skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Forecasting Responses of a Northern Peatland Carbon Cycle to Elevated CO2 and a Gradient of Experimental Warming

Abstract

The ability to forecast ecological carbon cycling is imperative to land management in a world where past carbon fluxes are no longer a clear guide in the Anthropocene. However, carbon–flux forecasting has not been practiced routinely like numerical weather prediction. This study explored (1) the relative contributions of model forcing data and parameters to uncertainty in forecasting flux– versus pool–based carbon cycle variables and (2) the time points when temperature and CO2 treatments may cause statistically detectable differences in those variables. We developed an online forecasting workflow (Ecological Platform for Assimilation of Data (EcoPAD)), which facilitates iterative data–model integration. EcoPAD automates data transfer from sensor networks, data assimilation, and ecological forecasting. We used the Spruce and Peatland Responses Under Changing Experiments data collected from 2011 to 2014 to constrain the parameters in the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model, forecast carbon cycle responses to elevated CO2 and a gradient of warming from 2015 to 2024, and specify uncertainties in the model output. Our results showed that data assimilation substantially reduces forecasting uncertainties. Interestingly, we found that the stochasticity of future external forcing contributed more to the uncertainty of forecasting future dynamics of C flux–related variables than model parameters. However, the parameter uncertainty primarilymore » contributes to the uncertainty in forecasting C pool–related response variables. Given the uncertainties in forecasting carbon fluxes and pools, our analysis showed that statistically different responses of fast–turnover pools to various CO2 and warming treatments were observed sooner than slow–turnover pools. In conclusion, our study has identified the sources of uncertainties in model prediction and thus leads to improve ecological carbon cycling forecasts in the future.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [6]
+ Show Author Affiliations
  1. Nanjing Forestry Univ., Nanjing (China)
  2. Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK (United States)
  3. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States)
  4. Univ. of Oklahoma Information Technology, Norman, OK (United States)
  5. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  6. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States); Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1468262
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1429538
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; 4000144122
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 123; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-8953
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; data assimilation; uncertainty; SPRUCE; model‐experiment; model‐data fusion; EcoPAD

Citation Formats

Jiang, Jiang, Huang, Yuanyuan, Ma, Shuang, Stacy, Mark, Shi, Zheng, Ricciuto, Daniel M., Hanson, Paul J., and Luo, Yiqi. Forecasting Responses of a Northern Peatland Carbon Cycle to Elevated CO2 and a Gradient of Experimental Warming. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/2017JG004040.
Copy to clipboard
Jiang, Jiang, Huang, Yuanyuan, Ma, Shuang, Stacy, Mark, Shi, Zheng, Ricciuto, Daniel M., Hanson, Paul J., & Luo, Yiqi. Forecasting Responses of a Northern Peatland Carbon Cycle to Elevated CO2 and a Gradient of Experimental Warming. United States. doi:10.1002/2017JG004040.
Copy to clipboard
Jiang, Jiang, Huang, Yuanyuan, Ma, Shuang, Stacy, Mark, Shi, Zheng, Ricciuto, Daniel M., Hanson, Paul J., and Luo, Yiqi. Fri . "Forecasting Responses of a Northern Peatland Carbon Cycle to Elevated CO2 and a Gradient of Experimental Warming". United States. doi:10.1002/2017JG004040. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1468262.
Copy to clipboard
@article{osti_1468262,
title = {Forecasting Responses of a Northern Peatland Carbon Cycle to Elevated CO2 and a Gradient of Experimental Warming},
author = {Jiang, Jiang and Huang, Yuanyuan and Ma, Shuang and Stacy, Mark and Shi, Zheng and Ricciuto, Daniel M. and Hanson, Paul J. and Luo, Yiqi},
abstractNote = {The ability to forecast ecological carbon cycling is imperative to land management in a world where past carbon fluxes are no longer a clear guide in the Anthropocene. However, carbon–flux forecasting has not been practiced routinely like numerical weather prediction. This study explored (1) the relative contributions of model forcing data and parameters to uncertainty in forecasting flux– versus pool–based carbon cycle variables and (2) the time points when temperature and CO2 treatments may cause statistically detectable differences in those variables. We developed an online forecasting workflow (Ecological Platform for Assimilation of Data (EcoPAD)), which facilitates iterative data–model integration. EcoPAD automates data transfer from sensor networks, data assimilation, and ecological forecasting. We used the Spruce and Peatland Responses Under Changing Experiments data collected from 2011 to 2014 to constrain the parameters in the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model, forecast carbon cycle responses to elevated CO2 and a gradient of warming from 2015 to 2024, and specify uncertainties in the model output. Our results showed that data assimilation substantially reduces forecasting uncertainties. Interestingly, we found that the stochasticity of future external forcing contributed more to the uncertainty of forecasting future dynamics of C flux–related variables than model parameters. However, the parameter uncertainty primarily contributes to the uncertainty in forecasting C pool–related response variables. Given the uncertainties in forecasting carbon fluxes and pools, our analysis showed that statistically different responses of fast–turnover pools to various CO2 and warming treatments were observed sooner than slow–turnover pools. In conclusion, our study has identified the sources of uncertainties in model prediction and thus leads to improve ecological carbon cycling forecasts in the future.},
doi = {10.1002/2017JG004040},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences},
number = 3,
volume = 123,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {3}
}
Copy to clipboard
Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
DOI:  10.1002/2017JG004040
Copyright Statement
Other availability
Search WorldCat Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 1 work
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Figure 1 Figure 1: Historical climate from the USDA MEF site during 1961-2014 and stochastic weather generation for 2015-2024. (a) Daily air temperature and (b) cumulative precipitation along Julian calendar. Curves and shaded areas represent mean and standard deviation (S.D.), respectively (gray is historical data, and black areas represent ensemble of futuremore » data). (c) and (d) are standard deviations of ensembles against means of each day for air temperature and precipitation, respectively.« less
All figures and tables (8 total)
Save / Share:
Export Metadata
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.

Works referenced in this record:

Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models
journal, May 2015

  • Medlyn, Belinda E.; Zaehle, Sönke; De Kauwe, Martin G.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2621

Variation of parameters in a Flux-Based Ecosystem Model across 12 sites of terrestrial ecosystems in the conterminous USA
journal, September 2016

Elevated CO 2 maintains grassland net carbon uptake under a future heat and drought extreme
journal, May 2016

  • Roy, Jacques; Picon-Cochard, Catherine; Augusti, Angela
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524527113

Optimizing the photosynthetic parameter Vcmax by assimilating MODIS-fPAR and MODIS-NDVI with a process-based ecosystem model
journal, November 2014

Relative information contributions of model vs. data to short- and long-term forecasts of forest carbon dynamics
journal, July 2011

  • Weng, Ensheng; Luo, Yiqi
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 21, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1890/09-1394.1

Stability of peatland carbon to rising temperatures
journal, December 2016

  • Wilson, R. M.; Hopple, A. M.; Tfaily, M. M.
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 7, Article No. 13723
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13723

Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts
journal, May 2015

  • Frank, Dorothea; Reichstein, Markus; Bahn, Michael
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12916

Projected ecosystem impact of the Prairie Heating and CO 2 Enrichment experiment
journal, June 2007

Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity
journal, December 2005

  • Norby, R. J.; DeLucia, E. H.; Gielen, B.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 102, Issue 50
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509478102

Robustness and uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to CMIP5 climate change projections
journal, October 2012

Ecological Forecasts: An Emerging Imperative
journal, July 2001

Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO 2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models
journal, April 2001

Challenging terrestrial biosphere models with data from the long‐term multifactor Prairie Heating and CO 2 Enrichment experiment
journal, March 2017

  • De Kauwe, Martin G.; Medlyn, Belinda E.; Walker, Anthony P.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 23, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13643

Large-scale variation in boreal and temperate forest carbon turnover rate related to climate: Climate-Related Forest C Turnover Rate
journal, May 2016

  • Thurner, Martin; Beer, Christian; Carvalhais, Nuno
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL068794

Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing net soil carbon storage
journal, May 2013

  • Sistla, Seeta A.; Moore, John C.; Simpson, Rodney T.
  • Nature, Vol. 497, Issue 7451
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12129

Assessing Interactions Among Changing Climate, Management, and Disturbance in Forests: A Macrosystems Approach
journal, February 2015

  • Becknell, Justin M.; Desai, Ankur R.; Dietze, Michael C.
  • BioScience, Vol. 65, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu234

Gaps in knowledge and data driving uncertainty in models of photosynthesis
journal, May 2013

A framework for benchmarking land models
journal, January 2012

Rate my data: quantifying the value of ecological data for the development of models of the terrestrial carbon cycle
journal, January 2013

  • Keenan, Trevor F.; Davidson, Eric A.; Munger, J. William
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 23, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1890/12-0747.1

Ecological forecasting and data assimilation in a data-rich era
journal, July 2011

  • Luo, Yiqi; Ogle, Kiona; Tucker, Colin
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 21, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1890/09-1275.1

An improved model for determining degree-day values from daily temperature data
journal, November 2001

  • Spano, D.; Duce, P.; Snyder, R. L.
  • International Journal of Biometeorology, Vol. 45, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s004840100104

Model-data synthesis for the next generation of forest free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments
journal, August 2015

  • Norby, Richard J.; De Kauwe, Martin G.; Domingues, Tomas F.
  • New Phytologist, Vol. 209, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.13593

Variation in stem mortality rates determines patterns of above-ground biomass in Amazonian forests: implications for dynamic global vegetation models
journal, May 2016

  • Johnson, Michelle O.; Galbraith, David; Gloor, Manuel
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 22, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13315

Intermediate-scale community-level flux of CO2 and CH4 in a Minnesota peatland: putting the SPRUCE project in a global context
journal, August 2016

The relationship of leaf photosynthetic traits - V cmax and J max - to leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus, and specific leaf area: a meta-analysis and modeling study
journal, July 2014

  • Walker, Anthony P.; Beckerman, Andrew P.; Gu, Lianhong
  • Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 4, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1173

Shifting grassland plant community structure drives positive interactive effects of warming and diversity on aboveground net primary productivity
journal, January 2016

  • Cowles, Jane M.; Wragg, Peter D.; Wright, Alexandra J.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 22, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13111

Using model-data fusion to interpret past trends, and quantify uncertainties in future projections, of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling
journal, April 2012

Plant community structure regulates responses of prairie soil respiration to decadal experimental warming
journal, June 2015

  • Xu, Xia; Shi, Zheng; Li, Dejun
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12940

Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi-factor world
journal, May 2004

The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction
journal, September 2015

  • Bauer, Peter; Thorpe, Alan; Brunet, Gilbert
  • Nature, Vol. 525, Issue 7567
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature14956

Complementarity of flux- and biometric-based data to constrain parameters in a terrestrial carbon model
journal, March 2015

  • Du, Zhenggang; Nie, Yuanyuan; He, Yanghui
  • Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, Vol. 67, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v67.24102

Improvement of global litter turnover rate predictions using a Bayesian MCMC approach
journal, December 2014

Response of grassland biomass production to simulated climate change and clipping along an elevation gradient
journal, November 2013

Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: biological nitrogen fixation as a case study
journal, April 2015

Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models: SOIL CARBON MODELING
journal, January 2016

  • Luo, Yiqi; Ahlström, Anders; Allison, Steven D.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 30, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GB005239

Variability in root production, phenology, and turnover rate among 12 temperate tree species
journal, August 2014

  • McCormack, M. Luke; Adams, Thomas S.; Smithwick, Erica A. H.
  • Ecology, Vol. 95, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1890/13-1942.1

Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie
journal, October 2001

  • Luo, Yiqi; Wan, Shiqiang; Hui, Dafeng
  • Nature, Vol. 413, Issue 6856
  • DOI: 10.1038/35098065

GCM characteristics explain the majority of uncertainty in projected 21st century terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance
journal, January 2013

Responses of terrestrial ecosystems and carbon budgets to current and future environmental variability
journal, April 2010

  • Medvigy, D.; Wofsy, S. C.; Munger, J. W.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912032107

How uncertainties in future climate change predictions translate into future terrestrial carbon fluxes
journal, June 2005

Uncertainty analysis of forest carbon sink forecast with varying measurement errors: a data assimilation approach
journal, June 2011

  • Weng, Ensheng; Luo, Yiqi; Gao, Chao
  • Journal of Plant Ecology, Vol. 4, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtr018

Experimental warming altered rates of carbon processes, allocation, and carbon storage in a tallgrass prairie
journal, November 2015

Estimating diurnal to annual ecosystem parameters by synthesis of a carbon flux model with eddy covariance net ecosystem exchange observations
journal, February 2005

Parameter identifiability, constraint, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models
journal, April 2009

  • Luo, Yiqi; Weng, Ensheng; Wu, Xiaowen
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 19, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1890/08-0561.1

Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability
journal, February 2016

  • Seddon, Alistair W. R.; Macias-Fauria, Marc; Long, Peter R.
  • Nature, Vol. 531, Issue 7593
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature16986

Climate extremes and the carbon cycle
journal, August 2013

  • Reichstein, Markus; Bahn, Michael; Ciais, Philippe
  • Nature, Vol. 500, Issue 7462
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12350

Prediction in ecology: a first-principles framework
journal, August 2017

  • Dietze, Michael C.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 27, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/eap.1589

VAR, SVAR and SVEC Models: Implementation Within R Package vars
journal, January 2008

The climate dependence of the terrestrial carbon cycle, including parameter and structural uncertainties
journal, January 2013

Predictability of the terrestrial carbon cycle
journal, December 2014

  • Luo, Yiqi; Keenan, Trevor F.; Smith, Matthew
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12766

Responses of ecosystem carbon cycle to experimental warming: a meta-analysis
journal, March 2013

  • Lu, Meng; Zhou, Xuhui; Yang, Qiang
  • Ecology, Vol. 94, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1890/12-0279.1

Faster Decomposition Under Increased Atmospheric CO2 Limits Soil Carbon Storage
journal, April 2014

    [ × clear filter / sort ]

    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Realized ecological forecast through an interactive Ecological Platform for Assimilating Data (EcoPAD, v1.0) into models
    journal, January 2019

    • Huang, Yuanyuan; Stacy, Mark; Jiang, Jiang
    • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-1119-2019
      [ × clear filter / sort ]

      Figures / Tables found in this record:

      Figure 1 (p. 17)figure
      Figure 2 (p. 18)figure
      Figure 3 (p. 19)figure
      Figure 4 (p. 20)figure
      Figure 5 (p. 21)figure
      Figure 6 (p. 22)figure
      Table 1 (p. 38)table
      Table 2 (p. 39)table
        [ × clear filter / sort ]
        Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.

        Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections: