DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A county‐level estimation of renewable surface water and groundwater availability associated with potential large‐scale bioenergy feedstock production scenarios in the United States

Abstract

Abstract This study examines fresh renewable water resources available for bioenergy feedstock production in the United States. The impacts of feedstock irrigation on surface and groundwater resources available to nonbioenergy sectors were quantified using a pair of water availability indexes: streamflow availability index and percolation flow availability index. The two metrics were applied to both historical (2008) and three possible future biomass production scenarios from the 2016 U.S. Billion‐Ton Report at the county level. For both historical and future scenarios, we found that the consumptive irrigation requirements for bioenergy feedstock account for <0.01% of annual streamflow in all but three counties in Nebraska. Results suggest that the irrigation demand of future biomass production could be supplied by annual renewable groundwater flow in about 94% of feedstock‐growing counties that use groundwater for irrigation, representing about 92% of production tonnage. Counties that require irrigation from nonrenewable groundwater resources are mostly located in the Northern Plains and Pacific regions. We also evaluated the sensitivity of crop water footprint estimation to soil moisture carryover by comparing blue water estimates from six different empirical and process‐based methods. Our findings suggest that accounting for preseason soil moisture is critical for representative blue water estimation, so thatmore » the irrigation water consumption is not overestimated. This is especially true in the Corn Belt region, where blue water estimates with and without preseason soil moisture would be about 1.9 versus 45.5 billion m 3 /year under the historical scenario. This difference is smaller in semiarid regions like the High Plains, but the blue water estimate can still triple if soil moisture is not considered. From the perspective of renewable surface water and groundwater resources, scaling feedstock production up in the High Plains and California will require careful planning integrated with water management strategies to improve water resource conservation.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Energy Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Lemont Illinois
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Sustainable Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office
OSTI Identifier:
1482263
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1482264; OSTI ID: 1509994
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Journal Volume: 11 Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; bioenergy feedstock; crop water demand; future biomass production; groundwater; renewable water; soil moisture; surface water; water availability

Citation Formats

Xu, Hui, Wu, May, and Ha, Miae. A county‐level estimation of renewable surface water and groundwater availability associated with potential large‐scale bioenergy feedstock production scenarios in the United States. United Kingdom: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12576.
Xu, Hui, Wu, May, & Ha, Miae. A county‐level estimation of renewable surface water and groundwater availability associated with potential large‐scale bioenergy feedstock production scenarios in the United States. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12576
Xu, Hui, Wu, May, and Ha, Miae. Wed . "A county‐level estimation of renewable surface water and groundwater availability associated with potential large‐scale bioenergy feedstock production scenarios in the United States". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12576.
@article{osti_1482263,
title = {A county‐level estimation of renewable surface water and groundwater availability associated with potential large‐scale bioenergy feedstock production scenarios in the United States},
author = {Xu, Hui and Wu, May and Ha, Miae},
abstractNote = {Abstract This study examines fresh renewable water resources available for bioenergy feedstock production in the United States. The impacts of feedstock irrigation on surface and groundwater resources available to nonbioenergy sectors were quantified using a pair of water availability indexes: streamflow availability index and percolation flow availability index. The two metrics were applied to both historical (2008) and three possible future biomass production scenarios from the 2016 U.S. Billion‐Ton Report at the county level. For both historical and future scenarios, we found that the consumptive irrigation requirements for bioenergy feedstock account for <0.01% of annual streamflow in all but three counties in Nebraska. Results suggest that the irrigation demand of future biomass production could be supplied by annual renewable groundwater flow in about 94% of feedstock‐growing counties that use groundwater for irrigation, representing about 92% of production tonnage. Counties that require irrigation from nonrenewable groundwater resources are mostly located in the Northern Plains and Pacific regions. We also evaluated the sensitivity of crop water footprint estimation to soil moisture carryover by comparing blue water estimates from six different empirical and process‐based methods. Our findings suggest that accounting for preseason soil moisture is critical for representative blue water estimation, so that the irrigation water consumption is not overestimated. This is especially true in the Corn Belt region, where blue water estimates with and without preseason soil moisture would be about 1.9 versus 45.5 billion m 3 /year under the historical scenario. This difference is smaller in semiarid regions like the High Plains, but the blue water estimate can still triple if soil moisture is not considered. From the perspective of renewable surface water and groundwater resources, scaling feedstock production up in the High Plains and California will require careful planning integrated with water management strategies to improve water resource conservation.},
doi = {10.1111/gcbb.12576},
journal = {Global Change Biology. Bioenergy},
number = 4,
volume = 11,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Wed Nov 14 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Wed Nov 14 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12576

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 7 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Water Consumption Footprint and Land Requirements of Large-Scale Alternative Diesel and Jet Fuel Production
journal, October 2013

  • Staples, Mark D.; Olcay, Hakan; Malina, Robert
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/es4030782

Estimating Water Consumption of Potential Natural Vegetation on Global Dry Lands: Building an LCA Framework for Green Water Flows
journal, October 2013

  • Núñez, Montserrat; Pfister, Stephan; Roux, Philippe
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/es403159t

Bioenergy and water—the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply
journal, December 2002


Managing the energy-water-food nexus for sustainable development
journal, January 2018


Large area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment part i: Model Development
journal, February 1998


The blue, green and grey water footprint of rice from production and consumption perspectives
journal, February 2011


Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: The global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030
journal, August 2012


The water footprint of bioenergy
journal, June 2009

  • Gerbens-Leenes, W.; Hoekstra, A. Y.; van der Meer, T. H.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, Issue 25
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812619106

The Response of Soil Moisture to Long-Term Variability of Precipitation
journal, October 2002


Sectoral contributions to surface water stress in the coterminous United States
journal, September 2013


Could biofuel development stress China's water resources?
journal, March 2017

  • Hao, Mengmeng; Jiang, Dong; Wang, Jianhua
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12440

A characterisation model to address the environmental impact of green water flows for water scarcity footprints
journal, June 2018


Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley
journal, May 2012

  • Scanlon, B. R.; Faunt, C. C.; Longuevergne, L.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200311109

Peak water limits to freshwater withdrawal and use
journal, May 2010

  • Gleick, P. H.; Palaniappan, M.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue 25
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004812107

Land management strategies for improving water quality in biomass production under changing climate
journal, March 2017


Regional water resource implications of bioethanol production in the Southeastern United States
journal, September 2009


Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production
journal, November 2014

  • Bonsch, Markus; Humpenöder, Florian; Popp, Alexander
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12226

A High Spatiotemporal Assessment of Consumptive Water Use and Water Scarcity in the Conterminous United States
journal, August 2015

  • Moore, Brandon C.; Coleman, André M.; Wigmosta, Mark S.
  • Water Resources Management, Vol. 29, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-1112-x

Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy
journal, March 2008

  • de Fraiture, Charlotte; Giordano, Mark; Liao, Yongsong
  • Water Policy, Vol. 10, Issue S1
  • DOI: 10.2166/wp.2008.054

Understanding and managing the food-energy-water nexus – opportunities for water resources research
journal, January 2018


Assessing County-Level Water Footprints of Different Cellulosic-Biofuel Feedstock Pathways
journal, July 2012

  • Chiu, Yi-Wen; Wu, May
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1021/es3002162

Soil water recharge in a semi-arid temperate climate of the Central U.S. Great Plains
journal, July 2010

  • Grassini, Patricio; You, Jinsheng; Hubbard, Kenneth G.
  • Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 97, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.02.019

Annual Estimates of Recharge, Quick-Flow Runoff, and Evapotranspiration for the Contiguous U.S. Using Empirical Regression Equations
journal, July 2017

  • Reitz, M.; Sanford, W. E.; Senay, G. B.
  • JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 53, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12546

Mapping water availability, projected use and cost in the western United States
journal, May 2014

  • Tidwell, Vincent C.; Moreland, Barbara D.; Zemlick, Katie M.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 9, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064009

Implications for the hydrologic cycle under climate change due to the expansion of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States
journal, August 2011

  • Le, P. V. V.; Kumar, P.; Drewry, D. T.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, Issue 37
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1107177108

The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products
journal, January 2011


Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass
journal, October 2009


Water-Yield Relationships for Irrigated and Dryland Wheat in the U.S. Southern Plains
journal, January 1994


21st century United States emissions mitigation could increase water stress more than the climate change it is mitigating
journal, August 2015

  • Hejazi, Mohamad I.; Voisin, Nathalie; Liu, Lu
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 34
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421675112

Assessing the Environmental Impact of Water Consumption by Energy Crops Grown in Spain
journal, May 2012


Comparative water use by maize, perennial crops, restored prairie, and poplar trees in the US Midwest
journal, June 2015


Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 “Level of water stress”
journal, February 2018


Soil Water Depletion and Recharge under Ten Crop Species and Applications to the Principles of Dynamic Cropping Systems
journal, January 2007

  • Merrill, Stephen D.; Tanaka, Donald L.; Krupinsky, Joseph M.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 99, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0134s

Regional Blue and Green Water Balances and Use by Selected Crops in the U.S.
journal, August 2015

  • White, Michael; Gambone, Marilyn; Yen, Haw
  • JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 51, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12344

Water depletion: An improved metric for incorporating seasonal and dry-year water scarcity into water risk assessments
journal, January 2016


Global monthly water stress: 2. Water demand and severity of water stress: GLOBAL MONTHLY WATER STRESS, 2
journal, July 2011

  • Wada, Yoshihide; van Beek, L. P. H.; Viviroli, Daniel
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 47, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010WR009792

Projecting Water Withdrawal and Supply for Future Decades in the U.S. under Climate Change Scenarios
journal, February 2012

  • Roy, Sujoy B.; Chen, Limin; Girvetz, Evan H.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/es2030774

Exploring the Water-Thermoelectric Power Nexus
journal, September 2012


Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased water-use efficiency in winter wheat under deficit irrigation
journal, February 2006


Irrigation in the Texas High Plains: a brief history and potential reductions in demand
journal, July 2009

  • Colaizzi, P. D.; Gowda, P. H.; Marek, T. H.
  • Irrigation and Drainage, Vol. 58, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/ird.418

Transition to Dryland Agriculture: Limited Irrigated vs. Dryland Corn
journal, March 2002