DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry

Abstract

Milk is presently Idaho’s most valuable agricultural commodity contributing 3.2 % to the state’s annual Gross Domestic Product. The dairy industry is characterized by a high number of large farms, concentrated in southern Idaho. The resulting spatial density of animals causes several environmental impacts. Anaerobic digestion is one promising technical solution to alleviate most of these impacts while simultaneously providing a regional energy source. This analysis assesses the economic viability of using dairy cow manure for either (i) the on-farm production and use of biogas to generate electricity and heat or (ii) the upgrading biogas to biomethane, a natural gas substitute. A non-linear optimization model was developed to optimize the anaerobic digestion plant capacity and maximize the net present value (NPV) for each option by farm size. The analysis implies that at least 3,000 cows per farm are required for an economically viable anaerobic digestion plant operation. For farms with up to 3,600 animals, the highest NPV was achieved for the on-farm use of biogas. Farms larger than that achieved their best economic results via the production of biomethane. In total about 45 % of Idaho’s dairy manure could be utilized by biogas and biomethane plants economically feasible. A highermore » manure utilization rate could be achieved through joint, cooperative anaerobic digestion plants and manure transportation. To do so, we recommend the exchange of information through (e.g.) the use of best-practice examples and provide similar results to policy makers.« less

Authors:
; ; ORCiD logo;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States); German Biomass Research Centre (DBFZ), Leipzig (Germany)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Sustainable Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office; Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) (Germany); International Energy Agency (IEA)
OSTI Identifier:
1756493
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1469342; OSTI ID: 1478242
Report Number(s):
INL/JOU-18-44477-Rev000
Journal ID: ISSN 0306-2619; S0306261918305695; PII: S0306261918305695
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC07-05ID14517
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Applied Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Applied Energy Journal Volume: 222 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0306-2619
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; manure utilization; anaerobic digestion; net present value; environmental impact; biogas; biomethane; 09 - BIOMASS FUELS

Citation Formats

Lauer, Markus, Hansen, Jason K., Lamers, Patrick, and Thrän, Daniela. Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry. United Kingdom: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.026.
Lauer, Markus, Hansen, Jason K., Lamers, Patrick, & Thrän, Daniela. Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.026
Lauer, Markus, Hansen, Jason K., Lamers, Patrick, and Thrän, Daniela. Sun . "Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.026.
@article{osti_1756493,
title = {Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry},
author = {Lauer, Markus and Hansen, Jason K. and Lamers, Patrick and Thrän, Daniela},
abstractNote = {Milk is presently Idaho’s most valuable agricultural commodity contributing 3.2 % to the state’s annual Gross Domestic Product. The dairy industry is characterized by a high number of large farms, concentrated in southern Idaho. The resulting spatial density of animals causes several environmental impacts. Anaerobic digestion is one promising technical solution to alleviate most of these impacts while simultaneously providing a regional energy source. This analysis assesses the economic viability of using dairy cow manure for either (i) the on-farm production and use of biogas to generate electricity and heat or (ii) the upgrading biogas to biomethane, a natural gas substitute. A non-linear optimization model was developed to optimize the anaerobic digestion plant capacity and maximize the net present value (NPV) for each option by farm size. The analysis implies that at least 3,000 cows per farm are required for an economically viable anaerobic digestion plant operation. For farms with up to 3,600 animals, the highest NPV was achieved for the on-farm use of biogas. Farms larger than that achieved their best economic results via the production of biomethane. In total about 45 % of Idaho’s dairy manure could be utilized by biogas and biomethane plants economically feasible. A higher manure utilization rate could be achieved through joint, cooperative anaerobic digestion plants and manure transportation. To do so, we recommend the exchange of information through (e.g.) the use of best-practice examples and provide similar results to policy makers.},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.026},
journal = {Applied Energy},
number = C,
volume = 222,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.026

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 37 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Structural Change of European Dairy Farms - A Cross-Regional Analysis: Dairy Farm Structural Changes in Europe
journal, August 2012


Technical efficiency, herd size, and exit intentions in U.S. dairy farms
journal, July 2016

  • Dong, Fengxia; Hennessy, David A.; Jensen, Helen H.
  • Agricultural Economics, Vol. 47, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/agec.12253

A strong geography department
journal, September 2017


Enlarging of scale in dairy farming: Consequences for farm-bound traffic flows in the countryside
journal, September 2013

  • Jaarsma, Rinus; Hermans, Tia; Rienks, Willem
  • NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, Vol. 64-65
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2013.03.003

Assessment and management of long-term nitrate pollution of ground water in agriculture-dominated watersheds
journal, August 2004


Reduction of indicator and pathogenic microorganisms by psychrophilic anaerobic digestion in swine slurries
journal, March 2006


Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being.
journal, January 1998


Nonmarket cobenefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production
journal, March 2009


The effect of slurry storage and anaerobic digestion on survival of pathogenic bacteria
journal, January 1993


Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste
journal, February 2013


Technical/economic/environmental analysis of biogas utilisation
journal, April 2004


Reasonable potential for GHG savings by anaerobic biomethane in Germany and UK derived from economic and ecological analyses
journal, December 2016


The indirect global warming potential and global temperature change potential due to methane oxidation
journal, October 2009


CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY:Costs of Multigreenhouse Gas Reduction Targets for the USA
journal, October 1999


Economic analysis of small-scale agricultural digesters in the United States
journal, July 2013


Biogas in the United States: estimating future production and learning from international experiences
journal, September 2015

  • Murray, Brian C.; Galik, Christopher S.; Vegh, Tibor
  • Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 22, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11027-015-9683-7

Investing in Methane Digesters on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms: Implications of Scale Economies and Environmental Programs
journal, October 2008

  • Leuer, Elizabeth R.; Hyde, Jeffrey; Richard, Tom L.
  • Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Vol. 37, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1017/S1068280500002999

Cooperation in manure-based biogas production networks: An agent-based modeling approach
journal, February 2018


Pipeline vs. truck transport of beef cattle manure
journal, February 2007


Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy – A life cycle perspective
journal, December 2012


Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: A European evaluation of research and development
journal, December 2017

  • Lora Grando, Rafaela; de Souza Antune, Adelaide Maria; da Fonseca, Fabiana Valéria
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 80
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.079

The light hydrocarbons in petroleum: a critical review
journal, April 1997


Flexible power generation scenarios for biogas plants operated in Germany: impacts on economic viability and GHG emissions: Flexible power generation scenarios for biogas plants
journal, July 2016

  • Lauer, Markus; Dotzauer, Martin; Hennig, Christiane
  • International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 41, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/er.3592

Works referencing / citing this record:

Sustainable Italian Cities: The Added Value of Biomethane from Organic Waste
journal, May 2019

  • Cucchiella, Federica; D’Adamo, Idiano; Gastaldi, Massimo
  • Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.3390/app9112221

Governance of sustainability in the German biogas sector—adaptive management of the Renewable Energy Act between agriculture and the energy sector
journal, January 2020

  • Thrän, Daniela; Schaubach, Kay; Majer, Stefan
  • Energy, Sustainability and Society, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13705-019-0227-y