72 with the DR14 Luminous Red Galaxy Sample
text, January 2017

Bautista, Julian E.; Vargas-Magaña, Mariana; Dawson, Kyle S.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1712.08064

The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline
text, January 2018

Morganson, E.; Gruendl, R. A.; Menanteau, F.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1801.03177

BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics
text, January 2018

Chan, K. C.; Crocce, M.; Ross, A. J.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1801.04390

Bayesian photometric redshift estimation
text, January 1998

Benitez, Narciso
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9811189

Works referencing / citing this record:

Phenotypic redshifts with self-organizing maps: A novel method to characterize redshift distributions of source galaxies for weak lensing
journal, August 2019

Buchs, R.; Davis, C.; Gruen, D.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2162

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: validation of weak lensing cluster member contamination estimates from P(z) decomposition
journal, August 2019

Varga, T. N.; DeRose, J.; Gruen, D.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2185

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: constraints on intrinsic alignments and their colour dependence from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, August 2019

Samuroff, S.; Blazek, J.; Troxel, M. A.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2197

Bending of light in a universe filled with quintessential dark energy
journal, November 2019

Saadati, R.; Shojai, F.
Physical Review D, Vol. 100, Issue 10
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.104041

How sound are our ultralight axion approximations?
journal, January 2020

Cookmeyer, Jonathan; Grin, Daniel; Smith, Tristan L.
Physical Review D, Vol. 101, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.023501

Stress testing the dark energy equation of state imprint on supernova data
journal, June 2019

Moews, Ben; de Souza, Rafael S.; Ishida, Emille E. O.
Physical Review D, Vol. 99, Issue 12
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.99.123529

Can the quantum vacuum fluctuations really solve the cosmological constant problem?
journal, January 2020

Bengochea, Gabriel R.; León, Gabriel; Okon, Elias
The European Physical Journal C, Vol. 80, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7554-1

A look into the cosmological consequences of a dark energy model with higher derivatives of H in the framework of Chameleon Brans–Dicke cosmology
journal, August 2019

Pasqua, Antonio; Chattopadhyay, Surajit; Beesham, Aroonkumar
International Journal of Modern Physics D, Vol. 28, Issue 11
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271819501499

Type Ia Supernovae Are Excellent Standard Candles in the Near-infrared
journal, December 2019

Avelino, Arturo; Friedman, Andrew S.; Mandel, Kaisey S.
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 887, Issue 1
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a16

A Future Percent-level Measurement of the Hubble Expansion at Redshift 0.8 with Advanced LIGO
journal, October 2019

Farr, Will M.; Fishbach, Maya; Ye, Jiani
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 883, Issue 2
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4284

Type Ia Supernovae Are Excellent Standard Candles in the Near-infrared
text, January 2019

Avelino, A.; Friedman, As; Mandel, Kaisey
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
DOI: 10.17863/cam.41379

A look into the cosmological consequences of a dark energy model with higher derivatives of $H$ in the framework of Chameleon Brans-Dicke Cosmology
preprint, January 2016

Pasqua, Antonio; Chattopadhyay, Surajit; Beesham, Aroonkumar
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1607.03384

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Intrinsic Alignments and their Colour Dependence from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
text, January 2018

Samuroff, S.; Blazek, J.; Troxel, M. A.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1811.06989

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Validation of weak lensing cluster member contamination estimates from P(z) decomposition
text, January 2018

Varga, T. N.; DeRose, J.; Gruen, D.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1812.05116

Phenotypic redshifts with self-organizing maps: A novel method to characterize redshift distributions of source galaxies for weak lensing
text, January 2019

Buchs, R.; Davis, C.; Gruen, D.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1901.05005

Type Ia Supernovae are Excellent Standard Candles in the Near-Infrared
text, January 2019

Avelino, Arturo; Friedman, Andrew S.; Mandel, Kaisey S.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1902.03261

Bending of light in the Universe filled with quintessential dark energy
text, January 2019

Saadati, R.; Shojai, F.
arXiv
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1910.13499

Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections:

Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey

Journal Article Abbott, T. M. C. ; Alarcon, A. ; Allam, S. ; ... - Physical Review Letters

The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically confirmed type Ia supernova light curves, the baryon acoustic oscillation feature, weak gravitational lensing, and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, w, of dark energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no darkmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.171301
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Constraints on extended cosmological models from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

Journal Article Abbott, T. M. C. ; Abdalla, F. B. ; Avila, S. ; ... - Physical Review D

We introduce constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models dominated by dark matter and dark energy, ΛCDM and wCDM, by utilizing a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated scenarios: (1) nonzero curvature Ω_k, (2) number of relativistic species N_eff different from the standard value of 3.046, (3) time-varying equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters w₀ and w_a (alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, w_p, and w_a), and (4) modified gravity described by the parameters μ₀ and Σ₀ that modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck cosmic microwave background measurements; baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; redshift-space distortion measurements from BOSS; and type Ia supernova information from the Pantheon compilation of datasets. Constraints on curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find Ω_k=0.0020more »« less
Cited by 60
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.99.123505

Full Text Available
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

Journal Article Abbott, T. M. C. ; Abdalla, F. B. ; Alarcon, A. ; ... - Physical Review D

Here, we present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg² of griz imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric-redshift estimation and validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias, the bulk of the analysis was carried out while “blind” to the true results; we describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat Λ CDM andmore »« less
Cited by 641
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043526

Full Text Available
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances and weak lensing

Journal Article Abbott, T. M. C. ; Aguena, M. ; Alarcon, A. ; ... - Physical Review D

In this work we perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values formore »« less
Cited by 89
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023509

Full Text Available
Cosmological constraints from measurements of type Ia supernovae discovered during the first 1.5 yr of the Pan-STARRS1 survey

Journal Article Rest, A. ; Scolnic, D. ; Riess, A. ; ... - Astrophysical Journal

We present griz {sub P1} light curves of 146 spectroscopically confirmed Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; 0.03 < z < 0.65) discovered during the first 1.5 yr of the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey. The Pan-STARRS1 natural photometric system is determined by a combination of on-site measurements of the instrument response function and observations of spectrophotometric standard stars. We find that the systematic uncertainties in the photometric system are currently 1.2% without accounting for the uncertainty in the Hubble Space Telescope Calspec definition of the AB system. A Hubble diagram is constructed with a subset of 113 out of 146 SNemore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/44

Similar Records

Title: Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey

Abstract

Citation Formats

THE CARNEGIE SUPERNOVA PROJECT: FIRST PHOTOMETRY DATA RELEASE OF LOW-REDSHIFT TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE journal, January 2010

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11 Galaxy samples journal, April 2014

Dark energy two decades after: observables, probes, consistency tests journal, December 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear journal, August 2018

Optimized clustering estimators for BAO measurements accounting for significant redshift uncertainty journal, August 2017

The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant journal, July 2011

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing journal, August 2018

Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration journal, May 2017

First cosmology results using Type Ia supernova from the Dark Energy Survey: simulations to correct supernova distance biases journal, February 2019

H0LiCOW – I. H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring: program overview journal, February 2017

The dark Energy Camera journal, October 2015

Measuring type ia Supernova Populations of Stretch and Color and Predicting Distance Biases journal, May 2016

Automated Transient Identification in the dark Energy Survey journal, August 2015

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample journal, March 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology journal, April 2018

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues journal, August 2018

Planck 2015 results : XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters journal, September 2016

cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys journal, May 2017

Observational probes of cosmic acceleration journal, September 2013

Planck 2015 results : XIII. Cosmological parameters journal, September 2016

Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant journal, September 1998

The SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations at Redshift of 0.72 with the DR14 Luminous Red Galaxy Sample journal, August 2018

The Dark Energy Survey data management system conference, July 2008

The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline journal, May 2018

DES Y1 Results: validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys journal, July 2018

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations journal, September 2018

The Blanco Cosmology Survey: data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics, and data Release journal, September 2012

The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15 journal, March 2015

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: cross-correlation redshifts – methods and systematics characterization journal, February 2018

IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW CfA SUPERNOVA TYPE Ia LIGHT CURVES journal, July 2009

Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe journal, September 2008

Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation journal, June 2000

The Difference Imaging Pipeline for the Transient Search in the dark Energy Survey journal, November 2015

Planck 2015 results : XV. Gravitational lensing journal, September 2016

Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology journal, September 2018

CfA4: LIGHT CURVES FOR 94 TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE journal, May 2012

Dark Energy Survey Year-1 results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO journal, May 2018

Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey journal, December 2017

BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics journal, July 2018

Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters journal, September 2011

CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation journal, September 2015

Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies journal, September 2002

SUPERCAL: CROSS-CALIBRATION OF MULTIPLE PHOTOMETRIC SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE COSMOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS WITH TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE journal, December 2015

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies journal, April 2018

Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment journal, January 2007

NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS journal, September 2013

The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample journal, May 2018

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes journal, August 2018

First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters journal, February 2019

Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae journal, June 1999

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing journal, August 2018

redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data journal, May 2016

Correcting Type Ia Supernova Distances for Selection Biases and Contamination in Photometrically Identified Samples journal, February 2017

Planck 2015 results : XXIII. The thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect-cosmic infrared background correlation journal, September 2016

Optimized clustering estimators for BAO measurements accounting for significant redshift uncertainty text, January 2017

Planck 2015 results : VI. LFI mapmaking journal, September 2016

Planck 2015 results : X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps journal, September 2016

Planck 2015 results : XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB journal, September 2016

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology text, January 2018

Planck 2015 results : XXVI. The Second journal, September 2016

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations text, January 2018

The Dark Energy Survey Data Management System text, January 2008

The Carnegie Supernova Project: First Photometry Data Release of Low-Redshift Type Ia Supernovae text, January 2009

The Blanco Cosmology Survey: Data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics and Data Release text, January 2012

CfA4: Light Curves for 94 Type Ia Supernovae text, January 2012

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 10 and 11 galaxy samples text, January 2013

CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation text, January 2014

Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters text, January 2015

Planck 2015 results. XV. Gravitational lensing text, January 2015

Automated Transient Identification in the Dark Energy Survey text, January 2015

Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters text, January 2015

redMaGiC: Selecting Luminous Red Galaxies from the DES Science Verification Data text, January 2015

H0LiCOW I. $H_0$ Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring: Program Overview text, January 2016

Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration text, January 2017

Optimized Clustering Estimators for BAO Measurements Accounting for Significant Redshift Uncertainty text, January 2017

Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey text, January 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing text, January 2017

THE CARNEGIE SUPERNOVA PROJECT: FIRST PHOTOMETRY DATA RELEASE OF LOW-REDSHIFT TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
journal, January 2010

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11 Galaxy samples
journal, April 2014

Dark energy two decades after: observables, probes, consistency tests
journal, December 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
journal, August 2018

Optimized clustering estimators for BAO measurements accounting for significant redshift uncertainty
journal, August 2017

The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
journal, July 2011

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, August 2018

Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
journal, May 2017

First cosmology results using Type Ia supernova from the Dark Energy Survey: simulations to correct supernova distance biases
journal, February 2019

H0LiCOW – I. H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring: program overview
journal, February 2017

The dark Energy Camera
journal, October 2015

Measuring type ia Supernova Populations of Stretch and Color and Predicting Distance Biases
journal, May 2016

Automated Transient Identification in the dark Energy Survey
journal, August 2015

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
journal, March 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
journal, April 2018

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues
journal, August 2018

Planck 2015 results : XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
journal, September 2016

cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys
journal, May 2017

Observational probes of cosmic acceleration
journal, September 2013

Planck 2015 results : XIII. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2016

Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
journal, September 1998

The SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations at Redshift of 0.72 with the DR14 Luminous Red Galaxy Sample
journal, August 2018

The Dark Energy Survey data management system
conference, July 2008

The Dark Energy Survey Image Processing Pipeline
journal, May 2018

DES Y1 Results: validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys
journal, July 2018

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations
journal, September 2018

The Blanco Cosmology Survey: data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics, and data Release
journal, September 2012

The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15
journal, March 2015

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: cross-correlation redshifts – methods and systematics characterization
journal, February 2018

IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW CfA SUPERNOVA TYPE Ia LIGHT CURVES
journal, July 2009

Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
journal, September 2008

Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation
journal, June 2000

The Difference Imaging Pipeline for the Transient Search in the dark Energy Survey
journal, November 2015

Planck 2015 results : XV. Gravitational lensing
journal, September 2016

Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
journal, September 2018

CfA4: LIGHT CURVES FOR 94 TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
journal, May 2012

Dark Energy Survey Year-1 results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO
journal, May 2018

Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
journal, December 2017

BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics
journal, July 2018

Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
journal, September 2011

CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation
journal, September 2015

Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
journal, September 2002

SUPERCAL: CROSS-CALIBRATION OF MULTIPLE PHOTOMETRIC SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE COSMOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS WITH TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
journal, December 2015

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies
journal, April 2018

Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment
journal, January 2007

NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS
journal, September 2013

The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample
journal, May 2018

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
journal, August 2018

First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
journal, February 2019

Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
journal, June 1999

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing
journal, August 2018

redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

Correcting Type Ia Supernova Distances for Selection Biases and Contamination in Photometrically Identified Samples
journal, February 2017

Planck 2015 results : XXIII. The thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect-cosmic infrared background correlation
journal, September 2016

Optimized clustering estimators for BAO measurements accounting for significant redshift uncertainty
text, January 2017

Planck 2015 results : VI. LFI mapmaking
journal, September 2016

Planck 2015 results : X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps
journal, September 2016

Planck 2015 results : XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
journal, September 2016

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2018

Planck 2015 results : XXVI. The Second
journal, September 2016

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC redshift distributions in DES and SDSS from cross-correlations
text, January 2018

The Dark Energy Survey Data Management System
text, January 2008

The Carnegie Supernova Project: First Photometry Data Release of Low-Redshift Type Ia Supernovae
text, January 2009

The Blanco Cosmology Survey: Data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics and Data Release
text, January 2012

CfA4: Light Curves for 94 Type Ia Supernovae
text, January 2012

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 10 and 11 galaxy samples
text, January 2013

CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation
text, January 2014

Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
text, January 2015

Planck 2015 results. XV. Gravitational lensing
text, January 2015

Automated Transient Identification in the Dark Energy Survey
text, January 2015

Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
text, January 2015

redMaGiC: Selecting Luminous Red Galaxies from the DES Science Verification Data
text, January 2015

H0LiCOW I. $H_0$ Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring: Program Overview
text, January 2016

Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
text, January 2017

Optimized Clustering Estimators for BAO Measurements Accounting for Significant Redshift Uncertainty
text, January 2017

Forward Global Photometric Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
text, January 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
text, January 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak lensing source galaxies
text, January 2017

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing
text, January 2017