skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Ionospheric Impact of an ICME-Driven Sheath Region Over Indian and American Sectors in the Absence of a Typical Geomagnetic Storm

Abstract

On 13 April 2013, the ACE spacecraft detected arrival of an interplanetary shock at 2250 UT, which is followed by the passage of the sheath region of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) for a prolonged (18-hr) period. The polarity of interplanetary magnetic field Bz was northward inside the magnetic cloud region of the ICME. The ring current (SYM-H) index did not go below -7 nT during this event suggesting the absence of a typical geomagnetic storm. In this paper, the responses of the global ionospheric electric field associated with the passage of the ICME sheath region have been investigated using incoherent scatter radar measurements of Jicamarca and Arecibo (postmidnight sector) along with the variations of equatorial electrojet strength over India (day sector). It is found that westward and eastward prompt penetration (PP) electric fields affected ionosphere over Jicamarca/Arecibo and Indian sectors, respectively, during 0545–0800 UT. The polarities of the PP electric field perturbations over the day/night sectors are consistent with model predictions. In fact, DP2-type electric field perturbations with ~40-min periodicity are found to affect the ionosphere over both the sectors for about 2.25 hr during the passage of the ICME sheath region. Finally, this result shows that SYM-Hmore » index may not capture the full geoeffectivenss of the ICME sheath-driven storms and suggests that the PP electric field perturbations should be evaluated for geoeffectiveness of ICME when the polarity of interplanetary magnetic field Bz is northward inside the magnetic cloud region of the ICME.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [1];  [3]; ORCiD logo [4];  [5];  [6];  [6];  [7]; ORCiD logo [8];  [8]
  1. Physical Research Lab., Ahmedabad (India)
  2. Indian Inst. of Technology Roorkee (India)
  3. Utah State Univ., Logan, UT (United States)
  4. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  5. Indian Inst. of Geomagnetism, Navi Mumbai (India)
  6. Arecibo Observatory, PR (United States). Space and Atmospheric Science
  7. Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States)
  8. Computational Physics Inc., Springfield, VA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); Utah State Univ., Logan, UT (United States); Arecibo Observatory, PR (United States); Physical Research Lab., Ahmedabad (India)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA); National Science Foundation (NSF); Dept. of Space (India)
OSTI Identifier:
1467371
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-17-28039
Journal ID: ISSN 2169-9380
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25396; 80NSSC17K071; AGS-1433968; LT-1100968
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 123; Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-9380
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; ICME sheath; prompt penetration; equatorial ionosphere; geoeffectiveness

Citation Formats

Rout, Diptiranjan, Chakrabarty, D., Sarkhel, S., Sekar, R., Fejer, B. G., Reeves, G. D., Kulkarni, Atul S., Aponte, Nestor, Sulzer, Mike, Mathews, John D., Kerr, Robert B., and Noto, John. The Ionospheric Impact of an ICME-Driven Sheath Region Over Indian and American Sectors in the Absence of a Typical Geomagnetic Storm. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1029/2018JA025334.
Rout, Diptiranjan, Chakrabarty, D., Sarkhel, S., Sekar, R., Fejer, B. G., Reeves, G. D., Kulkarni, Atul S., Aponte, Nestor, Sulzer, Mike, Mathews, John D., Kerr, Robert B., & Noto, John. The Ionospheric Impact of an ICME-Driven Sheath Region Over Indian and American Sectors in the Absence of a Typical Geomagnetic Storm. United States. doi:10.1029/2018JA025334.
Rout, Diptiranjan, Chakrabarty, D., Sarkhel, S., Sekar, R., Fejer, B. G., Reeves, G. D., Kulkarni, Atul S., Aponte, Nestor, Sulzer, Mike, Mathews, John D., Kerr, Robert B., and Noto, John. Wed . "The Ionospheric Impact of an ICME-Driven Sheath Region Over Indian and American Sectors in the Absence of a Typical Geomagnetic Storm". United States. doi:10.1029/2018JA025334. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1467371.
@article{osti_1467371,
title = {The Ionospheric Impact of an ICME-Driven Sheath Region Over Indian and American Sectors in the Absence of a Typical Geomagnetic Storm},
author = {Rout, Diptiranjan and Chakrabarty, D. and Sarkhel, S. and Sekar, R. and Fejer, B. G. and Reeves, G. D. and Kulkarni, Atul S. and Aponte, Nestor and Sulzer, Mike and Mathews, John D. and Kerr, Robert B. and Noto, John},
abstractNote = {On 13 April 2013, the ACE spacecraft detected arrival of an interplanetary shock at 2250 UT, which is followed by the passage of the sheath region of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) for a prolonged (18-hr) period. The polarity of interplanetary magnetic field Bz was northward inside the magnetic cloud region of the ICME. The ring current (SYM-H) index did not go below -7 nT during this event suggesting the absence of a typical geomagnetic storm. In this paper, the responses of the global ionospheric electric field associated with the passage of the ICME sheath region have been investigated using incoherent scatter radar measurements of Jicamarca and Arecibo (postmidnight sector) along with the variations of equatorial electrojet strength over India (day sector). It is found that westward and eastward prompt penetration (PP) electric fields affected ionosphere over Jicamarca/Arecibo and Indian sectors, respectively, during 0545–0800 UT. The polarities of the PP electric field perturbations over the day/night sectors are consistent with model predictions. In fact, DP2-type electric field perturbations with ~40-min periodicity are found to affect the ionosphere over both the sectors for about 2.25 hr during the passage of the ICME sheath region. Finally, this result shows that SYM-H index may not capture the full geoeffectivenss of the ICME sheath-driven storms and suggests that the PP electric field perturbations should be evaluated for geoeffectiveness of ICME when the polarity of interplanetary magnetic field Bz is northward inside the magnetic cloud region of the ICME.},
doi = {10.1029/2018JA025334},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics},
number = 5,
volume = 123,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {5}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 1 work
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Seasonal and longitudinal dependence of equatorial disturbance vertical plasma drifts
journal, January 2008

  • Fejer, Bela G.; Jensen, John W.; Su, Shin-Yi
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008GL035584

Direct penetration of the polar electric field to the equator during a DP 2 event as detected by the auroral and equatorial magnetometer chains and the EISCAT radar
journal, August 1996

  • Kikuchi, T.; Lühr, H.; Kitamura, T.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 101, Issue A8
  • DOI: 10.1029/96JA01299

On the Control of Magnetospheric Convection by the Spatial Distribution of Ionospheric Conductivities
journal, January 1984


A full Study on the Sun–Earth Connection of an Earth-Directed cme Magnetic flux rope
journal, November 2015


Evidence for the interplanetary electric field effect on the OI 630.0 nm airglow over low latitude
journal, January 2005

  • Chakrabarty, D.; Sekar, R.; Narayanan, R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 110, Issue A11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005JA011221

Responses of the ionospheric electric field to the sheath region of ICME: A case study
journal, January 2011


Effects of interplanetary electric field on the development of an equatorial spread F event
journal, January 2006

  • Chakrabarty, D.; Sekar, R.; Narayanan, R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, Issue A12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006JA011884

Spectrum: spectral analysis of unevenly spaced paleoclimatic time series
journal, November 1997


Unified PC indices: Relation to isolated magnetic substorms : RELATION OF
journal, September 2007

  • Janzhura, A.; Troshichev, O.; Stauning, P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 112, Issue A9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006JA012132

Solar wind flow angle and geoeffectiveness of corotating interaction regions: First results: GEOEFFECTIVENESS OF CIR
journal, May 2017

  • Rout, Diptiranjan; Chakrabarty, D.; Janardhan, P.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073038

Interplanetary drivers of ionospheric prompt penetration electric fields
journal, January 2011

  • Guo, Jianpeng; Feng, Xueshang; Zuo, Pingbing
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 73, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.01.010

Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones
journal, January 1961


Application of linear regularization methods to Arecibo vector velocities
journal, January 2005


A magnetic cloud and a coronal mass ejection
journal, December 1982

  • Burlaga, L. F.; Klein, L.; Sheeley, N. R.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 9, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/GL009i012p01317

Radar and satellite global equatorial F region vertical drift model
journal, April 1999

  • Scherliess, L.; Fejer, B. G.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 104, Issue A4
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999JA900025

Variability of magnetospheric storms driven by different solar wind perturbations
journal, January 2002

  • Huttunen, K. Emilia J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 107, Issue A7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2001JA900171

Geomagnetic D p 2 fluctuations and associated magnetospheric phenomena
journal, March 1968


Testing for Periodicity in a Time Series
journal, June 1980


Response of the equatorial ionosphere to the geomagnetic DP 2 current system : Response of the Equatorial Ionosphere
journal, July 2016

  • Yizengaw, E.; Moldwin, M. B.; Zesta, E.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL070090

Penetration of auroral electric fields to the equator during a substorm
journal, October 2000

  • Kikuchi, T.; Lühr, H.; Schlegel, K.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 105, Issue A10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JA900016

Polar-equatorial coupling during magnetically active periods
journal, August 1978


Dynamics of North American sector ionospheric and thermospheric response during the November 2004 superstorm
journal, March 2010

  • Erickson, P. J.; Goncharenko, L. P.; Nicolls, M. J.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 72, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2009.04.001

Low Latitude Ionospheric Electrodynamics
journal, November 2010


Relationship between solar wind parameters and magnetic activity in the near-pole region: Application to space weather forecasting
journal, January 2000


The relationship between interplanetary quantities and magnetic activity in the southern polar cap
journal, April 1985


Radar chain study of the May, 1995 storm
journal, February 1999

  • Buonsanto, M. J.; González, S. a.; Pi, X.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 61, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6826(98)00134-5

Downstream structures of interplanetary fast shocks associated with coronal mass ejections: DOWNSTREAM STRUCTURES OF FAST SHOCKS
journal, June 2005

  • Kataoka, R.; Watari, S.; Shimada, N.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 32, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005GL022777

Distinctive effects of interplanetary electric field and substorm on nighttime equatorial F layer: A case study
journal, January 2008

  • Chakrabarty, D.; Sekar, R.; Sastri, J. H.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008GL035415

Multi-longitude case studies comparing the interplanetary and equatorial ionospheric electric fields using an empirical model
journal, July 2007

  • Kelley, M. C.; Nicolls, M. J.; Anderson, D.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 69, Issue 10-11
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2006.08.014

Interplanetary shock waves and magnetospheric substorms
journal, April 1980


F region plasma drifts over Arecibo: Solar cycle, seasonal, and magnetic activity effects
journal, August 1993

  • Fejer, B. G.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 98, Issue A8
  • DOI: 10.1029/93JA00953

Asymmetric development of magnetospheric storms during magnetic clouds and sheath regions
journal, January 2006

  • Huttunen, K. E. J.; Koskinen, H. E. J.; Karinen, A.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005GL024894

Letter to the editor: Electric field fluctuations (25-35 min) in the midnight dip equatorial ionosphere
journal, January 2000


Effects of magnetic clouds on the occurrence of geomagnetic storms: The first 4 years of Wind
journal, January 2002


Solar sources and geospace consequences of interplanetary magnetic clouds observed during solar cycle 23
journal, February 2008

  • Gopalswamy, N.; Akiyama, S.; Yashiro, S.
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 70, Issue 2-4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2007.08.070

Differences in geomagnetic storms driven by magnetic clouds and ICME sheath regions
journal, January 2007

  • Pulkkinen, T. I.; Partamies, N.; Huttunen, K. E. J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006GL027775

Coronal Mass Ejection Shock and Sheath Structures Relevant to Particle Acceleration
journal, April 2005

  • Manchester IV, W. B.; Gombosi, T. I.; De Zeeuw, D. L.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 622, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/427768

Interplanetary conditions causing intense geomagnetic storms (Dst ≤ −100 nT) during solar cycle 23 (1996-2006): IP CAUSES OF STORMS DURING CYCLE 23
journal, May 2008

  • Echer, E.; Gonzalez, W. D.; Tsurutani, B. T.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 113, Issue A5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JA012744

Solar wind parameters and geomagnetic indices for four different interplanetary shock/ICME structures: BRIEF REPORT
journal, December 2011

  • Yue, Chao; Zong, Qiugang
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 116, Issue A12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JA017013

Origin of interplanetary southward magnetic fields responsible for major magnetic storms near solar maximum (1978–1979)
journal, January 1988

  • Tsurutani, Bruce T.; Gonzalez, Walter D.; Tang, Frances
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 93, Issue A8
  • DOI: 10.1029/JA093iA08p08519

Polar cap index (PC) as a proxy for ionospheric electric field in the near-pole region
journal, December 2000

  • Troshichev, O. A.; Lukianova, R. Yu.; Papitashvili, V. O.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000GL003756

Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
journal, July 1964

  • Savitzky, Abraham.; Golay, M. J. E.
  • Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 36, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/ac60214a047

Importance of post-shock streams and sheath region as drivers of intense magnetospheric storms and high-latitude activity
journal, January 2004


In-Situ Solar Wind and Magnetic Field Signatures of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections
journal, September 2006


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Critical Evaluation of the Impact of Disturbance Dynamo on Equatorial Ionosphere During Daytime
    journal, November 2018

    • Pandey, Kuldeep; Chakrabarty, D.; Sekar, R.
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 123, Issue 11
    • DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025686

    Significant Electric Field Perturbations in Low Latitude Ionosphere due to the Passage of Two Consecutive ICMEs During 6–8 September 2017
    journal, November 2019

    • Rout, Diptiranjan; Pandey, Kuldeep; Chakrabarty, D.
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 124, Issue 11
    • DOI: 10.1029/2019ja027133