DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Simulation Modeling for Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design Under Operational Disruptions

Journal Article · · Frontiers in Energy Research

Lignocellulosic biomass derived fuels and chemicals are a promising and sustainable supplement for petroleum-based products. Currently, the lignocellulosic biofuel industry relies on a conventional system where feedstock is harvested, baled, stored locally, and then delivered in a low-density format to the biorefinery. However, the conventional supply chain system causes operational disruptions at the biorefinery mainly due to seasonal availability, handling problems, and quality variability in biomass feedstock. Operational disruptions decrease facility uptime, production efficiencies, and increase maintenance costs. For a low-value high-volume product where margins are very tight, system disruptions are especially problematic. In this work we evaluate an advanced system strategy in which a network of biomass processing centers (depots) are utilized for storing and preprocessing biomass into stable, dense, and uniform material to reduce feedstock supply disruptions, and facility downtime in order to boost economic returns to the bioenergy industry. A database centric discrete event supply chain simulation model was developed, and the impact of operational disruptions on supply chain cost, inventory and production levels, farm metrics and facility metrics were evaluated. Three scenarios were evaluated for a 7-year time-period: (1) bale-delivery scenario with biorefinery uptime varying from 20 to 85%; (2) pellet-delivery scenario with depot uptime varying from 20 to 85% and biorefinery uptime at 85%; and (3) pellet-delivery scenario with depot and biorefinery uptime at 85%. In scenarios 1 and 2, tonnage discarded at the field edge could be reduced by increasing uptime at facility, contracting fewer farms at the beginning and subsequently increasing contracts as facility uptime increases, or determining alternative corn stover markets. Harvest cost was the biggest contributor to the average delivered costs and inventory levels were dependent on facility uptimes. We found a cascading effect of failure propagating through the system from depot to biorefinery. Therefore, mitigating risk at a facility level is not enough and conducting a system-level reliability simulation incorporating failure dependencies among subsystems is critical.

Research Organization:
Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-00OR22725; EE0007088
OSTI ID:
1474612
Report Number(s):
DOE-ANTARES--07088-23
Journal Information:
Frontiers in Energy Research, Journal Name: Frontiers in Energy Research Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 6; ISSN 2296-598X
Publisher:
Frontiers Research FoundationCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (23)

Strategic supply system design - a holistic evaluation of operational and production cost for a biorefinery supply chain: Strategic biorefinery feedstock supply system design journal August 2015
A techno-economic analysis of the corn stover feedstock supply system for cellulosic biorefineries: A techno-economic analysis of the corn stover feedstock supply system for cellulosic biorefineries journal June 2016
Estimating the required logistical resources to support the development of a sustainable corn stover bioeconomy in the USA journal November 2016
Techno‐economic assessment of biomass bales storage systems for a large‐scale biorefinery journal January 2017
Rice straw as a feedstock for biofuels: Availability, recalcitrance, and chemical properties journal October 2017
A novel risk analysis methodology to evaluate the economic performance of a biorefinery and to quantify the economic incentives for participating biomass producers: Modeling and Analysis:A novel risk analysis methodology to evaluate the economic performance of a biorefinery and to quantify the economic incentives journal February 2018
Spatial modeling framework for bioethanol plant siting and biofuel production potential in the U.S journal April 2017
Impact of the biorefinery size on the logistics of corn stover supply – A scenario analysis journal July 2017
Development and implementation of integrated biomass supply analysis and logistics model (IBSAL) journal October 2006
Techno-economic analysis of decentralized biomass processing depots journal October 2015
A new simulation model for multi-agricultural biomass logistics system in bioenergy production journal November 2011
Modeling and optimization of biomass supply chains: A review and a critical look journal January 2016
Biomass supply chain design and analysis: Basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future journal August 2013
Analyzing the impact of intermodal-related risk to the design and management of biofuel supply chain journal September 2014
Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): literature review and practical application discussion journal July 2008
Modelling and optimisation of biomass supply chains: a review journal February 2017
Subfield profitability analysis reveals an economic case for cropland diversification journal January 2016
ExtendSim advanced techology: Integrated simulation database conference December 2010
Biofuels 2020: Biorefineries based on lignocellulosic materials journal July 2016
Breeding Maize for a Bioeconomy: A Literature Survey Examining Harvest Index and Stover Yield and Their Relationship to Grain Yield journal January 2010
Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design under Feedstock Seasonality and Probabilistic Facility Disruptions journal November 2017
Effects of Disruption Risks on Biorefinery Location Design journal February 2015
Biomass storage: an update on industrial solutions for baled biomass feedstocks journal May 2012

Cited By (1)

Challenges in applying capacitated covering models journal January 2020