DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system

Abstract

Abstract. The unprecedented use of Earth's resources by humans, in combination with increasing natural variability in natural processes over the past century, is affecting the evolution of the Earth system. To better understand natural processes and their potential future trajectories requires improved integration with and quantification of human processes. Similarly, to mitigate risk and facilitate socio-economic development requires a better understanding of how the natural system (e.g. climate variability and change, extreme weather events, and processes affecting soil fertility) affects human processes. Our understanding of these interactions and feedback between human and natural systems has been formalized through a variety of modelling approaches. However, a common conceptual framework or set of guidelines to model human–natural-system feedbacks is lacking. The presented research lays out a conceptual framework that includes representing model coupling configuration in combination with the frequency of interaction and coordination of communication between coupled models. Four different approaches used to couple representations of the human and natural system are presented in relation to this framework, which vary in the processes represented and in the scale of their application. From the development and experience associated with the four models of coupled human–natural systems, the following eight lessons were identified thatmore » if taken into account by future coupled human–natural-systems model developments may increase their success: (1) leverage the power of sensitivity analysis with models, (2) remember modelling is an iterative process, (3) create a common language, (4) make code open-access, (5) ensure consistency, (6) reconcile spatio-temporal mismatch, (7) construct homogeneous units, and (8) incorporating feedback increases non-linearity and variability. Following a discussion of feedbacks, a way forward to expedite model coupling and increase the longevity and interoperability of models is given, which suggests the use of a wrapper container software, a standardized applications programming interface (API), the incorporation of standard names, the mitigation of sunk costs by creating interfaces to multiple coupling frameworks, and the adoption of reproducible workflow environments to wire the pieces together.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER). Earth and Environmental Systems Science Division
OSTI Identifier:
1457508
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1476517
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Earth System Dynamics (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Earth System Dynamics (Online) Journal Volume: 9 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 2190-4987
Publisher:
Copernicus Publications, EGU
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES

Citation Formats

Robinson, Derek T., Di Vittorio, Alan, Alexander, Peter, Arneth, Almut, Barton, C. Michael, Brown, Daniel G., Kettner, Albert, Lemmen, Carsten, O'Neill, Brian C., Janssen, Marco, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Rabin, Sam S., Rounsevell, Mark, Syvitski, James P., Ullah, Isaac, and Verburg, Peter H. Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system. Germany: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.5194/esd-9-895-2018.
Robinson, Derek T., Di Vittorio, Alan, Alexander, Peter, Arneth, Almut, Barton, C. Michael, Brown, Daniel G., Kettner, Albert, Lemmen, Carsten, O'Neill, Brian C., Janssen, Marco, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Rabin, Sam S., Rounsevell, Mark, Syvitski, James P., Ullah, Isaac, & Verburg, Peter H. Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-895-2018
Robinson, Derek T., Di Vittorio, Alan, Alexander, Peter, Arneth, Almut, Barton, C. Michael, Brown, Daniel G., Kettner, Albert, Lemmen, Carsten, O'Neill, Brian C., Janssen, Marco, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Rabin, Sam S., Rounsevell, Mark, Syvitski, James P., Ullah, Isaac, and Verburg, Peter H. Tue . "Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-895-2018.
@article{osti_1457508,
title = {Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system},
author = {Robinson, Derek T. and Di Vittorio, Alan and Alexander, Peter and Arneth, Almut and Barton, C. Michael and Brown, Daniel G. and Kettner, Albert and Lemmen, Carsten and O'Neill, Brian C. and Janssen, Marco and Pugh, Thomas A. M. and Rabin, Sam S. and Rounsevell, Mark and Syvitski, James P. and Ullah, Isaac and Verburg, Peter H.},
abstractNote = {Abstract. The unprecedented use of Earth's resources by humans, in combination with increasing natural variability in natural processes over the past century, is affecting the evolution of the Earth system. To better understand natural processes and their potential future trajectories requires improved integration with and quantification of human processes. Similarly, to mitigate risk and facilitate socio-economic development requires a better understanding of how the natural system (e.g. climate variability and change, extreme weather events, and processes affecting soil fertility) affects human processes. Our understanding of these interactions and feedback between human and natural systems has been formalized through a variety of modelling approaches. However, a common conceptual framework or set of guidelines to model human–natural-system feedbacks is lacking. The presented research lays out a conceptual framework that includes representing model coupling configuration in combination with the frequency of interaction and coordination of communication between coupled models. Four different approaches used to couple representations of the human and natural system are presented in relation to this framework, which vary in the processes represented and in the scale of their application. From the development and experience associated with the four models of coupled human–natural systems, the following eight lessons were identified that if taken into account by future coupled human–natural-systems model developments may increase their success: (1) leverage the power of sensitivity analysis with models, (2) remember modelling is an iterative process, (3) create a common language, (4) make code open-access, (5) ensure consistency, (6) reconcile spatio-temporal mismatch, (7) construct homogeneous units, and (8) incorporating feedback increases non-linearity and variability. Following a discussion of feedbacks, a way forward to expedite model coupling and increase the longevity and interoperability of models is given, which suggests the use of a wrapper container software, a standardized applications programming interface (API), the incorporation of standard names, the mitigation of sunk costs by creating interfaces to multiple coupling frameworks, and the adoption of reproducible workflow environments to wire the pieces together.},
doi = {10.5194/esd-9-895-2018},
journal = {Earth System Dynamics (Online)},
number = 2,
volume = 9,
place = {Germany},
year = {Tue Jun 26 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Tue Jun 26 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-895-2018

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 44 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Modular System for Shelves and Coasts (MOSSCO v1.0) – a flexible and multi-component framework for coupled coastal ocean ecosystem modelling
journal, January 2018

  • Lemmen, Carsten; Hofmeister, Richard; Klingbeil, Knut
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-915-2018

Climate change impact modelling needs to include cross-sectoral interactions
journal, May 2016

  • Harrison, Paula A.; Dunford, Robert W.; Holman, Ian P.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3039

Modelling carbon storage in highly fragmented and human-dominated landscapes: Linking land-cover patterns and ecosystem models
journal, May 2009


Modular ABM development for improved dissemination and training
journal, November 2015


An introduction to the special issue on Geoscience Papers of the Future: Geoscience Papers of the Future
journal, October 2016

  • David, Cédric H.; Gil, Yolanda; Duffy, Christopher J.
  • Earth and Space Science, Vol. 3, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016EA000201

Experimental socioecology: Integrative science for anthropocene landscape dynamics
journal, March 2016


Climate and socio-economic scenarios for climate change research and assessment: reconciling the new with the old
journal, November 2013


Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere
journal, August 2015


Agent-based and analytical modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts
journal, December 2004


Effects of land markets and land management on ecosystem function: A framework for modelling exurban land-change
journal, July 2013


Model Composability
conference, December 2006


The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene
journal, January 2016


An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012

  • Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models
journal, November 2006


Effects of Heterogeneity in Residential Preferences on an Agent-Based Model of Urban Sprawl
journal, January 2006


Analysis of Factors Controlling Soil Organic Matter Levels in Great Plains Grasslands1
journal, January 1987


Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land change in the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region of Mexico
journal, December 2005


Climate modeling
journal, January 1974


The Earth System Prediction Suite: Toward a Coordinated U.S. Modeling Capability
journal, July 2016

  • Theurich, Gerhard; DeLuca, C.; Campbell, T.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 97, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00164.1

Earth system modelling with complex dynamic human societies: the copan:CORE World-Earth modeling framework
journal, January 2018

  • Donges, Jonathan F.; Heitzig, Jobst; Barfuss, Wolfram
  • Earth System Dynamics Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-2017-126

Soil carbon management in large-scale Earth system modelling: implications for crop yields and nitrogen leaching
journal, January 2015


Improving the Composability of DoD Models and Simulations
journal, April 2004

  • Davis, Paul K.; Anderson, Robert H.
  • The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1177/154851290400100101

Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems
journal, September 2007


Adding ecosystem function to agent-based land use models
journal, July 2008


IMOGEN: an intermediate complexity model to evaluate terrestrial impacts of a changing climate
journal, January 2010

  • Huntingford, C.; Booth, B. B. B.; Sitch, S.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-3-679-2010

Why Model?
journal, March 2004


From actors to agents in socio-ecological systems models
journal, January 2012

  • Rounsevell, M. D. A.; Robinson, D. T.; Murray-Rust, D.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 367, Issue 1586
  • DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0187

The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability
journal, December 2007

  • Turner, B. L.; Lambin, E. F.; Reenberg, A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, Issue 52
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704119104

The use of multiscale remote sensing imagery to derive regional estimates of forest growth capacity using 3-PGS
journal, March 2001


Environmental cognitions, land change, and social–ecological feedbacks: an overview
journal, September 2013


The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research
journal, September 2013

  • Hurrell, James W.; Holland, M. M.; Gent, P. R.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 94, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00121.1

Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene
journal, July 2016


Developing composed simulation and optimization models using actual supply-demand network datasets
conference, December 2014

  • Gholami, Soroosh; Sarjoughian, Hessam S.; Godding, Gary W.
  • 2014 Winter Simulation Conference - (WSC 2014), Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014
  • DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2014.7020095

Making Computational Social Science Effective: Epistemology, Methodology, and Technology
journal, November 2002

  • Bankes, Steven; Lempert, Robert; Popper, Steven
  • Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 20, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1177/089443902237317

Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space
journal, November 2001


Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model
journal, January 2014


The integrated Earth system model version 1: formulation and functionality
journal, January 2015

  • Collins, W. D.; Craig, A. P.; Truesdale, J. E.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-2203-2015

GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GIS
journal, May 2012


How to Make a Barranco: Modeling Erosion and Land-Use in Mediterranean Landscapes
journal, July 2015


Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change
journal, June 1997


Will the Real Model Please Stand Up: Comments on Saidel's 'Round House or Square?'
journal, June 1993


Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) - a new approach towards Earth System Modeling
journal, January 2005

  • Jöckel, P.; Sander, R.; Kerkweg, A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-5-433-2005

Assessing sustainable biophysical human–nature connectedness at regional scales
journal, April 2017

  • Dorninger, Christian; Abson, David J.; Fischer, Joern
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa68a5

A component-based approach to integrated modeling in the geosciences: The design of CSDMS
journal, April 2013


Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda
journal, July 2016


Applying Occam's razor to global agricultural land use change
journal, January 2016


Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem carbon cycling in Africa
journal, January 2013


Land-cover fragmentation and configuration of ownership parcels in an exurban landscape
journal, August 2011


Adaptation of global land use and management intensity to changes in climate and atmospheric carbon dioxide
journal, March 2018

  • Alexander, Peter; Rabin, Sam; Anthoni, Peter
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 24, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14110

Colonization of the Americas, ‘Little Ice Age’ climate, and bomb-produced carbon: Their role in defining the Anthropocene
journal, May 2015

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan; Waters, Colin N.; Barnosky, Anthony D.
  • The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1177/2053019615587056

A Community Approach to Earth Systems Modeling
journal, January 2010

  • Voinov, Alexey A.; DeLuca, Cecelia; Hood, Raleigh R.
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 91, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010EO130001

Market Impacts on Land-Use Change: An Agent-Based Experiment
journal, April 2014

  • Sun, Shipeng; Parker, Dawn C.; Huang, Qingxu
  • Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 104, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2014.892338

Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure
journal, September 2000

  • Kucharik, Christopher J.; Foley, Jonathan A.; Delire, Christine
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 14, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999GB001138

Towards decision-based global land use models for improved understanding of the Earth system
journal, January 2014

  • Rounsevell, M. D. A.; Arneth, A.; Alexander, P.
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-5-117-2014

Economic and Physical Modeling of land use in gcam 3.0 and an Application to Agricultural Productivity, Land, and Terrestrial Carbon
journal, May 2014


Parameterization and Sensitivity Analysis of the BIOME–BGC Terrestrial Ecosystem Model: Net Primary Production Controls
journal, January 2000


Exurbia from the bottom-up: Confronting empirical challenges to characterizing a complex system
journal, March 2008


Systems integration for global sustainability
journal, February 2015


Representing ecological processes in agent-based models of land use and cover change
journal, June 2013


On linking an Earth system model to the equilibrium carbon representation of an economically optimizing land use model
journal, January 2014

  • Bond-Lamberty, B.; Calvin, K.; Jones, A. D.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-2545-2014

Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model
journal, January 2011

  • Lawrence, David M.; Oleson, Keith W.; Flanner, Mark G.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 3, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011MS000045

Multi-scale heterogeneity in vegetation and soil carbon in exurban residential land of southeastern Michigan, USA
journal, July 2016

  • Currie, William S.; Kiger, Sarah; Nassauer, Joan I.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 26, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1890/15-0817

A feature model of coupling technologies for Earth System Models
journal, April 2013


Colonist Household Decisionmaking and Land-Use Change in the Amazon Rainforest: An Agent-Based Simulation
journal, October 2004

  • Deadman, Peter; Robinson, Derek; Moran, Emilio
  • Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 31, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1068/b3098

What are the effects of Agro-Ecological Zones and land use region boundaries on land resource projection using the Global Change Assessment Model?
journal, November 2016


Mapping and Modeling the Biogeochemical Cycling of Turf Grasses in the United States
journal, July 2005

  • Milesi, Cristina; Running, Steven W.; Elvidge, Christopher D.
  • Environmental Management, Vol. 36, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0316-2

Simulated carbon emissions from land-use change are substantially enhanced by accounting for agricultural management
journal, December 2015