DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Simulation Modeling for Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design Under Operational Disruptions

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass derived fuels and chemicals are a promising and sustainable supplement for petroleum-based products. Currently, the lignocellulosic biofuel industry relies on a conventional system where feedstock is harvested, baled, stored locally, and then delivered in a low-density format to the biorefinery. However, the conventional supply chain system causes operational disruptions at the biorefinery mainly due to seasonal availability, handling problems, and quality variability in biomass feedstock. Operational disruptions decrease facility uptime, production efficiencies, and increase maintenance costs. For a low-value high-volume product where margins are very tight, system disruptions are especially problematic. In this work we evaluate an advanced system strategy in which a network of biomass processing centers (depots) are utilized for storing and preprocessing biomass into stable, dense, and uniform material to reduce feedstock supply disruptions, and facility downtime in order to boost economic returns to the bioenergy industry. A database centric discrete event supply chain simulation model was developed, and the impact of operational disruptions on supply chain cost, inventory and production levels, farm metrics and facility metrics were evaluated. Three scenarios were evaluated for a 7-year time-period: (1) bale-delivery scenario with biorefinery uptime varying from 20 to 85%; (2) pellet-delivery scenario with depot uptime varyingmore » from 20 to 85% and biorefinery uptime at 85%; and (3) pellet-delivery scenario with depot and biorefinery uptime at 85%. In scenarios 1 and 2, tonnage discarded at the field edge could be reduced by increasing uptime at facility, contracting fewer farms at the beginning and subsequently increasing contracts as facility uptime increases, or determining alternative corn stover markets. Harvest cost was the biggest contributor to the average delivered costs and inventory levels were dependent on facility uptimes. We found a cascading effect of failure propagating through the system from depot to biorefinery. Therefore, mitigating risk at a facility level is not enough and conducting a system-level reliability simulation incorporating failure dependencies among subsystems is critical.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Environmental Sciences Division
  2. QMT Group, Knoxville, TN (United States)
  3. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Energy & Transportation Science Division
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office
OSTI Identifier:
1474612
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1836094
Report Number(s):
DOE-ANTARES-07088-23
Journal ID: ISSN 2296-598X
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; EE0007088
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Frontiers in Energy Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 6; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2296-598X
Publisher:
Frontiers Research Foundation
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; operational disruptions; biorefinery; pre-processing; biomass; depots; simulation; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Sharma, Bhavna, Clark, Robin, Hilliard, Michael R., and Webb, Erin. Simulation Modeling for Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design Under Operational Disruptions. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2018.00100.
Sharma, Bhavna, Clark, Robin, Hilliard, Michael R., & Webb, Erin. Simulation Modeling for Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design Under Operational Disruptions. United States. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00100
Sharma, Bhavna, Clark, Robin, Hilliard, Michael R., and Webb, Erin. Tue . "Simulation Modeling for Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design Under Operational Disruptions". United States. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00100. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1474612.
@article{osti_1474612,
title = {Simulation Modeling for Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design Under Operational Disruptions},
author = {Sharma, Bhavna and Clark, Robin and Hilliard, Michael R. and Webb, Erin},
abstractNote = {Lignocellulosic biomass derived fuels and chemicals are a promising and sustainable supplement for petroleum-based products. Currently, the lignocellulosic biofuel industry relies on a conventional system where feedstock is harvested, baled, stored locally, and then delivered in a low-density format to the biorefinery. However, the conventional supply chain system causes operational disruptions at the biorefinery mainly due to seasonal availability, handling problems, and quality variability in biomass feedstock. Operational disruptions decrease facility uptime, production efficiencies, and increase maintenance costs. For a low-value high-volume product where margins are very tight, system disruptions are especially problematic. In this work we evaluate an advanced system strategy in which a network of biomass processing centers (depots) are utilized for storing and preprocessing biomass into stable, dense, and uniform material to reduce feedstock supply disruptions, and facility downtime in order to boost economic returns to the bioenergy industry. A database centric discrete event supply chain simulation model was developed, and the impact of operational disruptions on supply chain cost, inventory and production levels, farm metrics and facility metrics were evaluated. Three scenarios were evaluated for a 7-year time-period: (1) bale-delivery scenario with biorefinery uptime varying from 20 to 85%; (2) pellet-delivery scenario with depot uptime varying from 20 to 85% and biorefinery uptime at 85%; and (3) pellet-delivery scenario with depot and biorefinery uptime at 85%. In scenarios 1 and 2, tonnage discarded at the field edge could be reduced by increasing uptime at facility, contracting fewer farms at the beginning and subsequently increasing contracts as facility uptime increases, or determining alternative corn stover markets. Harvest cost was the biggest contributor to the average delivered costs and inventory levels were dependent on facility uptimes. We found a cascading effect of failure propagating through the system from depot to biorefinery. Therefore, mitigating risk at a facility level is not enough and conducting a system-level reliability simulation incorporating failure dependencies among subsystems is critical.},
doi = {10.3389/fenrg.2018.00100},
journal = {Frontiers in Energy Research},
number = 1,
volume = 6,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Sep 25 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Tue Sep 25 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 9 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design under Feedstock Seasonality and Probabilistic Facility Disruptions
journal, November 2017

  • Liu, Zhixue; Wang, Shukun; Ouyang, Yanfeng
  • Energies, Vol. 10, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.3390/en10111895

Breeding Maize for a Bioeconomy: A Literature Survey Examining Harvest Index and Stover Yield and Their Relationship to Grain Yield
journal, January 2010


Biomass supply chain design and analysis: Basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future
journal, August 2013


Spatial modeling framework for bioethanol plant siting and biofuel production potential in the U.S
journal, April 2017


Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): literature review and practical application discussion
journal, July 2008


Subfield profitability analysis reveals an economic case for cropland diversification
journal, January 2016


Estimating the required logistical resources to support the development of a sustainable corn stover bioeconomy in the USA
journal, November 2016

  • Ebadian, Mahmood; Sokhansanj, Shahab; Webb, Erin
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1736

Biofuels 2020: Biorefineries based on lignocellulosic materials
journal, July 2016

  • Valdivia, Miguel; Galan, Jose Luis; Laffarga, Joaquina
  • Microbial Biotechnology, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12387

Strategic supply system design - a holistic evaluation of operational and production cost for a biorefinery supply chain: Strategic biorefinery feedstock supply system design
journal, August 2015

  • Lamers, Patrick; Tan, Eric C. D.; Searcy, Erin M.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 9, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1575

Techno‐economic assessment of biomass bales storage systems for a large‐scale biorefinery
journal, January 2017

  • Sahoo, Kamalakanta; Mani, Sudhagar
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 11, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1751

Modeling and optimization of biomass supply chains: A review and a critical look
journal, January 2016


ExtendSim advanced techology: Integrated simulation database
conference, December 2010

  • Diamond, Bob; Krahl, David; Nastasi, Anthony
  • 2010 Winter Simulation Conference - (WSC 2010), Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference
  • DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2010.5679178

A new simulation model for multi-agricultural biomass logistics system in bioenergy production
journal, November 2011


Rice straw as a feedstock for biofuels: Availability, recalcitrance, and chemical properties
journal, October 2017

  • Satlewal, Alok; Agrawal, Ruchi; Bhagia, Samarthya
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1818

Analyzing the impact of intermodal-related risk to the design and management of biofuel supply chain
journal, September 2014

  • Marufuzzaman, Mohammad; Eksioglu, Sandra D.; Li, Xiaopeng
  • Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 69
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.008

Modelling and optimisation of biomass supply chains: a review
journal, February 2017

  • Zandi Atashbar, Nasim; Labadie, Nacima; Prins, Christian
  • International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1343506

Effects of Disruption Risks on Biorefinery Location Design
journal, February 2015


Biomass storage: an update on industrial solutions for baled biomass feedstocks
journal, May 2012


Impact of the biorefinery size on the logistics of corn stover supply – A scenario analysis
journal, July 2017


Development and implementation of integrated biomass supply analysis and logistics model (IBSAL)
journal, October 2006


Techno-economic analysis of decentralized biomass processing depots
journal, October 2015


Works referencing / citing this record:

Challenges in applying capacitated covering models
journal, January 2020

  • Xu, Jing; Murray, Alan; Wang, Zifan
  • Transactions in GIS, Vol. 24, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12608