Mining data in a dynamic PRA framework
Abstract
Computational (also known as Dynamic) Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) methods employs system simulation codes coupled with stochastic analysis tools in order to determine probabilities of certain outcomes such as system failure. In contrast to classical PRA methods (i.e., Event-Tree and Fault-Tree) in which timing and sequencing of events is set by the analyst, accident progression is dictated by the system control logic and its interaction with system temporal evolution. Due to the nature of the problem, Simulation-Based PRA methods require large amount of computationally expensive simulation runs. In addition, these methods usually generate a large number of simulation runs (database storage may be on the order of gigabytes or higher). In this paper we investigate and apply several methods and algorithms to analyze these large amounts of time-dependent data. Furthermore, the scope of this article is to present a broad overview of methods and algorithms that can be used to improve data quality and to analyze and extract information from large data sets containing time dependent data. In this context, “extracting information” means constructing input-output correlations, finding commonalities, and identifying outliers.
- Authors:
-
- Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1478243
- Report Number(s):
- INL/JOU-18-44526-Rev000
Journal ID: ISSN 0149-1970
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC07-05ID14517
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Progress in Nuclear Energy
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 108; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0149-1970
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; Data mining; Dynamic PRA; Probabilistic risk assessment; Clustering
Citation Formats
Mandelli, Diego, Maljovec, Daniel, Alfonsi, Andrea, Parisi, Carlo, Talbot, Paul, Cogliati, Joshua J., Smith, Curtis, and Rabiti, Cristian. Mining data in a dynamic PRA framework. United States: N. p., 2018.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.05.004.
Mandelli, Diego, Maljovec, Daniel, Alfonsi, Andrea, Parisi, Carlo, Talbot, Paul, Cogliati, Joshua J., Smith, Curtis, & Rabiti, Cristian. Mining data in a dynamic PRA framework. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.05.004
Mandelli, Diego, Maljovec, Daniel, Alfonsi, Andrea, Parisi, Carlo, Talbot, Paul, Cogliati, Joshua J., Smith, Curtis, and Rabiti, Cristian. Sat .
"Mining data in a dynamic PRA framework". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.05.004. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1478243.
@article{osti_1478243,
title = {Mining data in a dynamic PRA framework},
author = {Mandelli, Diego and Maljovec, Daniel and Alfonsi, Andrea and Parisi, Carlo and Talbot, Paul and Cogliati, Joshua J. and Smith, Curtis and Rabiti, Cristian},
abstractNote = {Computational (also known as Dynamic) Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) methods employs system simulation codes coupled with stochastic analysis tools in order to determine probabilities of certain outcomes such as system failure. In contrast to classical PRA methods (i.e., Event-Tree and Fault-Tree) in which timing and sequencing of events is set by the analyst, accident progression is dictated by the system control logic and its interaction with system temporal evolution. Due to the nature of the problem, Simulation-Based PRA methods require large amount of computationally expensive simulation runs. In addition, these methods usually generate a large number of simulation runs (database storage may be on the order of gigabytes or higher). In this paper we investigate and apply several methods and algorithms to analyze these large amounts of time-dependent data. Furthermore, the scope of this article is to present a broad overview of methods and algorithms that can be used to improve data quality and to analyze and extract information from large data sets containing time dependent data. In this context, “extracting information” means constructing input-output correlations, finding commonalities, and identifying outliers.},
doi = {10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.05.004},
journal = {Progress in Nuclear Energy},
number = C,
volume = 108,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat May 26 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Sat May 26 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}
Web of Science
Figures / Tables:
Works referenced in this record:
A Flooding Induced Station Blackout Analysis for a Pressurized Water Reactor Using the RISMC Toolkit
journal, January 2015
- Mandelli, Diego; Prescott, Steven; Smith, Curtis
- Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, Vol. 2015
Reduced Order Modeling for Nonlinear Multi-Component Models
journal, January 2012
- Abdel-Khalik, Hany S.; Bang, Youngsuk; Kennedy, Christopher
- International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, Vol. 2, Issue 4
Dynamic event trees in accident sequence analysis: application to steam generator tube rupture
journal, January 1993
- Acosta, C.; Siu, N.
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 41, Issue 2
Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis
journal, May 2002
- Comaniciu, D.; Meer, P.
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 24, Issue 5
Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems
journal, July 2003
- Helton, J. C.; Davis, F. J.
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 81, Issue 1
An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties
journal, September 2002
- Hofer, Eduard; Kloos, Martina; Krzykacz-Hausmann, Bernard
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 77, Issue 3
The development and application of the accident dynamic simulator for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants
journal, June 1996
- Hsueh, Kae-Sheng; Mosleh, Ali
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 52, Issue 3
Hierarchical clustering schemes
journal, September 1967
- Johnson, Stephen C.
- Psychometrika, Vol. 32, Issue 3
Analyzing simulation-based PRA data through traditional and topological clustering: A BWR station blackout case study
journal, January 2016
- Maljovec, D.; Liu, S.; Wang, B.
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 145
BWR Station Blackout: A RISMC Analysis Using RAVEN and RELAP5-3D
journal, January 2016
- Mandelli, D.; Smith, C.; Riley, T.
- Nuclear Technology, Vol. 193, Issue 1
Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics
journal, January 2009
- Najm, Habib N.
- Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 41, Issue 1
Figures / Tables found in this record: