skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Evaluation of the performance of distributed and centralized biomass technologies in rural China

Abstract

Biomass fermentation and gasification are two types of biomass utilization technologies for residential households. Government plays an essential role in the diffusion of improved technologies. Cost-effectiveness analysis can provide the cost and abatement potentials of each alternative under a single abatement strategy; however, it is difficult for policy-makers to make an integrated assessment when multiple objectives are involved. This paper evaluates the performance of three distributed alternatives and two centralized alternatives for residential biomass use in rural China, including centralized biogas and centralized gasifier systems. An integrated assessment approach is built, which combines cost-benefit analysis, an entropy-weighting method, and a preference-ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations using the PROMETHEE approach. A total of 686 sample households in three regions of China were surveyed in this study. The centralized gasifier system and distributed household biogas were the top two alternatives for further development to meet the government’s 2020 development goal for biogas technology. The overall biomass utilization amount in the prioritized scenario is about three times that of the business-as-usual scenario by 2020. Furthermore, this study can provide significant insights for China’s policy-makers to draft strategic policies and countermeasures that will promote the development of renewable energy in China.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [6]
  1. The Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong (China); Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Civil Aviation Univ. of China, Tianjin (China)
  2. Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China)
  3. China Univ. of Geosciences, Wuhan (China)
  4. The Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong (China)
  5. Zhejiang Univ. of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou (China)
  6. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1466354
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1582749
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Renewable Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 125; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0960-1481
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; Biomass gasification; Household biogas; Multiple-criteria decision-making; Renewable energy policy in China; Residential biomass

Citation Formats

Zhang, Weishi, Wang, Can, Zhang, Long, Xu, Ying, Cui, Yuanzheng, Lu, Zifeng, and Streets, David G. Evaluation of the performance of distributed and centralized biomass technologies in rural China. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.109.
Zhang, Weishi, Wang, Can, Zhang, Long, Xu, Ying, Cui, Yuanzheng, Lu, Zifeng, & Streets, David G. Evaluation of the performance of distributed and centralized biomass technologies in rural China. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.109
Zhang, Weishi, Wang, Can, Zhang, Long, Xu, Ying, Cui, Yuanzheng, Lu, Zifeng, and Streets, David G. Fri . "Evaluation of the performance of distributed and centralized biomass technologies in rural China". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.109. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1466354.
@article{osti_1466354,
title = {Evaluation of the performance of distributed and centralized biomass technologies in rural China},
author = {Zhang, Weishi and Wang, Can and Zhang, Long and Xu, Ying and Cui, Yuanzheng and Lu, Zifeng and Streets, David G.},
abstractNote = {Biomass fermentation and gasification are two types of biomass utilization technologies for residential households. Government plays an essential role in the diffusion of improved technologies. Cost-effectiveness analysis can provide the cost and abatement potentials of each alternative under a single abatement strategy; however, it is difficult for policy-makers to make an integrated assessment when multiple objectives are involved. This paper evaluates the performance of three distributed alternatives and two centralized alternatives for residential biomass use in rural China, including centralized biogas and centralized gasifier systems. An integrated assessment approach is built, which combines cost-benefit analysis, an entropy-weighting method, and a preference-ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations using the PROMETHEE approach. A total of 686 sample households in three regions of China were surveyed in this study. The centralized gasifier system and distributed household biogas were the top two alternatives for further development to meet the government’s 2020 development goal for biogas technology. The overall biomass utilization amount in the prioritized scenario is about three times that of the business-as-usual scenario by 2020. Furthermore, this study can provide significant insights for China’s policy-makers to draft strategic policies and countermeasures that will promote the development of renewable energy in China.},
doi = {10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.109},
journal = {Renewable Energy},
number = C,
volume = 125,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {2}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 8 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Table 1 Table 1: Impact category and criteria selected in this study.

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A review of climate change impacts on commercial buildings and their technical services in the tropics
journal, February 2013


Comparing centralized and decentralized bio-energy systems in rural China
journal, December 2013


Sustainability effects of household-scale biogas in rural China
journal, March 2013


Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice
journal, December 2011


Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making
journal, March 2015

  • Ren, Jingzheng; Manzardo, Alessandro; Mazzi, Anna
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 20, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0877-8

An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
journal, March 2009


Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: A review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method
journal, November 2016

  • Si, Jin; Marjanovic-Halburd, Ljiljana; Nasiri, Fuzhan
  • Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 27
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.013

A PROMETHEE-based approach to portfolio selection problems
journal, May 2012

  • Vetschera, Rudolf; de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
  • Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 39, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.019

PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.
journal, March 2004

  • Macharis, Cathy; Springael, Johan; De Brucker, Klaas
  • European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 153, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X

A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet
journal, January 2011

  • Turcksin, Laurence; Bernardini, Annalia; Macharis, Cathy
  • Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 20
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104

Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making)
journal, June 1985


A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights
journal, January 1999


The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used
journal, January 1987


The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration
journal, May 1993


A mathematical theory of communication
journal, January 2001

  • Shannon, C. E.
  • ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1145/584091.584093

Towards green rural energy in Yunnan, China
journal, February 2005


Technical, economic and environmental assessment of household biogas digesters for rural communities
journal, February 2014


Improved economic viability of integrated biogas energy and compost production for sustainable palm oil mill management
journal, April 2013


Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air
journal, March 2012


Multi-criteria evaluation of cooking energy alternatives for promoting parabolic solar cooker in India
journal, July 2004


Sustainable development of the Belgrade energy system
journal, May 2009


Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies
journal, August 2009


Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
journal, January 2009


Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions
journal, October 2003


A review on the development and commercialization of biomass gasification technologies in China
journal, December 2004

  • Leung, Dennis Y. C.; Yin, X. L.; Wu, C. Z.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.010

The influence of using biogas digesters on family energy consumption and its economic benefit in rural areas—comparative study between Lianshui and Guichi in China
journal, June 2007

  • Xiaohua, Wang; Chonglan, Di; Xiaoyan, Hu
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.08.001

Agricultural residue production and potentials for energy and materials services
journal, February 2014

  • Bentsen, Niclas Scott; Felby, Claus; Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark
  • Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 40
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2013.09.003

Pollutant Emissions from Improved Coal- and Wood-Fuelled Cookstoves in Rural Households
journal, May 2015

  • Shen, Guofeng; Chen, Yuanchen; Xue, Chunyu
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/es506343z

Pollutant Emissions and Energy Efficiency under Controlled Conditions for Household Biomass Cookstoves and Implications for Metrics Useful in Setting International Test Standards
journal, September 2012

  • Jetter, James; Zhao, Yongxin; Smith, Kirk R.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1021/es301693f

What Role for Short-Lived Climate Pollutants in Mitigation Policy?
journal, December 2013


Using fuzzy MCDM to select partners of strategic alliances for liner shipping
journal, June 2005


How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method
journal, February 1986


Selection of the Economic Objective Function for the Optimization of Process Flow Sheets
journal, June 2006

  • Pintarič, Z. Novak; Kravanja, Z.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 45, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie050496z

Employment impacts of CDM projects in China's power sector
journal, August 2013


A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development
journal, January 2005


Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making
journal, April 2004


Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
journal, December 2009

  • Wang, Jiang-Jiang; Jing, You-Yin; Zhang, Chun-Fa
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021

A neuro-fuzzy program approach for evaluating electric power generation systems
journal, June 2001


Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system—Bosnian case
journal, October 2007


Use of the equivalent attribute technique in multi-criteria planning of local energy systems
journal, September 2009

  • Løken, Espen; Botterud, Audun; Holen, Arne T.
  • European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 197, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.050

Fuzzy sets programming to perform evaluation of solar systems in Jordan
journal, September 2001


Evaluation of domestic solar water heating system in Jordan using analytic hierarchy process
journal, December 1997


Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
journal, March 2009


A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system
journal, October 2008


Multi-criteria evaluation of residential energy supply systems
journal, December 2007


A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion
journal, January 2004


Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment: BLACK CARBON IN THE CLIMATE SYSTEM
journal, June 2013

  • Bond, T. C.; Doherty, S. J.; Fahey, D. W.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50171

Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon
journal, March 2008

  • Ramanathan, V.; Carmichael, G.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 1, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo156

Black Carbon as an Additional Indicator of the Adverse Health Effects of Airborne Particles Compared with PM 10 and PM 2.5
journal, December 2011

  • Janssen, Nicole A. H.; Hoek, Gerard; Simic-Lawson, Milena
  • Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 119, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1003369

Household fuel choice in Zimbabwe
journal, December 1987


Physicochemical characterization of fine particles from small-scale wood combustion
journal, December 2011


Comparison of biogas development from households and medium and large-scale biogas plants in rural China
journal, May 2014


Which factors are effective for farmers’ biogas use?–Evidence from a large-scale survey in China
journal, December 2013


Household biogas use in rural China: A study of opportunities and constraints
journal, January 2010

  • Chen, Yu; Yang, Gaihe; Sweeney, Sandra
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.019

Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker
journal, December 2014


A review of the primary measures for tar elimination in biomass gasification processes
journal, February 2003


Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review
journal, January 2014


Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China
journal, June 2007

  • Zeng, Xianyang; Ma, Yitai; Ma, Lirong
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.003

    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Catalysts for gasification: a review
    journal, January 2019

    • Arnold, R. A.; Hill, J. M.
    • Sustainable Energy & Fuels, Vol. 3, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1039/c8se00614h