Evaluation of the performance of distributed and centralized biomass technologies in rural China

Zhang, Weishi; Wang, Can; Zhang, Long; Xu, Ying; Cui, Yuanzheng; Lu, Zifeng; Streets, David G.

doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.109

Title: Evaluation of the performance of distributed and centralized biomass technologies in rural China

Journal Article · 23 February 2018 · Renewable Energy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.109 · OSTI ID:1466354

Zhang, Weishi ^[1]; Wang, Can ^[2]; Zhang, Long ^[3]; Xu, Ying ^[4]; Cui, Yuanzheng ^[5]; Lu, Zifeng ^[6]; Streets, David G. ^[6]

The Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong (China); Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Civil Aviation Univ. of China, Tianjin (China)
Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China)
China Univ. of Geosciences, Wuhan (China)
The Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong (China)
Zhejiang Univ. of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou (China)
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)

Biomass fermentation and gasification are two types of biomass utilization technologies for residential households. Government plays an essential role in the diffusion of improved technologies. Cost-effectiveness analysis can provide the cost and abatement potentials of each alternative under a single abatement strategy; however, it is difficult for policy-makers to make an integrated assessment when multiple objectives are involved. This paper evaluates the performance of three distributed alternatives and two centralized alternatives for residential biomass use in rural China, including centralized biogas and centralized gasifier systems. An integrated assessment approach is built, which combines cost-benefit analysis, an entropy-weighting method, and a preference-ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations using the PROMETHEE approach. A total of 686 sample households in three regions of China were surveyed in this study. The centralized gasifier system and distributed household biogas were the top two alternatives for further development to meet the government’s 2020 development goal for biogas technology. The overall biomass utilization amount in the prioritized scenario is about three times that of the business-as-usual scenario by 2020. Furthermore, this study can provide significant insights for China’s policy-makers to draft strategic policies and countermeasures that will promote the development of renewable energy in China.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

View Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE

Grant/Contract Number:: AC02-06CH11357

OSTI ID:: 1466354

Alternate ID(s):: OSTI ID: 1582749

Journal Information:: Renewable Energy, Vol. 125, Issue C; ISSN 0960-1481

Publisher:: ElsevierCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 33 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (65)

A review of climate change impacts on commercial buildings and their technical services in the tropics Yau, Y. H.; Hasbi, S. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.035	journal	February 2013
Comparing centralized and decentralized bio-energy systems in rural China He, Guizhen; Bluemling, Bettina; Mol, Arthur P. J. Energy Policy, Vol. 63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.019	journal	December 2013
Sustainability effects of household-scale biogas in rural China Gosens, Jorrit; Lu, Yonglong; He, Guizhen Energy Policy, Vol. 54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.032	journal	March 2013
Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice Kesicki, Fabian; Strachan, Neil Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 14, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.004	journal	December 2011
Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making Ren, Jingzheng; Manzardo, Alessandro; Mazzi, Anna The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 20, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0877-8	journal	March 2015
An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies Singh, Rajesh Kumar; Murty, H. R.; Gupta, S. K. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 9, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011	journal	March 2009
Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: A review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method Si, Jin; Marjanovic-Halburd, Ljiljana; Nasiri, Fuzhan Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.013	journal	November 2016
Marginal abatement cost curves and abatement strategies: Taking option interdependency and investments unrelated to climate change into account Levihn, F.; Nuur, C.; Laestadius, S. Energy, Vol. 76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.025	journal	November 2014
A PROMETHEE-based approach to portfolio selection problems Vetschera, Rudolf; de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 39, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.019	journal	May 2012
PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Macharis, Cathy; Springael, Johan; De Brucker, Klaas European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 153, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X	journal	March 2004
Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: A case study from Bangladesh Kabir, Golam; Sumi, Razia Sultana Energy, Vol. 72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.098	journal	August 2014
A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet Turcksin, Laurence; Bernardini, Annalia; Macharis, Cathy Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104	journal	January 2011
Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making) Brans, J. P.; Vincke, Ph. Management Science, Vol. 31, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647	journal	June 1985
A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights Ma, Jian; Fan, Zhi-Ping; Huang, Li-Hua European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 112, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00141-6	journal	January 1999
The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used Saaty, R. W. Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 9, Issue 3-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8	journal	January 1987
The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration Ishikawa, Akira; Amagasa, Michio; Shiga, Tetsuo Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 55, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C	journal	May 1993
A mathematical theory of communication Shannon, C. E. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, Vol. 5, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1145/584091.584093	journal	January 2001
Environmental conflict analysis using an integrated grey clustering and entropy-weight method: A case study of a mining project in Peru Delgado, Alexi; Romero, I. Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.011	journal	March 2016
Towards green rural energy in Yunnan, China Li, Zhimin; Tang, Runsheng; Xia, Chaofeng Renewable Energy, Vol. 30, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.05.011	journal	February 2005
Technical, economic and environmental assessment of household biogas digesters for rural communities Pérez, Irene; Garfí, Marianna; Cadena, Erasmo Renewable Energy, Vol. 62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.017	journal	February 2014
Improved economic viability of integrated biogas energy and compost production for sustainable palm oil mill management Yoshizaki, Tatsuya; Shirai, Yoshihito; Hassan, Mohd Ali Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.007	journal	April 2013
Techno-economic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell-based combined heat and power systems for biogas utilization at wastewater treatment facilities Trendewicz, A. A.; Braun, R. J. Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 233 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.017	journal	July 2013
Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air Poeschl, Martina; Ward, Shane; Owende, Philip Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.039	journal	March 2012
Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems Börjesson, Pål; Berglund, Maria Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 31, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.004	journal	May 2007
Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties Troldborg, Mads; Heslop, Simon; Hough, Rupert L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.160	journal	November 2014
Multi-criteria evaluation of cooking energy alternatives for promoting parabolic solar cooker in India Pohekar, S. D.; Ramachandran, M. Renewable Energy, Vol. 29, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.017	journal	July 2004
Sustainable development of the Belgrade energy system Jovanović, Marina; Afgan, Naim; Radovanović, Predrag Energy, Vol. 34, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.01.013	journal	May 2009
Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies Pilavachi, Petros A.; Stephanidis, Stilianos D.; Pappas, Vasilios A. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 29, Issue 11-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.11.014	journal	August 2009
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making Fisher, Brendan; Turner, R. Kerry; Morling, Paul Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014	journal	January 2009
Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions Turner, R. Kerry; Paavola, Jouni; Cooper, Philip Ecological Economics, Vol. 46, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7	journal	October 2003
A review on the development and commercialization of biomass gasification technologies in China Leung, Dennis Y. C.; Yin, X. L.; Wu, C. Z. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 8, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.010	journal	December 2004
The influence of using biogas digesters on family energy consumption and its economic benefit in rural areas—comparative study between Lianshui and Guichi in China Xiaohua, Wang; Chonglan, Di; Xiaoyan, Hu Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 11, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.08.001	journal	June 2007
Agricultural residue production and potentials for energy and materials services Bentsen, Niclas Scott; Felby, Claus; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2013.09.003	journal	February 2014
Pollutant Emissions from Improved Coal- and Wood-Fuelled Cookstoves in Rural Households Shen, Guofeng; Chen, Yuanchen; Xue, Chunyu Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1021/es506343z	journal	May 2015
Pollutant Emissions and Energy Efficiency under Controlled Conditions for Household Biomass Cookstoves and Implications for Metrics Useful in Setting International Test Standards Jetter, James; Zhao, Yongxin; Smith, Kirk R. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 19 https://doi.org/10.1021/es301693f	journal	September 2012
What Role for Short-Lived Climate Pollutants in Mitigation Policy? Shoemaker, J. K.; Schrag, D. P.; Molina, M. J. Science, Vol. 342, Issue 6164 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240162	journal	December 2013
Using fuzzy MCDM to select partners of strategic alliances for liner shipping Ding, Ji-Feng; Liang, Gin-Shuh Information Sciences, Vol. 173, Issue 1-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.07.013	journal	June 2005
How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method Brans, J. P.; Vincke, Ph.; Mareschal, B. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 24, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5	journal	February 1986
Selection of the Economic Objective Function for the Optimization of Process Flow Sheets Pintarič, Z. Novak; Kravanja, Z. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 45, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050496z	journal	June 2006
Employment impacts of CDM projects in China's power sector Wang, Can; Zhang, Weishi; Cai, Wenjia Energy Policy, Vol. 59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.010	journal	August 2013
A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development Krajnc, D.; Glavic, P. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 43, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(04)00120-X	journal	January 2005
Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making Greening, Lorna A.; Bernow, Steve Energy Policy, Vol. 32, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.017	journal	April 2004
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making Wang, Jiang-Jiang; Jing, You-Yin; Zhang, Chun-Fa Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021	journal	December 2009
A neuro-fuzzy program approach for evaluating electric power generation systems Mamlook, Rustom; Akash, Bilal A.; Mohsen, Mousa S. Energy, Vol. 26, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00015-9	journal	June 2001
Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system—Bosnian case Begić, Fajik; Afgan, Naim H. Energy, Vol. 32, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.02.006	journal	October 2007
Use of the equivalent attribute technique in multi-criteria planning of local energy systems Løken, Espen; Botterud, Audun; Holen, Arne T. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 197, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.050	journal	September 2009
Fuzzy sets programming to perform evaluation of solar systems in Jordan Mamlook, Rustom; Akash, Bilal A.; Nijmeh, Salem Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 42, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00152-7	journal	September 2001
Evaluation of domestic solar water heating system in Jordan using analytic hierarchy process Mohsen, Mousa S.; Akash, Bilal A. Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 38, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00115-X	journal	December 1997
Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I.; Pilavachi, Petros A. Energy Policy, Vol. 37, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.009	journal	March 2009
A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system Wang, Jiang-Jiang; Jing, You-Yin; Zhang, Chun-Fa Energy Policy, Vol. 36, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.002	journal	October 2008
Multi-criteria evaluation of residential energy supply systems Alanne, Kari; Salo, Ahti; Saari, Arto Energy and Buildings, Vol. 39, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.01.009	journal	December 2007
A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion Bond, Tami C. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 109, Issue D14 https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003697	journal	January 2004
Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment: BLACK CARBON IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM Bond, T. C.; Doherty, S. J.; Fahey, D. W. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171	journal	June 2013
Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon Ramanathan, V.; Carmichael, G. Nature Geoscience, Vol. 1, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156	journal	March 2008
Black Carbon as an Additional Indicator of the Adverse Health Effects of Airborne Particles Compared with PM ₁₀ and PM _2.5 Janssen, Nicole A. H.; Hoek, Gerard; Simic-Lawson, Milena Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 119, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003369	journal	December 2011
Household fuel choice in Zimbabwe Hosier, Richard H.; Dowd, Jeffrey Resources and Energy, Vol. 9, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0572(87)90003-X	journal	December 1987
Physicochemical characterization of fine particles from small-scale wood combustion Lamberg, Heikki; Nuutinen, Kati; Tissari, Jarkko Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 45, Issue 40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.072	journal	December 2011
Comparison of biogas development from households and medium and large-scale biogas plants in rural China Song, Zilin; Zhang, Chao; Yang, Gaihe Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.084	journal	May 2014
Socioeconomic Barriers to Biogas Development in Rural Southwest China: An Ethnographic Case Study Jian, Li Human Organization, Vol. 68, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.68.4.y21mu5lt8075t881	journal	December 2009
Which factors are effective for farmers’ biogas use?–Evidence from a large-scale survey in China Qu, Wei; Tu, Qin; Bluemling, Bettina Energy Policy, Vol. 63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.019	journal	December 2013
Household biogas use in rural China: A study of opportunities and constraints Chen, Yu; Yang, Gaihe; Sweeney, Sandra Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.019	journal	January 2010
Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker Grima-Olmedo, C.; Ramírez-Gómez, Á.; Alcalde-Cartagena, R. Applied Energy, Vol. 134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.032	journal	December 2014
A review of the primary measures for tar elimination in biomass gasification processes Devi, Lopamudra; Ptasinski, Krzysztof J.; Janssen, Frans J. J. G. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 24, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00102-2	journal	February 2003
Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review Asadullah, Mohammad Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.074	journal	January 2014
Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China Zeng, Xianyang; Ma, Yitai; Ma, Lirong Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 11, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.003	journal	June 2007

Cited By (1)

Catalysts for gasification: a review Arnold, R. A.; Hill, J. M. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, Vol. 3, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1039/c8se00614h	journal	January 2019