skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement

Abstract

Here, continued development of cellulosic-based biofuels is needed to provide renewable energy and strengthen rural investment and development in the United States (US). To ensure biofuel development is sustainable and does not negatively affect ecosystem services, stakeholder input is necessary to identify sensitive and meaningful indicators. A major challenge is that there are substantial differences in terminology, perspectives, and methods used to quantify sustainability and ecosystem services with regard to processes, biodiversity, and socioeconomic effects. Our objectives were to identify relevant indicator categories for both perspectives using a case study from the US state of Iowa. A scientific literature review and engagement with stakeholders were used to identify 11 indicator categories associated with production, harvest, storage, and transport of cellulosic feedstocks. Five categories focus on environmental concerns (soil quality, water quality and quantity, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, and productivity) and six on socioeconomic concerns (social wellbeing, energy security, external trade, profitability, resource conservation, and social acceptability). Although these indicators reflect sustainability concerns of these stakeholders, additional monitoring and stakeholder engagement are needed to support the continual improvement that is part of adaptive management.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  2. Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States)
  3. United States Dept. of Agriculture, Ames, IA (United States)
  4. Antares Group Inc., Moravia, IA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1468293
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1564429
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; EE0007088
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biomass and Bioenergy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 114; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0961-9534
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; Biofuel; Ecosystem services; Landscape design; Sustainability; Water quality

Citation Formats

Dale, Virginia H., Kline, Keith L., Richard, Tom L., Karlen, Douglas L., and Belden, William W. Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.09.016.
Dale, Virginia H., Kline, Keith L., Richard, Tom L., Karlen, Douglas L., & Belden, William W. Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.09.016
Dale, Virginia H., Kline, Keith L., Richard, Tom L., Karlen, Douglas L., and Belden, William W. Tue . "Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.09.016. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1468293.
@article{osti_1468293,
title = {Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement},
author = {Dale, Virginia H. and Kline, Keith L. and Richard, Tom L. and Karlen, Douglas L. and Belden, William W.},
abstractNote = {Here, continued development of cellulosic-based biofuels is needed to provide renewable energy and strengthen rural investment and development in the United States (US). To ensure biofuel development is sustainable and does not negatively affect ecosystem services, stakeholder input is necessary to identify sensitive and meaningful indicators. A major challenge is that there are substantial differences in terminology, perspectives, and methods used to quantify sustainability and ecosystem services with regard to processes, biodiversity, and socioeconomic effects. Our objectives were to identify relevant indicator categories for both perspectives using a case study from the US state of Iowa. A scientific literature review and engagement with stakeholders were used to identify 11 indicator categories associated with production, harvest, storage, and transport of cellulosic feedstocks. Five categories focus on environmental concerns (soil quality, water quality and quantity, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, and productivity) and six on socioeconomic concerns (social wellbeing, energy security, external trade, profitability, resource conservation, and social acceptability). Although these indicators reflect sustainability concerns of these stakeholders, additional monitoring and stakeholder engagement are needed to support the continual improvement that is part of adaptive management.},
doi = {10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.09.016},
journal = {Biomass and Bioenergy},
number = C,
volume = 114,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {10}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 5 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Balancing energy, conservation, and soil health requirements for plant biomass
journal, September 2015

  • Karlen, D. L.; Beeler, L. W.; Ong, R. G.
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 70, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.5.279

Take a Closer Look: Biofuels Can Support Environmental, Economic and Social Goals
journal, June 2014

  • Dale, Bruce E.; Anderson, James E.; Brown, Robert C.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5025433

Hope and skepticism: Farmer and local community views on the socio-economic benefits of agricultural bioenergy
journal, April 2011


Biofuels, ecosystem services and human wellbeing: Putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative
journal, August 2011

  • Gasparatos, Alexandros; Stromberg, Per; Takeuchi, Kazuhiko
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 142, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.020

Do we need a unified appraisal framework to synthesize biofuel impacts?
journal, March 2013


Reconciling food security and bioenergy: priorities for action
journal, June 2016

  • Kline, Keith L.; Msangi, Siwa; Dale, Virginia H.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12366

Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review
journal, June 2017

  • Ferrarini, Andrea; Serra, Paolo; Almagro, María
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 73
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.052

Comparing Bioenergy Production Sites in the Southeastern US Regarding Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand
journal, March 2015


A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production
journal, June 2015


Environmental Indicators of Biofuel Sustainability: What About Context?
journal, July 2012

  • Efroymson, Rebecca A.; Dale, Virginia H.; Kline, Keith L.
  • Environmental Management, Vol. 51, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9907-5

AGRICULTURE: Sustainable Biofuels Redux
journal, October 2008


Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States
journal, April 2017

  • Dale, Virginia H.; Kline, Keith L.; Parish, Esther S.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12445

Ensiling Corn Stover: Effect of Feedstock Preservation on Particleboard Performance
journal, February 2006

  • Ren, H.; Richard, T. L.; Chen, Z.
  • Biotechnology Progress, Vol. 22, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/bp050174q

Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems: A short list of practical measures
journal, March 2013


Determining the most sustainable lignocellulosic bioenergy system following a case study approach
journal, November 2014


Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems
journal, February 2008


Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs
journal, April 2016

  • Dale, Virginia H.; Kline, Keith L.; Buford, Marilyn A.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 56
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.038

Opportunities and barriers for international bioenergy trade
journal, April 2011


Measuring the impact of user participation in agricultural and natural resource management research
journal, November 2003


Categorising tools for sustainability assessment
journal, January 2007


The meaning of agricultural sustainability: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey
journal, July 2008


Coupling stakeholder assessments of ecosystem services with biophysical ecosystem properties reveals importance of social contexts
journal, February 2017


Bioenergy Sustainability at the Regional Scale
journal, January 2010

  • Dale, Virginia H.; Lowrance, Richard; Mulholland, Patrick
  • Ecology and Society, Vol. 15, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5751/ES-03725-150423

Estimating vulnerability to risks: an application in a biofuel supply chain
journal, January 2017

  • dos Santos, Silvio Francisco; Brandi, Humberto Siqueira; Borschiver, Suzana
  • Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Vol. 19, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10098-016-1320-y

Criteria and indicators for a bioenergy production industry identified via stakeholder participation
journal, January 2016

  • Vaidya, Ashma; Mayer, Audrey L.
  • International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, Vol. 23, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1135830

What drives sustainable biofuels? A review of indicator assessments of biofuel production systems involving smallholder farmers
journal, March 2014


A framework for selecting indicators of bioenergy sustainability
journal, May 2015

  • Dale, Virginia H.; Efroymson, Rebecca A.; Kline, Keith L.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 9, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1562

Curve numbers for long-term no-till corn and agricultural practices with high watershed infiltration
journal, November 2013

  • Bonta, J. V.; Shipitalo, M. J.
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 68, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.6.487

Nutrient removal by prairie filter strips in agricultural landscapes
journal, January 2014

  • Zhou, X.; Helmers, M. J.; Asbjornsen, H.
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 69, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2489/jswc.69.1.54

Dedicated Energy Crops and Crop Residues for Bioenergy Feedstocks in the Central and Eastern USA
journal, June 2016


Influence of corn, switchgrass, and prairie cropping systems on soil microbial communities in the upper Midwest of the United States
journal, December 2015

  • Jesus, Ederson da C.; Liang, Chao; Quensen, John F.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12289

Transition to second generation cellulosic biofuel production systems reveals limited negative impacts on the soil microbial community structure.
journal, November 2015


Assessment of Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Strategies for Nitrate Impairment of the Raccoon River, Iowa
journal, July 2010

  • Jha, Manoj K.; Wolter, Calvin F.; Schilling, Keith E.
  • Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 39, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2009.0392

Nitrate-nitrogen patterns in the Raccoon River Basin related to agricultural practices
journal, May 2009

  • Hatfield, J. L.; McMullen, L. D.; Jones, C. S.
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 64, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2489/jswc.64.3.190

Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to The Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin
journal, February 2008

  • Alexander, Richard B.; Smith, Richard A.; Schwarz, Gregory E.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 42, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/es0716103

Farming strategies to fuel bioenergy demands and facilitate essential soil services
journal, December 2015


Decision hierarchy, competitive priorities and indicators in large-scale ‘herbaceous biomass to energy’ supply chains
journal, September 2015


Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems
journal, September 2011


Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments
journal, October 2010

  • Luo, Zhongkui; Wang, Enli; Sun, Osbert J.
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 139, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.006

Soil organic carbon and nitrogen in a Mollisol in central Ohio as affected by tillage and land use
journal, January 2005


Factors affecting farmers' willingness to grow alternative biofuel feedstocks across Kansas
journal, July 2014


Multilocation Corn Stover Harvest Effects on Crop Yields and Nutrient Removal
journal, February 2014

  • Karlen, Douglas L.; Birrell, Stuart J.; Johnson, Jane M. F.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9419-7

Corn Stover Nutrient Removal Estimates for Central Iowa, USA
journal, July 2015

  • Karlen, Douglas; Kovar, John; Birrell, Stuart
  • Sustainability, Vol. 7, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.3390/su7078621

Distribution of Structural Carbohydrates in Corn Plants Across the Southeastern USA
journal, February 2014

  • Mourtzinis, Spyridon; Cantrell, Keri B.; Arriaga, Francisco J.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9429-5

Influence of Corn Residue Harvest Management on Grain, Stover, and Energy Yields
journal, March 2014

  • Cantrell, Keri B.; Novak, Jeffrey M.; Frederick, James R.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9433-9

Drought effects on composition and yield for corn stover, mixed grasses, and Miscanthus as bioenergy feedstocks
journal, May 2014


Vertical Distribution of Structural Components in Corn Stover
journal, November 2014


Monitoring Soil Quality to Assess the Sustainability of Harvesting Corn Stover
journal, January 2011

  • Karlen, Douglas L.; Varvel, Gary E.; Johnson, Jane M. F.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 103, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0160s

Crop Residue Mass Needed to Maintain Soil Organic Carbon Levels: Can It Be Determined?
journal, January 2014


LLWR Techniques for Quantifying Potential Soil Compaction Consequences of Crop Residue Removal
journal, January 2014


An Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Determining Corn Stover Removal Rate and Transboundary Effects
journal, November 2013


A five-year assessment of corn stover harvest in central Iowa, USA
journal, October 2011


Life cycle analysis of biochemical cellulosic ethanol under multiple scenarios
journal, June 2014

  • Murphy, Colin W.; Kendall, Alissa
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12204

Impacts of biofuels production alternatives on water quantity and quality in the Iowa River Basin
journal, January 2012


Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline
journal, February 2009

  • Hill, Jason; Polasky, Stephen; Nelson, Erik
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812835106

Landscape, community, countryside: linking biophysical and social scales in US Corn Belt agricultural landscapes
journal, May 2009


Bioenergy from permanent grassland – A review: 2. Combustion
journal, November 2009


Butterfly response to floral resources during early establishment at a heterogeneous prairie biomass production site in Iowa, USA
journal, September 2011

  • Myers, Mark C.; Hoksch, Benjamin J.; Mason, James T.
  • Journal of Insect Conservation, Vol. 16, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10841-011-9433-4

Birds and butterflies respond to soil-induced habitat heterogeneity in experimental plantings of tallgrass prairie species managed as agroenergy crops in Iowa, USA
journal, August 2015

  • Myers, Mark C.; Mason, James T.; Hoksch, Benjamin J.
  • Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 52, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12503

Comparison of Cellulosic Ethanol Yields from Midwestern Maize and Reconstructed Tallgrass Prairie Systems Managed for Bioenergy
journal, June 2014


Opportunities for Energy Crop Production Based on Subfield Scale Distribution of Profitability
journal, October 2014

  • Bonner, Ian; Cafferty, Kara; Muth, David
  • Energies, Vol. 7, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.3390/en7106509

Impact of Air Pollution Control Costs on the Cost and Spatial Arrangement of Cellulosic Biofuel Production in the U.S.
journal, February 2014

  • Murphy, Colin W.; Parker, Nathan C.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/es405025h

Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States
journal, December 2014

  • Tessum, Christopher W.; Hill, Jason D.; Marshall, Julian D.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 52
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1406853111

Corn stover for bioenergy production: Cost estimates and farmer supply response
journal, March 2014


Corn stover as a biofuel feedstock in Iowa’s bio-economy: An Iowa farmer survey
journal, April 2011


Producer willingness and ability to supply biomass: Evidence from the U.S. Midwest
journal, January 2012


Farmers’ attitudes about growing energy crops: A choice experiment approach
journal, December 2010


Soil Carbon Sequestration to Mitigate Climate Change and Advance food Security
journal, January 2007


A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health
journal, July 1993

  • Cairns, John; McCormick, Paul V.; Niederlehner, B. R.
  • Hydrobiologia, Vol. 263, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00006084

Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits
journal, December 2007


Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture
journal, December 2007


The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people
journal, June 2015

  • Díaz, Sandra; Demissew, Sebsebe; Carabias, Julia
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 14
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

A Rosetta Stone for Nature’s Benefits to People
journal, January 2015


Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship
journal, January 2012

  • Mace, Georgina M.; Norris, Ken; Fitter, Alastair H.
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 27, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006

Communicating About Bioenergy Sustainability
journal, January 2013


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Bioenergy from biofuel residues and waste
    journal, September 2019

    • Plante, Luke; Sheehan, Nathaniel P.; Bier, Peter
    • Water Environment Research, Vol. 91, Issue 10
    • DOI: 10.1002/wer.1214

    Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability
    journal, June 2019


    Socio-environmental and land-use impacts of double-cropped maize ethanol in Brazil
    journal, January 2020

    • Moreira, Marcelo M. R.; Seabra, Joaquim E. A.; Lynd, Lee R.
    • Nature Sustainability, Vol. 3, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0456-2