DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Transient Traceability Analysis of Land Carbon Storage Dynamics: Procedures and Its Application to Two Forest Ecosystems

Abstract

Uptake of anthropogenically emitted carbon (C) dioxide by terrestrial ecosystem is critical for determining future climate. However, Earth system models project large uncertainties in future C storage. To help identify sources of uncertainties in model predictions, this study develops a transient traceability framework to trace components of C storage dynamics. Transient C storage (X) can be decomposed into two components, C storage capacity (Xc) and C storage potential (Xp). Xc is the maximum C amount that an ecosystem can potentially store and Xp represents the internal capacity of an ecosystem to equilibrate C input and output for a network of pools. Xc is codetermined by net primary production (NPP) and residence time (τN), with the latter being determined by allocation coefficients, transfer coefficients, environmental scalar, and exit rate. Xp is the product of redistribution matrix (τch) and net ecosystem exchange. We applied this framework to two contrasting ecosystems, Duke Forest and Harvard Forest with an ecosystem model. This framework helps identify the mechanisms underlying the responses of carbon cycling in the two forests to climate change. The temporal trajectories of X are similar between the two ecosystems. Using this framework, we found that different mechanisms lead to a similar trajectorymore » between the two ecosystems. Furthermore, this framework has potential to reveal mechanisms behind transient C storage in response to various global change factors. Furthermore, tt can also identify sources of uncertainties in predicted transient C storage across models and can therefore be useful for model intercomparison.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [4];  [1];  [5];  [6]
  1. Center for Ecosystem Science and Society Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ USA
  2. Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology University of Oklahoma Norman OK USA
  3. School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences East China Normal University Shanghai China
  4. Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology University of Oklahoma Norman OK USA, Environmental Science Division and Climate Change Science Institute Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN USA
  5. Department of Mathematics University of Oklahoma Norman Oklahoma USA
  6. Center for Ecosystem Science and Society Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ USA, Department of Earth System Science Tsinghua University Beijing China
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1411262
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1411263; OSTI ID: 1468037
Grant/Contract Number:  
DE‐SC0008270; DE‐SC0014085; EF 1137293; OIA‐1301789; AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems Journal Volume: 9 Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 1942-2466
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; carbon storage capacity; carbon storage potential; model intercomparison; residence time; traceability analysis; transient carbon dynamics

Citation Formats

Jiang, Lifen, Shi, Zheng, Xia, Jianyang, Liang, Junyi, Lu, Xingjie, Wang, Ying, and Luo, Yiqi. Transient Traceability Analysis of Land Carbon Storage Dynamics: Procedures and Its Application to Two Forest Ecosystems. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1002/2017MS001004.
Jiang, Lifen, Shi, Zheng, Xia, Jianyang, Liang, Junyi, Lu, Xingjie, Wang, Ying, & Luo, Yiqi. Transient Traceability Analysis of Land Carbon Storage Dynamics: Procedures and Its Application to Two Forest Ecosystems. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001004
Jiang, Lifen, Shi, Zheng, Xia, Jianyang, Liang, Junyi, Lu, Xingjie, Wang, Ying, and Luo, Yiqi. Mon . "Transient Traceability Analysis of Land Carbon Storage Dynamics: Procedures and Its Application to Two Forest Ecosystems". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001004.
@article{osti_1411262,
title = {Transient Traceability Analysis of Land Carbon Storage Dynamics: Procedures and Its Application to Two Forest Ecosystems},
author = {Jiang, Lifen and Shi, Zheng and Xia, Jianyang and Liang, Junyi and Lu, Xingjie and Wang, Ying and Luo, Yiqi},
abstractNote = {Uptake of anthropogenically emitted carbon (C) dioxide by terrestrial ecosystem is critical for determining future climate. However, Earth system models project large uncertainties in future C storage. To help identify sources of uncertainties in model predictions, this study develops a transient traceability framework to trace components of C storage dynamics. Transient C storage (X) can be decomposed into two components, C storage capacity (Xc) and C storage potential (Xp). Xc is the maximum C amount that an ecosystem can potentially store and Xp represents the internal capacity of an ecosystem to equilibrate C input and output for a network of pools. Xc is codetermined by net primary production (NPP) and residence time (τN), with the latter being determined by allocation coefficients, transfer coefficients, environmental scalar, and exit rate. Xp is the product of redistribution matrix (τch) and net ecosystem exchange. We applied this framework to two contrasting ecosystems, Duke Forest and Harvard Forest with an ecosystem model. This framework helps identify the mechanisms underlying the responses of carbon cycling in the two forests to climate change. The temporal trajectories of X are similar between the two ecosystems. Using this framework, we found that different mechanisms lead to a similar trajectory between the two ecosystems. Furthermore, this framework has potential to reveal mechanisms behind transient C storage in response to various global change factors. Furthermore, tt can also identify sources of uncertainties in predicted transient C storage across models and can therefore be useful for model intercomparison.},
doi = {10.1002/2017MS001004},
journal = {Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems},
number = 8,
volume = 9,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Dec 04 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Mon Dec 04 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001004

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 13 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND TURNOVER IN A PINE FOREST AFTER SIX YEARS OF ATMOSPHERIC CO 2 ENRICHMENT
journal, July 2005

  • Lichter, John; Barron, Stacy H.; Bevacqua, Christine E.
  • Ecology, Vol. 86, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1890/04-1205

Transient dynamics of terrestrial carbon storage: mathematical foundation and its applications
journal, January 2017


A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I:
journal, May 1998


Improvement of global litter turnover rate predictions using a Bayesian MCMC approach
journal, December 2014


A general mathematical framework for representing soil organic matter dynamics
journal, November 2015

  • Sierra, Carlos A.; Müller, Markus
  • Ecological Monographs, Vol. 85, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1890/15-0361.1

Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks
journal, January 2014

  • Friedlingstein, Pierre; Meinshausen, Malte; Arora, Vivek K.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00579.1

Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability
journal, February 2013

  • Cox, Peter M.; Pearson, David; Booth, Ben B.
  • Nature, Vol. 494, Issue 7437
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11882

Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models: SOIL CARBON MODELING
journal, January 2016

  • Luo, Yiqi; Ahlström, Anders; Allison, Steven D.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 30, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GB005239

Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models
journal, August 2013

  • Arora, Vivek K.; Boer, George J.; Friedlingstein, Pierre
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00494.1

Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales
journal, July 2009


Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO 2
journal, December 2013

  • Friend, Andrew D.; Lucht, Wolfgang; Rademacher, Tim T.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222477110

Dynamic disequilibrium of the terrestrial carbon cycle under global change
journal, February 2011


GCM characteristics explain the majority of uncertainty in projected 21st century terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance
journal, January 2013


Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations
journal, January 2013

  • Todd-Brown, K. E. O.; Randerson, J. T.; Post, W. M.
  • Biogeosciences, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/bg-10-1717-2013

Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C 4 MIP Model Intercomparison
journal, July 2006

  • Friedlingstein, P.; Cox, P.; Betts, R.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3800.1

Scale-Dependent Performance of CMIP5 Earth System Models in Simulating Terrestrial Vegetation Carbon
journal, July 2015


Experimental warming altered rates of carbon processes, allocation, and carbon storage in a tallgrass prairie
journal, November 2015


Radiocarbon constraints imply reduced carbon uptake by soils during the 21st century
journal, September 2016


Global carbon budget 2014
journal, January 2015

  • Le Quéré, C.; Moriarty, R.; Andrew, R. M.
  • Earth System Science Data, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/essd-7-47-2015

Factors controlling CO 2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard Forest
journal, January 2007

  • Urbanski, S.; Barford, C.; Wofsy, S.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, Issue G2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006JG000293

Traceable components of terrestrial carbon storage capacity in biogeochemical models
journal, March 2013

  • Xia, Jianyang; Luo, Yiqi; Wang, Ying-Ping
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 19, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12172

Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems
journal, September 2014

  • Carvalhais, Nuno; Forkel, Matthias; Khomik, Myroslava
  • Nature, Vol. 514, Issue 7521
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13731

Canopy leaf area constrains [CO2]-induced enhancement of productivity and partitioning among aboveground carbon pools
journal, December 2006

  • McCarthy, H. R.; Oren, R.; Finzi, A. C.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 103, Issue 51
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609448103

Soil hydrological properties regulate grassland ecosystem responses to multifactor global change: A modeling analysis
journal, January 2008

  • Weng, Ensheng; Luo, Yiqi
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue G3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JG000539

Soil warming, carbon-nitrogen interactions, and forest carbon budgets
journal, May 2011

  • Melillo, J. M.; Butler, S.; Johnson, J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018189108

A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
journal, June 1980

  • Farquhar, G. D.; von Caemmerer, S.; Berry, J. A.
  • Planta, Vol. 149, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00386231

A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions
book, January 1987


Simulation of Global Land Surface Conditions from 1948 to 2004. Part I: Forcing Data and Evaluations
journal, October 2006

  • Qian, Taotao; Dai, Aiguo; Trenberth, Kevin E.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 7, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM540.1

Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by Earth system models during the 21st century
journal, January 2014

  • Todd-Brown, K. E. O.; Randerson, J. T.; Hopkins, F.
  • Biogeosciences, Vol. 11, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-2341-2014

Predictability of the terrestrial carbon cycle
journal, December 2014

  • Luo, Yiqi; Keenan, Trevor F.; Smith, Matthew
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12766

Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability
journal, April 2015

  • Wieder, William R.; Cleveland, Cory C.; Smith, W. Kolby
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2413

Modeling the Terrestrial Biosphere
journal, October 2014