DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modeling the Aliso Canyon underground gas storage well blowout and kill operations using the coupled well-reservoir simulator T2Well

Abstract

A blowout of the Sesnon Standard-25 well (SS-25; API 03700776) at the Aliso Canyon Underground Gas Storage Facility, first observed on October 23, 2015, eventually resulted in emission of nearly 100,000 tonnes of natural gas (mostly methane) to the atmosphere. Several thousand people were displaced from their homes as the blowout spanned 111 days. Seven attempts to gain pressure control and stop the gas flow by injection of heavy kill fluids through the wellhead failed, a process referred to as a “top kill.” Introduction of drilling mud when a relief well milled through the casing of SS-25 at a depth of ~8 400 ft (“bottom kill”) succeeded in halting the gas flow on February 11, 2016. We carried out coupled well-reservoir numerical modeling using T2Well to assess why the top kills failed to control the blowout. T2Well couples a reservoir simulation in which porous media flow is described using Darcy's law with a discretized wellbore in which the Navier-Stokes momentum equation implemented via a drift-flux model (Shi et al., 2005) is used to describe multi-phase fluid transport to allow detailed process modeling of well blowouts and kill attempts. Modeling reveals the critical importance of well geometry in controlling flow dynamicsmore » and the corresponding success or failure of the kill attempts. Geometry plays a role in controlling where fluids can flow, e.g., when gas flow prevents liquid flow from entering the tubing from the annulus, but geometry also provides the opportunity for dead end regions to accumulate stagnant gas and liquid that can also affect kill attempts. Simulations show that follow-up fluid injections after the main kill attempts likely would have been effective to ensure that gas leakage remains stopped. Finally, T2Well is capable of simulating well kills and understanding the mechanisms behind well control failures and successes.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE); California Dept. of Conservation (United States)
OSTI Identifier:
1476623
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1582710
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 161; Journal ID: ISSN 0920-4105
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; 03 NATURAL GAS; Aliso canyon; gas leak; well blowout; well kill; coupled well-reservoir processes; numerical modeling; wellbore modeling

Citation Formats

Pan, Lehua, Oldenburg, Curtis M., Freifeld, Barry M., and Jordan, Preston D.. Modeling the Aliso Canyon underground gas storage well blowout and kill operations using the coupled well-reservoir simulator T2Well. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.066.
Pan, Lehua, Oldenburg, Curtis M., Freifeld, Barry M., & Jordan, Preston D.. Modeling the Aliso Canyon underground gas storage well blowout and kill operations using the coupled well-reservoir simulator T2Well. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.066
Pan, Lehua, Oldenburg, Curtis M., Freifeld, Barry M., and Jordan, Preston D.. Sat . "Modeling the Aliso Canyon underground gas storage well blowout and kill operations using the coupled well-reservoir simulator T2Well". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.066. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1476623.
@article{osti_1476623,
title = {Modeling the Aliso Canyon underground gas storage well blowout and kill operations using the coupled well-reservoir simulator T2Well},
author = {Pan, Lehua and Oldenburg, Curtis M. and Freifeld, Barry M. and Jordan, Preston D.},
abstractNote = {A blowout of the Sesnon Standard-25 well (SS-25; API 03700776) at the Aliso Canyon Underground Gas Storage Facility, first observed on October 23, 2015, eventually resulted in emission of nearly 100,000 tonnes of natural gas (mostly methane) to the atmosphere. Several thousand people were displaced from their homes as the blowout spanned 111 days. Seven attempts to gain pressure control and stop the gas flow by injection of heavy kill fluids through the wellhead failed, a process referred to as a “top kill.” Introduction of drilling mud when a relief well milled through the casing of SS-25 at a depth of ~8 400 ft (“bottom kill”) succeeded in halting the gas flow on February 11, 2016. We carried out coupled well-reservoir numerical modeling using T2Well to assess why the top kills failed to control the blowout. T2Well couples a reservoir simulation in which porous media flow is described using Darcy's law with a discretized wellbore in which the Navier-Stokes momentum equation implemented via a drift-flux model (Shi et al., 2005) is used to describe multi-phase fluid transport to allow detailed process modeling of well blowouts and kill attempts. Modeling reveals the critical importance of well geometry in controlling flow dynamics and the corresponding success or failure of the kill attempts. Geometry plays a role in controlling where fluids can flow, e.g., when gas flow prevents liquid flow from entering the tubing from the annulus, but geometry also provides the opportunity for dead end regions to accumulate stagnant gas and liquid that can also affect kill attempts. Simulations show that follow-up fluid injections after the main kill attempts likely would have been effective to ensure that gas leakage remains stopped. Finally, T2Well is capable of simulating well kills and understanding the mechanisms behind well control failures and successes.},
doi = {10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.066},
journal = {Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering},
number = ,
volume = 161,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {12}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 16 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Dynamic Two-Fluid Model OLGA: Theory and Application
journal, May 1991

  • Bendiksen, Kjell H.; Maines, Dag; Moe, Randi
  • SPE Production Engineering, Vol. 6, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.2118/19451-PA

Methane emissions from the 2015 Aliso Canyon blowout in Los Angeles, CA
journal, February 2016


Numerical simulations of the Macondo well blowout reveal strong control of oil flow by reservoir permeability and exsolution of gas
journal, July 2011

  • Oldenburg, C. M.; Freifeld, B. M.; Pruess, K.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 50
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1105165108

Selected papers from the 11thUS annual conference on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration
journal, February 2013

  • Oldenburg, Curtis M.
  • Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1333

Porous Media Compressed-Air Energy Storage (PM-CAES): Theory and Simulation of the Coupled Wellbore–Reservoir System
journal, January 2013


Fully coupled wellbore-reservoir modeling of geothermal heat extraction using CO 2 as the working fluid
journal, January 2015


T2Well—An integrated wellbore–reservoir simulator
journal, April 2014


Analytical solution for two-phase flow in a wellbore using the drift-flux model
journal, December 2011


Transient CO2 leakage and injection in wellbore-reservoir systems for geologic carbon sequestration
journal, October 2011

  • Pan, Lehua; Oldenburg, Curtis M.; Pruess, Karsten
  • Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Vol. 1, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/ghg.41